Cannot risk a parallel army in North: Basil

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
you know one thing,you lankans are damn lucky to have us Indians as your neighbors.this is the sole reason why you even exist as a free country!if you had neighbors like china or pakistan you would have felt the taste of your own medicine because they would never tolerate this kind of attitude from a puny island country like yours:rolleyes:!
Be real for once man. There is no ifs now......... Tamils are just a minority in Sri Lanka. If they can't tolerate Sinhalese they can jump in to the sea or swim away to TN.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709
you know one thing,you lankans are damn lucky to have us Indians as your neighbors.this is the sole reason why you even exist as a free country!if you had neighbors like china or pakistan you would have felt the taste of your own medicine because they would never tolerate this kind of attitude from a puny island country like yours:rolleyes:!
Actually, Myanmar has faced ethnic fractures remarkably similar to what Sri Lanka faces now, and it shares a land border with China and many of the ethnicities in question (the Wa, the Kachin) are split between the Sino-Burman border.

China has never told or even suggested how Myanmar should settle its ethnic questions. Indeed, the only time this ethnic conflict has become a bilateral issue has been when the Burman military's airstrikes and artillery fire landed on the wrong side of the border and killed somebody.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
Actually, Myanmar has faced ethnic fractures remarkably similar to what Sri Lanka faces now, and it shares a land border with China and many of the ethnicities in question (the Wa, the Kachin) are split between the Sino-Burman border.

China has never told or even suggested how Myanmar should settle its ethnic questions. Indeed, the only time this ethnic conflict has become a bilateral issue has been when the Burman military's airstrikes and artillery fire landed on the wrong side of the border and killed somebody.
but that was a completely different scenario as the Wa and the Kachin both are Christian communties and we all know that China is a communist country hence majority of you Han chinese are atheists and had little or no sympathy towards the plight of the christian non-Han communities but God forbid if a massacre of Han people starts somewhere in the world tomorrow then i am cent percent sure that china will the first to protest vehemently against that incident.on the other hand India is a Hindu majority country(where around 81% of the population follows Hinduism),so its quite natural that we would feel the pain when the ethnic Tamil Hindu minorities were butchered in S.L.but then again as we are a "Secular" nation,we did nothing when the Lankan Buddhist majority people were orchestrating a massive genocide of the Tamil minority population in Lanka.even now the lankan mentality is filled with hatred towards the Tamil minority,so that's why i said that they were lucky to have India as their immediate neighbor instead of China or Pakistan!
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
Be real for once man. There is no ifs now......... Tamils are just a minority in Sri Lanka. If they can't tolerate Sinhalese they can jump in to the sea or swim away to TN.
so i could say the same thing to you as we all know that the Indian Ocean Region is our hegemony.so as it is clearly seen that you Lankans literally hate India and your country is making defence and strategic pacts with our enemies against us,so according to your logic we have got every right to occupy your island country to protect our national interest.am i wrong to say this!
 

Razor

STABLE GENIUS
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,701
Likes
9,099
Country flag
Actually, Myanmar has faced ethnic fractures remarkably similar to what Sri Lanka faces now, and it shares a land border with China and many of the ethnicities in question (the Wa, the Kachin) are split between the Sino-Burman border.

China has never told or even suggested how Myanmar should settle its ethnic questions. Indeed, the only time this ethnic conflict has become a bilateral issue has been when the Burman military's airstrikes and artillery fire landed on the wrong side of the border and killed somebody.
And yet China supplies weaponry and money to the UWSA.
Did you conveniently forget that ? :aww:
 

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
so i could say the same thing to you as we all know that the Indian Ocean Region is our hegemony.so as it is clearly seen that you Lankans literally hate India and your country is making defence and strategic pacts with our enemies against us,so according to your logic we have got every right to occupy your island country to protect our national interest.am i wrong to say this!
Yeah try... we will look forward to it.

P.S. Indian track record for invading other countries is not that good. Still you couldn't take over the Azad Kashmir so I see your threat as a empty one.
 

Sydney

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
1
Likes
0
Hello
Despite India's efforts to persuade Sri Lanka to fully implement the 13th Amendment in the island's northern province, the Rajapaksa government appears firm about not handing over some powers, including those related to police and law enforcement, to the Tamil minority.Referring to the Tamil National Army — a militant outfit raised by the beleaguered 1988 EPRLF government in the North-Eastern Province in a futile attempt to protect itself against the LTTE that had rejected the Amendment and boycotted the election — he said there was no ruling out that a future Northern provincial government would not do the same: "If [the NPC] form another army, can we afford another war now?"
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
And yet China supplies weaponry and money to the UWSA.
Did you conveniently forget that ? :aww:
that's a legitimate entity in Myanmar. lots of money for humanitarian cause and eradication of opium, and replacement with sugercane or rubber plants.

what has India done for Lanka?

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
The issue is simple.

Sri Lanka has treated and legislated that Tamils (and they are Hindus, Christians and all) are to be second class.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike Govt made Tamils second class. First, the government introduced a double standard for admission grades to universities, requiring the Tamil students to achieve higher grades than the Sinhalese students. Secondly, the same kind of policy was adopted for jobs as public servants, which were held by less than ten percent of the Tamil-speaking population.

Those were the main reason what gave credence to outfits like the LTTE.

The Sinhala Only Act (formally the Official Language Act No. 33 of 1956) was an act passed in the Parliament of Ceylon in 1956.] The act replaced English as the official language of Ceylon with Sinhala. The act failed to give official recognition to Tamil, which had not received official recognition before.

The Sinhalese broke the trust and they still have no faith in the Tamils and the Tamils have no faith in the Sinhalese. And the policies remain to discriminate.

And Buddhism plays dirty tricks too since ipso facto SL is a Theocratic State where one has to be a Buddhist to be the Head of State.

That is why Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike, converted to Buddhism in order to join politics!

 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Yeah try... we will look forward to it.

P.S. Indian track record for invading other countries is not that good. Still you couldn't take over the Jammu and Kashmir so I see your threat as a empty one.
For instance?

Learn history and then come back!

Please enumerate and put your money where your mouth is.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
that's a legitimate entity in Myanmar. lots of money for humanitarian cause and eradication of opium, and replacement with sugercane or rubber plants.

what has India done for Lanka?

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
Legitimate?

How is arming rebels legitimate?

Then Pakistan trained Uighurs are legitimate, right?

So, why the hullabaloo in China over it?

Why China's sale of gunships to Myanmar rebels is aimed at peace, not war

China has long played a delicate game in Myanmar's vast eastern region, secretly arming a rebel ethnic group known as the United Wa State Army. But according to a report by Jane's Information Group, the stakes just got higher: In February and March, the UWSA took delivery of Chinese military helicopters armed with air-to-air missiles for the first time.

Jane's reports that between two and five Mil Mi-17 'Hip' helicopters were flown across the Mekong River from Laos into Myanmar's Shan State, where the USWA has between 20,000 and 30,000 fighters.

Why is China supplying rebels with gunships while simultaneously courting the resource-rich Myanmar government? In a nutshell, it wants to keep the peace along its long border, and discourage the Myanmar army from attacking the Shan and disturbing the status quo.

Myanmar has 10 armed ethnic groups, and China's nightmare is that conflict could spill over across its borders. Fierce fighting between the Kachin Independence Army and the Myanmar army has already crossed into China and threatened a giant pipeline project between the two nations. China is keen to stop a similar situation develop in Shan State.

Jane's analyst Anthony Davis told Voice of America that "the Chinese are not stoking fires in northern Burma. By reinforcing the Wa they are reinforcing a military deterrent. If you like, they are reinforcing peace and stability which has existed for the last 20 years in a manner that's been favourable to China."

China's balancing act is made even more complicated by the titanic shifts taking place in Myanmar. The country has emerged from a long period of isolation and engaged with the United States and other western nations, pulling away from the Chinese orbit.

As Prashanth Parameswaran of China Brief wrote in an incisive analysis last week:

Beijing's more aggressive role with respect to sensitive issues like ethnic rebel groups in Burma will likely buy it less, not more influence in [Myanmar's capital] Naypyidaw as China is seen as an increasingly untrustworthy partner interfering in internal affairs.

No one ever said playing both sides against the middle was easy.

Why China's sale of gunships to Myanmar rebels is aimed at peace, not war – Quartz

******************************

We may strat another thread of China humanitarian and legitimate aid through arming rebels!

NO wonder the Myanmar military Govt, which was pro China, has told China to take a hike and get out!

Who can cohabit with fork tongued specimen and snake oil salesmen?
 
Last edited:

Razor

STABLE GENIUS
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
7,701
Likes
9,099
Country flag
that's a legitimate entity in Myanmar. lots of money for humanitarian cause and eradication of opium, and replacement with sugercane or rubber plants.

what has India done for Lanka?

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
The Wa state is not recognized by the Burmese govt. The Burmese govt. has signed a ceasefire with the UWSA, that's all. And the CCP is arming them.
And either you re ignoring the facts (aka lying ) or ignorant of the facts: the UWSA is heavily involved in narcotics activities.
The UWSA also has links to ULFA.
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Pakistan and Sikkim..... ring any bells.......
No.mo bells rang.

Only the thunder of silence generate by the depth of ignorance.

Pakistan?

Check history, who attacked?

If attacked, what should be reaction?

Lie down and enjoy it?

Don't be daft.

Sikkim?

Check facts.
 
Last edited:

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
Pakistan?

Check history, who attacked?

If attacked, what should be reaction?

Lie down and enjoy it?

Don't be daft.

Sikkim?

Check facts.
Doesn't matter who attacked India never were a bully with the military strength.. India is only a verbal bully.....
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Doesn't matter who attacked India never were a bully with the military strength.. India is only a verbal bully.....
That is the most ridiculous post I have observed.

Doesn't matter who attacked India?

Are you intelligence challenged?
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
Well we do trust Tamils but the issue here is the power is about to be vested on a bunch of puppets who neither represent Tamils nor Sinhalese but USA. So we Sinhalese do not want to give powers that could be manipulated to USA to do their bidding.

About the Tamils trust... actually we do not need Tamils to trust us. Rather we do not care. If Tamils do not trust us, they can jump to the sea. :p
In that case The Tamils deserve a seperate nation. Tamils are not your slaves or second rate citizens.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Even if we did, what is wrong with that? You can assume the situation as same as the dalit situation in India. :p
Then don't pontificate and stand on the high horse that you trust the Tamil and such other tripe that is being purveyed by you.


[MOD Edit: No longer required. - PM ]

Are you a human being or a deranged person?

I have never sided with the LTTE, but now I understand why they rose against you racially horrid individuals.

Carry on this way and this time you will regret your racial overtones.



Then Tamils have to develop the faith one way the other. We Sinhalese are the majority and we rule the country as to our liking. If Tamils do not like the way we rule it they can go to some place they think they are happy. Maybe they can go to TN where there own kin resides. :p
Tamils are a part of SL and so you have to ensure that they are treated equal.

They have been there always and every time. It is not your land alone and you are not even the original inhabitants. In fact, you come from Bengal and Odisha.

Mahavamsa attests that the ancestors of the Sinhalese came from Sihapura (Sinhapura) located in Lala Rattha (=Lata Rashtra). Prince Sihabahu had left his maternal grand father's kingdom in Vanga and founded a Sihapura in Lata Rashtra. He married Sihasivali and there were born Vijaya and Sumitta and thirty more sons to her. With time, Sihabahu consecrated Vijaya as prince-regent, but due to some misdemeanor of prince Vijaya, the king had to banish him and his 700 followers from Sinhapura. Story says that the king had caused their heads to be shaved (aradh-mundak) before putting them on a ship and driving them away into the sea. The exiles sailed past Bharukachcha and Soparaka and finally landed at Tambapanni (Ceylon) near Puttalam.[5] on the day of Parinibhana (decease) of the Buddha (542 BCE or 486 BCE). The exiles permanently settled on the island, married local wives and established their kingdom which, in succeeding generations, assumed the name as Sinhala, said to have been named after Sinhapura, the ancestral city of the exiles. (Wiki)

While considerable evidence points to western India as the home of the first immigrants, it seems probable that a subsequent wave arrived from the east around Bengal and Orissa"

Get off your high horse or the high horse will get you off!


What is wrong with that...? SL is not secular country....
Then be upfront about that.

And not be coy like a bashful girl!

That is why Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike, converted to Buddhism in order to join politics!
/QUOTE]

It is just like Sonia won't become the PM on India.......
Sonia Gandhi was a foreigner and then after many years took Indian citizenship.

And she did not want to be the PM.

Further, we have had representatives of all religions as President and PM.

Our Constitution does not prohibit anyone from holding high office.

So, don't compare a racist people like you Buddhist DL with others!

Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike was a born Sri Lankan but a Christian and that was not good enough for him because SL is a racial horror with religion intolerance at its foundation and psyche!

Shameful and deceitful people like you, who make your nation!

Did our Muslim Presidents have to convert to be the Head of State?
 
Last edited:

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
In that case The Tamils deserve a seperate nation. Tamils are not your slaves or second rate citizens.
I have a answer to this but dunno whether I get banned for saying it.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top