Are you trolling or just very clueless?
I will apologize if you feel offended. I simply try to discuss the potential of this new organization suggested.
And I have good reason to question it: remember last time, India did formed a similar one---Non align movement. What did this one archive? Nothing!
Well first an Indian block would be every nation that wants to reform the security council, so you can expect India, Japan, Germany, Brazil to join off the bat. Now that's already a pretty solid coalition.
Well, the first, this so called "Indian block" is only the idea of the members in this forum, not even Indian government's idea; Second, ironically, the reason these 4 countries creating this coalition is to promote their status within UN instead of quite UN; third, none of Big 4 is giving up their effort after so many years, that tell you how much they think of their own capability and influence.
Add to that ever nation that the P5 have abused, mistreated, disrespected or ignored via the UN and you have the beginnings of a powerful populist international movement. Probably the MAJORITY of nations have a problem with the UN, so the potential support base is most of the nations on earth. The UN is also famous for being impotent, a new block could be organized and implemented far better.
One of major reason that P5 can abuse, mistreat or even disrespect others is they have the veto power. So far, the Big 4 has been focusing on sharing this power instead of removing this power from any member of UN. So, basically, India and others intention is to make themselves a new member of P5, not making everyone equal.
The block wouldn't be designed to project the members FROM the P5, how many UNSC resolutions have been against the P5? But the new block could do one hell of a job maintaining world order, especially without the biases of the current P5, imagine a truly democratic new UN that is actually able to get things done.
Your plan sounds good. But have you ever think about how to get things done? Who is making the contribution? At what portion? Since you suggest a truly democratic new UN, then I assume everyone gets the same value of vote so it is safe to say everyone is bearing same share of contribution. Now, hypothetically, a disaster happens in a Southern American country--a member of this new UN, who seeks help from the new UN. But, naturally, some African countries would turn it down because they really don't have spare resource to support. Obviously, either some big countries in the organization, such as India, promises to pay the bill, or this south American country has to find help somewhere else. Ok, this time India agrees to make up the gap. What about next time, and after? If every time, it is always the big countries like India carrying the major responsibility, certainly, your public will ask the question:" if we are doing far more than average, shouldn't we get more vote than others?"
Now, you may say:" we are still a truly democratic UN since no one can veto any proposal." So, now, let's check the second stage--what can this organization offer you. Since you are already the top powers in this UN, there is fewer chance you need the aid from this organization. But you still want to benefit from this organization. So the only way is you use your vote to help your allies and your allies provide economical or political benefit as reward. There are 2 ways to do that--passing the bills favour your allies or rejecting the bills against your allies. Since you don't have majority vote, you have to spend your own resource to get supports which may not make sense economically. You realise that after spending billions dollars each year, you still need to pay for each individual bills.
I'm not saying it's the perfect solution or a good idea for now. But dismissing it with silly comments like "why those small countries join you if you can do nothing for them?" imply that you are either not very well versed in international politics, bigoted to the point of delusions, or simply attempting to insult and troll others.
Or maybe you can name one example of any country joining an international political organization for purely moral cause.