- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
- Messages
- 613
- Likes
- 281
I think you havent grasped Modi yet He has Invited Tibet PM in exile today he increased few more border posts in Arunachal.You're such an idiot.
I think you havent grasped Modi yet He has Invited Tibet PM in exile today he increased few more border posts in Arunachal.You're such an idiot.
increasing border post nothing to do with this cause everyone will have to care about security of border. He invited pakis pm and next day he agrees to have special forces on west border. You have to take care of border. It doesn't means if your border dispute is solved then you should not place guards their. Surely he won't will do same mistake of not placing guards that nehru didI think you havent grasped Modi yet He has Invited Tibet PM in exile today he increased few more border posts in Arunachal.
That couldn't be further from the truth. In my travels to HK, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc., I've seen enough Chinese TV, including CCTV's world news bulletins. Even as most world news channels (CNN, BBC, France24, etc) were busy showing their favorite India-bashing subject after poverty (rape), CCTV ran a report on subsidized generic drugs, and how poor are able to buy cost-effective medicine in India, and another report on C++ being mandated in some Indian state-board school curriculum. It gave me the impression that Chinese media doesn't show much negative news in general, and applies that principle even to foreign news coverage.india is refered as poor cause chinese media want to show it ,
Personally, I have no problem of giving up our claim on south Tibet! But the question is whether India is willing to settle the dispute based on current LOC?China Prepared to Settle India Border Dispute, Wang Says - Bloomberg
Seems like the rumors I'd heard through China's foreign policy apparatus are true: China did the border incursions as part of a broader strategy to support Modi's candidacy (that included financial support), so that China could negotiate with someone unburdened by Nehru's 1962 legacy and with impeccable nationalist credentials.
india is always ready to be friend with china. But the only thing we hate of china is helping pakistanPersonally, I have no problem of giving up our claim on south Tibet! But the question is whether India is willing to settle the dispute based on current LOC?
From my experience in this forum, I don't think so.
Why do I call yours a WISHFUL THINKING?Personally, I have no problem of giving up our claim on south Tibet! But the question is whether India is willing to settle the dispute based on current LOC?
From my experience in this forum, I don't think so.
Don't take this forum opinion as common Indians opinion as you will find ultra nationalist type of Indian here.Personally, I have no problem of giving up our claim on south Tibet! But the question is whether India is willing to settle the dispute based on current LOC?
From my experience in this forum, I don't think so.
Personally, I have no problem of giving up our claim on south Tibet! But the question is whether India is willing to settle the dispute based on current LOC?
From my experience in this forum, I don't think so.
You can't use 2 different principles in one case: either historic reason (McMahon Line) or Geographical principal.1> Arunachal was always been with India, will stay with India. South Tibet in itself is a misnomer as geographically Arunachal is in the south of Himalayas where as Tibet is in the north. Geographically, Arunachal is not a part of the Tibetan plateau.
2> Aksai Chin is a land occupied by military force. PRC can keep the part with the road with some buffer, give up the rest. (Zhou Enlai's offer to Nehru, based on MacMohan line)
And then we can be good neighbors ever after.
Sorry Brother, I beg to disagree with you...Folks...China and India need to start trusting each other....a small piece of land is not greater than love between 1.3 billion Chinese and 1.25 billion Indians..
Piece of land becomes irrelevant when their is trust and love in hearts of people....I hope ..some selfish and greedy power does not succeed in dividing and creating rift between these two great ancient civilizations. I wish China and India a lot of goodwill and unbreakable bond of trust and friendship.
When Chinese and Indian people have more and more people to people contact ..they will start liking and understanding each other and then, border disputes will become irrelevant.
Tawang was historically part of Tibet inhabited by the Monpa people. The Tawang Monastery was founded by the Merak Lama Lodre Gyatso in 1681 in accordance with the wishes of the 5th Dalai Lama, Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, and has an interesting legend surrounding its name, which means "Chosen by Horse". The sixth Dalai Lama, Tsangyang Gyatso, was born in Tawang.
The 1914 Simla Accord defined the McMahon Line as the new boundary between British India and Tibet. By this treaty Tibet relinquished several hundred square miles of its territory, including Tawang, to the British, but it was not recognised by China.[4] However, the British did not take possession of Tawang and Tibet continued to administer and collect taxes in Tawang. When the British botanist Frank Kingdon-Ward crossed the Sela Pass and entered Tawang in 1935 without permission from Tibet, he was briefly arrested. This drew the attention of the British, who reexamined the Indo-Tibetan border and rediscovered that Tibet had ceded Tawang to British India. Tibet did not repudiate the Simla Accord and the McMahon Line but refused to surrender Tawang, partly because of the importance attached to the Tawang Monastery. In 1938 the British made a cautious move to assert sovereignty over Tawang by sending a small military column under Capt. G.S. Lightfoot to Tawang.[5]
What a flip flop of Lama?! A chameleon catering for his host?Tawang Monastery is said to be the biggest Buddhist monastery in the world outside of Lhasa, Tibet.[11]
Until 2003, the Dalai Lama said that Arunachal Pradesh was "actually part of Tibet". He reversed his position in 2008, acknowledging the legitimacy of the McMahon Line and the Indian claim to the region.[12]
Don't listen to this guy. Be a patriot, not a nationalist. A patriot wishes well upon his own country; a nationalist wishes ill upon all others. The true folly of India would be turning so emotional that it ends up wanting to hurt China more than it wants to help itself.@prohumanity
Sir please do not preach sitting in USA (your status says so).
Have some nationalism towards your country.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese Medicine - PRC Style | China | 1 | ||
Frontier Infrastructure: What's up on the PRC or Chinese side? | China | 90 | ||
Chinese Commercial Space News | China | 46 | ||
Chinese Air Defense Near The Indian Border | Indian Air Force | 1 |