A decade ago, the height difference was 1.13 cm, so Paharis were/are shorter than Punjabis, although you are
maybe catching up (I say 'maybe' because J&K statistics don't only refer to Dogras but also count in ~7 million Kashmiri population).... so no, J&K statistics are not indicative of only Dogras.. Infact, the Kashmiri population outnumbers you..
Again, J&K statistics are not Dogra stats..
You are speculating to suite yourself.. Blaming the low height requirements in army for Dogras on the Himachal Dogras, yet clubbing the Haryanvi Jats with all Haryanvis and saying they are probably same or shorter height as Dogras.. lolll.. I get the dick measuring contest, but this is getting really ridiculous.. Blaming Punjabis for something which you yourself are knee deep in!
First of all, you are comparing one specific ethnic group, Dogras, to a wide range of ethnic groups in Punjab and Haryana. Makes no sense. "Punjabi" and "Haryanvi" is as much an ethnicity as "Pahari". We already went over this..
Secondly, I'd like to see these statistics.. no such stats comparing ethnic groups exist.. You are using J&K statistics, where majority of the population is not even Dogra!! Unless you want to rely on army data.. and that doesn't suite you..
A height decrease of 0.04 cm is insignificant, so it cannot be due to migration? that makes no sense whatsoever.. and Bihari population in Punjab just shot up to 10% of Punjab's total population.. that's an insignificant demographic shift?.. loll..
I call an end to this dick measuring contest which has been based on nothing but ridiculous assertions..