11 Dead in Shooting at French Satirical Weekly's Office in Paris

[ladder]

To protest peacefully is a democratic right. Is killing one? And they say they are so called protectors of 'democracy'.

 

[Mad Indian]

Hey don't forget about Venice and Lepanto too.

But who really fought them hardly until the end were the Albanians with Skanderberg

Skanderbeg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And the reason French under Napoleon had to fight Ottomans was because the Ottomans had been a very strong ally of the French Nobility(and hence the French Royalists and the French Crown) and the Ottomans wanted to restore monarchy to France. It had nothing to do with stemming the Ottomans nor protecting Europe against Ottomans. In fact, French revolution was in many ways against the Catholic church of the time!

Modalvians with stephen III

Stephen III of Moldavia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and the well known Vlad III (aka Dracula)

Yep, his treatment of the invading Turk army(he impaled 30000 heads of the Turks in a Flag pole right?) was so frightening that it birthed the legendary Count Dracula !

 

[thethinker]

And now a terror scare in Metro

[tweet]552855802214883329[/tweet]

leela jacinto "@leelajacinto
International news reporter at FRANCE 24


En route to Place Republique demo, metro #8 temporarily halted due to suspicious pkg at a station. Paris on edge today.

 

[Peter]

Hey don't forget about Venice and Lepanto too.

But who really fought them hardly until the end were the Albanians with Skanderberg

Skanderbeg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modalvians with stephen III

Stephen III of Moldavia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and the well known Vlad III (aka Dracula)

Vlad III aka Dracula was once a vassal of Ottoman Turks. Also the French helped the house of Savoy in their wars against other Italian minors and Austria/prussia etc. Italian reunification would have been difficult if not outright impossible without French aid.

 

[Mad Indian]

Yes France was allied with Ottomans for only a short time. They ditched the alliance later

Dude, learn proper history. France was allied with Ottoman empire for political reasons and was a strong ally of them for many centuries! It never was a Vangaurd for the Christians, as you made it out to be. It was the Spanish, the Austrians and Venice(in some cases) who defended Christianity for centuries.

.
Now you got the part about Spain wrong. Spanish people killed a lot of natives in America and created mulatto population there. France was allied with Ottomans in name only. The Siege of Vienna which was another turning point in world history was won with the help of the French. Also check out Battle of Tours.

In India the Spanish-Portuguese alliance tried to create a Christian catholic state by converting all Hindus. So much fior their greatness. Goan inquisition happened under Portugal which was in a personal union under Spain for 100 years. Also the present Spanish monarchs are all from French Bourbon dynasty.

None of which changes the fact that it was Spain which stemmed the Islamic entry into western europe

 

[ladder]

Can we get back to 2015 please.

 

[Peter]

And the reason French under Napoleon had to fight Ottomans was because the Ottomans had been a very strong ally of the French Nobility(and hence the French Royalists and the French Crown) and the Ottomans wanted to restore monarchy to France. It had nothing to do with stemming the Ottomans nor protecting Europe against Ottomans. In fact, French revolution was in many ways against the Catholic church of the time!



Yep, his treatment of the invading Turk army(he impaled 30000 heads of the Turks in a Flag pole right?) was so frightening that it birthed the legendary Count Dracula !

However victory at battle of Tours was due to the French you have to admit.

As for interests the Spanish were no different. Many Spanish dukes were vassals of the Almoravids during the Muslim rule of Iberia. Also the French were the first to help in the reconquista of Spain.

 

[Mad Indian]

Vlad III aka Dracula was once a vassal of Ottoman Turks. Also the French helped the house of Savoy in their wars against other Italian minors and Austria/prussia etc. Italian reunification would have been difficult if not outright impossible without French aid.

And he rebelled against the Ottomans and freed his nation from vassalage. Anyway, France was never an anti-islamic state in History!

Anyway, lets leave it here. I think French are wise people who learn fast and won't talk nonsense and politically correct BS about educating Muslims to prevent them from becoming terrorists like many Indians here do

 

[Peter]

Dude, learn proper history. France was allied with Ottoman empire for political reasons and was a strong ally of them for many centuries! It never was a Vangaurd for the Christians, as you made it out to be. It was the Spanish, the Austrians and Venice(in some cases) who defended Christianity for centuries.



None of which changes the fact that it was Spain which stemmed the Islamic entry into western europe

Dude don`t wanna argue. Both Spain and France were good nations. Ok

Sadly Spain is now ruled by a French dynasty.


House of Bourbon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Mad Indian]

I am pretty sure that if such an incident happens in India, uber secutards would be condemning the Modi govt and the RSS for provoking the peaceful Muslims

 

[CrYsIs]

RIP innocent victims

 

[Peter]

And he rebelled against the Ottomans and freed his nation from vassalage. Anyway, France was never an anti-islamic state in History!

Anyway, lets leave it here. I think French are wise people who learn fast and won't talk nonsense and politically correct BS about educating Muslims to prevent them from becoming terrorists like many Indians here do

Which country contributed the most during the crusades. The Christian crusader states were set up by whom? Who had Europe`s largest population?

Crusades - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Answer these questions first.

France was in every respect the leader of the Crusades. While the First Crusade was led by lords who would not have regarded themselves as French, from the Second Crusade onward, French kings played a prominent role in all but the Fourth and the Sixth. Moreover, French knights made up the largest part of the steady flow of reinforcements throughout the two-hundred-year span. French knights also comprised the majority in both the Hospital and the Temple. The Templars, in particular, held huge commanderies throughout France and by the 13th century were the principal bankers for the French crown. Finally, the French occupied the premiere position in the songs of the troubadours, which served as a kind of popular press. That is to say, in the minds of many, the French were the leaders of the crusading movement; indeed, the usual Arab name for all crusaders, regardless of nationality, was Franj.

Also I am correct about education. No one is born a terrorist. If a Muslim baby is adopted by americans he will become american in his outlook. If he is given to a tribe in africa he will become a tribal.

http://europeanhistory.boisestate.edu/crusades/Europe/france/01.shtml

 

[Screambowl]

Same old nonsense as to how terrorists are uneducated? Its not like creation of bombs and pulling off a terror attack this magnitude requires any education is it? And people not educated in madarassas dont turn into terrorists?

There is something fundementally wrong with that pathetic religion. Just name it. Being politically correct idiots is not going to help anyone but the terrorists and their sympathisers(the supposedly moderate but very very silent majority?)

Christianity, Judaism and Islam are in conflict to recognize whose prophet and ideologies are correct after Abraham/Ibrahim. Jesus was an arabi only or you call some one from middle east, so was Mohammad. The europe went into transformation , that was 'golden age' when they had big minds like Newton, Einstein, Curie who gave technological benefit to christians and jews. Muslims left behind.

Ibn Tehmiya was the first theologian to use Jehad as an offensive tool of brutality against the advancing Mongols and Europeans. Then came al Wahab to carry his way of fighting war. This is an ongoing war since ages and this will go on. Important is, Hindus should not get involved into this unless until there is a threat to national security and only upto threat level not beyond that.

 

[Nicky G]

More PC BS:

[TWEET]552858699161563136[/TWEET]

 

[arnabmit]

Just look at the lunatic flip-flops of this lowlife!

[TWEET]552846096125263872[/TWEET]

So what happened to freedom of speech now? Why should the cartoons not be reproduced?

 

[Mad Indian]

Christianity, Judaism and Islam are in conflict to recognize whose prophet and ideologies are correct after Abraham/Ibrahim. Jesus was an arabi only or you call some one from middle east, so was Mohammad. The europe went into transformation , that was 'golden age' when they had big minds like Newton, Einstein, Curie who gave technological benefit to christians and jews. Muslims left behind.

Ibn Tehmiya was the first theologian to use Jehad as an offensive tool of brutality against the advancing Mongols and Europeans. Then came al Wahab to carry his way of fighting war. This is an ongoing war since ages and this will go on. Important is, Hindus should not get involved into this unless until there is a threat to national security and only upto threat level not beyond that.

What? We should not fight the war which is at our homeland? Hindus have been at war with Islam for the past 12 centuries, whether the marxists and the secutards accept it or not. Nothing has changed till now and nothing is going to change in the future

 

[Peter]

What? We should not fight the war which is at our homeland? Hindus have been at war with Islam for the past 12 centuries, whether the marxists and the secutards accept it or not. Nothing has changed till now and nothing is going to change in the future

What has Marxism or Secularism to do with all this? Everyone knows that Indians fought them for 12 centuries.

 

[Screambowl]

What? We should not fight the war which is at our homeland? Hindus have been at war with Islam for the past 12 centuries. Nothing has changed till now and nothing is going to change in the future

The war with Hindus, is not the war of ideology it is the geopolitical expansion of Arab.

The 3rd battle of Panipat happened between Marathas and Afghans not Hindus and Muslims. Because Maratha's Military General was a Muslim.

 

[arnabmit]

 

[Mad Indian]

The war with Hindus, is not the war of ideology it is the geopolitical expansion of Arab.

The 3rd battle of Panipat happened between Marathas and Afghans not Hindus and Muslims. Because Maratha's Military General was a Muslim.

Religion has nothing to do with politics right? You can live in your own world where every religion lives in peace.

I prefer the real world where partition and massacre happened. I live in a world where Hindus got reduced from 20% to 2% under Muslim majority. Thanks but no thanks