Poor Arguments:
I've been thinking about this in the past couple of days, as I sit in my lectures and listen to the people who disagree with fairly reasonable evidence, or as I attend study sessions and certain topics come up.
So here I present to you the two worst ways to start an argument against something you disagree with.
A. This one pertains specifically to Evolution. I will also tell you that this argument is worse than using your religion in a way to deny other people the right to explore scientific theory.
"Well, I just don't like the feeling of us being descended from monkeys."
I'm sorry. This is just not an argument. The religion thing I understand. If you believe that humans were set on this planet in their form by God to continue procreating, that's your business and you know what? I'm not going to tell you "no you're wrong and you're a terrible human being for believing that." But let me tell you, deary, science does not care how you feel about what it presents to you.
In addition, we're not descended from monkeys. We share a common ancestor through a very long and complicated process. If you want something to feel uncomfortable about being descended from, try bacteria.
B. This one is the bigger one that I dislike and I hear all the time when I'm sitting in class. It irritates me not just because it often is paired with a statement that is either a completely obvious fact or that has no actual evidence to support it.
"Well, my teacher said"¦"
The general layout of these statements is usually: My teacher in another class that shares little expertise on this subject or is only concerned with expertise in this subject up to a certain level told me this statement that I am now presenting to you as fact despite your countless number of years of research that allows you to present evidence against this statement.
This statement is usually also followed by a particular kind of sigh, snort, rolling of the eyes or offhand remark once their statement has been disproved.
Exhibit 1: "Well, I just read this book in high school—which was last year—and my teacher told me that this was _____ " (Concerning a question concerning the context of the time the book was written and if this had an impact)
Exhibit 2: "Well, my art history teacher told me that those were actually for ____ purposes" (Concerning an archaeological discussion about the purpose of the Venus Figurines, complete with the presentation of "well this is one group's view and this is why they think so. Later following: "Well, that's 'cause they're crazy.")
I don't mean to come off as arrogant or anything in this post. I've just discovered in the past week that this is becoming a huge pet peeve of mine. Really, I don't mind differing views and opinions. I just want you to be able to explain them without regurgitating somebody else's conclusion that wasn't explained to you in full.
Source:
bad ways to debate | Tumblr