- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,042
It is been said again and again about her condition and held modification and upgrades pending, 50 years old ship still going strong coz we simply dont have other option to replace it, In such case we should not held back this small upgrade which gives huge capability..
The thing is until IAC-1 comes into play, nothing changes and there is no guarantee about its dead line, you use the math..
Even when IAC-1 comes into play, Virrat will be moved for amphibious operations as an assault ship, She can carry +750 troops and LAC for landing..
=======================================
About arsenal class ship idea, better design a new ship rather making massive modification to an 50year old ship, which may cost you double the original price of CV..
The thing is until IAC-1 comes into play, nothing changes and there is no guarantee about its dead line, you use the math..
Even when IAC-1 comes into play, Virrat will be moved for amphibious operations as an assault ship, She can carry +750 troops and LAC for landing..
=======================================
About arsenal class ship idea, better design a new ship rather making massive modification to an 50year old ship, which may cost you double the original price of CV..
Ok so 2021 fine i dint know that ...I am not sure it can hold its sea worthy for so long .Even after the upgrade it can hold its breathe till 2016 as far as i knew ..But since u said its going to be in service for another 10 years(Am not sure as its Hull can not be changed in refitting) Yes it can be a good platform for N-Tejas or Mig-29K ... But why do u think Indian Navy never Thought about it ? There should be a good Reason for that may be technically ...
But if it is to serve till 2021 we should have N-Tejas or Mig-29KUB with it..Or it will be a waste of money for next 5 years(after 2016) as a sitting duck with 3 harrier jet and i dont even know these jets can do their job at the time of war..