Another Proof of Marx's Folly: Cuba

[Adux]

Adux,

Here are the details about statistical normalisation. Read it. What happens in the USA satisfies the theories and processes in the link below. I challenge you to post the formulae used for mark normalisation in Kerala. If they agree, it will be proven that you are an imbecile of grade 1.

Normalization (statistics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ah! Wiki, all the while still not explaining how 'mark normalization is employed in the US, and how different streams have actually tried to make their grading more clearer so as to get a the proper result of mark normalization. But then, your tiny pea brain; dont have the capacity for such actions.

Anyways regarding Kerala

This is how the 'tripe' that is Mark Normalization is done in Kerala http://www.cee-kerala.org/docs/keam2011/normalization_how_it_works.pdf

Curtailing these numbers as 100 is tantamount to bringing the mark closer to the average and denying the student the benefit of better performance. This has affected a large number of students securing high marks in examinations other than that of the Kerala board, submits the former principal who is presently the dean of engineering at Amrita Viswa Vidya Peetham at Coimbatore.

Normalization method flawed, says expert - Times Of India

There is a feeling among some in the CBSE stream that the State board is bit relaxed and liberal. It is said that a student having a rough idea about a topic may get marks in the State board examination even if they do not completely reproduce it in the answer scripts. But in CBSE, answers have to be reproduced accurately to score marks.

Interestingly, CBSE parents who are teachers in State schools are more worried than parents from other professions. The anxieties of teacher-parents are often contagious, and they take the lead in shifting their children from the CBSE to State schools after Class X.

I want people to read this paragraph. See how above the socialist send their kin to the best private schools and abroad to earn dollars, but they want the ordinary Indian to reel under the pressures of their evil ideology. This is coming from the 'HINDU' mind you.

The Hindu : Education Plus : Students in CBSE stream get the willies

Kerala board = Unionized fiefdom of leftist nutjobs. Who wants kids not to get a job, so they can enrol into SFI and later CPI.

Now read and learn something.

 

[pmaitra]

Ah! Wiki, all the while still not explaining how 'mark normalization is employed in the US, and how different streams have actually tried to make their grading more clearer so as to get a the proper result of mark normalization. But then, your tiny pea brain; dont have the capacity for such actions.

Anyways regarding Kerala

This is how the 'tripe' that is Mark Normalization is done in Kerala http://www.cee-kerala.org/docs/keam2011/normalization_how_it_works.pdf



Normalization method flawed, says expert - Times Of India






I want people to read this paragraph. See how above the socialist send their kin to the best private schools and abroad to earn dollars, but they want the ordinary Indian to reel under the pressures of their evil ideology. This is coming from the 'HINDU' mind you.

The Hindu : Education Plus : Students in CBSE stream get the willies

Kerala board = Unionized fiefdom of leftist nutjobs. Who wants kids not to get a job, so they can enrol into SFI and later CPI.

Now read and learn something.

Listen you idiot, I want to go back to the topic and not worry about mark normalisation. Open a new thread and discuss it there.

Yes, Wiki. Are you claiming the formulae in Wiki are wrong? Fine, then buy this book and help yourself:

Point proven: Mark normalisation in both places follow the same principles.

I do not care whether one feels that mark normalisation is flawed or not. It is a matter of policy. Now quit embarrassing yourself. Go look at yourself in the mirror.

Edit: For those who have doubts about the legal validity or mark normalisation in the USA, here is one example. Do keep in mind that rules may vary from state to state and state funded schools are oftentimes obligated to pass out a certain number or % of students:
http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/current/registrar/gradenormalization.stj


Quoting for convenience:

Adux,

Here are the details about statistical normalisation. Read it. What happens in the USA satisfies the theories and processes in the link below. I challenge you to post the formulae used for mark normalisation in Kerala. If they agree, it will be proven that you are an imbecile of grade 1.

Normalization (statistics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit:

Never mind, I don't expect you to respond.

Read the equation at the bottom of page one and the equations for mean and standard deviation on page four in the link below:
http://www.cee-kerala.org/docs/keam2011/normalization_how_it_works.pdf

Now try to figure out what kind of a nincompoop you are!

 

[Adux]

Listen you idiot, I want to go back to the topic and not worry about mark normalisation. Open a new thread and discuss it there.

Yes, Wiki. Are you claiming the formulae in Wiki are wrong? Fine, then buy this book and help yourself:

Point proven: Mark normalisation in both places follow the same principles.

I do not care whether one feels that mark normalisation is flawed or not. It is a matter of policy. Now quit embarrassing yourself. Go look at yourself in the mirror.

Edit: For those who have doubts about the legal validity or mark normalisation in the USA, here is one example. Do keep in mind that rules may vary from state to state and state funded schools are oftentimes obligated to pass out a certain number or % of students:
School of Law Faculty Statement on Grade Normalization
Quoting for convenience:

So mark normalization will be equitable, when we you are given marks are given liberally for 'writing question numbers' and attempt? while in CBSE, you are graded with greater integrity and strictness? A little daft arent you. When you talk about the formulae, but at the same time you have no comprehension of the fact, integrity of the results of the formulae depends on the integrity of the inputs of the formuale! You are such a little twit, that you are not getting to understand the fact, that by unions and their dependent government are trying to kill off the private school's by having two sets of standards and making it easier for students to get undue and unfair marks in the government schools while denying the same in CBSE. They brought in mark normalization for 50% of the Entrance marks, and then liberally started giving marks to their board. So whatever happens, CBSE students are always going to be 14% lesser than the state government schools students, even if they are equal.

Government abusing its power as usual. Which is alright and dandy for you, since you are calling for socialism sitting in United States of America, earning money as a taxi driver.

Read it a bit slowly, you can get it .

 

[pmaitra]

So mark normalization will be equitable, when we you are given marks are given liberally for 'writing question numbers' and attempt? while in CBSE, you are graded with greater integrity and strictness? A little daft arent you. When you talk about the formulae, but at the same time you have no comprehension of the fact, integrity of the results of the formulae depends on the integrity of the inputs of the formuale! You are such a little twit, that you are not getting to understand the fact, that by unions and their dependent government are trying to kill off the private school's by having two sets of standards and making it easier for students to get undue and unfair marks in the government schools while denying the same in CBSE. They brought in mark normalization for 50% of the Entrance marks, and then liberally started giving marks to their board. So whatever happens, CBSE students are always going to be 14% lesser than the state government schools students, even if they are equal.

Government abusing its power as usual. Which is alright and dandy for you, since you are calling for socialism sitting in United States of America, earning money as a taxi driver.

Read it a bit slowly, you can get it .

I haven't read anything. This thread has got nothing to do with mark normalisation. You don't get it when told once, twice or thrice, do you? Mark of Attention Deficit Disorder.

Open a new thread.

 

[Adux]

I haven't read anything. This thread has got nothing to do with mark normalisation. You don't get it when told once, twice or thrice, do you? Mark of Attention Deficit Disorder.

Open a new thread.

So what happened to your challenge and earlier to that your assertion that Mark Normalization is the same through out the world. Your idiot if you thought that just because of the formula. Now, that you have lost yet again, you are into your trademark shifting of goal posts and into 'open a new thread'. When your daft little airhead cant see how something like mark normalization is being used by the unionist and socialist to curb advantage to the masses, because of their want to protect their turf. As usual, you are found wanting. Happens when you are a two faced hypocrite.

 

[Naren1987]

@pmaitra,
I've said this many times and I'll say it again, Socialism is a failure, a FAILURE.
And in India it's even worse because it cannot have a merit based recruitment for its social services like in Sweden,Norway, etc.
The only centralized system that worked was Germany in the third Reich, and you know that a government like that is just not possible in India.

 

[pmaitra]

@pmaitra,
I've said this many times and I'll say it again, Socialism is a failure, a FAILURE.
And in India it's even worse because it cannot have a merit based recruitment for its social services like in Sweden,Norway, etc.
The only centralized system that worked was Germany in the third Reich, and you know that a government like that is just not possible in India.

Sure, you are free to say anything any number of times. Even capitalism has failed, hasn't it? There is a reason why the world moved towards free market economy.

 

[The Messiah]

There are more capitalistic countries in the dumps today than socialistic ones.

But the ideology isn't entirely to blame for that.

 

[Naren1987]

Sure, you are free to say anything any number of times. Even capitalism has failed, hasn't it? There is a reason why the world moved towards free market economy.

You're living in a country built by Capitalism, it's crony capitalism that is the culprit.
Capitalism is private profits and private losses, not Private profits and socialized losses.

 

[pmaitra]

You're living in a country built by Capitalism, it's crony capitalism that is the culprit.
Capitalism is private profits and private losses, not Private profits and socialized losses.

India was not built by Capitalism. It was built by Socialism.

Capitalism is private profit at the cost of social losses.

 

[Naren1987]

There are more capitalistic countries in the dumps today than socialistic ones.

But the ideology isn't entirely to blame for that.

Really?
Is that why South Korea is better of than North Korea?
It is overspending that is about to kill the EU.
Greece,Spain, the countries about to kill the Euro, these are Laissez faire capitalist economies?

 

[The Messiah]

If poor man turns at a hospital and doesn't have any money then should he be treated or turned away ?

 

[Naren1987]

India was not built by Capitalism. It was built by Socialism.

Capitalism is private profit at the cost of social losses.

I'm talking about the US?
At least that's what your location says where you live.
India was a built country in 1991?, you seem to be on something really powerful.

 

[Naren1987]

If poor man turns at a hospital and doesn't have any money then should he be treated or turned away ?

I'll gladly pay his medical bills at a private hospital, if that receipt can get me a tax rebate, I wanna cut the middle man.

 

[The Messiah]

Really?
Is that why South Korea is better of than North Korea?
It is overspending that is about to kill the EU.
Greece,Spain, the countries about to kill the Euro, these are Laissez faire capitalist economies?

How about starting with africa ?

no one is saying socialism is a perfect system but doesn't mean we shouldn't highlight failures of capitalism.

 

[pmaitra]

I'm talking about the US?
At least that's what your location says where you live.
India was a built country in 1991?, you seem to be on something really powerful.

Yes, I am living in the US, I said India was built on Socialism. The US is Capitalist with a fair mix of Socialism. Read up on the housing bubble and social security.

And what's up with 1991? What is your point?

 

[The Messiah]

I'll gladly pay his medical bills at a private hospital, if that receipt can get me a tax rebate, I wanna cut the middle man.

I thought i was an idealist

But seriously in a purely capitalistic society he'd be turned away from the hospital if he doesn't have the money to pay for his treatment.

 

[Naren1987]

How about starting with africa ?

no one is saying socialism is a perfect system but doesn't mean we shouldn't highlight failures of capitalism.

I said it was crony capitalism,
Crony corporatism is not the same as capitalism, I'm talking about, of course is no bailouts, etc.
Just like Stalinism is not the same as the welfare state(a destructive system as well)
What was about that reference to Africa?

 

[Naren1987]

Yes, I am living in the US, I said India was built on Socialism. The US is Capitalist with a fair mix of Socialism. Read up on the housing bubble and social security.

And what's up with 1991? What is your point?

India is NOT a built country, Einstein, her infrastructure compares to African countries, same goes for poverty rates, Hunger, malnutrition.
Citing India as an example of Socialist success is not going to win you any debates.
I'm talking about 1991 to state that the Indian economy was poor, bankrupt, with the lowest GDP per capita in South Asia, ie NOT A BUILT FIRST WORLD COUNTRY.

 

[Naren1987]

I thought i was an idealist

But seriously in a purely capitalistic society he'd be turned away from the hospital if he doesn't have the money to pay for his treatment.

That's why I'm saying, I'd pay for it instead.