China denies visa to top general in J&K

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Both China and India are doing a 'good' job in needling each other.

Fun or waste of time?
China fails to recognize that they already have many enemies at doorsteps and this needling for fun will create biggest enemy for them. SO far India is not very proactive against china we are still in reactive state . moment we say enough is enough and decide to become proactive these chinese will get Bamboo in return for their needling.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
China: A Stealth Move to Make an Underwater Claim
China said Thursday that it had used a small, staffed submarine to plant the national flag deep beneath the South China Sea, where it has tussled with other nations in territorial disputes. The vessel achieved the feat during 17 dives from May to July, when it went as deep as 12,330 feet, state media reported. In 2007, a Russian expedition descended in a pair of vessels more than two miles under the ice cap and deposited a Russian flag on the seabed at the North Pole.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
ya CCP is poor in PR (most Chinese think so) esp. in a one-party system (though with lots of other disabled / marginalized 'political parties')

by the way Chinese can't be regarded as a monolith in thinking, nor can CCP. Empathy is probably an effective tool to use when dealing with conflict btwn neighbors. IMO at least such trivalities shan't be allowed to escalate even if the 2 countries can't be 'friends'.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Visa row: China in damage control mode

NEW DELHI: Amid reports that an Indian Army General was denied a visa to visit China, the country's envoy Zhang Yan visited South Block on Friday afternoon to meet officials of the ministry of external affairs, sources said.

They said Zhang was holding meetings with senior officials of the ministry.

The Chinese envoy's South Block sojourn follows a media report that Lt. Gen. B S Jaswal, who heads the Northern Command, was to have visited China for a high-level exchange but was denied a visa as he had Jammu and Kashmir under his area of control.

The external affairs ministry said Jaswal's visit had not taken place "due to certain reasons".

"While we value our exchanges with China, there must be sensitivity to each others' concerns," said ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash.

India has cancelled defence exchanges with China after Beijing refused to allow the visit of the Indian Army's General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Northern Area Command, because he was responsible for Jammu & Kashmir, a state that China maintained was disputed.

In keeping with a practice for the past few years, the Indian defence establishment in June had began preparations for a regular high-level exchange visit to China this August by one of the top commanders of the Indian army — the northern area commander, Lt-Gen B S Jaswal.

However, Delhi was stunned when Beijing responded to his nomination by saying that it was unwilling to "welcome" Gen Jaswal because he "controlled" a disputed area, Jammu and Kashmir.

An angry New Delhi shot off a strongly worded demarche to Beijing, protesting its decision. Soon thereafter, India refused permission to two Chinese defence officials to come to India for a course at the National Defence College. A subsequent visit by Indian military officials to China was also cancelled by India.

To ensure that there was no ambiguity about the reason for its annoyance, New Delhi has since also bluntly told Beijing that the unexpected decision to block Lt-Gen Jaswal's visit to China was the reason behind India's decisions.

New Delhi found China's behaviour particularly provocative because in August 2009, Lt-Gen V K Singh, currently the Army chief and then the GOC-in-C Eastern Command, had visited China for a similar high-level exchange. If territorial sensitivity was the issue with China, then Singh's visit should have been even more problematic because, as head of the Eastern Command, he had jurisdiction over Arunachal Pradesh, a state that is claimed by China.

Read more: Visa row: China in damage control mode - India - The Times of India Visa row: China in damage control mode - India - The Times of India
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,598
Country flag
no need to talk with the Chinese just wait for the anti chinese coalition to develop led by USA.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
no need to talk with the Chinese just wait for the anti chinese coalition to develop led by USA.
After these Incidences I firmly beleive that Chinese have Brain in their A*** . India is trying its level of not destroying relationship with China but those fools are hell bent on doing that. Looks like recent found power and money has made them loose mind. They already have USA coming after them and Now Unwillingly India will join Grand coalition against Chinese. whether they like it or not India will be their biggest headache is we start acting against chinese intrest in Asian region . We are their biggest military adversary here .
 
Last edited:

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Antony rules out snapping defence ties with China


Amid the controversy over China denying permission to a senior Army general to visit the country, Defence Minister A.K. Antony ruled out snapping defence ties with Beijing.

"It is not the question of breaking defence ties with China. We have close ties with China though there could be some problems occasionally," he told reporters after laying the foundation-stone for an expansion project in the Mishra Dhatu Nigam here.

The Minister was responding to a question on whether India was considering snapping its defence ties with China in the wake of the recent misgivings between the two countries.

"Short-term problems would not affect India's overall approach towards China," the Defence Minister said.

His comments come against the backdrop of China denying permission to Northern Army Commander Lt. Gen. B.S. Jaswal to visit that country.

Asked if foreign direct investment cap in the defence production sector would be enhanced to 49 per cent, he said, "We have now allowed 26 per cent FDI in our defence production."

He noted that India's defence production was improving but there was still scope for improvement.

"Our main target is to develop India into a strong base for defence industrial production. We are not restricting this area only to the public sector and we will be supporting the private sector as well. But we must also encourage the public sector," Mr. Antony said.

Asked about the adverse observations made by the Comptroller and Auditor General in the latest report on defence-related issues, he said, "We always take CAG's observations positively. We also take any criticism by Constitutional bodies and even the media positively. But, forget about the past".
 

Illusive

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
3,674
Likes
7,312
Country flag
I think China has lost it, whats the point in making all the world's top military and economic powers its enemy for countries like pakistan and north korea whose expiry date are nearing.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730


India halts defence exchanges, refuses visas to Chinese army officers


India on Friday put all future defence exchanges with China on hold after Beijing refused to welcome an army general as he had Jammu and Kashmir under his command, well informed sources said. Lt Gen B S Jaswal, who heads the Northern Command that guards the borders with China and Pakistan, had been nominated to travel to China for a regular high-level defence exchange visit.

"Sometime, in July, we were informed that it would be difficult to take the visit forward since he (Jaswal) looked after an area which is 'difficult'," said the sources, adding that it was tantamount to saying that India was in adverse possession of Kashmir.

For the last few weeks, India had been speaking to the Chinese officials to resolve the issue. But, for the time being, India has decided to stop all exchanges in the defence area, the sources said, speaking only on condition they were not identified.

"We should not only introspect, but there is little point in taking forward defence exchanges unless this is resolved," the sources told IANS.

Defence Minister A K Antony, however, said the cancellation of Jaswal's visit was "not the question of breaking ties."

"There are occasional problems but that will not affect our broader approach," he told reporters in Hyderabad.

As an immediate fallout of the Jaswal episode, three Chinese army officers have been denied visas. Two captains who were to visit Pachmarhi and a colonel had been invited for a guest lecture at the National Defence College here.

Meanwhile, the external affairs ministry called for "sensitivity" by Beijing and also summoned the Chinese envoy here. The Indian Army only said the general's visit had been "called off" while both the ruling Congress and the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Pary (BJP) called for an appropriate response.

This is the second time that China has raised a question mark over Kashmir. Earlier, China had started issuing visas on loose paper stapled to the Indian passports of residents of Kashmir. "That in a sense has mushroomed to include regular defence exchanges...It is not something that we can accept," the sources said.

The message given to China is that this is a question of Indian sovereignty. "This issue is as important to us as Tibet is to China," the sources added.

They also pointed out that in variance with its official stance on Kashmir, China had made it clear that it only questioned India's control of Kashmir.

"In Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, they (China) are building dams and roads. Chinese engineers are present in that place. So, their line that they are not taking sides, is not true".

Indian officials said that they will continue to have a dialogue with China over the Jaswal issue, rather than open confrontation.

"We want a candid discussion with China to resolve this issue and till then, there will be no military ties with China... We want a fair resolution of all issues, which is a halt to practice of issuing stapled visas and making such statements on regular exchanges," the sources said.

According to the sources, China has to take the first step to resolve the matter. "They have tied the knot, they have to untie it," they said.

Accusing the Chinese of being inconsistent, the sources said the Chinese had issued a visa to Lt Gen V K Singh to visit Beijing when he headed the Indian Army's Eastern Command that has jurisdiction over Arunachal Pradesh, over which China has staked its claim.

They also said that Northern Command officials also had functional meetings with their Chinese counterparts during regular border meetings in the Ladakh region.

It was pointed out that China generally had an aggressive posture on boundary issues, referring to its recent position on the disputed territory in the South China Sea. "There is an increase in its assertiveness at staking claims on islands.. We are monitoring that," the sources said.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Visa row: India reads out riot act to Chinese envoy


NEW DELHI: India summoned the Chinese ambassador on Friday and has refused to allow visits of two Chinese military officials to protest against Beijing's refusal of a visa to a general in the Indian Army.

The discussion came after India, as reported by TOI on Friday, cancelled defence exchanges to protest against China refusing to allow the visit of an Indian Army general on the ground that his jurisdiction included "disputed" J&K. In a tit-for-tat response, India refused to allow the visits of two captain-level Chinese officers to Pachmarhi, and one colonel-level officer to National Defence College.

India was also cold to China's fence-mending bid by offering to send a colonel-level official to New Delhi for talks with joint secretary (international cooperation) in the defence ministry. With passions running high, there was no certainty that the government would allow the visit scheduled for September 7.

Chinese ambassador Zhang Yan met joint secretary (east Asia) Gautam Bambawale in the foreign office to discuss the issue against the backdrop of outrage in India over the the provocation and Beijing's anxiety to de-escalate tensions. The message India gave was that China was solely responsible for the current fracas and that the onus of untying the knot rested with it, said sources.

With the Congress and the BJP joining hands to lambast China over the refusal of visa to Lt General B S Jaswal, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of Northern Area Command, government made it clear that it was not going to let go of Beijing's latest effort to meddle in J&K. "The defence minister has taken a strong view. Talks on the issue will go on," minister of state for external affairs Preneet Kaur said.

Congress spokesperson Manish Tiwari reacted to the report in TOI by saying that the Chinse envoy should be summoned by the government and be told of the resentment its action has generated.

CPM, known for its sympathetic views on China, refused to react, arguing that there was no official word on the issue yet.

The BJP, however, came out strongly against China. Party spokesperson Prakash Javdekar said, "We must strongly condemn the Chinese on the issue. It is the worst kind of insult inflicted upon India by denying visa to Jaswal. It should be made clear to China that Kashmir is an integral part of India and not a disputed territory."

Party leader and former foreign minister Yashwant Sinha said, " Government of India should retaliate in kind. A very strong message should go to China that India will not take such pinpricks lying down."

The anger was in accord with the mood in the government which seems to be determined to engage in some bluntspeak with China. Until then, military exchanges will be on hold, sources said.

In a statement on Friday, the MEA spokesperson said, "While we value our exchanges with China, there must be sensitivity to each other's concerns. Our dialogue with China on these issues is ongoing." This is diplomatese for India's determination to refuse to negotiate on this issue.

However, the government was clear that this issue would not spill over to other sectors. For instance, border personnel meetings would not be cancelled or put on hold.

India has a modest defence relationship with China but with an intention to improve it so as to gain a greater understanding of each other's defence systems. However, on Kashmir, the PLA takes a stand that is designed to infuriate India and placate Pakistan's equally powerful military.

The Chinese approach to the Indian part of J&K is markedly different from its activities in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir where it is engaged in construction work. This has already been protested by India, with little effect on Chinese behaviour.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
After looking at reactions I dont think we have taken some concrete steps . Its just routine job of scolding them in press and then calling the ambassador. We should also start issue stapled Visas to people from Xinxiang and Tibbet. Trade is heavily in favour of Chinese and we should hit them in this field as well. I would love to see chinese reactions when we hit at their revenues which has emboldened them to take on us .
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
I think China has lost it, whats the point in making all the world's top military and economic powers its enemy for countries like pakistan and north korea whose expiry date are nearing.
There is a saying in my state that Admi ki aukat uski sangati se pata chalti hai. It means you can judge a person by kind of friends he has . Same goes to china a rogue state will only have rogue friends .
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
The storm over China's denial of a visa to an Indian general serving in Jammu & Kashmir may be only a "diversionary sideshow" compared to another far more serious development — the "effective control" by the Chinese army of large swathes of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), strategic analysts told DNA.


"A large tract of territory in PoK is now under the effective control of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA)," a Singapore-based analyst who returned recently from Afghanistan said on the condition of anonymity
Chinese army in control of much of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, says expert - India - DNA
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
DEALING WITH CHINESE MACHINATIONS ON J & K

B.RAMAN


The international community treats Jammu & Kashmir as a de facto----but not de jure --- part of India. Similarly, it treats Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) as de facto---- but not de jure---parts of Pakistan. In pursuance of this policy, other countries honour the Indian passports held by the residents of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) and issue them normal visas on those passports when they want to travel. Similarly, they honour the Pakistani passports held by the residents of POK and GB and issue them visas on those passports.


2. China used to follow a similar policy till last year. It has now modified that policy in a significant manner. While it does not question the validity of the Indian passports held by the residents of J&K, it has stopped issuing visas on those passports.It has not debarred them from traveling to China, but they are allowed to travel only on the basis of a plain paper visa which is stapled to their Indian passport. The entry and exit stamps of the Chinese immigration are affixed on the plan paper visa and not on their Indian passport.


3. While doing so, Beijing has not changed its visa issue policy in respect of Pakistani residents of POK and GB. It is believed they are still issued visas on their Pakistani passports. Moreover, ignoring Indian protests, it is going ahead with its project to assist Pakistan in the upgradation of the Karakoram Highway which runs across GB and in the construction of hydel power and irrigation projects in GB. It has also agreed to participate in a feasibility study for the construction of a railway line to Xinjiang through GB. It has not yet agreed to assist Pakistan in the construction of an oil/gas pipeline from Gwadar to Xinjiang through GB.


4.The modifications in the Chinese policy have the following implications:

* Firstly, China has started treating POK and GB as de facto and de jure parts of Pakistan. It does not recognise Indian claims to these territories.
* Secondly, it has diluted its past acceptance of J&K as a de facto part of India. This would give satisfaction to Pakistan, which projects J&K as Pakistani territory under the illegal occupation of India. This would also lend support to the Pakistani contention that it has a political, diplomatic and moral right to support the so-called freedom struggle in J&K.
* Thirdly, by questioning the legitimacy of India's sovereignty over J&K, the Chinese may be creating a future option for themselves of questioning India's locus standi to negotiate with them on the future of the Indian territory in the Ladakh area occupied by them in the past. They could use this option in future if their relations with India deteriorate.


5. The modification in the Chinese position on J & K and its active involvement in infrastructure and other development projects in POK and GB have coincided with indicators of active Pakistani assistance to China in quelling the revolt of the Uighurs in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region which has a common border with GB. These indicators include an increase in the number of Chinese intelligence officers posted in Pakistan to keep a watch on the Uighur community living in Pakistan, Pakistani intensification of the surveillance of the members of the Uighur community and restrictions on their travel in Pakistan, rounding up of members of the Uighur community living in Pakistan who are accused by the Chinese of being members of the Eastern Turkestan lslamic Movement and their being handed over to the Chinese authorities without following the due process of law, intensification of the intelligence exchange and the recent joint counter-terrorism exercise, which was, in effect, a joint counter-Uighur exercise.


6. In the Chinese perception, their ability to pacify Xinjiang would depend on continued co-operation from Pakistan and strengthening Pakistan's control over POK and GB. Their modification of their policy relating to J&K is as a quid pro quo to Pakistan playing the role of their frontline ally in the fight against the Uighur freedom fighters represented by the Munich-based World Uighur Congress and Uighur jihadis belonging to the Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement. The Chinese decision to modify their policy even at the risk of its coming in the way of their developing relations with India is indicative of their serious concerns relating to Xinjiang. The need to pacify Xinjiang has assumed primacy in Chinese policy-making over the importance of misunderstanding-free relations with India.


7.India woke up to the changes in the Chinese policy last year when it noticed that the Chinese had stopped issuing regular visas to residents of J&K and have started issuing plain paper visas. There has been a further jolt to the Government of India in this matter by the reported disinclination of the Chinese to issue a visa to Lt.Gen.R.S.Jaswal, chief of the Northern Command of the Indian Army, to make an official visit to China as part of the high-level military exchanges agreed to by the two countries. The reasons for which they expressed their disinclination are not clear. Some reports say that it was because the Northern Command is responsible for external security in the J&K area along the Line of Control and the international border and they consider J&K to be a disputed territory. Some other reports attribute the Chinese disinclination to the fact that Lt.Gen.Jaswal was perceived to be a hawk who believed that China posed a military threat to India. There are still other reports claiming that Lt.Gen.Jaswal is actually a Kashmiri native and hence the Chinese objection to him. One does not know whether this is factually correct.


8. Whatever be the reason, the Chinese disinclination to issue a visa to him has to be strongly opposed by the Government of India. New Delhi has done well to suspend military-military exchanges till this issue is settled to the satisfaction of India without allowing it to affect the other aspects of the developing relations with China and come in the way of the on-going border talks. India's response has been limited to the military-military relationship.


9. The issue has tactical and strategic aspects. The tactical aspect relates to our response to the non-issue of a visa to Lt.Gen.Jaswal. We have reacted in adequate measure.


10. The strategic aspect relates to the following:

* How are we going to counter the Chinese attempts to question the legitimacy of our sovereignty over J&K and to re-open the entire issue?
* How are we going to counter the repeated Chinese actions in ignoring our protests and concerns relating to their involvement in the POK and GB?


11. Our response at the strategic level cannot remain confined to the suspension of military exchanges. It has to go beyond that. We had recognised Tibet as an integral part of China. We have shown good faith in adhering to that position. China has not shown good faith on the issue of J&K being an integral part of India. The time has come for us to re-examine our position in matters relating to Tibet. We have to make it clear to Beijing that our continued adherence to our present position on Tibet would depend on its respecting our sensitivities in matters relating to J&K, POK and GB. If it does not respect our core interests in relation to J &K, POK and GB, it cannot expect us to continue to respect its core interests relating to Tibet.


12. As a starter in the re-examination of our Tibetan policy, we should make evident the seriousness of our unhappiness with Beijing on this issue by immediately associating His Holiness the Dalai Lama with the project for the revival of the Nalanda University. ( 28-8-10)



( The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: [email protected] )
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
We should definitely relook our policy towards Tibet and Taiwan. What stops us from derecognizing Tibet as part of China and reasserting our claim on that ? We should also recognize Taiwan as Independent country.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
It's the season for India versus China


The next Economist, or at least the Asian one, is going to have "Contest of the Century: India versus China" as its cover. I just reviewed a book on India vs China by an Indian businessman. And there are more than a few oped items on this issue in the media.
What gives? Personally I think it's largely about the fact it's August. "The month nothing happens," as an article in the Guardian UK recently noted. So media turn to lists of things. Predictions. Big picture stuff like India vs China. Especially since the future of Obama, future of Pakistan, future of climate change and so on have been done to death.
Otherwise, almost anyone you ask, including any Indian who's actually been to China, will say there's no contest. China is roughly four to five times wealthier, has done more on infrastructure – social and physical, has piled up huge mountains of cash, and has a political leadership who have effectively transformed into an executive class.
And yet.
Besides it being the silly season let me list why a minority are suddenly talking about their actually being a fight.
One, is a very real expectation India's economic growth rate will overtake that of China's in a decade or so. India has to get a few things right, not too much, to push its growth rate from its present 8.5 per cent to about 10 per cent. Control government red ink. Pass the GST, unifying the country's disparate revenue systems. Let its manufacturing sector continue to move, as it is, rapidly up the value ladder. And at least get some infrastructure right – power I think is doable in the coming five years. Mathematically that should be enough. China, on the other hand, can be expected to sink to about nine or 10 per cent as its ageing population begins to hoard money for their retirement.
Once India begins growing even a little bit faster, the gap between the two will shrink rapidly. India may never overtake. But it may be just a few steps rather than many leagues behind.Two, is the real economic difference between India and China is that one has a world class government while the other has a world class corporate sector.
By all accounts, the biggest Chinese firms are, inside, poorly managed and often little more than extensions of the government. India has come up with globally competitive industries at a remarkable rate. Its government is hopelessly dysfunctional.
Which will triumph in the long run? Looking at the historical experience of the United States, I would argue it is the corporate sector that matters the most. Not least because it transforms the state along the way. The state tends to suffocate the private sector if given half a chance.
Three, the biggest but not to be exaggerated risk is that the Chinese state has none of the resilience of the Indian democratic system. It is efficient because it cannot afford to be. If Beijing is perceived to have failed, all hell breaks loose on the streets. In New Delhi they wait for the next election.
This has been known but the argument was the Chinese Communist Party was too smart to make that sort of misstep. But I'm now seeing a lot of China watchers wondering if that is true. The party has made missteps and big ones. It is struggling with a needed economic transition because it can't figure out how to sell the policy. It has also been unable to resist throwing its weight around the region, stirring up some anti-China geopolitical balancing. So we are seeing the rise of a school of China bears. They see speculative bubbles, poor demographics, a bloated heavy industry sector, bad geopolitical ploys and social unrest coupled with mediocre leaders. It is fair to say the Indian bulls are still pretty rare but the China negatives are at least raising questions.
As one China watcher told me, "The Chinese leadership know their growth rate is going to fall. And they worry about India beating them one day. But they calculate New Delhi will make a hash of it and miss the chance."
Let me put it another way. China has some big flaws in the structure of its economy and polity. But it combines a decisive and far-seeing leadership with oodles of money to cover up and repair these flaws. If you doubt the leaders and the stash shrinks, then all these mistakes become serious. Which is why China is suddenly finding itself being thrown in the same league as India, at least speculatively. But the speculation has a core of empiricism in it.I went back and read a book or two about China during the early phase of its reforms. It was like reading about India. And this was all true until about 2002 or so. Not so far behind.
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Kapil Sibal to visit China next month

Even as India has put on hold its defence exchanges with China, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal will be visiting that country next month to attend the World Economic Forum meet during which he is also expected to discuss bilateral student exchange programmes.

Sibal will undertake a seven-day visit to Tianjin from September 10 for the WEF meet, where he is representing India, sources in the ministry said.

The theme of the annual WEF meeting in Tianjin from September 13 to 15 is sustainable growth.

Ministers and business leaders from several countries will be attending the meet to discuss ways to push the sustainable growth through increased energy efficiency, lower carbon emissions and development of green technology and infrastructure.

During his visit to China, Sibal is also expected to meet some Chinese leaders and discuss student exchange programmes and cultural exchanges, the sources said.

This assumes significance as India has put on hold all defence exchanges with China after the latter disallowed Northern Army Commander Lt Gen B S Jaswal from visiting that country as he comes from the "sensitive" Jammu and Kashmir.

Gen Jaswal was to visit China as part of defence exchanges programme.

China conveyed its decision in July and India retaliated by refusing permission to three Chinese army officials -- a Senior Colonel and two Captains.

India has said the Chinese action amounted to questioning the status of Jammu and Kashmir, which is an integral part of India, and is "unacceptable".

Sending out a message to China, sources here have said that issues related to Jammu and Kashmir are as sensitive to India as those related to Tibet to China.

Defence ties with India not "halted": China

China on Saturday said that it has received no communication that India has "halted" military exchanges between the two countries, but remained mum on issue of denial of permission to a top Indian General to visit China.

"China has not halted defence exchanges with India and has received no word that India has stopped military exchanges between the two countries," China's defence ministry said in a brief statement faxed to Western news agencies in Beijing.

India has said that it has put on hold its defence exchanges with China after Northern Army Commander Lt Gen B S Jaswal was refused permission to visit Beijing as he commands the "sensitive" Jammu and Kashmir.

New Delhi has said that Beijing's action amounts to questioning the status of Jammu and Kashmir which is unacceptable and the defence exchanges will remain suspended till the matter is resolved.

In retaliation, India has denied permission to three Chinese army officials to visit the country.

There was no response to queries sent by the Beijing based Indian correspondents to the Chinese Foreign Ministry here nor there were any references to the on going controversy between the two countries.

Chinese Ambassador to India Zhang Yan met Foreign Office officials on Friday during which India reportedly conveyed its strong feelings as well as decision to suspend defence exchanges.





I dont understand why the hell is he going there? It clearly shows that we are reacting to China just for sake of doing it . I sure we would have called chinese ambassador and tell him that sir we are going to do something as issue is no under full highlight of media and opposition party so Please don't mind (hope you understand our vote bank politics.).
 
Last edited:

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
It could be a far fetched idea but I feel its PR relationship exercise by China to show solidarity with Pakistan. They failed miserably to help Pakistan during flood and now trying to show solidarity with Pakistan that brother we are still here for you , look how we have screwed happiness of India .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top