Plassey to Bangistan dream to Bangladesh to Brohit Bengal
http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/brihot-bangladesh-bangistan-or-gr-bangladesh.jpg?w=468&h=324
Dhaka Diary: Bangladesh fights India's hegemony designs
lot of water has gone down the Brahmaputra since December 16th 1971 and August 14th 1975. After becoming a country in 1971 Bangladesh reversed course on August 14th 1975 and told the world that it did not want to become a colony of West Bengal, and did not want to be secular (euphemism for Hinduism light). The Bengali patriots who killed the Indian agent Mujib Ur Rehman informed the world that the 100 year struggle that began on October 24th 1906 for the creation of Muslim Bengal was alive. Konkkor Mushtaque and General Zia tore up the 'treaty of friendhip" with India and told Ne Delhi that it did not want to be a Sikkim. Today bangladesh is the major impediment to the hegemony designs of India
India wants hegemony over the region: says BD newspaper
A leading weekly newspaper of Bangladesh "The EkalerKatha" in its latest issue has strongly criticised India for its negative behaviour withneighbouring countries.The newspaper in its editorial said India extremely violates all norms of peaceful coexistence.In its June 17-23 issue, the weekly wrote, "Instead of coexistence withits neighbours with equal status and sovereignty India wants to forcibly realize submissive loyalty from its neigbours."
India shows such attitude, as if, other sovereign countries of South Asian region will have to act on whatever India may dictate them to act and they will formulate their internal and external policies, even defence arrangements, according to India's will and whims."
The weekly says, India desires its neighbouring counties will obey and do whatever and whenever India asks them to do. "It means the expansionists of New Delhi will determine the extent of independence and sovereignty their neighbouring countries will enjoy," it said.
Referring the recent comment of M K Narayanan, the weekly alleged, "India very recently bid to set such an example. India unjustifiably rebuked and scared Sri Lanka when she (Sri Lanka) expressed her desire to collect traditional, but effective, radars and other smaller equipments from Pakistan and China due to inability and failure of India-origin radars to detect air attacks of Tamil rebels."
"Ignoring and reputing Sri Lanka's sovereign and independent status, and violating all limits of shamelessness, M K Narayanan, India's National Security Advisor, on May 13, 2007, thundered out like a so-called superpower declaring, "We are the big power in this region. Let us make it very clear. We strongly believe that whatever requirements the Sri Lankan government has, they should come to us. And we will give them what we think is necessary. We do not favour their going to China or Pakistan or any other country.
"M K Narayanan more nakedly said, we will not give such strong deterrents and arms to Sri Lanka that will ensure superiority of the Sri Lankan Armed forces over the Tamil guerrillas. It means, India wants to continue Sri Lanka's war withthe Tamils so that India can sell arms bothto both the parties."
The weekly asked, "In what power and sense India expresses its intention to impose such disgraceful and shameful precondition on Sri Lanka that she will not be able to collect arms from other sources according to her own requirements and policy."
"India's such audacious threatening is also an awful warning to other sovereign and independent nations of the region. If the adventurous and audacious precondition that India designs to impose on Sri Lankais not responded befittingly with equal tone, India will tomorrow dare to impose such preconditions on other counties of the region as well," the weekly warned.
Referring to the urgency of defence factor among the neighbouring countries of India, the weekly suggested, "To deter India's aggressive attitude, all other countries of the region immediately should form a strong forum with strong military might. It is imperative to develop such strong and effective defence arrangement, so that India does not dare to extend its paw on any country of the region."
Moreover, to make international community aware of the situation, the issue must be raised in the international forums uncovering India's hegemonic designs that may irk unrest and violence, even war in the region, the weekly warned.
"No nation having minimum sense of prestige will tolerate or consume such insulting deliberation. So it is the responsibility of the international community to take initiative to bridle the expansionist paw of India and compel India to shun her aggressive and hegemonic design so that no evil shadow can overcast the region. No country in the region will accept the roar of so-called big power, named India," the weekly opined.
The daily said, the concerned countries of the region have already made it clear that they will not accept such bully in the region. "Sri Lankan government itself officially conveyed the message to India and all concerned that Sri Lanka reserves the freedom to acquire necessary and suitable equipments from wherever this was available, particularly in view of the fact India was unable to meet Sri Lanka's perceived needs.""The spokesman of Pakistan Foreign Ministry said, Pakistan would not accept the hegemonic tendencies from any country in the region and added, the matter primarily for Sri Lanka to decide," the weekly quoted Pakistan's reaction.
The weekly said, India's statement virtually questions India's attitude and policy to its neighbouring countries. "It is hoped good sense will develop in the mindset of Indian leadership. India for her own interest will shun its expansionist mentality and attitude and follow the policy of peaceful coexistence."
"Otherwise India will have to compensate heavy price for its policy," the weekly cautioned and added, "India should keep it in mind, the independent nations of this region will never accept Indian supremacy, i.e., slavery under any circumstances.
http://www.app.com.pk/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11073&Itemid=2"²
