Alternative to Hormuz: A canal through UAE/Oman

Page 1 of 2 12 > Last >>
  1. #1
    GUARDIAN Yusuf
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    BANGalore
    Posts
    22,599
    Likes
    7993
    India
    I wonder if this is a possibility that can be explored considering the trouble that can be caused Iran if there is no regime change there which is not hardliner and is pro business if not pro west. What will be the cost of it and i am sure that the two countries would benefit from the transit charges that they will levy.

  2. #2
    Zandu balm all day Shaitan
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Judica
    Posts
    2,529
    Likes
    1858
    United States
    Why not a canal through just UAE??

    map of oman mu

  3. #3
    GUARDIAN Yusuf
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    BANGalore
    Posts
    22,599
    Likes
    7993
    India
    i saw the map. Only through UAE will still make it vulnerable to Iran. Though it is possible

  4. #4
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,707
    Likes
    1975
    Malaysia
    Why a canal? Why not a less expensive network of pipes to Oman (for Asian distribution)? Then later on to Syria (after Assad is deposed) from Iraq and SA (for EU distribution).
    Last edited by asianobserve; 29-12-11 at 11:16 AM.

  5. #5
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,707
    Likes
    1975
    Malaysia
    Here's a more detailed map:

    middle east

  6. #6
    Senior Member HeinzGud
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Posts
    1,225
    Likes
    258
    Sri Lanka
    Business mate it's all ways business. Who wants to cut the revenue of the shipping industry!

  7. #7
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,707
    Likes
    1975
    Malaysia
    I can understand that but the Saudis and the rest can also venture into pipe distribution just like how they've ventured into oil shipping...

  8. #8
    Senior Member HeinzGud
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Posts
    1,225
    Likes
    258
    Sri Lanka
    Maybe they are bit afraid about the terrorist activities!

  9. #9
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,707
    Likes
    1975
    Malaysia

    Oh, I'd rather deal with sporadic terrorist activities than be at the strategic mercy of your biggest enemy...

  10. #10
    House keeper Sridhar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,096
    Likes
    469
    Saudi are already Shipping Oil From Red Sea. And any blockade of Hormuz will not lost longer which will not require any alternate plans.

  11. #11
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,707
    Likes
    1975
    Malaysia
    The Iraqis and Kuwaitis would still be hard hit in case of Iranian blockade. Although it may be true that Iran cannot impose a prolonged blockade...

  12. #12

    KS

    Bye bye DFI KS
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Yank Land
    Posts
    8,023
    Likes
    5602
    India
    Iran trying to impose a blockade is like throwing shyt on its own head.

    Americans and GCC states will be shytting them in no time.

  13. #13
    DFI Technocrat p2prada
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Holy Hell
    Posts
    8,169
    Likes
    2173
    India
    The venture will not even reach the drawing board. Iran will not stop shipping anywhere. Heck even India will join the US in blowing up their ships.

    Let's assume the canal was built. Firstly the canal will be heavily dependent on the notion that Iran will block all passage, which is frankly impossible for a Navy their size.

    Secondly, the costs will be extremely high. The Middle Eastern states are rich, but not that rich. Let Dubai save itself first.

    Thirdly the costs will be amortized over many years, probably a decade or two. Costs recovery can be achieved only if Iran managed to successfully block shipping for that long and other countries use this facility.

    Lastly and most importantly, what if Iran never blocks anything? This would mean the canal would never be used and would be as big a blunder as the Palm islands, except for the fact that the Palm islands cost only a fraction of the cost compared to the "Hormuz" canal we are talking about.

    The Americans don't need a canal to ensure supplies. They can plough through any type of opposition.

  14. #14
    Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2011 W.G.Ewald
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    9,047
    Likes
    4932
    United States
    Better to deal with that unspeakable bully straight out than to look for some expensive engineering solution. Same goes for that other mentally ill country, North Korea.

    But then, we have that post-American president in the White House.

  15. #15
    Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2011 W.G.Ewald
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    9,047
    Likes
    4932
    United States
    Ok, after posting this I go to Lucianne.com and this ad appears on the page, offering dates with Persian women.

    Muslim Dating and Marriage

    How bizarre.

Page 1 of 2 12 > Last >>

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. An alternative to SSBN ?
    By plugwater in forum Indian Navy
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 28-11-12, 07:58 PM
  2. Panama Canal widening
    By W.G.Ewald in forum Americas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-05-12, 07:44 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-02-11, 12:46 PM
  4. Report: U.S., Israeli warships cross Suez Canal toward Red Sea
    By bhramos in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20-06-10, 12:33 PM
  5. Egypt offers India exclusive zone along Suez Canal
    By IBRIS in forum Economy & Infrastructure
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-10-09, 02:49 PM