Oh, I am always confused with this H and I combination, have hard time with New Delhi or New DehliIt's bhai, not bahi.
Oh, I am always confused with this H and I combination, have hard time with New Delhi or New DehliIt's bhai, not bahi.
Sir, I am surprised you dont know that!! Their whole Navy is based on CG.CG = Carrier Group?
The pictures don't show that, does it?
No idea, I don't even know if they are going to use a catapult at all. but the following are some other CGs, might be helpfulSo CSSC is going for a 80000-ton catapult-driven flattop,i.e. CV Type 002。
What about CSIC?Same?Or CV Type 001A,an upgrade version of CV16 Liaoning?
These are more like science fiction CGG illustrations, heheh.I saw some cool graphics about a submarine aircraft carrier, which, I suppose, is being considered by PRC? Perhaps it is just an individual's idea put into images. Anyway, I found it quite interesting:
See more: User originality: the People's Liberation Army No. Zheng Yu-class strategic nuclear submarine program motherships - China Military Report
You said it, please continue to think this way. thank you.Sir, I am surprised you dont know that!! Their whole Navy is based on CG.
For example: Look at all those pics most of them are on CG...So their navy is Computer Generated Navy.
The P in PLAN stands for Photoshop Liberation Army Navy. As you can see all those pics are CG or photoshop.
Their Airforce is Photoshop Liberation Army Airforce.
OK@DaTang, please upload images to 3rd party hosting sites and then hotlink them here, if the original source does not allow hotlinking. Most are usually free, e.g. ImageShack.
The domestic AC will be pretty much like this though.
yeah, nothing to worry about, and they outsourced their design to Bangalore as well. actually, they are using Indian CG to build up their blue sea fleet.Here comes the Photoshop Navy...Wooooo.. I am scared these pics may become real and launch a missile through the monitor!
We would not do such a bad job, useing Uncle Sams ACs to PS our fleet.yeah, nothing to worry about, and they outsourced their design to Bangalore as well. actually, they are using Indian CG to build up their blue sea fleet.
Okay, they must used some cheap indian CGs, cheap Bangalore churns out Maal CGs that does not last and cheap is their only virtue.We would not do such a bad job, useing Uncle Sams ACs to PS our fleet.
Atleast use original CGs where we can have a 3D view of the project, these American PS versions makes no sense.
Catapult。The head of CSSC couldn't have made it more clearer in the Chinese version of the article posted herein。No idea, I don't even know if they are going to use a catapult at all. but the following are some other CGs, might be helpful
L15 on board
catapult
This, I really don't have a clue. I assume they may very well start from a very conservative design rather than leaping too radically forward.Catapult。The head of CSSC couldn't have made it more clearer in the Chinese version of the article posted herein。
My question is if CSIC would also choose flattop catapult(Type 002)or opt for Type 001A。
As for Type 003(100000-ton plus nuclear-powered flattop with EMALS etc)。。。:cool2: