Anti-Modi Resolution in America

[Mad Indian]

Not mine, yours, or anyone's to control. Your party needs to start vetting its candidates more carefully. This is common practice in 1st-world politics, but I'll understand if the concept seems foreign to you.

For example: this is why you'll rarely see reputable US politicians make negative remarks about mohamedians. Even though such remarks would probably be quite popular, it would make them unsuitable for higher office where it is important not to antagonize overseas interests.

Thats why American idiots should stop commenting on Indian politics and politicians. Modi has not commented on Muslims if thats what you meant. And if you meant he presided over killings of Muslims, then nope, Supreme court has found him "not guilty". Even if he is guilty, its none of your govt's damn fuking business. We dont pass resolutions here in Indian parliament about why blacks/arabs/muslims are racially profiled in your airports, neither do we pass resolutions about why american prisons are selectively filled with Blacks nor do we care about the religious freedom of USA where only Christians can become presidents.

 

[skumar7777]

Not mine, yours, or anyone's to control. Your party needs to start vetting its candidates more carefully. This is common practice in 1st-world politics, but I'll understand if the concept seems foreign to you.

For example: this is why you'll rarely see reputable US politicians make negative remarks about mohamedians. Even though such remarks would probably be quite popular, it would make them unsuitable for higher office where it is important not to antagonize overseas interests.

Seriously, this is bizarre. You mean that the Republican Party vetted its candidates when it chose someone like Bush Jr? Your rules and standards are not good enough.

Saying something about Muslims makes people unsuitable for higher office where it is important not to antagonise overseas interests? What about bombing the hell out of them and alienating half the Arab world while pandering to their autocrats?

 

[Mad Indian]

Seriously, this is bizarre. You mean that the Republican Party vetted its candidates when it chose a dumbo like Bush Jr

Dont forget that retard Sarah Palin!

 

[sam80]

And more to it , It has Paki Angle as well . Members in Resolution are Lobbyist of Pakistani Pigs as well ..................

 

[lookieloo]

@Mad Indian @skumar7777

The term "for example" seems lost you. Likewise, your contextless moral relativism vis-a-vis "Sarah Palin" or "W" is all too typical of 3rd-world $hitheads on the internet.

Nothing for it. If you want to squat in the mud and bawl like (whatever the Hindu term is for provincial hicks)... I can't stop you.

 

[sam80]

So we need to Push Resolution against Obama , this guy Supporting terrorists in Syria . Who knows tomorrow he will push them in Bangladesh backyard of India.

 

[praneet.bajpaie]

@Mad Indian @skumar7777

The term "for example" seems lost you. Likewise, your contextless moral relativism vis-a-vis "Sarah Palin" or "W" is all too typical of 3rd-world $hitheads on the internet.

Nothing for it. If you want to squat in the mud and bawl like (whatever the Hindu term is for provincial hicks)... I can't stop you.

Stop being personal. There is no need for such language here.

 

[sam80]

@Mad Indian @skumar7777

The term "for example" seems lost you. Likewise, your contextless moral relativism vis-a-vis "Sarah Palin" or "W" is all too typical of 3rd-world $hitheads on the internet.

Nothing for it. If you want to squat in the mud and bawl like (whatever the Hindu term is for provincial hicks)... I can't stop you.

when you last time passed resolution on your allies country leaders ??? you offer diplomatic immunity to Pakistani Masterminds of Mumbai Attack . You are sick people . You have allies like paki , saudi , Syrian Jihadis . You want to push saudi Agendas in world . Taliban , Osama were American Friends until they waged war against America . you helped paki to kill millions of Bangladeshis in 1971.

 

[Mad Indian]

@Mad Indian @skumar7777

The term "for example" seems lost you. Likewise, your contextless moral relativism vis-a-vis "Sarah Palin" or "W" is all too typical of 3rd-world $hitheads on the internet.

Nothing for it. If you want to squat in the mud and bawl like (whatever the Hindu term is for provincial hicks)... I can't stop you.

The very fact that those dung heads were your presidents/president nominees and the fact that dungheads like yourself choose to defend them speak volumes of the American intelligence

We all know about american war crimes and religious intolerance. You and taliban are a match made in heaven. May God Bless american onlee

 

[sam80]

No less blame on indian side , where are indian lobbyist ? is Sonia so desperate that she silently supporting it and no opposition from Indian Lobbyist for Political gains . This Sonia Gandhi has sold India to Foreign agents .

 

[LurkerBaba]

I hope , your words makes sense to you . It's Indian Politics not American . Control your Christen Trolls in congress.

It's not just the Christian trolls, this resolution cuts across party lines. Republicans as well as the Democrats are supporting it.

The bipartisan resolution was introduced by Congressmen Keith Ellison from the Democratic Party and Joe Pitts from the Republican Party last November.

 

[Illusive]

It seems US is hell bent on making even India its enemy.

 

[sam80]

It's not just the Christian trolls, this resolution cuts across party lines. Republicans as well as the Democrats are supporting it.

You Think Democrat Don't have Christen Trolls ? Both of them have . In fact biggest Christen troll of Democrats is Foreign Secretory "John Curry" Which Is Also Israel Hater and Pakistan Lover.

 

[LurkerBaba]

You Think Democrat Don't have Christen Trolls ? Both of them have . In fact biggest Christen troll of Democrats is Foreign Secretory "John Curry" Which Is Also Israel Hater and Pakistan Lover.

Yeah, but Keith Ellison doesn't seem like one (cursory look at his Wiki page)

 

[sam80]

Yeah, but Keith Ellison doesn't seem like one (cursory look at his Wiki page)

He is First Muslim in US congress , He lobbied for Muslim Brotherhood in 2008

Currently he is Pakistani Lobbyist . He is Anti-India Guy .

Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Keith Ellison Introduces Bill Blaming Hindus for Violence Which was Committed by Islamic Jihadists : Freedom Outpost


Lobbying for Pakistan - Ali Eteraz

 

[sam80]

Pakistani/Islamist Angle Behind Anti-modi Resolution In America

Keith Ellison He is First Muslim in US congress , He lobbied for Muslim Brotherhood in 2008

Currently he is Pakistani Lobbyist . Hardcore Anti-india Guy


It should be no surprise that Muslim Congressman Keith "Hakim Muhammad" Ellison recently introduced anti-India and anti-Hindu legislation in Congress - H.R. 417.
In 2007, Ellison took his oath of office on a Koran, a book that commands Muslims to wage violent jihad against non-Muslims and institute an Islamic government or caliphate under shariah or Islamic doctrine.


In 2008, Muslim Brotherhood front, the Muslim American Society (MAS), financed Ellison's pilgrimage to Mecca or Hajj to the tune of $13,350. The Muslim Brotherhood has stated that "Muslims must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands...so that...Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."


Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Keith Ellison Introduces Bill Blaming Hindus for Violence Which was Committed by Islamic Jihadists : Freedom Outpost


Pakistani Lobbyist

Lobbying for Pakistan - Ali Eteraz

 

[sam80]

Re: Pakistani/Islamist Angle Behind Anti-modi Resolution In America

U.S. Congressmen Joe Pitts (R-PA) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) this is main gang of lobbyist.

 

[skumar7777]

@Mad Indian @skumar7777

The term "for example" seems lost you. Likewise, your contextless moral relativism vis-a-vis "Sarah Palin" or "W" is all too typical of 3rd-world $hitheads on the internet.

Nothing for it. If you want to squat in the mud and bawl like (whatever the Hindu term is for provincial hicks)... I can't stop you.

If 1st-world (so called) $hitheads on the internet like you cannot get over their contextless delusional moral superiority, it is upto us 3rd-world heathens to point it out to you. But it is good to see Bush Jr touching a raw nerve. Kissinger, anyone?

Talk about not antagonizing overseas "mohamedians" and bombing them to hell twice over! Does this not even strike you as hypocritical for a moment? Do you think the rest of the world is going to continue accepting garbage?

Please keep your senseless sermonising to yourself and protect what is left of your democracy.

 

[Dark Sorrow]

And US is any different. It is also good at bullying weak neighbors only? Has Iraq had more Human rights violations than China or does it have more weapons of mass destruction than China?

I doubt US will have the balls to deny Visa to Modi if he becomes PM. But modi should not visit US . India should look to Europe for finances and east asia for technology and leave US stranded.

When US invades Iraq they do after massive PR campaign that seem like they are freeing oppressed from a tyrant on the other hand Russia is behaving like WWII Nazis. Even when we entered Bangladesh is '71 we proved the world about the atrocities and hence their was no severe backlash (Except for US due to Cold War).
Once Modi becomes PM US will have to issue him visa or it will be international issue. Americans are businessmen. More Americans support Modi than their are who oppose him. American's are very particular about PR hence don't openly support him. Their are some pysdo-secular among them too who carry around flag of Morality and so but most of them (American's) are indifferent about him.

 

[sam80]

Re: Pakistani/Islamist Angle Behind Anti-modi Resolution In America

In 2008, Muslim Brotherhood front, the Muslim American Society (MAS), financed Ellison's pilgrimage to Mecca or Hajj to the tune of $13,350