Aircraft carriers gain clout in naval power

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by LETHALFORCE, May 8, 2011.


    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Feb 16, 2009
    Likes Received:

    ABOARD THE CHARLES DE GAULLE — Despite growing controversy about the cost and relevance of aircraft carriers, navies around the world are adding new ones to their inventories at a pace unseen since World War II.

    FILE -- In this Tuesday, April 12, 2011 file photo, France's flagship Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, navigates in the Gulf of Sirte, off the Libyan coast. Despite growing controversy about the cost and relevance of aircraft carriers, navies around the world are adding new ones to their inventories at a pace unseen since World War II. The United States _ with more carriers than all other nations combined _ and established naval powers such as Britain, France and Russia are doing it. So are Brazil, India and China _ which with Russia form the BRIC grouping of emerging economic giants.(AP Photo/Christophe Ena, File)
    More Nation & World stories »

    "The whole idea is about being able to project power," said Rear Adm. Philippe Coindreau, commander of the French navy task force that has led the air strikes on Libya since March 22.

    "An aircraft carrier is perfectly suited to these kinds of conflicts, and this ship demonstrates it every day," he said in an interview aboard the French carrier Charles de Gaulle, which has been launching daily raids against Moammar Gadhafi's forces since the international intervention in the Libyan conflict began March 22.

    The 42,000-ton nuclear-powered carrier has been joined in this task by another smaller ship, Italy's 14,000-ton Giuseppe Garibaldi. None of the U.S. Navy's supercarriers have been involved, despite American participation in the war's initial phase.

    The U.S. Navy still operates 11 nuclear-powered carriers, mostly Nimitz-class vessels displacing up to 100,000 tons.

    The floating fortresses became the backbone of U.S. sea power after WWII, projecting military might around the world in crises and in conflicts such as Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Kosovo and Afghanistan.

    Lee Willett, head of the maritime studies program at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based military think tank, said the war in Libya illustrated the usefulness of carriers to other navies with more regional interests.

    France and Italy, the NATO nations closest to the North African coast, chose to deploy their ships on operations although they have air force bases within easy reach, he noted.

    "All around the world there are major and not-so-major navies now looking into getting into some form of sea-based airpower," Willett said. "They may not want to be global powers but they certainly want to have some regional power-projection capability."

    The exact number of aircraft carriers in service worldwide is difficult to establish because of the proliferation of vessels that are classified as amphibious warfare ships, helicopter carriers or even cruisers or destroyers — but that fit the classic definition of a carrier as a mobile air base with a flat deck from which aircraft take off and land.

    These include the United States' eight 41,000-ton Wasp-class amphibious warfare ships, whose standard complement includes Harrier jets and SuperCobra helicopter gunships, in addition to transport choppers.

    The French Mistral Class, Britain's HMS Ocean, and Spain's Juan Carlos I share the same concept of multipurpose ships that can carry strike jets, helicopters and hundreds of marines for amphibious landing operations.

    Even Japan's two Hyuga class "destroyers" have the characteristic flat deck, effectively making them carriers despite their official designation.

    "At the end of the day, the popularity of carriers is due to the fact that these are very flexible platforms that can be used for a wide variety of tasks and not just warfare," said Nate Hughes, director of military analysis at the U.S.-based think tank Stratfor.

    The U.S. Navy is scheduled to induct the Gerald R. Ford, the lead ship of a new class three-ship class of supercarriers, in 2015. Each is expected to cost about $9 billion.

    Other NATO nations adding flattops to their fleets include Britain, already building two ships, and France, which is considering procuring a second nuclear-powered vessel. Spain and Italy have just inducted two new flattops.

    China and India are both in the process of acquiring revamped Soviet-built carriers, and India is also building its first homegrown flattop. Russia will modernize its Admiral Kuznetsov carrier next year to extend its life until after 2030, and plans to acquire French Mistral-class ships.

    Brazil has completed an extensive refit of the recently acquired French carrier Foch — now renamed the Sao Paolo — which has become its navy's flagship.

    "The BRIC navies in particular are all getting into ... major aircraft carriers," said Willett.

    Military experts have long debated the relevance of aircraft carriers, which some have dismissed as relics of the Cold War.

    "What many countries don't realize is that sustaining operations at sea is a very complex task," Hughes said. "The magnitude of the expense necessary to get to that sort of fixed wing capability that the U.S. and French navy have is difficult to overstate."

    Some critics say the entire concept of the seagoing air base is now antiquated. They contend that advances in anti-ship weapons have turned the carriers into white elephants that are just too expensive to risk losing in a war.

    While the mammoth floating airports bristling with jets and missiles appear invincible, the reality is that since World War II they have mostly been used in conflicts with far weaker opponents. They have yet to face off against modern navies with their array of carrier-killing ballistic missiles, super-torpedos, and supersonic cruise missiles.

    "These new technologies make it easier to target carriers from much greater distances," said Benjamin Friedman, a research fellow with the Washington-based CATO Institute.

    "Those technologies are set to advance faster than the ability to defend against them, meaning that in a couple of decades the carrier business may not be viable anymore."
  3. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Glad that the article is centred on CdG. She makes one proud of the flagship projecting power to Afghanistan to Africa in the same year. This is her 6th month in operations since relaunch and still going strong, crew serving beautifully. I hope this impress the need on the government of having a second carrier... it must really or we cannot always conduct these operations.
    A.V. likes this.
  4. prototype

    prototype Regular Member

    Aug 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    AC's r now days used more (among developing nation's) as a symbol of status rather than forward power projection,I dont know for what exact reason India and China are running after AC's.

    For both India and China projection of power in their respective zones does not need AC's,as most of their targets r in striking distance.Now the question is can India cruise into South China sea with an AC for power projection,that is going to be suicidal,the same stands for China.

    The article states it right that this mammoth complex can be only used against weaker nation's those which lack serious naval and air power.
  5. shuvo@y2k10

    [email protected] Senior Member Senior Member

    Apr 4, 2010
    Likes Received:
    aircraft carriers could also be sitting ducks to anti ship ballistic missiles like the one which china is developing.even the russian might develop their own asbm.
  6. bhramos

    bhramos Elite Member Elite Member

    Mar 21, 2009
    Likes Received:
    But still India would use AC at the end of war, not beginning, as of like 1971 war, for India or China its a symbol of status.. for India to become a king of IOR.. as know other country posses an AC, even Until now it was Symbol of status and pride... as no other country in Asia posses an AC...
  7. bengalraider

    bengalraider DFI Technocrat Stars and Ambassadors

    Oct 10, 2009
    Likes Received:
    in a fast food joint next to the imperial shipyard
    An aircraft carrier is and shall remain a potent symbol of "gunboat diplomacy".Also the carrier platform offers the host nation with far more flexibility as far as humanitarian support ops are concerned . Also as far as naval ops are concerned aircraft operating out of a carrier platform can provide CAP to any fleet and deter airborne operations against aforesaid fleet to a much farther distance than any shipborne SAM can .
    As far as India is concerned we may not be able to cruise into the south china sea but we can use carrier borne aircraft in say an operation against Al Qaeda targets in Yemen with the cooperation of the Yemeni authorities and that is what matters.
    A.V. likes this.
  8. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    May 26, 2010
    Likes Received:
    There is nothing like CV/AC striking distance..

    A Aircraft can travel 3000km and fires a cruise missile of another 2000kms via conventional means..

    Nothing on the planet gives such capability..

    AC/CV are not much vulnerable to cruise missiles as a CV/AC is always protected by layers of other warships..

    Having a Carrier Group in the Ocean posses greater danger for all types of hostile vessels..

    India and China have large parts of oceans and sea for surveillance, And there is nothing better than a CV/AC..

Share This Page