China never 'stabbed' India in the back in 1962 war

[Lee40]

It's very simple, even a 5 year can understand this.

When China and India signed 'five principles of peaceful co-existence' in 1954, one of the articles stated mutual non-agression; which in other words means that China and India signed a non-agression pact that was to expire in 1962.

This non-agression pact was so common for powers in world war 2 to use that it was pretty obvious that this was just a 'pause' in agressive intent until one of the powers was ready to attack before or upon expiry of treaty. Hitler used it, Stalin used it etc. China was not even obliged to follow UN charter on limitations of agression until 1971 when China was recognised at UN. I mean, your leader nehru was a lawyer and he didn't even know what treaty he was signing?

So, is it China's fault or your own leadership's fault for being so incompetent and unprepared in 1962?

In all this, China played by the book. So, where in all this have we done wrong?:biggrin2:

 

[Alien]

Chinese in Swedish shadow? (Hint, Snake in Eagles shadow ?)

In all this, China played by the book. So, where in all this have we done wrong?:biggrin2:

Naah, chinese were never wrong! Happy now? Go and eat some noodles and momos

 

[Compersion]

Hitler used it and also Stalin used it ...

Do you mind to elaborate ...

It is good to have honest views from you that the PRC intent was aggression ...

 

[Lee40]

Hitler used it and also Stalin used it ...

Do you mind to elaborate ...

It is good to have honest views from you that the PRC intent was aggression ...

It does not matter what the intent was. The treaty was only valid till 1962 and by then relations were sour in any case.

The point is that it was a non-agression pact and I'm surprised that your leaders could not understand what they were signing and later blame their incompetence on being 'stabbed in the back'. So your nehru was not only an incompetent politician, he was an incompetent lawyer.

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

It does not matter what the intent was. The treaty was only valid till 1962 and by then relations were sour in any case.

The point is that it was a non-agression pact and I'm surprised that your leaders could not understand what they were signing and later blame their incompetence on being 'stabbed in the back'. So your nehru was not only an incompetent politician, he was an incompetent lawyer.

Yes, Nehru had stupid notions about foreign policy. No doubts about it.

 

[punjab47]

It's very simple, even a 5 year can understand this.

When China and India signed 'five principles of peaceful co-existence' in 1954, one of the articles stated mutual non-agression; which in other words means that China and India signed a non-agression pact that was to expire in 1962.

This non-agression pact was so common for powers in world war 2 to use that it was pretty obvious that this was just a 'pause' in agressive intent until one of the powers was ready to attack before or upon expiry of treaty. Hitler used it, Stalin used it etc. China was not even obliged to follow UN charter on limitations of agression until 1971 when China was recognised at UN. I mean, your leader nehru was a lawyer and he didn't even know what treaty he was signing?

So, is it China's fault or your own leadership's fault for being so incompetent and unprepared in 1962?

In all this, China played by the book. So, where in all this have we done wrong?:biggrin2:

You did wrong in that 500 Sikhs with bolt actions forced your divisions with AKs to retreat bloody.

You'll be ethnically cleansed back to your core of North China.

 

[Lee40]

You did wrong in that 500 Sikhs with bolt actions forced your divisions with AKs to retreat bloody.

You'll be ethnically cleansed back to your core of North China.

Hey man I like your... tuk tuk tuk tuk da da da da... they make a lot of jokes about sikhs don't they?

In 1962 we took what we wanted. After all, you gave us Tibet without a fight, we took some more after the 1962 war and most amazing thing is your leaders signed a treaty which said that China promised not to attack you for 8 years and then you lived as if it was happy days. That is indeed height of stupidity. Considering that almost immediately after the treaty was signed things started going sour over the next 8 years.. and you still lived like it was happy days.

 

[Lee40]

Chinese in Swedish shadow? (Hint, Snake in Eagles shadow ?)



Naah, chinese were never wrong! Happy now? Go and eat some noodles and momos

What's the matter? Is your dalit pride hurt?

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

Thread closed. @Lee40 - you seem to more interested in flaimbaiting rather than discussion. Keep your chicom pride to yourself. You don't even have freedom to speak your mind in your own country. Go do something there.