attack on shia muslims in pakistan

[Bornubus]

Muslims are much safer in Indian than failed state of Paksitan.Jinnah would have been killed for being a shia if he were alive today.

Sunni Punjabi Awam loves to persecute Non muslims,Ahmadia,Shia and Hazara.

 

[maomao]

Muslims are much safer in Indian than failed state of Paksitan.Jinnah would have been killed for being a shia if he were alive today.

Sunni Punjabi Awam loves to persecute Non muslims,Ahmadia,Shia and Hazara.

Punjabis were never this fanatic! If you read history of pakistan you will realize punjabis were radicalized by Ahmadias, Muhajirs and to some extent Shias seeking refuge from India! Heck Punjabi muslims have historically always been docile slaves of all!

And it is said Karma is a.......

 

[Bornubus]

Punjabi muslims have historically always been docile slaves of all!

And it is said Karma is a.......

Punjabi Muslims never had a small Kingdom let alone empire,mughals appointed Indians (Rajput) as governors to rule over them,foolish punjabis always expected Afghans to liberate them from Sikhs in the name of Islam,while pashtun/Afghans look down on them both racially and culturally.

weakling Punjabi musilms are the most pathetic and filthy race in this entire subcontinent,even stateless Rohingya are better than Punjabi musalman.

 

[Screambowl]

Punjabi Muslims never had a small Kingdom let alone empire,mughals appointed Indians (Rajput) as governors to rule over them,foolish punjabis always expected Afghans to liberate them from Sikhs in the name of Islam,while pashtun/Afghans look down on them both racially and culturally.

weakling Punjabi musilms are the most pathetic and filthy race in this entire subcontinent,even stateless Rohingya are better than Punjabi musalman.

not every one is like gurkha, garhwali , maratha or pathan you know. These people are blunt and fearless. Where as punjabis are more diplomatic and buttering type. And when they are Punjabi Muslim, then forget the words.

 

[Screambowl]

“Extremists groups are being trained and supervised by the state military and intelligence institutions to target religious minorities in Balochistan. A systematic genocide of Shia Hazaras in areas like Quetta and Mastung by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi which is headquartered in Punjab. Other similar groups have been targeting Christians, Hindus and Zikris which is aimed to confuse the international community and malign the secular Baloch movement and to label it as religious terrorism”, He said while addressing the participant in the conference.


http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1251817

LeJ was already mentioned by Balochi leader NB Bugti in June 2015.

 

[Bornubus]

not every one is like gurkha, garhwali , maratha or pathan you know. These people are blunt and fearless. Where as punjabis are more diplomatic and buttering type. And when they are Punjabi Muslim, then forget the words.

Add Ahir,jat,Gujjar,Mohyal Brahmin,Sikh and other,India is a land of the bravest communities for ages faught and defeated Greeks to Germans and Japanese only when we are United.

BTW Punjabi mualims were not always this pathetic,they were freedom loving people but Political Islam not only enslaved their ancestors but most importantly took their Identity and made them weak ******s resulting from Incest.

 

[thethinker]

Congratulations Pakistan!
Take care of your minorities first rather than sermonizing about recent isolated events in India.
Net freedom report notes rise in online blasphemy allegations


ISLAMABAD: Allegations of blasphemy related to online content have registered an increase in Pakistan, according to the recently-released ‘Freedom on the Net 2015’ report.

Compiled by Freedom House – a US government-funded organisation that conducts research and advocacy on democracy, political freedom, and human rights issues - the report once again awarded Pakistan a ‘Not Free’ score on internet freedom.

On a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 being the worst, Pakistan received a 69. According to a press release issued by the Digital Rights Foundation (DRF), 2015 marks the fourth consecutive year that Pakistan has been categorised as ‘Not Free’.

Earlier, Pakistan had earned its best score of ‘partly free’ in 2011.

The report highlights that blasphemy allegations levelled online have increased in the 2014-2015 period. It also stated that a hacking attack on a surveillance software company, Hacking Team, revealed that Pakistani intelligence had been interacting with the company for years and that law enforcement agencies had wanted software that would work with older mobile phone models common in Pakistan.

Despite being a defining moment in the ongoing conversation in Pakistan about surveillance and internet freedom, the Hacking Team revelations received little national attention. According to DRF Executive Director Nighat Dad, this may have been because there was no concrete evidence linking intelligence officials to the company itself.

The report discusses aspects of internet freedom such as content filtering, the legal environment, surveillance, rights and violations, availability and ease of access, intimidation and violence and technical attacks.

A press release quoted Freedom on the Net research analyst Madeline Earp as saying, “We are troubled to report that Pakistan’s poor internet freedom score failed to improve in 2015. Communications shutdowns, violence, and blasphemy charges related to online content continue to restrict the environment for ordinary internet users. The government has also failed to lift the ongoing ban on YouTube.”

The report also cited increasing online harassment and threats to free expression online. It stated that while incidents and reports of such incidents have increased in Pakistan – over 3,000 cybercrimes were reported to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) between August 2014 and August 2015 – many victims do not come forward “for fear of losing access to ICTs”.

It added that even as technical attacks and online harassment cases increase, the FIA often ignores attacks affecting regular users. The report states that the FIA said that “due to the absence of a law defining cybercrime, the body is unable to ensure that all criminals will be brought to justice”.

However, the report goes on to state that efforts to pass an anti-cybercrime law have been problematic.

It states that existing laws can invoke either blasphemy or terrorism to limit expression, and that the fiercely debated draft Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2015 could give intelligence agencies “unrestricted mass surveillance powers”.

Published in Dawn October 29th, 2015