Who is Vladimir Putin?

Discussion in 'Europe and Russia' started by Cadian, Jul 8, 2015.

  1. Cadian

    Cadian Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    781
    Location:
    Russia, Ryazan
    Who is Vladimir Putin? Why Does the US Government Hate Him?
    By Sharon Tennison
    Global Research, May 08, 2014

    winterpatriot.com
    Region: Russia and FSU, USA
    Theme: Culture, Society & History, Media Disinformation

    [​IMG]

    As the Ukraine situation has worsened, unconscionable misinformation and hype is being poured on Russia and Vladimir Putin.

    Journalists and pundits must scour the Internet and thesauruses to come up with fiendish new epithets to describe both.

    Wherever I make presentations across America, the first question ominously asked during Q&A is always, “What about Putin?”

    It’s time to share my thoughts which follow:

    [​IMG]
    Author - Sharon Tennison

    Putin obviously has his faults and makes mistakes. Based on my earlier experience with him, and the experiences of trusted people, including U.S. officials who have worked closely with him over a period of years, Putin most likely is a straight, reliable and exceptionally inventive man.

    He is obviously a long-term thinker and planner and has proven to be an excellent analyst and strategist. He is a leader who can quietly work toward his goals under mounds of accusations and myths that have been steadily leveled at him since he became Russia’s second president.

    I’ve stood by silently watching the demonization of Putin grow since it began in the early 2000s –– I pondered on computer my thoughts and concerns, hoping eventually to include them in a book (which was published in 2011). The book explains my observations more thoroughly than this article. Like others who have had direct experience with this little known man, I’ve tried to no avail to avoid being labeled a “Putin apologist”. If one is even neutral about him, they are considered “soft on Putin” by pundits, news hounds and average citizens who get their news from CNN, Fox and MSNBC.

    I don’t pretend to be an expert, just a program developer in the USSR and Russia for the past 30 years. But during this time, I’ve have had far more direct, on-ground contact with Russians of all stripes across 11 time zones than any of the Western reporters or for that matter any of Washington’s officials.

    I’ve been in country long enough to ponder on Russian history and culture deeply, to study their psychology and conditioning, and to understand the marked differences between American and Russian mentalities which so complicate our political relations with their leaders. As with personalities in a family or a civic club or in a city hall, it takes understanding and compromise to be able to create workable relationships when basic conditionings are different. Washington has been notoriously disinterested in understanding these differences and attempting to meet Russia halfway.

    In addition to my personal experience with Putin, I’ve had discussions with numerous American officials and U.S. businessmen who have had years of experience working with him––I believe it is safe to say that none would describe him as “brutal” or “thuggish”, or the other slanderous adjectives and nouns that are repeatedly used in western media.

    I met Putin years before he ever dreamed of being president of Russia, as did many of us working in St.Petersburg during the 1990s. Since all of the slander started, I’ve become nearly obsessed with understanding his character. I think I’ve read every major speech he has given (including the full texts of his annual hours-long telephone “talk-ins” with Russian citizens). I’ve been trying to ascertain whether he has changed for the worse since being elevated to the presidency, or whether he is a straight character cast into a role he never anticipated––and is using sheer wits to try to do the best he can to deal with Washington under extremely difficult circumstances. If the latter is the case, and I think it is, he should get high marks for his performance over the past 14 years. It’s not by accident that Forbes declared him the most Powerful Leader of 2013, replacing Obama who was given the title for 2012. The following is my one personal experience with Putin.

    The year was 1992: It was two years after the implosion of communism; the place was St.Petersburg. For years I had been creating programs to open up relations between the two countries and hopefully to help Soviet people to get beyond their entrenched top-down mentalities. A new program possibility emerged in my head. Since I expected it might require a signature from the Marienskii City Hall, an appointment was made. My friend Volodya Shestakov and I showed up at a side door entrance to the Marienskii building. We found ourselves in a small, dull brown office, facing a rather trim nondescript man in a brown suit. He inquired about my reason for coming in. After scanning the proposal I provided he began asking intelligent questions. After each of my answers, he asked the next relevant question.

    I became aware that this interviewer was different from other Soviet bureaucrats who always seemed to fall into chummy conversations with foreigners with hopes of obtaining bribes in exchange for the Americans’ requests. CCI stood on the principle that we would never, never give bribes. This bureaucrat was open, inquiring, and impersonal in demeanor. After more than an hour of careful questions and answers, he quietly explained that he had tried hard to determine if the proposal was legal, then said that unfortunately at the time it was not. A few good words about the proposal were uttered. That was all. He simply and kindly showed us to the door. Out on the sidewalk, I said to my colleague, “Volodya, this is the first time we have ever dealt with a Soviet bureaucrat who didn’t ask us for a trip to the US or something valuable!” I remember looking at his business card in the sunlight––it read Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

    1994: U.S. Consul General Jack Gosnell put in an SOS call to me in St.Petersburg. He had 14 Congress members and the new American Ambassador to Russia, Thomas Pickering, coming to St.Petersburg in the next three days. He needed immediate help. I scurried over to the Consulate and learned that Jack intended me to brief this auspicious delegation and the incoming ambassador. I was stunned but he insisted. They were coming from Moscow and were furious about how U.S. funding was being wasted there. Jack wanted them to hear the”good news” about CCI’s programs that were showing fine results. In the next 24 hours Jack and I also set up “home” meetings in a dozen Russian entrepreneurs’ small apartments for the arriving dignitaries (St.Petersburg State Department people were aghast, since it had never been done before––but Jack overruled). Only later in 2000, did I learn of Jack’s former three-year experience with Vladimir Putin in the 1990s while the latter was running the city for Mayor Sobchak. More on this further down.

    December 31, 1999: With no warning, at the turn of the year, President Boris Yeltsin made the announcement to the world that from the next day forward he was vacating his office and leaving Russia in the hands of an unknown Vladimir Putin. On hearing the news, I thought surely not the Putin I remembered––he could never lead Russia. The next day a NYT article included a photo. Yes, it was the same Putin I’d met years ago! I was shocked and dismayed, telling friends, “This is a disaster for Russia, I’ve spent time with this guy, he is too introverted and too intelligent––he will never be able to relate to Russia’s masses.” Further, I lamented: “For Russia to get up off of its knees, two things must happen: 1) The arrogant young oligarchs have to be removed by force from the Kremlin, and 2) A way must be found to remove the regional bosses (governors) from their fiefdoms across Russia’s 89 regions”. It was clear to me that the man in the brown suit would never have the instincts or guts to tackle Russia’s overriding twin challenges.

    February 2000: Almost immediately Putin began putting Russia’s oligarchs on edge. In February a question about the oligarchs came up; he clarified with a question and his answer: “What should be the relationship with the so-called oligarchs? The same as anyone else. The same as the owner of a small bakery or a shoe repair shop.” This was the first signal that the tycoons would no longer be able to flaunt government regulations or count on special access in the Kremlin. It also made the West’s capitalists nervous. After all, these oligarchs were wealthy untouchable businessmen––good capitalists, never mind that they got their enterprises illegally and were putting their profits in offshore banks.

    Four months later Putin called a meeting with the oligarchs and gave them his deal: They could keep their illegally-gained wealth-producing Soviet enterprises and they would not be nationalized …. IF taxes were paid on their revenues and if they personally stayed out of politics. This was the first of Putin’s “elegant solutions” to the near impossible challenges facing the new Russia. But the deal also put Putin in crosshairs with US media and officials who then began to champion the oligarchs, particularly Mikhail Khodorkovsky. The latter became highly political, didn’t pay taxes, and prior to being apprehended and jailed was in the process of selling a major portion of Russia’s largest private oil company, Yukos Oil, to Exxon Mobil. Unfortunately, to U.S. media and governing structures, Khodorkovsky became a martyr (and remains so up to today).

    March 2000: I arrived in St.Petersburg. A Russian friend (a psychologist) since 1983 came for our usual visit. My first question was, “Lena what do you think about your new president?” She laughed and retorted, “Volodya! I went to school with him!” She began to describe Putin as a quiet youngster, poor, fond of martial arts, who stood up for kids being bullied on the playgrounds. She remembered him as a patriotic youth who applied for the KGB prematurely after graduating secondary school (they sent him away and told him to get an education).

    He went to law school, later reapplied and was accepted. I must have grimaced at this, because Lena said, “Sharon in those days we all admired the KGB and believed that those who worked there were patriots and were keeping the country safe. We thought it was natural for Volodya to choose this career. My next question was, “What do you think he will do with Yeltsin’s criminals in the Kremlin?” Putting on her psychologist hat, she pondered and replied, “If left to his normal behaviors, he will watch them for a while to be sure what is going on, then he will throw up some flares to let them know that he is watching. If they don’t respond, he will address them personally, then if the behaviors don’t change–– some will be in prison in a couple of years.” I congratulated her via email when her predictions began to show up in real time.

    Throughout the 2000′s: St.Petersburg’s many CCI alumni were being interviewed to determine how the PEP business training program was working and how we could make the U.S. experience more valuable for their new small businesses. Most believed that the program had been enormously important, even life changing. Last, each was asked, “So what do you think of your new president?” None responded negatively, even though at that time entrepreneurs hated Russia’s bureaucrats. Most answered similarly, “Putin registered my business a few years ago”. Next question, “So, how much did it cost you?” To a person they replied, “Putin didn’t charge anything”. One said, “We went to Putin’s desk because the others providing registrations at the Marienskii were getting ‘rich on their seats.’”

    Late 2000: Into Putin’s first year as Russia’s president, US officials seemed to me to be suspect that he would be antithetical to America’s interests––his every move was called into question in American media. I couldn’t understand why and was chronicling these happenings in my computer and newsletters.

    Year 2001: Jack Gosnell (former USCG mentioned earlier) explained his relationship with Putin when the latter was deputy mayor of St.Petersburg. The two of them worked closely to create joint ventures and other ways to promote relations between the two countries. Jack related that Putin was always straight up, courteous and helpful. When Putin’s wife, Ludmila, was in a severe auto accident, Jack took the liberty (before informing Putin) to arrange hospitalization and airline travel for her to get medical care in Finland. When Jack told Putin, he reported that the latter was overcome by the generous offer, but ended saying that he couldn’t accept this favor, that Ludmila would have to recover in a Russian hospital. She did––although medical care in Russia was abominably bad in the 1990s.

    A senior CSIS officer I was friends with in the 2000s worked closely with Putin on a number of joint ventures during the 1990s. He reported that he had no dealings with Putin that were questionable, that he respected him and believed he was getting an undeserved dour reputation from U.S. media. Matter of fact, he closed the door at CSIS when we started talking about Putin. I guessed his comments wouldn’t be acceptable if others were listening.

    Another former U.S. official who will go unidentified, also reported working closely with Putin, saying there was never any hint of bribery, pressuring, nothing but respectable behaviors and helpfulness.

    I had two encounters in 2013 with State Department officials regarding Putin:

    At the first one, I felt free to ask the question I had previously yearned to get answered:

    “When did Putin become unacceptable to Washington officials and why? Without hesitating the answer came back: “

    ‘The knives were drawn’ when it was announced that Putin would be the next president.”

    I questioned WHY? The answer: “I could never find out why––maybe because he was KGB.” I offered that Bush #I, was head of the CIA. The reply was, “That would have made no difference, he was our guy.”

    The second was a former State Department official with whom I recently shared a radio interview on Russia. Afterward when we were chatting, I remarked, “You might be interested to know that I’ve collected experiences of Putin from numerous people, some over a period of years, and they all say they had no negative experiences with Putin and there was no evidence of taking bribes”. He firmly replied, “No one has ever been able to come up with a bribery charge against Putin.”

    From 2001 up to today, I’ve watched the negative U.S. media mounting against Putin …. even accusations of assassinations, poisonings, and comparing him to Hitler.

    No one yet has come up with any concrete evidence for these allegations. During this time, I’ve traveled throughout Russia several times every year, and have watched the country slowly change under Putin’s watch. Taxes were lowered, inflation lessened, and laws slowly put in place. Schools and hospitals began improving. Small businesses were growing, agriculture was showing improvement, and stores were becoming stocked with food.

    Alcohol challenges were less obvious, smoking was banned from buildings, and life expectancy began increasing. Highways were being laid across the country, new rails and modern trains appeared even in far out places, and the banking industry was becoming dependable. Russia was beginning to look like a decent country –– certainly not where Russians hoped it to be long term, but improving incrementally for the first time in their memories.

    My 2013/14 Trips to Russia: In addition to St.Petersburg and Moscow, in September I traveled out to the Ural Mountains, spent time in Ekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk and Perm. We traveled between cities via autos and rail––the fields and forests look healthy, small towns sport new paint and construction. Today’s Russians look like Americans (we get the same clothing from China). Old concrete Khrushchev block houses are giving way to new multi-story private residential complexes which are lovely. High-rise business centers, fine hotels and great restaurants are now common place––and ordinary Russians frequent these places. Two and three story private homes rim these Russian cities far from Moscow.

    We visited new museums, municipal buildings and huge super markets. Streets are in good repair, highways are new and well marked now, service stations looks like those dotting American highways. In January I went to Novosibirsk out in Siberia where similar new architecture was noted. Streets were kept navigable with constant snowplowing, modern lighting kept the city bright all night, lots of new traffic lights (with seconds counting down to light change) have appeared. It is astounding to me how much progress Russia has made in the past 14 years since an unknown man with no experience walked into Russia’s presidency and took over a country that was flat on its belly.

    So why do our leaders and media demean and demonize Putin and Russia???

    Like Lady MacBeth, do they protest too much?

    Psychologists tell us that people (and countries?) project off on others what they don’t want to face in themselves. Others carry our “shadow”when we refuse to own it. We confer on others the very traits that we are horrified to acknowledge in ourselves.

    Could this be why we constantly find fault with Putin and Russia?

    Could it be that we project on to Putin the sins of ourselves and our leaders?

    Could it be that we condemn Russia’s corruption, acting like the corruption within our corporate world doesn’t exist?

    Could it be that we condemn their human rights and LGBT issues, not facing the fact that we haven’t solved our own?

    Could it be that we accuse Russia of “reconstituting the USSR”––because of what we do to remain the world’s “hegemon”?

    Could it be that we project nationalist behaviors on Russia, because that is what we have become and we don’t want to face it?

    Could it be that we project warmongering off on Russia, because of what we have done over the past several administrations?

    Some of you were around Putin in the earlier years. Please share your opinions, pro and con …. confidentiality will be assured. It’s important to develop a composite picture of this demonized leader and get the record straight. I’m quite sure that 99% of those who excoriate him in mainstream media have had no personal contact with him at all. They write articles on hearsay, rumors and fabrication, or they read scripts others have written on their tele-prompters. This is how our nation gets its “news”, such as it is.

    There is a well known code of ethics among us: Is it the Truth, Is it Fair, Does it build Friendship and Goodwill, and Will it be Beneficial for All Concerned?

    It seems to me that if our nation’s leaders would commit to using these four principles in international relations, the world would operate in a completely different manner, and human beings across this planet would live in better conditions than they do today.

    As always your comments will be appreciated. Please resend this report to as many friends and colleagues as possible.

    Sharon Tennison

    Sharon Tennison is President and Founder of the Center for Citizen Initiatives, [email protected], Author of The Power of Impossible Ideas www.ccisf.org (under revision)

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-is-vladimir-putin-why-does-the-us-government-hate-him/5381205
     
  2.  
  3. Rowdy

    Rowdy Co ja kurwa czytam! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    2,959
    Location:
    Milky Bar
    Summing it up in one video

    like a boss
     
    Cadian likes this.
  4. anupamsurey

    anupamsurey Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    396
    Location:
    karnataka
    arrogant , narrow minded, such people are very few, hitler had similar qualities.
     
  5. SafedSagar

    SafedSagar Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    156
    This pic is enough.
    [​IMG]
    .............................................
     
    maomao, VIP, Mad Indian and 3 others like this.
  6. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    That's the head of state of Britain, helped by so many people.

    And this is the head of state of the Russian Federation, who helps millions of people—and—dolphins.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    Britain - ‘just a small island no one pays any attention to’

    I agree with Dmitry Peskov's pesky comment.
     
    Batfan, Cadian, TrueSpirit2 and 3 others like this.
  7. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    [​IMG]
    A class photo of Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg, then called Leningrad, circa 1960.

    [​IMG]
    A class photo with Vladimir Putin, (first row, third from right), circa 1964-65.

    [​IMG]
    Vladimir Putin in 1970.

    [​IMG]
    Vladimir Putin dances with his classmate, Elena, during a party in St. Petersburg, then called Leningrad, in 1970.

    [​IMG]
    A young Vladimir Putin during judo training with fellow pupil Vassily Shestakov in St. Petersburg, then known as Leningrad, in 1971.

    [​IMG]
    Vladimir Putin with his then-wife Lyudmila and daughter, Masha, in 1985.

    [​IMG]
    Vladimir Putin with his parents, Maria and Vladimir, just before his departure to Germany, in 1985.

    [​IMG]
    Vladimir Putin, then-Deputy Mayor in St. Petersburg, with then-Mayor Anatoly Sobchak in 1994.

    Source: TIME
     
    TrueSpirit2, SANITY and SafedSagar like this.
  8. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Ankit Purohit and TrueSpirit2 like this.
  9. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    And a bit of humour with Putin:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. SafedSagar

    SafedSagar Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    156
    Not just Dolphins.
    ........................................................


    [​IMG]
    In this Aug. 31, 2008, photo, then-Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin locks a collar with a satellite tracker on a tranquilized five-year-old Siberian tiger in a Russian Academy of Sciences reserve in Russia's Far East. (Alexei Druzhinin/Pool-AP)

    While Europe and the United States have imposed sanctions against Russia to weaken President Vladimir Putin, his latest loss comes from a different source: On Thursday, an endangered Siberian tiger named Kuzya crossed the Russian border to China, apparently searching for food. It was one of three tigers Putin had personally released into the wild back in May.

    There are now concerns about the tiger's safety. China's official Xinhua news agency quoted local officials who were quick to say that the tiger would experience no shortage of food. The officials even said they would "release cattle into the region to feed it," if necessary. To make matters worse, on Friday, a second of the tigers was found near the Chinese border.

    It's a strange moment between China and Russia, which have recently seen relations flourish as the Russian president became a pariah in much of the world. Could Putin, a renowned animal lover, take it personally?

    [​IMG]
    Russian President Vladimir Putin pets his dog Koni before one of his meetings with officials in his office in the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow in March 2004. (Reuters)
    While the Russian president may be a former KGB agent and expert in martial arts with a reputation as a fierce political leader, he has frequently shown his softer side around animals. He has a number of pet dogs (which he occasionally uses to intimidate rival leaders) and loves to be photographed with a variety of animals.

    Putin's love of animals beguiles political scientists. "Putin is very much at home with these animals," Burdett Loomis, a professor of political science at the University of Kansas, told The Washington Post, before adding: "He knows that they are great for photo opportunities."

    [​IMG]
    Putin plays with his dogs Yume, left, and Buffy at his countryside residence in Novo-Ogariovo outside Moscow in April 2013. (Alexey Druzhinyn/Ria Novosti/Kremlin-Pool via EPA)
    And photos there certainly are: Putin has been photographed with a huge variety of animals, from polar bears to dolphins and many in between.

    [​IMG]
    Then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, right, assists in polar bear research during a visit to Alexandra Land in far north Russia. (Ria Novosti/Reuters)
    For Jan Kubik, chair at the Department of Political Science at Rutgers University, there are a number of different ways to interpret Putin's animal photos. In an e-mail, he pointed out that photos portrayed Putin as a "nature lover who rides a horse shirtless."

    Kubik goes on to explain that he had seen "at least three more types of images falling into the following categories: a loving pet owner (all those puppies), a consummate animal handler (horses, tigers) and the rescuer of endangered species (flying with Siberian cranes, saving a Siberian bear)."

    [​IMG]
    Putin touches a dolphin as he visits the Primorsky Aquarium on Russky Island in Vladivostok in September 2013. (Alexei Nikolskyi/Ria Novosti/Kremlin via Reuters)
    Those pictures could convey three underlying messages, according to Kubik:

    "One idea is that he is trying to formulate – subconsciously, perhaps – yet another way of distinguishing Russia from Europe. Consider half-naked Putin on horseback. He is a mysterious hybrid of a powerful animal and (rational) human. But the image is also heavily sexualized. A virile lover, if needs be, but also a fertile father. The father of a nation that is close to nature, tough, muscular, energetic. Quite different from those effeminate European males.

    Second, he seems to be saying: 'I love animals. So, I am not such a heartless dictator, as the Westerners tend to think I am.'

    Third, he says: 'I have a heart, but my love is tough, manly.' His message is: I am not a softie. I love animals (so I can love people), I can guide them, as a consummate leader, but I can also easily tame them as tough ruler. So, the message is tough love."

    Putin has had his mishaps with animals before – in 2012, his attempt to fly a glider and lead Siberian cranes on their seasonal migration failed and the cranes turned back (he later compared anti-Kremlin protesters to the "weak cranes"). But rarely has the problem involved another nation, in particular one with which Russia is enjoying a burgeoning relationship.

    [​IMG]
    Putin flies in a motorized glider alongside two Siberian white cranes on the Yamal Peninsula in Russia in September 2012. (Alexei Druzhinin/Ria Novosti/Presidential Press Service via AP.
     
    sorcerer and pmaitra like this.
  11. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    @SafedSagar, that tiger case was stage managed, obviously for propaganda purposes, however, most of his activites show he is indeed very fit.

    He even went to Tuva and pulled off a Dersu Uzala.

    [​IMG]

    Dersu Uzala is a character in an eponymous movie about a Siberian hunter, and the person who acted in that role, Maxim Munzuk, was actually from Tuva.

    [​IMG]
    Dersu Uzala or Maxim Munzuk
     
    SafedSagar likes this.
  12. SafedSagar

    SafedSagar Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    156
    Yes Yes i'm aware or that tiger thing. Speaking of his vacations....
    [​IMG]
     
  13. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
    Russians have always sought for a strong leader. Ideas of democratic civil society never had time to root there. Putin also is just mostly following agreed doctrines of Russia, so it is not all about him. There are also good things about this: life is quite simple for many Russians, no need to over analyze everything ( like we like to do in the west ), more time to spend with friends and family.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Cadian

    Cadian Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    781
    Location:
    Russia, Ryazan
    You are speechifying about how you like to "over analyze everything" in the west, but at the same time you repeat nobrain stereotypical mantras. Go "overanalyze" the text above, it's written by the US non-government organisation leader, who is surely unaffected by "Putinism".


    For the past 25 years, the Center for Citizen Initiatives (CCI) has dedicated itself to supporting political and economic reforms in Russia. CCI is a highly respected, non-profit “501(c)(3)” organization that keeps its ear to the ground in Russia and develops trend-setting programs to meet emerging needs. Today its Productivity Enhancement Program (PEP) is the organization’s chief vehicle for assisting Russia’s efforts to build a viable market economy. PEP is widely regarded as the leading edge program for business training in Russia.

    CCI has graduated nearly 7,000 Russian entrepreneurs from U.S.-based business management internships. Currently, it manages an army of over 25,000 dedicated volunteers, who train these interns, across 45 U.S. states. CCI’s alumni come from over 600 Russian regional cities and towns beyond Moscow. Countless thousands of Russians have benefited from CCI’s Russia-based program activity.

    CCI’s origins date from the height of the Cold War in 1983 when Sharon Tennison, CCI’s president, led a handful of ordinary American citizens upon an extraordinary mission – challenging the dangerous barriers of fear and mistrust between the two Superpowers. The group’s preposterous mission was to create an alternative to the arms race and open communications between the U.S. and the USSR. They called themselves “Citizen Diplomats.”


    http://ccisf.org/history/
     
    Mad Indian and marrakesh like this.
  15. salute

    salute Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    787
    Location:
    india
    10 Things You Need To Know About Vladimir Putin
     
  16. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
    I hope this kind of programs can continue and prosper. Unfortunately headlines get only the programs that are stopped, like this:

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...asty-foundation-branded-foreign-agent-kremlin
     
  17. Cadian

    Cadian Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    781
    Location:
    Russia, Ryazan
    pmaitra, marrakesh and jouni like this.
  18. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
    Is this also propaganda?


    http://www.nature.com/news/russian-science-foundation-shuts-down-1.17952?


    Modern Russia’s first private science-funding organization, the Dynasty Foundation, is closing down after falling out of favour with the Kremlin. The foundation — which has been widely praised as a force for good in Russian science and which supports hundreds of young Russian researchers — said on its website that the decision was taken at a board meeting on 5 July.

    Dmitry Zimin, who created the foundation 13 years ago after making his fortune at one of Russia's largest telecommunications firms, had told Russian media in May that he planned to stop funding the organization after the Ministry of Justice had designated it a ‘foreign agent’, sparking shockfrom Russian scientists.

    That label — which to Russian ears carries Soviet-era connotations of espionage — was created under a 2012 law. It is reserved for non-governmental organizations that receive funding from abroad and are deemed to be involved in vaguely defined “political activities”. Tanya Lokshina, the Russia programme director at Human Rights Watch in Moscow, told Nature in May that the law was “an outrageous attack on free speech”.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
  20. Cadian

    Cadian Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    781
    Location:
    Russia, Ryazan
    The founder of this organisation had a choice - stop receiving foreign money or continue working with a label 'foreign agent'. He decided the third - to close the fund. His choice.

    The Kremlin regrets the decision of the management fund "Dynasty" to stop the activities, said presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov. "There are no injunction against the fund "Dynasty" that was accepted. Foreign agent status does not mean a ban ", - he said.

    The fact that the Council of Dmitry Zimin fund decided to liquidate, was announced on Wednesday. As told RBC executive director of the "Dynasty" Anna Piotrovskaya, the fund will last a few more months before liquidation. The exact date of the closure of "Dynasty" it could not be called, as by law the decision to liquidate the Fund will make a court. Executive Director of the Fund assured that all obligations to the beneficiaries who have "Dynasty" at the moment, will be fulfilled.

    More information on the RBC:
    http://top.rbc.ru/politics/08/07/2015/559cf6ad9a79478a6b11a76c
     
    Mad Indian likes this.
  21. jouni

    jouni Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    3,898
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Location:
    finland
    This is really intriguing to watch Russia change this way. It shows that it is now really starting to hurt you that you did not deal with your communist past. Is it called lustration? What east-european countries did to deal with past and move on.

    I could understand this kind of slow descent on some half illiterate African country, but Russia? Wow.... This is oil curse at it's worst when combined with ghosts of communism/ cold war...
     

Share This Page