Why does Pakistan name its weapons after foreign invaders and Indian Kings?

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by Dreamhunter, Apr 10, 2016.

  1. Dreamhunter

    Dreamhunter Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2014
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    India
    Pakistan has a policy to name its missiles and other weapons after Turkic and Arab invaders like Ghazni,
    Timur, Bin Qasim, Ghori who caused more destruction and plunder in the region of modern Pakistan than
    anywhere else. These rulers do not have any connection to Pakistan apart from the fact that they invaded
    Pakistan. It is even more amusing that Pakistan named several weapons after the south Indian ruler
    Tipu Sultan who also does not have any connection to Pakistan.
    But why does Pakistan not name its weapons after its own native rulers?
     
  2.  
  3. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    1,361
    Well, they can't name their missiles after Terror kings Hafiz saeed, Masood Azhar or for that matter Zaid Hamid, can they? Probably Nawaz I ? :lol:

    But wait another 10 years or so. They probably will! :biggrin2:
     
  4. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    7,758
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    MKM and abingdonboy like this.
  5. thethinker

    thethinker Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    2,796
    Location:
    India
    It is because of one of the many psychological defects that Pakis show.

    Stockholm syndrome

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

    Stockholm syndrome
    , or capture-bonding, is a psychological phenomenon described in 1973 in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captors. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.[1][2] The FBI's Hostage Barricade Database System shows that roughly eight percent of victims show evidence of Stockholm syndrome.[3]

    Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."[4] One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual's response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be perceived as a threat.[5]
     
  6. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Stockholm syndrome, they like people who oppressed them !
     
    Kshatriya87 likes this.
  7. saty

    saty Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    ISLAM


    Erases everything related to native land so that EMPTY mind be filled with the hate book 'kuran',who ever following that hate book are their brothers and liberators.

    Indonesia/Egypt leaders stick to their past glories(because undestructable Pyramids in Egypt &Temples in Indonesia) but they never attack hate book or Pedo poppet directly why because they would be slaughtered in the streets by islamic radicals.Then slowly&steadily these countries also fall in real islam aka islamic terror.
     
    Kshatriya87, MKM and raja696 like this.
  8. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Why are Turks not taking the name of Arabs and vice versa? Pakistanis suffer with Stock holm syndrome they also like to serve Arabs.
     
  9. Bornubus

    Bornubus Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,237
    Likes Received:
    7,074
    The reason for Tipu Sultan is that they claim every successful Musalman ruler of subcontinent for themselves.

    Porks on the other have nothing in common with Turko -Mongols, Arab Bin Qasim and other Musalman warlords.They share their religion with them not Blood.

    What a Pathetic Qaum of defeated Hindus which never produced any empire and took their tormentors as heroes.It's like victim of Gangrape named her rape kids after the Rapists.

    The most funny being Babur and Ghori who crushed Paki Punjab before enter India.
     
  10. saty

    saty Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    Add Turkey TO indonesia+egypt gang.............. Wait few more years Turkey also slowly turn into Pakistan,terrorism started already.

    Koran is a war doctrine.
     
  11. suny6611

    suny6611 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    New Delhi

    R U SURE !!

    i thought it was goats & camels !!!! Persians and Arabs favourites r goats & camels.
     
    Indx TechStyle likes this.
  12. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    7,758
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    If you know, I said what pakis think, not reality.
    Otherwise we know how wonderful creatures they are. :grin:
     
  13. Syama Ayas

    Syama Ayas Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    78
    The people inhabiting the region of modern day Pakistan have been under foreign subjugation for over 2400 years.

    The foreign subjugation beginning as early as 515 BC under Achaemenid Persian empire to all the way to the British empire in 1947.

    List of foreign invaders being:
    1. Persians
    2. Huns
    3. Sychthicians
    4. Arabs
    5. Mongols.
    6. Turks
    7. Afghans
    8.British.

    There has been not a single instance of united/divided case of successful defense/resistance against these invaders.

    With such a history, the only way one can hide the shame of being subjugated is by associating onself with the invaders.

    Irony here is Afghanistan size of Pakistani state has far better record of overthrowing its invaders, not surprisingly Afghans have a strong sense of national identity.
     
    Kshatriya87, south block, MKM and 5 others like this.
  14. suny6611

    suny6611 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    New Delhi
    the most secretively weapon is osama bin laden ................... even usa could not find "it" & killed a "innocent" "hidden" man

    LINK : right out of a porki back side !!!!!!!!!
     
  15. Syama Ayas

    Syama Ayas Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2015
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    78
    Fun fact
    Ghurids were responsible for exterminating the Ghanazivds, an empire from where another Pakistani national hero Mahmud of Ghazni hailed from.

    Its like worshiping a prophet and also his assassin at the same time.
     
    Kshatriya87, MKM and Dreamhunter like this.
  16. Dreamhunter

    Dreamhunter Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2014
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    India
    Actually the history of Afghanistan is almost as bad as the history of Pakistan.
    Afghanistan was also mostly ruled by foreign invaders like the Persians, Greeks, Huns, Arabs, Turks and Mongols.
     
  17. suny6611

    suny6611 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    New Delhi

    by the way even the greek king Sikander could come only upto paki land.
    even he had a traitor from the same land to defeat & conquer that land.
    BUT HE did not dare to go east.

    poki land is a land of traitors ..... the govt. will sell the locals for their personal gains.

    all the 8 listed by u .... all were given entry to that land by the traitor of that land
     
  18. Bornubus

    Bornubus Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,237
    Likes Received:
    7,074
    Pork Mind doesn't bother such facts and history.

    Only word matter for these brain dead Betal is "Muslim"
     
  19. for truth

    for truth Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2013
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    156
    Location:
    India
    What do you think of this?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Miani

    From Wikipedia:

    "The Battle of Miani (or Battle of Meeanee) was a battle between British forces under Sir Charles Napier and the TalpurAmirs of Sindh, of today's Pakistan. The Battle took place on 17 February 1843 at Miani, Sindh in what is now Pakistan. According to Nadeem Wagan [Sindh Writer] The primary causes of the battle were that the British desired to expand their British Raj and the British General Charles Napier's ambitions.The General had held previous position as Governor of the Greek island of Kefalonia with very limited scope for glory. TheTalpur kingdom of Sindh was inefficiently and loosely governed by the Amirs and a relatively easy target as opposed to the Sikh kingdom of the Punjab. Napier moved his army aggressively from the East India Company's Bombay presidency area and entered the Sindh border. Negotiations ensued between the Talpur Amir in Hyderabad and Napier. An agreement was reached after the Amir gave significant concessions. Napier then started to move his army back towards Bombay and the Amir disbanded his army that had been mobilised. However, Napier was firmly determined in conquering Sindh and Hyderabad. Whilst moving towards Bombay and giving the impression of keeping the agreement that had been reached, he suddenly turned back towards Hyderabad on the pretext of hostile intentions by the Amir and marched with great speed towards the capital."

    The article in wikipedia is woefully lack on citations...but, there is one instance of resistance I have come across. But it wasn't much of a resistance as much as a case of humiliation.

    Quite interesting observation from the From the article:

    A British journal said of the captive Sindhi Amirs: "The Amirs as being the prisoners of the state are maintained in strict seclution; they are described as Broken-Hearted and Miserable men, maintaining much of the dignity of fallen greatness, and without any querulous or angry complainngs at this unallivable source of sorrow, refusing to be comforted"
     
    Indx TechStyle likes this.
  20. saty

    saty Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    Apart from Islam human civilization&history is always based on GEOGRAPHY.

    From ancient times this side of the Indus river is called as HIND-us(by culture). By grace of one fake God Allah there is hostile 'THAR DESERT' divides sindh,WPunjab(Pak) with present day India. Some invaders attacked and destroyed our temples but not the way they changed the entire DNA&Deen of Sindhis&W Punjabi's.

    Conclusion:BECAUSE of Thar desert still our missiles are named as Agni&Prithvi instead of Ghori&Ghajnavi. If Hindus want to worship god,it must be the God 'THAR' desert. :p :D
    [​IMG]
     
    MKM and HeinzGud like this.
  21. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    And don't forget the brave Gujara-Prathihara clan.
     
    Kshatriya87 and MKM like this.

Share This Page