Much of Modern day Pakistan wasn't really even considered India...
Well; relationship depends on the individual not your ethnicity. They got along fine and are close in terms of contributions to the military. Recently in Pakistan there has been large-scale cultural exchange; there are inter-ethnic marriages, cultural adoptions and borrowing. If this continues; maybe in the next several generations - the ethnic lines will begin to fade away.
1. Then what was considered India?
I don't think ethnno-linguistic lines will ever fade away. I think that either they stay separate or one culture will consume another with parts of the consumed culture incorporated by the dominant culture.
It depends on what you consider spiritual.
Their rule over the region of modern day Pakistan was loose, short and very brief - what are you trying to prove?For the uninitiated:
.
Nowadays it's hard to tell apart from Sindhi, Pashtun, Kashmiri, Baloch and Punjabi other than language. Hundreds of languages are going extinct and cultures are merging. I think that only cultures that will remain separate will be isolates such as the Kalash culture. The Kalash People itself most likely numbered in the millions; but after you convert to Islam - you are no longer considered apart of the Kalash (according to their beliefs).
Well, Greeks never reached that area. So whatever that was beyond the Indus was named after the river itself (Indus).
Interesting, you wouldn't think so from the threads opened on PDF. Pathans and Jatts end up fighting and abusing each other and claiming superiority.
Plenty of such kingdoms existed in that area which had strong cultural and religious links with the mainland India. I know other than history about camel fcking religion, history in true form is hardly toaught in Pakistan, but one has to be big moron to believe area which now constitute dump called Pakistan had more strong links with Greek/Arabs / Aliens than Indian civilizations. Baruhis of Baloch are more closely related to Tamils than Greek or Camel fcking Arabs or self exploding Turks. Greeks had their own names for anything of prominence in INdian subcontinent. So mere mention of Greek names for Indiic things means nothing
That is what I just said, didn't you read?
But they did know about north Indian river system and we know because of indica
Sindhis were/are Hindus and depending upon which part of sindh, they had cultural affinity with ranging from Gujrat(India) to Punjab (India). To understand more about it, just meet sindhis settled in Mumbai, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana/Punjab.India (Brand/Values/Culture/kingdoms) name given to people living east side of the 'Indus' river and called them as Sindhus or Hindus in Persia.
Porki Punjabis and Sindhis are mostly ruled by Indian kingdoms and Baloch &Pakthoon by persian kingdoms.That is still shows in their languages.
Those are just Hellenized names. Arachosia was Gandhara roughly, Gedrosia too has some Indian name I think. Nevertheless extreme Balochistan perhaps was not part of India. But Makran surely was. See Andre Wink's book
I was talking about hindus from Sindh now living in India since 1947.Of-course ALL Sindhis and Punjabis are Hindus by culture even today.Once they get rid of the invaders terrorist religion they realize their REAL identity.
btw Traitors are always there in every community and religion for money/women/power but Hindu kings rises again and again after few defeats, made few compromises with Jihadi mogols also and later Sikhs,Maratha rise and so on.
http://www.amazon.in/gp/product/B00EQERMRK/ref=pd_cp_14_3?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=0KSF65VVQ104X6H0EYS1
