Zebra
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,060
- Likes
- 2,303
According to Pakistan Defence - India didn't exist untill 1947
Then from where the hell "Indian Ocean" name came from....!
According to Pakistan Defence - India didn't exist untill 1947
Then from where the hell "Indian Ocean" name came from....!
Syeds would be direct descendant of Arabs (they would claim to be descendants of Mohammed) that makes them highest caste equivalent to Brahmins; but I would not generalize his ancestors of being invaders and trying to convert India.
In case of India it was the Turkic tribes and to lesser extent the Pashtun tribes (themselves converted by Turkics) who did that.
Arab invasion in India was limited to Sindh and majority of Sindh people remained connected to native culture despite long Islamic rule which shows their number can't be significant.
Majority of Arabs in India came as economic migrants. They in general served local Indian kings- both Miuslim as well as Hindu kings. Anyway most would have married local women.
But off course lot of Syeds are just converted Hindus claiming to be Syed to get higher caste status, so take such claims with a pinch of salt.
And these are the same guys who believe Pakistan existed since the time of Ghaznavis and Ghoris...some even stretch it to the time since human beings walked on earth!!View attachment 6706
Pakistan Defence @defencepk
India didn't exist until the 15th of August 1947.
•Retweets 12
•Likes 33
• View attachment 6708
7:45 AM - 23 Nov 2015
Very well said..Pakis hold conflicting beliefs. They see themselves as Arabs but also know deep down their DNA is pretty much non Arabic.
This kind of contradictions and confusions give rise to a denial and anger about what they really are and so try to attack everything that reminds them of their origin i.e India.
To sum it up, reposting this below graphic as Pakis experience cognitive dissonance all the time :
This is why you see Paki trolls always emphasize on skin colour of "darkie" Indians, Hinduism, Indian gods and so on. They simply try to deny and erase their roots as this kind of conflicting beliefs literally drives them crazy.
Good one!!They believe prophecies of Ghazwat Al Hind (Conquest of India) in the Hadith but India doesn't exist for them.
No. Pakistan became independant from a slave colony called British India. So did Bharat. So did MyanmarAccording to Pakistan History book, India separated from Pakistan in 1947. Pakistan broke in 1947.
No. Pakistan became independant from a slave colony called British India. So did Bharat. So did Myanmar
This below
became these two
today are these four
Pakistan
Myanmar
Bangladesh
and Bharat
And here they all four as they were in the slave colony called British India.
Awesome catchThey believe prophecies of Ghazwat Al Hind (Conquest of India) in the Hadith but India doesn't exist for them.
http://www.hudson.org/research/11167-prophecy-the-jihad-in-the-indian-subcontinentn one May 2013 TTP video, entitled “Ghazwa-e-Hind 3,” footage of militants loyal to Mullah Fazlullah are supplemented with a critique of ISIS for limiting its jihad to Kashmir. According to Fazlullah, “the India jihad begins from Attock [in Pakistan]; the India jihad is in the land of Pakistan; the area of Lahore is in the India jihad; Multan is in India; all the towns of Punjab are in the India jihad that we are waging. Therefore, the Ulema should rise up and explain the borders of the India jihad, explain these sayings of Prophet Muhammad, explain to the public the boundaries of India, which areas were in India 50 years ago, what were their boundaries…”17
And this will become Baluchistan, Sindh, FATA, And Pakisytni Punjab further very shortly.Pakistan
You guys may have enough inferiority complex to define identity by colonization of western maleechas. Indians have not.No. Pakistan became independant from a slave colony called British India. So did Bharat. So did Myanmar
This below
became these two
today are these four
Pakistan
Myanmar
Bangladesh
and Bharat
And here they all four as they were in the slave colony called British India.
Yes you are. :biggrin2:Hey my friend. You mentioned Atanz. Well here he is. So I get "tempted easy". Very interesting.
Dono milke lete haiSorry, didn't notice you before.
Yes you are. :biggrin2:
Anyway z welcome to our Forum.
"India" the term came before 1947, given by British. So pakis are wrong there itself.Yes, the name "India" was coined only later. Before that it was just Hindustan.
abe kya jhand log hai yar..@Screambowl
@SREEKAR
@Blackwater anybody on PDF. There's another farhan named Talwaar e pakistan claims that pakistan has its own independent history.
Some guys wanna play with him with me. I'm named as bad guy.
Ghar wapsi ??Ur statement is wrong . U should say
Convert back to Hinduism [emoji38][emoji38][emoji38][emoji38][emoji38]
This is your problem. Someone says believe in one guy, you guys start believing in him and then kill everyone else who goes against him.So why indian seaching for previous life?
Modi belivez in punarjanam.
how could u go against ur pm.
"Brahmin terrorism" ??????Bhai I am a syed so definitely not vedantist convert but yes my ancestors were Christian convert.
I am a proud hindu and hind is my parents country and Insha allah time will come when land of hind become a state of muslim and vedantist. Muslims and true vedantist must join hands to curb brahmin terrorism and zionist sponsored islamists.