trackwhack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 3,757
- Likes
- 2,589
The headline reads Gujarat accounts for 6% of India's dubious bank transactions
and the story goes ....
Out of the total 17,209 dubious transactions reported across India in four financial years from March 2006 to March 2010, Gujarat accounted for around 1,032 or 6 per cent of the country. However, the only silver lining is that the state is way behind Maharashtra, which leads the pack of such transactions with 29 per cent, Delhi with 12.1 per cent and West Bengal with 7.3 per cent.
So MH with 5 times as many 'dubious transactions' did not make the headline but Gujarat, which is fourth on the list did.
Says as much about TOI's political stance as their rederships headline skimming behaviour.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Gujarat-accounts-for-6-of-Indias-dubious-bank-transactions/articleshow/10573385.cms
and the story goes ....
Out of the total 17,209 dubious transactions reported across India in four financial years from March 2006 to March 2010, Gujarat accounted for around 1,032 or 6 per cent of the country. However, the only silver lining is that the state is way behind Maharashtra, which leads the pack of such transactions with 29 per cent, Delhi with 12.1 per cent and West Bengal with 7.3 per cent.
So MH with 5 times as many 'dubious transactions' did not make the headline but Gujarat, which is fourth on the list did.
Says as much about TOI's political stance as their rederships headline skimming behaviour.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Gujarat-accounts-for-6-of-Indias-dubious-bank-transactions/articleshow/10573385.cms
Last edited: