Britain: How ignorant a country's population can ever get

[Horushmar.]

dude India has installed 800kV HVDC transmission lines and even UK does not have it. And how said 40% does not have electricity? Are you insane or what?
Come out of illiteracy!

Well we get shitty electricity no hiding that....

 

[Screambowl]

Well we get shitty electricity no hiding that....

getting electricity is way different than 40% having no electricity.

in 2013 the electricity coverage was 81% now it is obviously more than that.

81% coverage of India means 5 United Kingdom

 

[Hemu Vikram Aditya]

getting electricity is way different than 40% having no electricity.

in 2013 the electricity coverage was 81% now it is obviously more than that.

81% coverage of India means 5 United Kingdom

MORE THAN 5 MUCH more as India gives 240 V to every home britain only gives 110v
And Even the freaking MP is bigger than uk and INDIA has many States

 

[gslv markIII]

And country specific forums aren't the most rational places(look at BR).

No offence, but I find BR far more logical than arrse or any other arrsehole forums forums. Of course, many Indians suffering from Stockholm syndrome would be okay with the British abusing us.

 

[gslv markIII]

It is also a fact that 40% of our population doesn't have electricity

Dude, help yourself with WB data.

 

[alphacentury]

Do you honestly think your average person in Indian villages knows more about Britain than your average Brit does about India?

The average Indian villager is very humble, he may not have any knowledge about britain(actually nobody is interested about that shithole.), but he wont be downright condescending about something he has little or zero knowledge about. The only thing british are good at is whining. Very little in India actually have knowledge of britain compared to the whining brits do about India.

Peak british culture..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soggy_biscuit

Why should we care about Brits?

If any Euros are to be on our radar it should be the French and the Russians.

Also what the hell is this I hear about Modi going to watch Baahubali 2 premiere in the UK, with that old hag elizabeth? WTF
Man, that is disappointing.

What. Why do we have to associate with them filths for anything. Its down right embarrassing. Man, modi has this tic of coming out with stupid ideas every once in a while.

 

[alphacentury]

Frankly man I dont care about trade or business deals with them. To me they are in the same league as of pakis. But yeah, any way to squeeze them would be nice.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Frankly man I dont care about trade or business deals with them. To me they are in the same league as of pakis. But yeah, any way to squeeze them would be nice.

Unlike PRC taught the children about Japanese war crimes, Indians were always taught to be pacifist. UK's decline pushed them out of attention.

 

[Kshatriya87]

You see what is their mental and psychic condition is. Take them lightly... 4th class lost world


View attachment 14221

Only reason they succeeded was of technological edge. Today its not there. British will go home with their ass kicked.

 

[Krusty]

yes true the generation born in 70's and 80's are ill informed but if you asked people born in 40's 50' they know.
My experience with them was like, they started telling us about Europe and later they said oh well India is equivalent to Europe and much more diverse these small stories are frequent.

One thing they appreciate about Indians is they think we are very good in studies and especially maths. This comes from some one born not from the 70's or 80's generation.

The current generation only knows how to eat how to shout on parents and nothing. They have huge generation gaps building and this is a major social problem in Europe.

Strongly agree. Most older Europeans are highly knowledgeable. Don't even get me started about the Millennials and the current teens

OT: just for fun

 

[The Last Stand]

Dr. Abdul Kalam after the 1998 tests.

"We have seen the reactions to the tests within the country in the Indian and foreign media. We have also had the benefit of private conversations with many Indians. In all these, I observed one striking feature: a number of persons in the fifty-plus bracket and especially those who are in powerful positions in government, industry, business and academia, seem to lack the will to face problems. They would like to be supported by other countries in every action we have to take in the country. This is not a good sign after fifty years of an independent India which has all along emphasised ‘self reliance’.


We are not advocating xenophobia nor isolation. But all of us have to be clear that nobody is going to hold our hands to lead us into the ‘developed country club’. Nuclear tests are the culmination of efforts to apply nuclear technology for national security. When we carried out the tests in May 1998, India witnessed issuing of sanctions by a few developed countries. In the process, the same countries have purposely collapsed their own doctrine of global marketing, global finance systems and global village. Hence India has to evolve its own original economic policy, as well as development, business and marketing strategies.

It is not just that the Indian nuclear tests are resented. If tomorrow Indian software export achieves a sizable share in the global market, becoming third or fourth or fifth in size, we should expect different types of reactions.

Today, we are a small percentage of the total trade in software or information technology. Similarly, if India becomes a large enough exporter of wheat or rice or agro-food products to take it into an exclusive club of four or five top food grain-exporting nations, various new issues would be raised couched in scientific and technical terms ranging from phyto-sanitary specifications to our contribution to global warming.

Multilateral regimes to these effects exist in terms of General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) and other environment-related multilateral treaties. India cannot afford not to sign these treaties, though we could have done our homework a little better during the negotiations. We have to face what we have with us. We need to play the multilateral game, attract foreign investments, have joint ventures and be an active international player.

Still, we have to remember that those who aim high, have to learn to walk alone too, when required."

-------------------------

I think that sums up the problem we have with the West's perception of us. It doesn't make a difference. We just have to keep being "non-violent", make money, and wait till we're powerful enough to start taking them on economically.

 

[Krusty]

Lol you may have worked with Brits, well I've been British for the most of my life. I moved here when I was 13 years old.

Why do we spend so much time in what other people think of India? It is also a fact that 40% of our population doesn't have electricity and we have one of the lowest media exposure. Why don't we try to better our socioeconomic parameters.

You moved there at 13 and now what, you are 300? Man I was in Europe for a good 10 years and have stayed at almost every country in continental Europe (except Portugal). More than enough to get to know them. I can say one thing for sure, the only people who are actually very nice are the Danish, Dutch and Belgians. All the rest are condescending to everyone else outside of their own country. The ones who TOP the rudeness list are the Brits, Italians and the French.

You moved there at 13 so other people won't know shit and I know better than them. Typical confused white bootlicking desi attitude. Go there and drop humility at the drop of a hat. It's common among pseudo British wannabies.

 

[Krusty]

Their cousins across the pond don't fare any better either.
GK is not their forte.

Yep, watch the video I linked. It's hilarious. Straight from the US of A

 

[pringles]

Not just that, these British people are so petty, even in historic times when they were at war with German, Russian, French tribes, they used to destroy the sculptures of their opponents to claim that their opponents could not make good art. They found a consignment of Greek statues and they broke their noses and started telling the British people that the Greek civilization was so primitive that they couldn't make the kind of cement required for sculptures to have delicate designs like sculptures. They did the same with Hindu statues.

They cannot tolerate that there are civilizations which are more older and more advanced than them. It is British national narrative to make others look bad. Even in 2014 France day, the british propaganda channel launched a documentary on Napolean saying that Napolean had big piles in his ass which prevented him from riding a horse in his last battle, that is why he lost. This caused a major diplomatic row between France and Britain when France refused to send their envoy to participate in the British World War victory day celebrations. Then Britain apologized and then France sent a low level bureaucrat to attend.

These Brits did the same when China and Russia invited other nations to participate in their national military parades. They kept saying that everyone will boycott it, but unsurprisingly, more than 100 nations participated in both events. Brits should not forget that more than 40% of steel in their country comes through (Indian + Chinese) companies. Roads, railways and even nuclear plants in Britain are being built by China. They have no business mocking Asians. Their brief period of glory is over.

 

[Mikesingh]

........................................................................

 

[pringles]

Check this : http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/argon...ced-the-missing-noses-of-classical-antiquity/

It's a big article, I'm only quoting a small part of it

Noses on the vast majority of ancient stone sculpture are missing. Some of these have inevitably broken off accidentally, but it is also evident that an overwhelming number of them have been deliberately targeted. A black basalt head of the emperor Tiberius’ nephew Germanicus in the British Museum shows a nose that has been clearly chiselled away, probably at the same time that early Christians carved a cross into the forehead of this pagan portrait.

So, this is all a representation of British racial arrogance. And they claim that they did the morally right thing by destroying Hitler for 'racial superiority'.

http://www.raceandhistory.com/manu/vanish3.htm << Even this is a big article, please do read it in detail.

 

[pringles]

But the bigger joke with this Christian arrogance is that, even with so much military firepower and propaganda tools at their disposal, they are falling apart, despite winning both world wars, a cold war and continuing to remain the foremost power in advanced scientific research.

Every country has some factors which act as a binding glue for their population, at the same time, every country also has factors which act as fault lines. It is wholly the job of the ruling elites (intel agencies) who formulate the core definition of their country's nationhood to define it in such a way that the factors which cause disaffection between various groups are downplayed and the factors which cause national pride are played up, for the nation to remain strong.

The Europeans, despite winning so many wars, could not keep their own house in order. First Northern Ireland broke away from UK, citing differences in their Christianity. Then the remaining Ireland started a violent struggle against the British using IRA militia. Then Scotland wants to become free from England, and UK wants to be free from EU.

In the above case, there was more common ground for ALL parties to join hands, than there were differences. In the end, they are all White skinned Christians. There is more reason to be united based on a common Caucasian heritage and common Bible. Still they fell apart citing differences of ethnicity (Irish, Scottish, English).

On the other hand, in India, we have so many states, religions, races, sub-races, cultures, castes etc, STILL we have managed to stay united because our idea of nationhood is solid. We had more reasons (excuses) for anyone to exploit and splinter away but we still stayed together, and the Europeans had more reasons to stay together still they fell apart.

The fact is that the only good thing that happened to the white race was that a handful of scientists in 1940 made some scientific breakthroughs which allowed them to win the world war and become global powers, that's it, nothing else. Apart from that, their life philosophy, worldview etc is extremely primitive and they understand nothing but jungle law (strong eats the weak). Had they lost the world war, everyone would be learning German now.

As a corollary all the bad things which are associated with India are actually a result of losing a few wars, and not because our civilization/ philosophy was faulty. We lost some wars, it lead to foreign invasions and our culture was distorted.

British have no reason to feel superior and Indians have no reason to feel inferior simply because of winning or losing a war in the past. The west has not won a single war after WW2 (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, all lost or stalemate but no clear victory). India has won all wars since independence. We will keep winning and reverse this trend of cultural decline.

India is consolidating its nationhood, making scientific breakthroughs in the outer space domain, winning wars AND spreading our philosophy to the world. On the other hand the west has started losing wars, their countries are breaking apart, and people are shunning their major Abrahamic philosophies and losing faith in their family system to embrace atheism and radical individualism. How long can such a decaying civilization last where the family structure is broken. An undivorced 40+ year old person in the west is considered as a rare alien these days. Their society has collapsed and their aircraft carriers cannot save their marriages.

The west knows it is in decline, it is just the self-loathing Hindus who refuse to accept it.

 

[Krusty]

Russia is also White Christian (Orthodox) but they are still fighting with White Protestant Christians of US. The fact is that the only good thing that happened to the white race was that a handful of scientists in 1940 made some scientific breakthroughs which allowed them to win the world war and become global powers, that's it, nothing else.

Bro, most of them were Jews. I'd say almost everyone. Christians did nothing. Oppenheimer, Feynman, Serber, Frankel, Perlman, Weinberg, Bohm, Morrison, Noveik, and most famously, Einstein who were the driving brains behind the manhatten project (first atomic bomb) were ALL Jewish. Later they went on to form the base of the American science R&D and basically built the platform that made USA the leading military power that it is now. All Jewish brains.

 

[pringles]

Bro, most of them were Jews. I'd say almost everyone. Christians did nothing. Oppenheimer, Feynman, Serber, Frankel, Perlman, Weinberg, Bohm, Morrison, Noveik, and most famously, Einstein who were the driving brains behind the manhatten project (first atomic bomb) were ALL Jewish. Later they went on to form the base of the American science R&D and basically built the platform that made USA the leading military power that it is now. All Jewish brains.

True. And look how the Christians have historically treated the Jews.

Jews have always faced persecution in Christian nations. In fact, they have lived more safely in Muslim nations than Christian nations. The Torah was given national recognition as a holy book by the Shah of Iran till he was overthrown by the west. Iran only became anti-Jew after the Iyatollah took power. Even in Palestine, the Muslims welcomed and sheltered Jews who were fleeing persecution from Christian lands.

There are Christian think tanks actively studying the core of Hinduism to find fault lines to exploit. We must do the same. They have their share of differences which can be widened by proper needling (protestant, catholic, orthodox, mormon), just like the shia, sunni, ahmediya, sufi divide.

This requires deep cunning and cannot be discussed openly but must be the core of our national strategy doctrine. Protestants are smaller in number but they form a major demographic chunk in powerful nations within the Christian world (US, Germany), and Catholics form the large bulk of Christian population, but most Catholic nations are poor nations so their numbers don't count for much (Brazil, Philippines). We must sign trade deals and military deals with these weaker nations with the sub-conscious intention to propping them up and making their dissenting voice stronger within their own Christian community. It will cause an intellectual conflict among themselves. Already the Philippines president was taking potshots at Obama and Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff (Catholic) is facing action by the US. Not to mention our Orthodox Christian bro, Putin. When all branches of Christianity will be more concerned with spending a larger % of their budget tackling other branches of Christianity, they will leave India alone (rather, they wont have the cash left to convert Indians).

Not to forget, this : Philippines President Calls Out Vatican For Pedophilia

Ya Allah! what is happening in the Christian world. I am sure we have nothing to do with it (apart from the fact that we have signed multi billion dollar military and economic pacts with Brazil and Philippines and (nuclear pact with) Argentina over the decades). Hinduism is a religion of peace, bro.

 

[Screambowl]

I still don't know why people would entertain @OrangeFlorian
He is a wannabe chela of @pmaitra , @Bornubus and
@Indx TechStyle why did you referred to him when you posted about that daily mail article

He is not even 18 take him easy or just ignore. Gen gap buddy lol