China names garrison commanders at new "Chinese" city in South China Sea

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
Looks like China is really preparing to military enforce its claims in South China sea

China names garrison commanders at newest city in South China Sea, pressing claims over waters - The Washington Post

BEIJING — China has taken another step in its campaign to claim the world's most disputed waters by naming two senior military officers to head a garrison in the South China Sea, days after calling the island community the country's newest city.

Senior Col. Cai Xihong was named commander of the Sansha garrison and Senior Col. Liao Chaoyi was named its political commissar, state media reported Friday. Sansha, a rugged outpost of just 1,000 people, was formally declared a city on July 20 with a flag-raising ceremony televised live.

The garrison is on an island barely large enough to host a single airstrip, while fresh water comes by freighter on a 13-hour journey from China's southernmost province. China claims control over most of the South China Sea, portions of which are also claimed by Vietnam, the Philippines and other neighbors.
.
.
.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry told Xinhua on Thursday that it is within China's sovereign right to establish the city.

Beijing created the city administration to oversee not only Shansa but also hundreds of thousands of square kilometers (miles) of water where it wants to strengthen its control over disputed — and potentially oil-rich — islands.

China claims virtually the entire South China Sea and its island groups, and its disputes occasionally erupt into open confrontation. The islands, many of them occupied by garrisons from the various claimants, sit amid some of the world's busiest commercial sea lanes, along with rich fishing grounds and potential oil and gas deposits.
 

Zebra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
China's Forward Policy in the South China Sea

R. S. Kalha

July 30, 2012

For reasons that are conceptually weak and militarily untenable, the top Chinese military decision making body—the Central Military Commission—took a surprising decision last Sunday to post about 1,200 PLA soldiers in the so-called Sansha City; a collection of a few huts on an island with an area of about 2.13 square kilometres in the Paracel group of islands located in the South China Sea. The nearest Chinese territory is Hainan Island, but that is about 350 kilometres away. The communication links are tenuous with a ship making a journey twice a month from the Chinese mainland to supply the residents with needed supplies in order to enable them to survive. Apart from the PLA soldiers, there are an estimated 613 residents on this barren patch of two square kilometres. According to Xinhua, the island has now taken the shape of a city; its infrastructure includes a small military airport, a seaport, roads, a clinic, a post office and an observatory. There are other small barren islands as well that will presumably be administered by the Sansha city 'government'. Not unsurprisingly a small Chinese Communist Party unit was also established within the Municipal Office and this was telecast live by CCTV. As Xinhua reported, the attempt is to 'safeguard China's sovereignty'.....

full article: China's Forward Policy in the South China Sea | Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
 

Oblaks

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
372
Likes
123
A War Footing in the South China Sea? – Wall Street Journal | MaritimeSecurity.Asia

As a first step, Washington should threaten to cut off military-to-military dialogue until it gets answers on how large the garrison will be. If China increases the size of its garrison and further intimidates its neighbors, the U.S. should consider postponing future annual Security and Economic Dialogues, which so far have produced little except press releases. Washington also should come up with a concrete plan to provide enhanced intelligence and military aid to nations threatened by China's military presence.


At best, these moves might force Beijing to realize that a truly negotiated settlement is the only way forward. At a minimum, they would show that America recognizes how China is attempting to unilaterally shape the future of the world's most important waterway.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top