Those strikes are of the more active period ,early they were 2-3 strikes (initial phase ,it is written in the article).It also include the bombing of Kurds by Turks in Iraq and Syria ,Qatar and Saudi mythical bombing of ISIS. NATO does invade poor country like Libya,Syria because it is easy win.If they wanted to fight seriously they can destroy Taliban in months .I use Crimea as example of how prepared their forces are. NATO is nothing without the US.US provide 75% of budget and 90% of attack capability.NATO is just a cover of US military. Can you provide a link for the latest link for no of bombs dropped by the collation(could not find it).Lets compare the bombs dropped by collation and Russian and were they dropped it in Syria and decide who is fighting ISIS.Let the fact to the talk ,we will know who is fighting who.
Yeah, I'm not really interested in going through numbers with you. You're typical of the pro Russian posters here in that you live in your own fantasy world made up of ridiculous boasts/ lies.
NATO never invaded Libya, unless you include a few teams of British SAS excuating foreigners, nor has there been much effort to put boots on the ground in Syria.
NATO contributed hundreds and hundreds of thousand of soldiers, and immense amounts of equipment and naval and aviation assets, for over a decade, to operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. To try and claim Russian troops crossing their border into the Crimea is in any way is beyond the capability of NATO is a classic example of the stupidity of pro Russian trolls here.
As I've been saying in this thread Russia isn't just in different league to NATO, there are playing a whole different sport.
It's like if Mumbai's U16 "Galli cricket" champions went to the Gabba to play test cricket against Australia and the Mumbai kids were talking them selves up in the press before the game.
As for Russian military they are using laser and TV Guided bombs. Unguided bombs are used with Su 34 which has a software that places them within 1 m of target
Not, 99 or 101 cm then? 1960's technology...
Indian Army is 100 times better fighting force then Finnish army in any combat .
Not, 99 or 101 times better?
The no of technical parameters for MRCA was over 600,was more 6 times the no tanks you have .We selected Rafael and other countries like Egypt,Qatar followed .
600 times the baksheesh you mean.
I'm done with you. Have when fun with the thread and your responses. I'll be ignoring you, along with Gadeshi, for a while.
There is a saying "Quantity [ read numbers] is a Quality of its own"...
I like that quote. Although, from what I understand, it's usually accredited to Stalin but a whole lot people claim he never said it. Although, working out what's truthful when it involves Russians, and particularly Communist Russians, is a bit of a pointless exercise.