'China ahead of India in creating world class institutions'

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I find it most amusing that the Chinese posters love using LOLs.

Just watch their posts, if you don't believe me!

The subject that they are commenting on is of no matter and I would not be surprised if they use LOL even when commenting on death, destruction, devastation, national calamities and everything sad!

Could it be that because of the hyper strict society they are from, they require to laugh all the time to relieve the stress?
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
One thing Chinese excesses did is that they weeded out the parasitic mentality of local people and got them a totally new working ethic.
Mao Tse Tung whipped them into shape.

He went to the extent of calling the Chinese people Frogs in the well!!
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Lol should be a banned word..At least as far as Chinese posters go. :D...use smilies instead :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ray

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Educational Disengagement: Undermining Academic Quality at a Chinese University

Michael Agelasto

Educational Disengagement (ISBN 962 86141 2 6) is the most comprehensive study written to date about education at a Chinese university, or for that matter any university. Through considerably rich detail, it portrays the life and times of Shenzhen University (SZU), an institution built in the first years of China's economic reforms under Deng Xiaoping. The study is the culmination of ten years of participant-observation research and relies on the analysis of hundreds of internal documents. Along with the author's companion study, University in Turmoil, it provides insight into the university's pedagogy and knowledge structure and the foreign influences that have shaped the institution.

Each of the book's chapters is preceded by an ethnographic story, written in the point of view of the informant. Stories include those of students annoyed at the quality of education they received and teachers who themselves have disengaged from the educational process. Most teachers at SZU over the school's first decade and a half have lost their enthusiasm for academic life. Many became involved in various types of money-making activities and paid only sufficient attention to their teaching and research to retain their faculty positions. Others left the university altogether; teacher turnover exceeded 30%, many leaving for overseas study and emigration. Those who remained stopped undertaking scholarly research, which fell dramatically after it had peaked in 1989.

Michael Agelasto, until his retirement, was an independent scholar specializing in Chinese education and culture. His dissertation explored the use of social relationships (guanxi) in job procurement by Shenzhen University graduates. He was co-editor of the 1998 compilation Higher Education in Post-Mao China and the author of University in Turmoil: The Political Economy of Shenzhen University.

Educational Disengagement
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
China has one of the world's largest (in terms of numbers of students) educational systems: a total of approximately 289,859,000 students were enrolled in 1998. Sixty-seven percent of the students were in primary and junior secondary schools, grades one through nine (China Statistical Yearbook). (Unfortunately though, statistics issued by the Chinese government should be used with caution; they best represent trends or the general picture.) These nine grades constitute China's formal basic education. Compulsory education has been very successful at the primary level (first through sixth grades), but not as impressive at the junior secondary level (seventh through ninth grades).

Although the quality of schools varies widely in China, there are standard textbooks and curricula for all subjects at all levels. The textbooks convey a strong nationalist message in content. Teaching style emphasizes the authority of the teacher and demands great amounts of memorization and recitation.[/B

]Higher education is merit-based and extremely competitive in China. The overall enrollment in 1998 was 3,409,000 in the formal higher education sector (China Statistical Yearbook 1999) and 74,967,300 in the nonformal sector (China Statistical Yearbook 1999). On average, formal higher education institutions admit about 50 percent of the graduates of general senior secondary schools (Agelasto & Adamson 1998).

Foreign influences on Chinese education manifested themselves through two main channels: foreign missionary schools and the Western-educated Chinese. Missionary education in China dates back to 1818 when British missionaries opened schools in Malacca for the children of overseas Chinese. Starting in the 1840s, missionary schools came under the protection of a series of "unequal treaties" between the Chinese government and the Western powers. The second half of the nineteenth century witnessed a steady rise in the number of mission schools due to missionaries' growing interests in education and a general advancement of Western powers in China. In many ways, mission schools were a catalyst for the educational reform in modern China.

The reform was initiated in the 1860s as a component of the Self-Strengthening Movement and sponsored by a few high-ranking officials involved in yiwu, (barbarian affairs). From the point of view of the Chinese court in Beijing, there was an urgent need to understand Western culture and Westerners. In 1903 the imperial government issued the Guidelines for Educational Affairs, which established an educational system modeled after that of the Japanese, who had successfully replicated the Western system.

During the Nationalist decade (1928-1937), Chinese education experienced a transition from the earlier Japanese model to the American model, partly because of the return of students from the West, especially the United States, and partly because of China's deteriorating relationship with Japan. China started a public school system patterned after that of the United States and adopted American textbooks in its 1922 educational system.

In addition to help from universities and colleges in the United States, American missionary colleges in China also played an important role in the Americanization of the Chinese educational system. By the 1930s there were 16 Christian colleges and universities in China. Three of them were sponsored by Catholic missions and 13 of them were by Protestants. Academically, they were the first to introduce relatively comprehensive programs in science, technology, and medicine. However, in spite of all their positive attributes and efforts to communicate with the Chinese populace, a huge gap always existed between mission schools and Chinese society at large. The factors that contributed to the distance included the unwillingness of the missionaries to learn Chinese and the unwillingness to address Chinese concerns about national sovereignty and China's cultural heritage.

Missionary institutions not only transformed the life of Chinese youth who enrolled in them, but also smoothed the way for those who desired to study abroad. For students who planned to go abroad to pursue graduate studies, a degree from a western missionary school was invaluable. The pro-Western attitude manifested itself most in universities and colleges in the 1920s and 1930s. By 1927, Western-educated men monopolized nearly all important posts in higher education. Returnees, especially those from the United States, also dominated the diplomatic corps, military forces, and top government positions. After the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the Communist Party expelled all missionary schools from China and forbade Chinese from going to the West to study, except for a very few who were allowed to study Western languages for diplomatic purposes. These measures were intended to end all Western influences on Chinese education. Since 1949 there has not been any private school operated exclusively by foreigners in China.

According to the China Statistical Yearbook, by 1998, China had a total population of 1,248,100,000 people. Among those over age 15, an estimated 83.22 percent were literate (China Statistical Yearbook 1999). In 1998, about 139,538,000 Chinese were enrolled in primary school; 63,010,000 were in middle school, among them 9,380,000 were high school students; 3,409,000 were students attending a university; and 198,885 were graduate students (China Statistical Yearbook 1999).

Illiteracy in China still poses a big challenge. Of those age 15 and older, 16.78 percent of Chinese know fewer than the 1,500 characters needed for basic literacy. Illiterate male Chinese make up 9.01 percent of the total male population over age 15, while illiterate female Chinese account for 22.61 percent of the total female population over age 15 (China Statistical Yearbook 1999).

Another problem of educational attainment is the huge discrepancy between urban and rural areas. Generally, almost all urban residents are literate due to better funding of schools and the prohibition of child labor. The majority of Chinese illiterates live in rural area. The lack of teachers and schools, poor funding, and the necessity for children to participate in farm-work contributes to the long-term problem.

The Compulsory Education Law of 1986 mandates six years for primary education and three years of middle school. Compulsory education serves two purposes: to prepare students for employment and to enable them to lay a solid foundation for entering schools of higher level. Although the law says the nine-year compulsory education should be free for all children, schools, often driven by economic necessity, ask parents to pay many fees, such as examination paper fees, school construction fees, water fees, and after-school coaching fees. Sometimes due to the high fees charged by schools, rural parents have to pull their children out of school (Lin 1999).

In order to develop compulsory education nationwide, the Chinese government is assisting economically deprived areas. To further increase state education appropriations, the government established the Hope Project, a back-to-school fund for children in impoverished areas who had discontinued schooling. By the end of 1994, the government had collected more than 350 million yuan (US$42.7 million) in donations, and 1,000,000 children who had been forced to leave school because of their impoverished situation were able to resume their education (Ashmore & Cao 1997).

The academic year in China is comprised of a fall semester and a spring semester. Students have classes five days a week with much homework assigned over the weekend. The school year extends from September to July. The teaching language is Putonghua, (Mandarin Chinese). Occasionally, local dialects are used as the teaching language in remote minority areas; however, the teaching of Mandarin Chinese is strictly enforced and is mostly used alongside local minority languages.

The new orientation of the Chinese economy in the 1980s required many skilled and trained laborers. Private education proved to be a pragmatic solution to meet the challenges of China's burgeoning market economy. Various nongovernmental schools became established in urban areas. They emphasized vocational training and offered courses such as foreign languages, accounting, bookkeeping, home economics, architecture, tailoring, and industrial management. By 1998, the total enrollment in nonformal institutions had reached 74,967,300 students (China Statistical Yearbook 1999).

In 1987 and 1988, the State Education Commission issued a series of documents, including the Provisional Regulations Concerning Educational Institutions Run by Social Forces and Provisional Regulations on the Finance of Educational Institutions Run by Social Forces. With these documents, the government allowed state-owned enterprises and institutions, the democratic parties, popular organizations, economic collectives, and learned societies to set up educational institutions. Private citizens were also allowed to do so with special permission from the educational office at various levels of the government. Foreigners, overseas Chinese, educators, and businessmen from Hong Kong and Taiwan were invited as well.

The first pre-college private school since the economic reforms was Guangya school in Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province. It opened in June 1992 by Qing Guangya. Three years later there were 20,780 private kindergartens, 3,159 private primary and secondary schools, and 672 private vocational and technical schools. In addition, there were 12,230 private colleges with an average enrollment of 2,400 students. Generally, there have been three types of private schools developed since the 1980s in terms of their funding and operation. The first type was founded and controlled by private investors, including former educators and businessmen. The second type of private schools was set up by Chinese individuals or business firms in collaboration with foreign investors. The third type included those founded and operated by Chinese enterprises and institutions in the tradition of the minban school, which are popularly-run schools supported by village funds in rural areas. Although the majority of minban schools are primary schools, there may be a few middle schools. Many private schools involved government officials or agencies in their administration or boards. In the 1990s, with strong financial support, private schools became much better equipped than most public schools. Computer labs, language labs, indoor gyms, swimming pools, and piano studios have enabled these schools to implement programs that prepared their students for the challenge of the market economy.

Although the future of private institutions remains uncertain, it seems that it is improving. More than ever before, the People's Republic of China is committed to economic reforms. Given the benefits of private universities, they are very likely to prosper in China's drive for modernization.

Although the philosophy of Communism dictates that women should enjoy equal rights with men, in educational life there have been consistently fewer females than males both overall and at each level of education throughout the history of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Females have consistently constituted a declining proportion of total students as one moves up the educational ladder. The obstacles of gender discrepancies at all levels of education stems in part from deeply embedded cultural sentiments. Female inferiority was enshrined in the Confucian ethic nan zun nu bei (male honorable, female inferior). This concept of female inferiority remains firmly entrenched in the basic social structure of modern Chinese society. Overt institutional discrimination occurs in the admission of females to both secondary and higher education. In the post-Mao Era, technical schools have been particularly active in this area, imposing quotas on the proportion of females enrolled. They argue that while girls mature faster intellectually than boys, they begin to fall behind at the later stage of junior middle school or in senior high school. More importantly, they use employment demands to justify gender discrimination. Since potential employers prefer male recruits, female graduates would have a hard time finding jobs. In addition women are considered less committed and are viewed as having less energy for their work because of their domestic responsibilities. Family attitudes and behavior also present obstacles to female education. Throughout the history of post-1949 China, the family has continued to favor the education of sons over daughters, especially in rural areas where both traditional attitudes and the virilocal family structure have persisted. Girls are often withdrawn from junior high school and even primary school to assist with domestic chores, accounting for their lower participation rates in education (Epstein 1991).

Despite the continuous disproportion of enrollment, female participation in education has increased over the period as a whole. Up to the mid-1980s, women's participation in formal higher education improved rapidly, from 23.4 percent in 1980 to 38.3 percent in 1998 (China Statistical Yearbook 1999). It is important to note, however, that free-market reforms have not always benefited women. Since the mid-1980s, female graduates have faced increasing discrimination in employment, as the centralized job allocation system has been modified to allow for greater autonomy on the part of employers. Because employers now have a choice, many choose to hire males over females to avoid paying maternity benefits. A new law protecting women's rights was passed by the national People's Congress in 1992, specifying that "schools and pertinent departments should ensure that females and males are treated equally when it comes to starting school, progressing from a lower-level school to a higher one, assigning jobs on graduation, awarding academic degrees, and selecting people for overseas study." But this is increasingly difficult to implement since educational institutions have less and less control over the employment of their graduates.

At the end of 1998, China had 55 minority groups with a population of 75,774,500. Although they constitute 6.07 percent of the total population, they are very unequally distributed among the 31 province-level territories. In 10 territories, their share of the total population is less than 1 percent. In 2 other territories, their share is between 10 and 20 percent (China Statistical Yearbook 1999). Because the Communist Party wanted to promote a unified country, it maintained that non-Han populations had the right to preserve their own languages, customs, and religions over a long period of time until all minorities would ultimately "melt together." In the meantime, the government also insisted that minorities were backward in their customs, economy, and political consciousness. Therefore, they needed assistance from the Han people to achieve a developed socialist country.

As a result of these contradictory policies, China has developed one of the oldest and largest programs of state-sponsored affirmative action for ethnic minorities. By 1950 the government had established 45 special minority primary schools and 8 provincial minority secondary schools. The minority students in these schools were provided free education, books, and school supplies and were subsidized for food and housing (Hansen 1990). For the long-term political goal, the government also focused on the education of minority cadres. An important institution to accomplish this goal is minzu xueyuan (special minority institutes), which trained minority cadres to work in minority regions as representatives of the Communist party and government. In college entrance examinations, minorities are given additional points to give them greater access to higher education—20 points are automatically added to their scores if they apply to minority institutes, or 5 points are added if they apply to other schools. Also, in many cases, minority students are allowed to take the examinations in their indigenous languages and later enroll in classes taught in Mandarin. Many prominent universities now have minzu ban (ethnic classes or cohorts). Since the early 1980s, there have also been one-year yuke ban (preparatory courses) for minorities at key universities and minority institutes. These classes, which may be arranged by agreement between minority areas and universities, can serve students who failed to enter a university through the national enrollment system. Minority students also benefit from quotas that set aside a certain percentage of the spaces in classes for them. Furthermore, governments at different levels tried to strengthen the training of local teachers and re-establish bilingual education, particularly among Tibetans, Mongols, and Uygurs. The autonomous governments of minorities are allowed to decide which kinds of schools to establish, the length of schooling, whether a special curriculum is needed, which languages to teach in addition to Chinese, and how to recruit students. The central government also decided that minority students studying in cities should be allocated jobs in their home-counties after graduation in order to ensure that poor and underdeveloped rural minority areas would benefit from minority higher education. In exchange for the preferential policies, minorities are expected to support China's construction by providing more natural resources.

In spite of governmental preferential policies, many minority areas are still characterized by low levels of school enrollment and educational attainment. In 1990, the level of illiteracy of the national minorities as a whole (30.8 percent) is markedly higher than that of all Han combined at 21.5 percent. While minority students continue to do relatively well in terms of opportunities to enter higher education, they are increasingly disadvantaged in their access to the job market upon graduation. Furthermore, both minority men and women are highly disadvantaged in applying to enter graduate school, due to the foreign language requirement. It is not easy for them to reach an adequate level in a foreign language when they must master Chinese in addition to their own language and then learn the foreign language through the medium of Chinese. Nor is there much evidence of affirmative action for minority students at the graduate level. Also, the fact that many minority undergraduates intend to become cadres, rather than academics, contributes to the scarcity of minority graduate students. In 1993, only 3 percent of graduate students were minorities.

The use of instructional technology in China's classrooms remains inadequate. Many schools, particularly in rural area, still rely on blackboard and chalk as their major instructional media. Since the economic reforms in the 1980s, some schools in the cities have acquired limited audio-visual resources. Both key high schools and universities have the advantage of being equipped first due to funding priority from the state. Private schools are better equipped than most public schools due to their generous donors, usually overseas Chinese or the newly rich entrepreneurs. As for Internet access in classrooms, Chinese schools are behind most advanced Western countries. Only very few researchers at key universities, supported by outside funding, have unlimited access to Internet resources. Due to both high cost and the fear of influx of undesired information, the Chinese government hesitates to make the Internet a valuable teaching tool on campuses.

In using both radio and television as instructional media to provide educational opportunities for Chinese mass, however, China is ahead of many countries in the world. Even during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) when all schools were closed, Chinese Central People's Broadcast Station started to offer English lessons through radio broadcast in the 1970s. In February 1979 a television university was formed to offer different courses to Chinese citizens. In 1998 there were 45 radio and television universities with a enrollment of 484,400 students (China Statistical Yearbook 1999). Upon passing all required tests in a particular field, students can receive diplomas from the universities. The well-developed network presents lectures and classes in all major cities and regions throughout China. By presenting lectures of top experts in a given field, these radio and television universities provide educational opportunities to a large viewing audience who cannot attend formal college.

China - Educational System—overview - Schools, Chinese, Students, and School - StateUniversity.com
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Since 1949, owing to the different political and economic situations in China, the weighing of admissions criteria constantly shifted, depending on the political climate. Immediately following the Communists' rise to power, admissions criteria focused heavily on the background of a student's family: the "good" (red) classes included the workers, peasants, the former poor, Revolutionary cadres, and revolutionary martyrs; the "bad" (black) consisted of former capitalists, landlords, rich peasants, Nationalists, reactionaries, and criminals. Later, however, because China was in desperate need of professionals and engineers for socialist construction, academic achievement became more important than class background in admissions criteria. Deng Xiaoping's reforms abolished class background as a factor of consideration altogether. Instead, he instituted the national unified college entrance examinations taken by high school graduates in their last school year. Students are admitted to colleges according to two factors: their scores in the gaokao (unified college entrance examination) and the quotas of enrollment in specific institutions and specific majors. The quotas are assigned to an institution according to a national plan. Students obtain an average score in the gaokao, in a range that permits choices of specialties in institutions. Each major within a college sets up a fenshuxian (score mark), meaning cut-off score. Students whose score is below the cut-off point cannot be accepted by that institution. A prestigious university, usually a key institution, may require a score of 850 out of 900 for entrance. A second-rate institution may require only 600. Economic reforms have motivated institutions to admit zifeisheng (self-supported students) since 1995 in order to increase income. Zifeisheng are candidates below the cut-off point and hence outside the state plan.

Meanwhile, there is a direct entrance system that allows a tiny number of superior students who achieve outstanding examination results or win prizes in important academic contests to enroll directly in a designated postsecondary institution without sitting for the college entrance examination. Key universities allot several minge (positions) to appropriate key secondary schools, and students to fill them are normally selected by a school administrator and the student's homeroom teacher in consultation with the student and his or her parents. This process is extremely competitive except for students who choose to enter institutions, such as normal colleges and universities, which have trouble attracting highly qualified students.

China - Higher Education - Students, Institutions, College, and Student - StateUniversity.com
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
The above posts should give a general idea about the education system in China.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Is this a thread on Indian University?

Where is your LOL?

Anything incorrect information given in the above posts?

If so, please educate us.

If there is none, why compare only with India, lets start with Niger and graduate all the way to the US, and of course going through China and India!
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Rural Students Falling Behind

Access to leading universities more difficult than ever for students from rural areas
By YIN PUMIN


As a sophomore majoring in English at the Department of Foreign Languages and Literature at Tsinghua University, Zhao Jun has learned the true meaning of "spiritual solitude" over the past year.

"Although I would call myself outgoing and sociable, I find I just don't have much in common with my classmates," said the 21-year-old student with an air of dissatisfaction.

What sets Zhao apart from his classmates is the fact that he is from a small village in central China's Henan Province, while most of his classmates are all from major cities.

"They have totally different life and educational experiences, so I always feel somewhat isolated, which can be demoralizing," Zhao said.

Only five out of the 36 students in Zhou's class came from rural areas.

This is reflective of a broader trend with rural students being massively underrepresented in China's universities. While they have always struggled to secure places at top universities, in recent years the situation for rural students has actually deteriorated. The proportion of rural students at Tsinghua University, which ranked 35th on The Times Higher Education magazine's list of world's top 100 universities in 2011, has dropped to a historical low point. According to a study conducted by Yang Dongping, a professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology, only 17 percent of freshmen at Tsinghua University in 2010 came from rural areas, even though they comprised 62 percent of those registered to take the national college entrance examination that year.

This year, less than 15 percent of the university's 3,349 newly enrolled students had their education in rural schools, according to the Admissions Office of Tsinghua University.

According to Jin Jun, a lecturer at the School of Humanities and Social Science of Tsinghua University, a typical student at Tsinghua University hails from a city, has parents who are teachers or government employees, and travels overseas with his or her parents at least once a year.

The situation at Tsinghua is comparable to that at China's other major universities. The ratio of rural students at Peking University, which was rated 43rd on The Times Higher Education magazine's list, has dropped to around 10 percent over the last decade from more than 30 percent between 1978 and 1998, according to a study by Liu Yunshan, Vice President of the university's Graduate School of Education.

Even at China Agricultural University, which has traditionally had a high percentage of rural students, fewer than 30 percent of students are now from rural areas.

"The decrease is alarming as the proportion of rural students in leading universities has dropped to below 20 percent," said Xiong Bingqi, Deputy Director of the 21st Century Education Research Institute, a private non-profit education policy research body.


LOOKING FOR THE FUTURE: A job fair at Tianjin University of Science and Technology attracts thousands of college graduates on January 3 (LIU HAIFENG)

For centuries, Chinese people have believed that "knowledge can change fate." A better education has been seen as the key to a brighter future and children in rural areas, particularly remote areas, struggle to get into college in order to improve their prospects and the livelihoods of their families.

"Getting admitted to a good university in a major city represents not only a personal achievement for rural students, but also a major change for their families," said Xiong. "It is the most direct and effective way for them, sometimes even the only way, to shake off poverty."

For several decades, rural students were a key part of the intake of major universities. They were viewed by professors and admissions staff as more focused and hard working compared to their urban counterparts.

But today this avenue of social advancement is in danger of being sealed off.

"It's become even harder for us rural students to get into top universities," Zhao said, adding that he was lucky to be an exception to the rule.

Recently a teacher with 15 years of teaching experience posted an article online saying that young people from poor rural families are bound to struggle to reach the top of society as they effectively start their lives as losers. The post sparked a new round of discussion and debate on the inequality of education and the uneven distribution of social resources.

Unequal resources

Zhou Xufeng, Director of the Admissions Office of China Agricultural University, suggests the hukou (registered permanent residence) system is responsible for the imbalanced intake.

"The search for better schools drives many rural residents into cities and changes their hukou status. Students originally from rural areas now hold urban hukou," Zhou said.

Therefore the decline may not mean that fewer students with rural origins are entering universities but rather reflects the fact that bright rural students often hold urban hukou by the time they enroll in universities.

"In terms of China Agricultural University, another problem is that students from rural areas are reluctant to take jobs related to agriculture, for many of them, college is a way to get out of the rural areas," Zhou said.

However, Xiong attributes the decrease of rural students at leading universities to the unequal distribution of educational resources.

"Educational equality is the foundation for providing opportunities for rural children in underdeveloped areas. Equality means an equal starting line, an equal process and fundamentally a fair chance to succeed," he said.

According to official statistics, less than 40 percent of rural children are receiving a preschool education.

Meanwhile, there exists another daunting challenge. For decades educational resources have been unfairly allocated between urban and rural areas.

"Urban areas have better teachers and resources. Schools in rural areas, on the other hand, are fraught with the outflow of talent, and a shortage of teachers and resources," Xiong said.

A 2009 survey of students and teachers in six counties in underdeveloped northwestern Gansu and Guizhou provinces and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region showed that poor living and teaching conditions result in a dearth of quality teachers and good students. Talented teachers and students try their best to reach county or even higher level schools where conditions are much better.

"Some rural teachers are simply not qualified as they received college degrees from continuing-education programs, which do not really provide a good education," Xiong said.

To correct this, the Ministry of Education has launched a series of special recruitment plans to attract qualified teachers to rural areas.

One of the government's major initiatives has placed more than 180,000 teachers in 18,000 rural schools around the country since 2006. Teachers involved in the program for three years will be able to study for a Master's Degree in Education without having to take an entrance exam.

But many of these teachers admit they will still leave the countryside after their three-year term ends. A yawning gap will remain between the number of quality teachers in rural and urban areas.

"With only a handful of able teachers in the provinces it is almost impossible for students in villages to compete with their urban counterparts," Xiong said.

The fact that the majority of China's most prestigious universities are located in big cities like Beijing and Shanghai is another advantage for urban students. Some schools now have policies favoring students from their own cities, in order to support the local government and economy.

A slew of policies, including lower entrance scores and bonus scores for special talent in arts or sports, have added to the discrimination faced by rural students, who have little or no access to extra-curricular activities.

Schools in big cities on the other hand have access to the best teachers and facilities. Students at these schools can choose from a range of subjects and stand a much better chance of being admitted to prestigious universities.


POWER OF KNOWLEDGE: Xu Shengxue, the only teacher at Sanchakou Primary School in Pingshun County of north China's Shanxi Province, gives class to students on June 15 (YAN YAN)

Weak competitiveness

Despite criticism of its "scores-for-school" system, which leads to tough competition among students, the national college entrance examination is still considered the fairest way to determine a student's fate. Regardless of wealth and social status, every student must take the same examination, a fact that in the past led to a high percentage of rural students getting admitted to high-quality universities.

"However, recent reforms to the exam have altered the balance. Under new broader criteria, hard working rural students find themselves at a disadvantage," Xiong said.

Some policies aimed at broadening access to higher education have in fact made it more difficult for rural students to gain entry to leading universities. In 2003 reforms were introduced to allow students with more rounded profiles, not simply outstanding performers in exams, to enter universities. The Ministry of Education permitted 22 key universities to use their own criteria to independently select 5 percent of their students from high schools around the country.

The independent criteria focus more on students' creativity, imagination and learning skills. Students who are particularly talented in art, sport and literature can now enter these key universities despite their lower test scores. For example, Zhang Tianci, a talented violinist from Jinzhou, a city in northeast China's Liaoning Province, earned 60 privilege points to gain entry to Tsinghua University last year.

Many experts see this program as a way to break down the country's exam-oriented education system. They believe it to be conducive to better understanding where students' talents lie. There are now 80 universities involved in the program.

The shift away from a purely exam-based selection process, however, has placed rural students at a disadvantage. Admission based on talent in art, music or sports favors students who have the resources and time to cultivate extracurricular talents.

"When urban students compete for the Mathematical Olympiad or participate in English summer camps, it's obvious that rural students have fallen behind due to limited teaching resources," Xiong said. "Their isolated living conditions limit their knowledge of the outside world compared to urban students."

Likewise, students whose families are well-off can attend special classes or hire private tutors to improve their grades. Poor families cannot.

Some experts also claimed that examination questions and terms for admission to universities today favor urban students, further exaggerating the existing inequality. Oral English examinations are unfair to rural students who have less access to good English teachers.

"I had no idea what the oral English exam was before the last year of my senior high school," said Li Chen, a student at Peking University who comes from a small county in Gansu Province.

The national college entrance examination also tends to be more concerned with knowledge found outside textbooks, an advantage for teenagers who live in cities.

Chen Meishi, a sophomore at Tsinghua University, said her entrance exam required that she write about Fei Xiaotong (1910-2005), a renowned Chinese sociologist and anthropologist, attended.

"I didn't even know who Fei was, but urban students did," recalled Chen, who was born in a small village.

"The independent exam is partial to students from developed areas and rich families," said He Yunfeng, Director of the Research Institute of Knowledge and Value at Shanghai Normal University.

Super schools

Zhao at Tsinghua University considers himself lucky to have had the privilege of studying at a prestigious provincial-level high school, a springboard to a first-class university. "The door to Tsinghua University would have been shut before I even sat for the exam if I hadn't attended the high school I went to," he said.

The school Zhao attended is one of China's super middle schools. These schools, usually based in provincial capitals or developed cities, take up more of the country's already uneven educational resources. Their influence is such that they can recommend their outstanding students to top universities without taking the national college entrance examination.

While they are undoubtedly successful, these schools receive regular funding and other support from local governments and absorb the best teachers and students in a province, shortchanging other schools.

Zhao was born in a small mountainous village in Henan's Huixian County. Originally, he attended a local high school but after one year there, he found the school could not provide him with a sufficiently high quality of education. Heeding the suggestion of one of his relatives, he left the school and took an entrance exam to gain admission to the Xinxiang-based Affiliated Middle School of Henan Normal University. Having passed the exam he was accepted by the key high school which is known for placing large numbers of its students at top universities. This year alone, more than 360 students from the school gained admission to major universities.

"I'm glad to see four of my junior schoolmates coming to Tsinghua," Zhao said.

The super high school, Zhao said, was a completely different academic experience. "When I entered the classroom for the first time, I was astonished to see advanced teaching equipment, including projectors, video players and many computers. I had never seen these things at my previous schools," he said. "For the first time I learned what creative education and multimedia classes were."

"In my previous schools everything came from the textbook, but I discovered that there are many other ways to teach and learn," he said.

"More online materials were used for further study," Zhao said. "Urban students can take courses online and can download education materials easily, while students from the countryside have less access to the Internet and know little about the outside world."

Almost every province has one or two such super schools. In Henan, famous key schools include the Affiliated Middle School of Henan Normal University and the Zhengzhou-based Henan Experimental High School, Zhengzhou Foreign Language School and Zhengzhou No.1 High School.

This year the Zhengzhou Foreign Language School has 17 students entering Tsinghua University.

"Students like us have to be outstanding to gain admission to super schools and receive a higher standard of education," Zhao said. "If not, we have to stay at a county-level high school, which means little chance to enter top universities, no matter how hard we work."

His former classmates who studied at the high school in Huixian all ended up in local colleges or even abandoned their studies to work in local factories or migrate to the big cities.

A survey conducted by Jin, the Tsinghua lecturer, in northwest China's Shaanxi Province found that of the 2010 freshmen at Tsinghua University and Peking University who came from Shaanxi, more than 97 percent were graduates of five elite high schools in Xi'an, the province's capital.

Financial burden

"It has become harder for students from rural areas to move up the social ladder," said Yang Dongping from the Beijing Institute of Technology. "This is really a dangerous signal for Chinese society."

According to his research, most students from rural areas only attend local colleges and polytechnic schools.

In central China's Hubei Province from 2002 to 2005, for example, the proportion of rural students at junior colleges rose from 39 to 62 percent, and at military and normal colleges went from 33 to 57 percent.

"A better university means a better chance of landing a good job after graduation. The lower chance of entering prestigious universities places students from rural areas at permanent disadvantage relative to their urban counterparts," Yang said.

According to Yang's survey, a large number of urban students receive help from their parents, particularly in terms of introductions and contacts, when they are looking for jobs.

"Given the difficulties they face both in getting into universities and finding jobs, more and more rural children are choosing not to pursue higher education. They think there is no meaning in going to a university," Xiong said.

According to a survey, among the 9.46 million registered candidates in 2010, nearly 1 million finally gave up the national college entrance examination. Most of those who quit were from rural areas. Other rural students leave school even earlier and chose to study in technical schools or seek jobs directly.

The high cost of a university education plus the difficulty of finding a job after graduation has contributed to the prevailing idea in the countryside that "education is useless."

For instance, in Beijing, college students have to pay an average of 5,000 yuan ($782) for a year's tuition, students also have to pay living costs of around 10,000 yuan ($1,564) a year. That's almost the same as an average rural household's income.

Sending a child to university can cost the equivalent of 10 years' household income of a rural family in Gansu's Huining County, according to the People's Daily, the country's leading newspaper.

"Instead of offering opportunities to young people from rural areas to move up social classes through education, the tertiary education system is reinforcing the social divide in the country," said Liu Yunshan of Peking University.

For a long time, the government has invested in top universities, but many private vocational and junior colleges have no access to state investment, subsidies or social donations.

"Education equity also means the choice of all kinds of higher education should be offered to meet the needs of people from different economic backgrounds," he said.



Rural Students Falling Behind -- Beijing Review
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
China's approach to education is good, but then it is a huge and complex country and therefore, to expect fair and equitable resource management is difficult.

It is currently only producing an urban elite!

I am sure, as time goes by, all will get a fair chance.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Hopefully, some Chinese posters will be able to clarify the education system in China beyond what the western sources have to say.
 

redragon

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
956
Likes
58
Country flag
1. The CCP has done a lot of things, some good, some bad, but obviously the good is >>> than the bad, that is why China is the hot topic and moving faster forward than most of other countries.
2. The West is almost dominating the world medias, they can control what they want people to know easily, this is kind like "brain wash", you can only get the information they want you to know, you can argue because they are independence so they should be un-biased, however anyone has been travelling around world or can read Chinese may have different view on this so call un-biased report.
3. The west obviously does not like some one to shake the advantage they have in the past 300 yrs, so it's very nature for them to be defensive against China, so they won't shed too much light on the possitive side of China, so for those who can only rely on west media to do their research, it is very difficult to get a more balanced pictures about China.
4. China is very big very complicated, some things or policy might be good for some but bad for others, if you can not evaluate things in big pictures, it will be very easy to get confused and lost, some decision simply can't satisfy everyone, what is going on in EU is a fresh example, if a Gov is confused or looks into details too much, it will be extrimely difficult to do meaningful decision for long term.
5. Chinese education system can not be all the same in every province or even every city, due to many factors, policy makers have to change their ideas all the time to meet the fast changing situations.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
I find it most amusing that the Chinese posters love using LOLs.

Just watch their posts, if you don't believe me!

The subject that they are commenting on is of no matter and I would not be surprised if they use LOL even when commenting on death, destruction, devastation, national calamities and everything sad!

Could it be that because of the hyper strict society they are from, they require to laugh all the time to relieve the stress?
LOL.

I like ROFL better.

There will be a lot of English speakers in China in another 10 years.

If we don't start spending money on R&D in basic science then we are going to be in a tight spot vis-à-vis China.
 

SPIEZ

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
Why isn't there any post about the actual educational system in China ? We all know Indian educational system is crap!
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
1. The CCP has done a lot of things, some good, some bad, but obviously the good is >>> than the bad, that is why China is the hot topic and moving faster forward than most of other countries.
2. The West is almost dominating the world medias, they can control what they want people to know easily, this is kind like "brain wash", you can only get the information they want you to know, you can argue because they are independence so they should be un-biased, however anyone has been travelling around world or can read Chinese may have different view on this so call un-biased report.
3. The west obviously does not like some one to shake the advantage they have in the past 300 yrs, so it's very nature for them to be defensive against China, so they won't shed too much light on the possitive side of China, so for those who can only rely on west media to do their research, it is very difficult to get a more balanced pictures about China.
4. China is very big very complicated, some things or policy might be good for some but bad for others, if you can not evaluate things in big pictures, it will be very easy to get confused and lost, some decision simply can't satisfy everyone, what is going on in EU is a fresh example, if a Gov is confused or looks into details too much, it will be extrimely difficult to do meaningful decision for long term.
5. Chinese education system can not be all the same in every province or even every city, due to many factors, policy makers have to change their ideas all the time to meet the fast changing situations.
A very valid observation!
 

Naren1987

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
438
Likes
97
I think in the short term , our aim should be to improve the English reading skills, our Graduate students struggle when they read literature published by Anglo Saxon authors.
I think this do much to improve our Engineers.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top