Alexander the Great Invades India

Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,882
Likes
48,595
Country flag
Seleucid-Mauryan war


Name of the war: Seleucid-Mauryan war
Year: 305-303 BC
Venue: Northwestern India; mainly the Indus River Valley


When Alexander the Great died in 323 BC, his military commanders or followers, also known as "the Diadochi", broke apart his vast empire and began to fight among themselves for 20 long years (322-301 BC), referred to by the historians as the Wars of the Diadochi. One such cavalry commander, Seleucus I Nikator, took control of the eastern lands, from Mesopotamia to Central Asia and India, which were left ignored by others. Seleucus Nikator, became the King of Persia, Syria and Bactria and proclaimed himself as the founder of the Seleucid Dynasty. During that time, after the death of Alexander, Chandragupta Maurya, another great emperor (ruled: 324–301 BC), had established a strong empire in India, "The Mauryan Dynasty". He expanded his rule westwards to present-day Southern Afghanistan and had driven out the Greeks from the Indian soil. Seleucus, therefore, wanted to restore these territories and move further to the east of Indus.

The reasons that led to the battle

Historians mention that it was Chandragupta Maurya's love for Helen, the daughter of Seleucus Nikator that led to the war between the two emperors. In Greek History, Chandragupta was referred to as Sandrocottus. He had secretly seen Helen and was mesmerised by her beauty and charm and fell in love with her the moment he saw her and thought of marrying her. For this, he seeked advice from his counsellor and advisor, Chanakya, who suggested that the only way to get married to her was by declaring war against Seleucus. In the meantime, Seleucus, not aware of the power of Chandragupta Maurya, while establishing his empire in Persia and Eastern India, was secretly aiming to take over the Western India as well. This was, however possible, only by conquering North India, which was under the Nanda Empire. And it was Chandragupta Maurya, who conquered the North India, raised an alarm to Seleucus about the growing power of Chandragupta Maurya. Thus, in 305 BC, Seleucus with his huge army advanced to fight against Chandragupta Maurya to conquer India, which he considered his rightful inheritance.

The strength of warring forces

The original strength of Seleucus' army was 50,000 which expanded by including 10,000 Bactrian recruits. On the other hand, the Indian army led by Chandragupta Maurya had 600,000 infantry, 30,000 cavalry, 9,000 war elephants.

Aftermath of the battle: Winner and Loser
Winner: Chandragupta Maurya, The Mauryan Empire
Loser: Seleucus, The Seleucid Empire

In the terrible Seleucid–Mauryan war on the northwest borders of India, Seleucus and his Greek army could not withstand the destructive attack on them by the valiant Indian fighters of the Mauryan Empire. The army of Chandragupta Maurya defeated the Greek invaders. There were many factors that led to the victory of Chandragupta Maurya. Besides the huge army and cavalry, Alexander's invasion also gave ideas to the Indian about the Greek methods of warfare. Moreover, Chandragupta's bravery and Chanakya's sharp intelligence led him build up such an extensive empire with a vast well-trained and well-equipped army.

The larger implications of the battle

As soon as Seleucus lost the battle, he was forced to sign the peace treaty, which included the following:
Sign a marital treaty, also referred to as "Epigamia" in Greek terminology, in which, Chandragupta Maurya, advised by Chanakya, married the daughter of Seleucus, Helen, as an alliance between the two empires.
Seleucus surrendered his territories Herat, Kandhar, and the Kabul valley in Afghanistan to Chandragupta Maurya.
Chandragupta also received vast territories on the west of the Indus, like the Hindu Kush, and the Balochistan province of Pakistan.
Seleucus also surrendered the satrapies (governors) of Arachosia (Kandhahar), Paropamisade (Kamboja and Gandhara), and Gedrosia (Balochistan).
Chandragupta Maurya conquers all of the Macedonian Satrapies in the Indus River Valley.
In return, Chandragupta gifted 500 war elephants to Seleucus, which helped him get victory against western Hellenistic kings in the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BCE.
Diplomatic relations were established, which led to trade missions and missionary expeditions as well.
Many Greek scholars, historians were invited to the Mauryan court. One special mention was the historian Megasthenes, who wrote a famous book entitled "Indica", giving a detailed account of his stay at the Mauryan court and of Chandragupta Maurya.
Another Greek ambassador to the Mauryan court at Pataliputra was Dimakos.

The overall place and significance of the battle in the Indian History

Though not much of detailed accounts of this war are available, but studies reveal that Seleucus faced a crushing defeat against the Mauryan emperor and his dream of conquering India was shattered forever.
Meanwhile, Chandragupta Maurya, kept on expanding his empire and established a strong centralised state. In fact, he was the first emperor to annex most of Greater India into one state.
According to Megasthenes, this centralised state, the capital of which was Pataliputra, was "surrounded by a wooden wall pierced by 64 gates and 570 towers and displayed the artistic splendours and expertise of Persian sites such as Susa and Ecbatana."
Chandragupta's son Bindusara extended the rule of the Mauryan dynasty, towards the central and the Southern India. It is mentioned that he conquered the land between the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal (the land between the two seas).
Mamulanar, the famous Tamil poet of the Sangam literature, also describes how the Deccan Plateau was invaded by the Maurya army.
Bindusara's son, Ashoka, also known as Ashoka the Great, was a brilliant ruler, commander who re-asserted the Mauyan Empire's superiority in the Southern and Western India. But it was his Kalinga War (262–261 BCE) which proved to be the turning point of his life.

Fifty years or so after Asoka's death, the huge Mauryan Empire began to decline. But, nevertheless, the Mauryan Empire in India was the first great empire in India's long history. The Mauryan dynasty was also one of the great empires of the Ancient world.


Seleucid-Mauryan War : Venue, Year, Reasons, Winner, Loser, Aftermath, Significance
 

anupamsurey

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
1,032
Likes
514
Country flag
for all reasons, i believe that there is no such a thing like Alexander's tomb.

see alexander was a greek (follower of Hellenic religion) and what greeks used to do was burn the dead body with three coins (drachma)- as a ferry charge across the styx. so when you are burning the dead body, where do you get a tomb from?. in that case only a memorial can be built. and what makes you think that the tomb/memorial of a great conqueror like alexander will go unnoticed?
 

Varahamihira

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
245
Likes
291
Country flag
First and foremost,Alexander wasn't a Greek.He was a Macedonian.
And he wasn't The Great.A guy who makes a treaty with Persians to let them go free,kills them from behind when they were leaving.What's great in it.

And one thing I never understood.The so called The Great defeated King Porus who was hardly mentioned(may be no where mentioned) in any of the ancient Indian texts(,It's somewhat odd as ancient Indians kept records of important events) returns not only the Kingdom to Porus but the Kingdoms that Alexander also won,why? Doesn't make any sense,a guy who killed Persians from behind after making a treaty is so willing that he gave what he won after so much of struggle.

May be he never won a war against Purushottam.He lost the war and surrendered.And as it was practiced by the Indian Kings in those times,Purushottam let him off with Alexanders' remaining soldiers.

May be later he died of injuries he suffered during the war against Purushottam.
That's why the Hollywood movie Alexander flopped as it has shown Alexander getting injured by Purushottam.The West didn't liked it as there hero lost to a King who was hardly mentioned in ancient Indian texts.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,882
Likes
48,595
Country flag
Alexander is given his status because as a symbolic gesture he is credited for paving the way for later colonization of the Middle East and Asia by the west. Lot of the real history is unknown. But the fact remains Alexander's army was decimated in india and his advance stopped at india. Like many others also in history.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,882
Likes
48,595
Country flag
http://www.padfield.com/1993/alex.html

Treated Like A King
by David Padfield
The greatest battle of Alexander the Great was fought in India at Jhelum. The Indian infantry attacked with 20,000 men and 130 elephants. The trumpeting, ferocious elephants were defeated at great cost to Alexander.

Porus, the Indian rajah, led the final elephant charge in person. He lost more than 12,000 troops while trying to stop the Macedonian phalanx; both of his sons were also killed in battle. Porus was finally captured and brought to meet Alexander. Arrian, the Roman historian, described the meeting:

"Alexander, informed of his approach, rode out to meet him, accompanied by a small party of his Companions. When they met, he reined in his horse, and looked at his adversary with admiration: he was a magnificent figure of a man, over seven feet high and of great personal beauty; his bearing had lost none of its pride; his air was of one brave man meeting another, of a king in the presence of a king, with whom he had fought honourably for his kingdom.

"Alexander was the first to speak. 'What,' he said, 'do you wish that I should do with you?'

"'Treat me as a king ought,' Porus is said to have replied.

"'For my part,' said Alexander, pleased by his answer, 'your request shall be granted. But is there not something you would wish for yourself? Ask it.'

"'Everything,' said Porus, 'is contained in this one request.' The dignity of these words gave Alexander even more pleasure, and he restored to Porus his sovereignty over his subjects, adding to his realm other territory of even greater extent." (The Campaigns Of Alexander, p. 281).
 

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
http://www.padfield.com/1993/alex.html

Treated Like A King
by David Padfield
The greatest battle of Alexander the Great was fought in India at Jhelum. The Indian infantry attacked with 20,000 men and 130 elephants. The trumpeting, ferocious elephants were defeated at great cost to Alexander.

Porus, the Indian rajah, led the final elephant charge in person. He lost more than 12,000 troops while trying to stop the Macedonian phalanx; both of his sons were also killed in battle. Porus was finally captured and brought to meet Alexander. Arrian, the Roman historian, described the meeting:

"Alexander, informed of his approach, rode out to meet him, accompanied by a small party of his Companions. When they met, he reined in his horse, and looked at his adversary with admiration: he was a magnificent figure of a man, over seven feet high and of great personal beauty; his bearing had lost none of its pride; his air was of one brave man meeting another, of a king in the presence of a king, with whom he had fought honourably for his kingdom.

"Alexander was the first to speak. 'What,' he said, 'do you wish that I should do with you?'

"'Treat me as a king ought,' Porus is said to have replied.

"'For my part,' said Alexander, pleased by his answer, 'your request shall be granted. But is there not something you would wish for yourself? Ask it.'

"'Everything,' said Porus, 'is contained in this one request.' The dignity of these words gave Alexander even more pleasure, and he restored to Porus his sovereignty over his subjects, adding to his realm other territory of even greater extent." (The Campaigns Of Alexander, p. 281).
In movie Alexsnder he says the same thing to the sister of dead king of Persia, Darius. Legend or not....
 

Varahamihira

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
245
Likes
291
Country flag
http://www.padfield.com/1993/alex.html

Treated Like A King
by David Padfield
The greatest battle of Alexander the Great was fought in India at Jhelum. The Indian infantry attacked with 20,000 men and 130 elephants. The trumpeting, ferocious elephants were defeated at great cost to Alexander.

Porus, the Indian rajah, led the final elephant charge in person. He lost more than 12,000 troops while trying to stop the Macedonian phalanx; both of his sons were also killed in battle. Porus was finally captured and brought to meet Alexander. Arrian, the Roman historian, described the meeting:

"Alexander, informed of his approach, rode out to meet him, accompanied by a small party of his Companions. When they met, he reined in his horse, and looked at his adversary with admiration: he was a magnificent figure of a man, over seven feet high and of great personal beauty; his bearing had lost none of its pride; his air was of one brave man meeting another, of a king in the presence of a king, with whom he had fought honourably for his kingdom.

"Alexander was the first to speak. 'What,' he said, 'do you wish that I should do with you?'

"'Treat me as a king ought,' Porus is said to have replied.

"'For my part,' said Alexander, pleased by his answer, 'your request shall be granted. But is there not something you would wish for yourself? Ask it.'

"'Everything,' said Porus, 'is contained in this one request.' The dignity of these words gave Alexander even more pleasure, and he restored to Porus his sovereignty over his subjects, adding to his realm other territory of even greater extent." (The Campaigns Of Alexander, p. 281).
Hahaha....
Bogus story.

In India Alexander killed civilians including children for no reason would give Purushottam who waged a war against him equal status and spare his life?
Laughable story.


And also if you see the so called historians quote historians who revived this "The Great" story after India's First War of Independence.To show us,in ancient times India came into existence because of Alexander.This is the old form of India came into existence in 1947.

And these Distortians not able to answer why a ruthless king like Alexander who didn't spared even the lives of children gave his Kingdoms to Purushottam.
 
Last edited:

Hari Sud

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
3,797
Likes
8,532
Country flag
Bogus hIstory for sure.

Pours was not captured in the battle. The battle was not over yet. He knew of his impeding loss but his 10,000 personal guard surrounded him for protection. It was no immediate win for Alexander. He could have forced his way into Porus position but that will cost him about 5,000 to 10,000 dead Greeks. That was not acceptable to Alexander. That is when Alexander's men helped by Ambhi went looking for Porus's Guru. They brought him to the battlefield to gently persuade Porus to give up. The Guru pleaded for the lives of the soldiers and his well being to prevent Ambhi from taking over his state. That is when Porus agreed to disarm himself and made his way to meet Alexander to discuss terms..........

Rest is now well known. It is Porus surrender part which is a bogus history.
 

Shaitan

Zandu Balm all day
Mod
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
4,654
Likes
8,364
Country flag

Ancient Indian Military Attire

Military of Ancient India
 

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,950
Likes
7,908
Country flag
LOL

Purshottam (Porus) f*cked Alexander badly in the Battle of river Vitasta/Jhelum and this was the reason why Alexander's men did not have courage to march forward.
 

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
It is sad to see what has come of those countries that Alexander once united. His legacy is totally wasted....

A lot of his ideas are now adapted in EU...
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
It is sad to see what has come of those countries that Alexander once united. His legacy is totally wasted....

A lot of his ideas are now adapted in EU...
not wasted at all. saw a documentary there were tribes deep in Afghan mountains (Hindu Kush?) of Macedonian descent telling of their saga to this day. also some places named after Alexander (?)though with varied localized pronunciations.

~Tapa talks: Orange is the new black.~
 
Last edited:

Shaitan

Zandu Balm all day
Mod
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
4,654
Likes
8,364
Country flag

Ancient Indian Military Attire

Military of Ancient India
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top