LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,876
- Likes
- 48,558
gulfnews : Britain to scrap aid to subcontinent
London: Britain is to stop giving aid to India, Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, said on Sunday.
The government has come under pressure to explain why British taxpayers are giving millions to countries such as India at a time of public sector cuts.
Mitchell's international aid budget was one of only two, alongside health, that had been ring-fenced and so was protected from the austerity drive. India was singled out because of increasing prosperity and the fact that it had a nuclear programme.
Mitchell said it was not only "morally right" but in Britain's national interests to continue to fund development projects around the world.
He said he wanted Britain to become a "development superpower", adding: "Britain is doing brilliant things around the world, saving lives."
A report from MPs on the House of Commons international development committee to be published today was expected to be critical of Britain for giving money to India.
In a television interview, Mitchell said the Indian programme had been frozen "so for the first time this year since the war it is not Britain's largest development programme". He said he did not think that Britain would continue to fund programmes in India "for very much longer".
"India is a place where there are more poor people than the whole of sub-Saharan Africa," he said.
"Britain's programme shows how we can get more people into school, and women particularly," he added.
"These programmes are massively scaled up by the Indian taxpayer. British know-how is making a huge contribution. Now is not the time to stop the programme in India but I don't think we will be there for very much longer."
— The Telegraph Group Limited, London 2011
London: Britain is to stop giving aid to India, Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, said on Sunday.
The government has come under pressure to explain why British taxpayers are giving millions to countries such as India at a time of public sector cuts.
Mitchell's international aid budget was one of only two, alongside health, that had been ring-fenced and so was protected from the austerity drive. India was singled out because of increasing prosperity and the fact that it had a nuclear programme.
Mitchell said it was not only "morally right" but in Britain's national interests to continue to fund development projects around the world.
He said he wanted Britain to become a "development superpower", adding: "Britain is doing brilliant things around the world, saving lives."
A report from MPs on the House of Commons international development committee to be published today was expected to be critical of Britain for giving money to India.
In a television interview, Mitchell said the Indian programme had been frozen "so for the first time this year since the war it is not Britain's largest development programme". He said he did not think that Britain would continue to fund programmes in India "for very much longer".
"India is a place where there are more poor people than the whole of sub-Saharan Africa," he said.
"Britain's programme shows how we can get more people into school, and women particularly," he added.
"These programmes are massively scaled up by the Indian taxpayer. British know-how is making a huge contribution. Now is not the time to stop the programme in India but I don't think we will be there for very much longer."
— The Telegraph Group Limited, London 2011