WAR 1971

Prometheus

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
400
Likes
344
Good news .... congrats to BD!.Its good to see the govt not bending to appease the people or not taking popularistic measures for political gains I think right wing fanatics from all there countries should be executed for the betterment of the sub-continent .
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
Sentencing a 73-year-old to death for alleged crimes committed in 1971
to trigger more rifts and bloodshed?

Don't get why the hurray?!

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
 

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,231
Likes
15,007
Country flag
Bangladesh is a true secular country than India.
Internet jamaatis are having a heartburn
 

Shirman

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Nothing new n exciting current Bangladeshi PM Sheikh hasina is a hard core rival of all Islamist-Jammati parties in Bangladeshi Landscape.....Something like how our desi Congress-RSS relationship stands 2day......
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Sentencing a 73-year-old to death for alleged crimes committed in 1971
to trigger more rifts and bloodshed?

Don't get why the hurray?!

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
I presume for the same reason why Eichman, who was not young, was sentenced to death, the same way as many other Nazi war criminals including one of World War II's most sadistic Nazis, Laszlo Csatary, lived openly in Budapest in recent years, but has apparently slipped into hiding as an international manhunt closed in on him and was hunted down and arrested.

Laszlo Csatary, now 97, has been convicted in absentia and sentenced to death for his role in sending nearly 16,000 Jews to their deaths.
 

gokussj9

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag
Sentencing a 73-year-old to death for alleged crimes committed in 1971
to trigger more rifts and bloodshed?

Don't get why the hurray?!

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
Think it this way. If you had some chinese collaborators who assisted Japan
during Nanjing massacre, will you forgive them no matter what?
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
Think it this way. If you had some chinese collaborators who assisted Japan
during Nanjing massacre, will you forgive them no matter what?
What an inappropriate analogy!!

Let me draw u to the context

1) Back then BD was part of Pakistan. Jamaat was against break fm PAK. Reconciliation should hv bn encouraged among diff. factions after almost 40yrs though Jamaat could hv bn on the "wrong" side of history.

2) The tribunal being used by PM as an instrument against her opponents - typically in a 3rd world populist "democracy".

3) 14 killed in protests, meaning the sentence has further enlarged the divide inside BD society thus detrimental to their internal stability.

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2

Do you NOT UNDERSTAND THAT SMS SYNTAX IS NOT ACCEPTED. YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD TWICE. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME. PLEASE DESIST FROM THIS PRACTICE. CONSIDER IT AS A SERIOUS CAUTION
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gokussj9

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag
What an inappropriate analogy!!

Let me draw u to the context

1) Back then BD was part of Pakistan. Jamaat was against break fm PAK. Reconciliation should hv bn encouraged among diff. factions after almost 40yrs though Jamaat could hv bn on the "wrong" side of history.

2) The tribunal being used by PM as an instrument against her opponents - typically in a 3rd world populist "democracy".

3) 14 killed in protests, meaning the sentence has further enlarged the divide inside BD society thus detrimental to their internal stability.

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
Let me give you some info

1) Why was Jamaat against the break up from Pak which was slaughtering and raping their own SDRE fellas?
The Jamaatis are staunchly anti-Hindu and massacred and raped many of them including BD muslims during 1971 so they had to
take refuge in India. Jamaat men torch Hindu temple, houses in Noakhali; 2 killed.

2) Yeah, Hasina is using this opportunity for wrong reasons. But they should be hanged for their horrendous war crimes.

3) Update: 30 killed in protests till now. They should have hanged him in private just like we did with our scum.

Again, the violence in south asian region has got a lot to do with religion.
 

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,231
Likes
15,007
Country flag
Violence grips Bangladesh after war crimes verdict, 32 killed

Violence grips Bangladesh after war crimes verdict, 32 killed - The Times of India

DHAKA: Bangladesh was on the boil today as at least 32 people, including three policemen, were killed and scores injured in violence after a top leader of the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami was sentenced to death for " crimes against humanity " during the 1971 liberation war.

The violence followed the verdict of the special Bangladeshi tribunal that handed down death penalty to Delwar Hossain Sayedee, vice-president of the party, amid a nationwide shutdown called by Jamaat-e-Islami (JI).

"He (Delwar Hossain Sayedee) will behanged by neck till he is dead," pronounced chairman of the three-judge International Crimes Tribunal Justice A T M Fazle Kabir.

The court verdict triggered street violence across the country leaving at least 32 people dead, authorities said.

The victims included the cops , activists of Jamaat, Shibir, Juba League and common people.

Of the deceased, six people, includingthree cops, were killed in Gaibandha, four in Thakurgaon, three in Satkhira, two each in Rangpur, Noakhali, Chittagong, Moulvibazar and Sirajganj while one each in Dinajpur, Natore, Cox's Bazar and Chapainawabganj.

Five deaths were also reported from other parts of the country.

Meanwhile, JI has called a 48-hour nationwide hartal from Sunday protesting death penalty for Sayedee.

Amiruzzaman, Jamaat chief of Chittagong (North) said the party would organise special prayers tomorrow and stage protest rallies on Saturday across the country.

Sayedee is the third JI politician to beconvicted by the Tribunal since the trial of war crimes suspects, mostly belonging to the Islamist group , began three years ago.

In the first verdict in January, former Jamaat leader Abul Kalam Azad was sentenced to death on similar charges.

Another Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Mollah was sentenced to life in February for atrocities during the war.

Jamaat-e-Islami, the largest Islamic party in Muslim-majority Bangladesh, was opposed to the 1971 liberation war when officially 3million people were killed and 200,000 women were raped.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
) The tribunal being used by PM as an instrument against her opponents - typically in a 3rd world populist "democracy".
How is taking action against collaborators and those who raped and committed atrocities and murder are political opponents?

This was long overdue and was enacted, but for vote bank politics was kept in the cold storage till now.
 

Payeng

Daku Mongol Singh
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,522
Likes
777
Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2

Do you NOT UNDERSTAND THAT SMS SYNTAX IS NOT ACCEPTED. YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD TWICE. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME. PLEASE DESIST FROM THIS PRACTICE. CONSIDER IT AS A SERIOUS CAUTION
bann Tapatalk :powah!:
 

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,231
Likes
15,007
Country flag
Jamaatis wreak havoc in Bangladesh, kill 19 after top leader sentenced to death

Jamaatis wreak havoc in Bangladesh, kill 19 after top leader sentenced to death | Niti Central



At least 19 people were killed by activists of Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing Islami Chhatra Shibir as they ran riot across the country following the verdict of war criminal Delawar Hossain Sayedeee on Thursday, a Daily Star report said.

Victims included policemen, Jamaat-Shibir activists and civilians.

Hours after Sayedee was sentenced to death, Jamaat-Shibir activists set fire to a Hindu temple and houses of the minority community in Noakhali, the report said.

Jamaat-Shibir activists attacked police and vandalised at least 60 vehicles in Rajshahi and Chittagong districts on Thursday in retaliation to Sayedee's sentencing, the report said.

The International Crimes Tribunal-1 awarded the death penalty to Sayedee, vice president of the Jamaat, for committing crimes against humanity during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971, according to the report.

Soon after the verdict was pronounced, around 500 Jamaat-Shibir men attacked law enforcers at Binodpur bazaar in Rajshahi, injuring two policemen, the report said.

At least 50 cocktails were exploded during the attack.

Meanwhile, another group of Jamaat-Shibir men blocked the Dhaka-Rajshahi highway. Police fired many rounds of rubber bullets and lobbed teargas shells to free the highway, according to the report.

Similar events took place in Chittagong, where at least 60 vehicles were vandalised by Jamaat-Shibir activists on the Chittagong-Cox's Bazar highway in the afternoon, the report said.

The Jamaat has called a 48-hour nationwide hartal from Sunday morning in protest of the death penalty for Sayedee.

The Government hastily decided to deploy the Border Guards Bangladesh (BGB) across the country from 8:00 pm on Thursday to assist the police in maintaining law and order, the report said.

According to BGB officials, additional members of the paramilitary force will be deployed in the capital, Dhaka, while BGB men would be deployed at different districts as per the requirements of respective district administrations, according to the report.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
The Wahhabi influence with abundant Saudi money is the worse thing that could happen to the Islamic world and the world.

It is only doing down the name of Islam and antagonising people who were totally unconcerned before!
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Bangladesh riots leave 42 dead, paramilitary forces deployed

Dhaka: Bangladesh today deployed paramilitary border guards to beef up security after a top Islamist opposition leader was sentenced to death, sparking nationwide riots that killed at least 42 people.

"Our troops were deployed in 15 troubled districts in aide of civil administration"¦ BGB (Border Guard Bangladesh) has been kept alert so it could move immediately wherever they are required," BGB chief major General Aziz Ahmed told PTI.

The violence broke out yesterday after 73-year-old Delwar Hossain Sayedee, vice-president of the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), was sentenced to death by International Crimes Tribunal after he was found guilty of eight counts out of 20 involving rape, mass killings and atrocities during the nine-month freedom war against Pakistan in 1971.

A police spokesman, meanwhile, said law enforcement agencies were on high alert as Jamaat and Sayedee's supporters planned more protests today.

Authorities feared that the JI activists might launch attacks on mosques during the Friday prayers.

Tens of thousands of youngsters, joined by 1971 veterans and ruling Awami League supporters, took to the streets in Dhaka and other major cities yesterday to celebrate the verdict against Sayedee.

Violence erupted as activists of JI clashed with security forces, denouncing the judgement.

They also clashed rival activists, beat to death four policemen, attacked their camps and snatched away their weapons, set ablaze offices of the ruling Awami League at their strongholds at different places across the country.

The four policemen were killed in north-western Gaibandha, one of the worst scenes of the violence, where fresh unrest today left one ruling Awami League activist dead.

Sayedee is the third JI politician to be convicted by the Tribunal since the trial of war crimes suspects, mostly belonging to the Islamist group, began three years ago.

In the first verdict in January, former Jamaat leader
Abul Kalam Azad was sentenced to death on similar charges.

Another Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Mollah was sentenced to life in February for atrocities during the war.

The JI, Muslim-majority Bangladesh's largest Islamic bloc, was opposed to the 1971 liberation war when officially 3 million people were killed and 200,000 women were raped.

A local journalist said JI activists beat an Awami League supporter to death after the ruling party men vandalised several shops belonging to the extreme rightwing party to retaliate yesterday's attacks.

Meanwhile, railway officials said south-eastern Chittagong port city's train link with Dhaka and north-eastern Sylhet were remained snapped as suspected JI activists uprooted fishplates of railway tracks last night.

"Six compartments of an intercity train were derailed as they (suspected activists) uprooted the fishplates on Dhaka-Chittagong route"¦fortunately no casualty was reported as the train slowed down as it was entering a nearby station at Feni," a railway police official said.

PTI
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,230
Country flag
Jamaat men torch Hindu Temple, houses in Noakhali; 2 killed

Hours after Jamaat top leader Delawar Hossain Sayedee was sentenced to death, Jamaat and Shibir activists set fire to a Temple and houses of Hindu community at different parts of Noakhali on Thursday.Two people were killed as the activists clashed with law enforcers at different points of the district town, reports our Noakhali correspondent.

Md Khokon, 17, a tempo helper, received a bullet wound in the clash around 3:45pm, locals said. Doctors pronounced Khokon dead after he was rushed to Noakhali Medical College Hospital at 4:00pm, said medical sources.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,231
Likes
15,007
Country flag
Bangladesh clashes over war crimes verdicts kill 52

Bangladesh clashes over war crimes verdicts kill 52 - The Times of India

DHAKA: Fresh clashes erupted on Friday in Bangladesh , bringing the number of people killed to 52 in violence triggered by convictions for Islamist leaders over war crimes committed during the 1971 independence war.

A rickshawpuller was killed after hundreds of pro-government supporters and followers of the rival Jamaat-e-Islami party clashed with sticks at a marketin the northern district of Gaibandha,local police chief Nahidul Islam said.

Security has been tightened around thousands of mosques across the Muslim-majority nation ahead of weekly prayers on Friday, with border guards deployed in major cities.

On Thursday, clashes flared across the country after Jamaat's vice president was found guilty of murder, religious persecution and rape by a war crimes tribunal hearing cases dating back to the 1971 independence conflict.

Delwar Hossain Sayedee , now a firebrand preacher, was the third person to be convicted by the court whose previous verdicts have been met with outrage from Islamists who say the process is more about settling scores than delivering justice.

At least 35 people were killed in the violence on Thursday, according to an AFP toll compiled after talking to police in the 15 districts where protests turned deadly.

A policeman was the latest to die of his wounds, raising the number of security personnel killed to five.

Twenty-three of those killed on Thursday were shot after police opened fire on thousands of rampaging Jamaat supporters who attacked law-enforcers with sticks and stones.

According to Sultana Kamal, head of rights group Ain O Salish Kendra, it was the deadliest political day of violence in the impoverished country's history since winning its independence from Pakistan in 1971.

The latest death on Friday brought the overall toll to 52 since the tribunal delivered its first verdict on January 21.

Jamaat, which rejected the verdict aspolitically motivated, has said 50 of its "innocent" supporters were on Thursday shot dead by police who"hunted them like birds".

But Kamal blamed Jamaat supportersfor "terror" attacks on the police.

Police on Friday have banned a number of planned demonstrations at several trouble spots while authorities in the country's biggest mosque, Baitul Mokarram, have locked some of the gates in a bid to limit numbers.

Security has been stepped up at Hindu villages after homes and temples came under attack by Islamists in the southern Noakhali and Chittagong districts, killing one old Hindu man, police said.

"We've (deployed) extra policemen in all the temples and Hindu areas to prevent attack," said Robiul Islam, a senior police officer in Chittagong.

Secular protesters, who erupted in jubilation as news of Sayedee's sentence filtered through on Thursday, are set to hold a celebration rally in a central Dhaka intersection.

The war crimes tribunal has been tainted by controversies and allegations that it is targeting only the opposition with trumped-up charges. Rights groups say its legal procedures fall short of international standards.

The government rejects the accusations, saying the tribunal is independent and the trials are fair and necessary to heal the wounds of the war that it says killed three million people.

It accuses Jamaat leaders of being part of pro-Pakistani militias blamed for much of the 1971 carnage.

Independent estimates put the war toll much lower, between 300,000 and 500,000.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
1971 War: Battle of Shakargarh Bulge

The Shakargarh bulge juts out like a tongue from the main landmass of Pakistan between the Chenab and the Ravi. It southern portion rests on the Ravi, the northern runs parallel to the Shivalik range, leaving a narrow segment between the international boundary and the hills, and its tip points towards Madhopur headworks and the Pathankot military base beyond. The main road and rail communications between Pathankot, Samba and Jammu run very close to the border throughout. In the south, the sensitive areas of Amritsar, Batala and Gurdaspur in Punjab state lie within easy striking distance across the Ravi.
The terrain in the bulge is generally flat and interlaced with numerous nullahs running north to south. Prominent among them from west to east are Aik, Degh, Basantar, Bein and Ujh. The bulge is generally well served with a network of roads and rail tracks emanating from Sialkot, Gujranwala and Lahore. The road system runs from west to east towards Shakargarh, passing through the important communication centres of Pasrur, Chaw- inda, Zafarwal, Dhamtal and Narowal. On the whole, the roads west of the Zafarwal, Dhamtal and Narowal line were of a higher grade compared with those east of it.

In consonance with the overall Indian defensive strategy in the western theatre, the option of taking military action squarely rested on Yahya Khan. Unstable and unpredictable as he was, a preemptive Pakistani attack could not be ruled out, especially in view of their holding defensive field formations as also their strike elements being located in cantonments within easy reach of the respective battle locations. From what could be surmised from the discernible pattern of deployment and obstacle plan, it was apparent that the Pakistani military planners had built a cauldron of fortifications in a hollow square with its sides touching the border in the north, the line of the Zafarwal-Dham, tal-Narowal fortresses in the east and the Ravi in the south.
The Pakistani holding force on these three sides consisted of 8 and 15 Infantry Divisions supported by 8 Independent Armoured Brigade. Pakistan 15 Infantry Division held the northern border covering the approaches to Sialkot and Chawinda, and Pakistan 8 Infantry Division manned the Zafarwal, Dhamtal and Narowal fortresses and the approaches to Pasrur through the Gil ferry north of Ajnala.
To protect Zafarwal from outflanking moves from the direction of Samba, a ditch was dug in the general area of Supwal north of the Lalial forest, and some areas north of the Gil ferry were flooded. The convex tip of the bulge tongue east of the fortress line, including the communication centre of Shakargarh, was known to be defended by paramilitary forces supported by covering troops consisting of 20 Lancers and elements of the reconnaissance and support battalions. The known battle location of the Pakistani strike force, two brigades of 6 Armoured Division and 17 Infantry Division, was in the hollow of the cauldron in the general area of Daska-Pasrur.
In this posture, Pakistan had the advantage of reacting from the interior lines to an Indian move piercing any side of the cauldron. Offensively, Pakistan had the option of hitting up north towards Jammu or down south towards Amritsar without upsetting the balance of its defensive posture as it involved only pivoting movements. It had the option of recoiling into interior lines in case of failure or to meet the Indian counteraction from the opposite direction. But if the strike force was committed towards Pathankot or between Samba and Madhopur, east of the fortress line, it would stick its neck out to the extent of losing the defensive balance against any Indian counteraction from the northern and southern shoulders in the direction of Sialkot and Pasrur respectively. It would have been easily accessible as the strike force committed outside the cauldron would have found it difficult to recoil to fill the hollow of the square in time.

If Pakistan chose to send its thrust lines into Indian territory through the sides of the cauldron either north or south, it could muster two or three additional brigades out of the holding force for further development of its offensive operation. But it could not do so in case of the lightly held tongue of the bulge east of the fortress line. Thus the resources left for an offensive directed against Pathankot and Madhopur did not permit deep penetration of any significance. In fact, Yahya Khan's best bet lay in a pre-emptive attack when the Indian defensive posture was low because of lack of troops in the vicinity. The Indian planners had to prepare for this contingency.
The head of the Indian planning team was Maj Gen K K Singh, Director of Military Operations and General Officer Commanding-designate of 1 Corps, which was operationally responsible for the Shakargarh bulge. A dedicated professional who was universally respected for his competence and patriotic zeal, in all the crises the Indian Army had faced after partition he had held appointments of responsibility and had grown up with the realities of pragmatism. He had commanded an armoured briga- de in the Sialkot sector in the 1965 conflict and was fully conscious that any setback at the hands of the Pakistani Army in this region would greatly embarrass the Indian Government.
On assessing the enemy capabilities, particularly in the matter of reserves, it was apparent that the only areas where it could exploit the strength of its armour was in the plains of Chhamb-Jaurian and in the Shakargarh bulge. Having participated in the armoured battle in the previous conflict, which had ended in a talemate, KK Singh brought personal involvement into planning, especially when he knew that he himself was going to execute the plan in the field.

His corps consisted of three infantry divisions and two independent armoured brigades supported by two independent artillery brigades and connected administrative services. For want of accommodation in the nearby cantonments these formations were located in the Indian hinterland as far deep as Hyderabad. Our movement staff worked out a schedule of about three weeks to concentrate the entire corps in the peripheral areas of the Shakargarh bulge. The main constraints on this movement were funnelling the rail arteries on to a single line between Jullundur and Pathankot, because this limited the feedin capacity, and the provisions of the Karachi Agreement, which forbade additional induction of troops in Jammu and Kashmir. This worried the planners a great deal, especially because any premature concentration of field forces would lay India open to charges of warlike intentions, and if the movement started after a Pakistani attack it would be too late.
This dilemma was resolved by increasing the covering force to sufficient combat strength to withstand any pre-emptive Pakistani attack in July or August so as to take the field in the following campaigning period at the slightest indications of military preparations on the part of the enemy. Although India intensified its diplomatic efforts in the international sphere to seek a political solution to the Bangladesh problem, the chances of this were receding.

With the passage of time, Yahya Khan's bellicosity was increasing, and this could not be ignored in the interest of India's security. Orders were accordingly passed in early October to concentrate the field forces in Punjab so as to adopt a defensive posture at short notice. I met K K Singh near the Thakurpur ferry in the middle of October, when his leading elements had just moved in and the rest of his corps was trickling in at an agonizingly slow pace. He smiled and commented: "Our weakest hour is now. Another four days and Yahya would have missed his opportunity." Yahya did exactly that, and by the third week of October K K was firmly poised in his defensive posture as follows:
36 Infantry Division under Maj Gen Balwant Singh Ahluwalia to cover the approaches to Pathankot across the Ravi in the general area of Gurdaspur-Dinanagar.
39 Infantry Division under Maj Gen B.R. Prabhu in the general area of Madhopur-Kottia Parol-Bamial-Ujh river-Dyala Chak to cover the approaches to Madhopur and protect rail and road communications in the area.
54 Infantry Division under Maj Gen W.A.G. Pinto in the general area of Samba between the Bein river and the Degh nadi.
The Ramgarh-Nandpur-Samba area between the Aik nullah and the Degh nadi was held by about two brigades under an ad hoc headquarters.
The defensive plan was to strongly hold the likely routes of ingress in depth and have suitably positioned reserves for counteraction in the rear. In characteristic fashion, K K had prepa- red the following contingency plans to contain the expected Pakistani thrust:
If the thrust materialized between Samba and Jammu in the direction of Jammu, 26 and 54 Infantry Divisions were to contain it while 39 Infantry Division and one armoured brigade were to hit the lodgment area in Charwa-Ramgarh from the eastern flank.
If Pakistan struck between Samba-Bamial-Madhopur, 39 and 54 Infantry Divisions were to contain it, while 36 Infantry Divisions and one armoured brigade were to cross. the Ravi to disrupt the enemy's lines of communication in the general area of Shakargarh.
In case of a major offensive across the Ravi, 15 Infantry Division would contain it, while 36 Infantry Division and one armoured brigade would counterattack bridges in the general area of Kalanaur-Dera Baba Nanak and Gill ferry. Simultaneously, 39 and 54 Infantry Divisions would launch an offensive along the Shakargarh and Narowal axes.

Contiguous to the zone defended by 1 Corps, the shoulders of the bulge were held in the north between the Chenab and the Aik nullah by 26 Infantry Division under XV Corps, and 15 Infantry Division under XI Corps covered in the south the Ranian and Dera Baba Nanak area, including Gill ferry. The overall coordination of the three corps operations involved in the defence of the bulge peripheral area was vested in Lt Gen Candeth. He had about six infantry divisions supported by four independent armoured brigades to fight the battle of Shakargarh bulge against Lt Gen Irshed Ahmed Khan, who had about three infantry divisions, one armoured division and one armoured brigade.

Besides numerical superiority, the nature of the bulge gave Candeth the advantage of three open sides served by good communications to develop thrusts along any combination of two to three directions, facing Ahmed Khan to split his strike elements and face defeat in detail. Pakistan had the river obstacle of the Chenab separating the Sialkot and Chhamb sectors, and this was a constraint on switching forces quickly from one sector to, another.
Before formulating the concept and pattern of the offensive operations in the bulge, much discussion had taken place between K K and his planning team, and later between the Chief and him. The Chief's aim was quite clear: first, he wanted to ensure the security of the sensitive areas of Akhnur, Jammu, Samba, Madhopur, Pathankot, Gurdaspur and Amritsar; secondly, to safeguard road and rail communications between Pathankot and Jammu; thirdly, to so engage the Pakistani strike force that it could not be extricated for employment in other sectors and to cause as much attrition as possible in the process; and lastly, acquire as much territory, especially in the Pakistani heartland, as possible to be used as a bargaining lever in postwar negotiations.
In translating the Chief's aims into action, KK projected that the enemy should not be given battle on ground of his choosing, that is the area of Pasrur and Quila Sobha Singh, where the Pakistani armour had the advantage of using the cauldron fortresses as pivots for manoeuvre, and the capability of bringing down massive artillery concentrations from prepared positions.
Moreover, he felt that any effort to pierce the cauldron by attacking the fortresses would be costly in attrition as well as for the operational time schedule. He preferred to draw out the Pakistani strike force (6 Armoured and 17 Infantry Divisions) from the cauldron and force an engagement of attrition outside it. Once the Pakistani armour was humbled in battle, the door would be open to the sensitive areas in the hinterland.The battle areas which met these requirements were either the tongue of the bulge east of the Zafarwal-Dhamtal-Narowal fortress line or the rear areas on either side of the Chenab. The dovetailed development of thrusts towards these areas, either simultaneously or one after the other, was bound to attract the Pakistani strike element and force it to split to meet the threats posed. Facing battle while divided against superior forces on ground not of its choosing, Pakistan could be defeated in detail. In pursuance of this concept, Candeth was asked to project detailed plans for a coordinated offensive to capture the Shakargarh bulge. He proposed to develop three divergent thrusts:
1 Corps with 36 and 54 Infantry Division and armou-red brigades to attack between the Degh nadi and Ravi to capture the Pakistani strongpoints of Zafarwal-Dhamtal-Narowal-Quila Sobha Singh. It was hoped that this would force the enemy to commit his reserve formations (6 Armou-red and 17 Infantry Divisions) south of the Degh nadi.
After the enemy's reserve formations had been committed thus, 39 Infantry Division, supported by one armoured regiment, was to break out of the general area of Nandpur-Ramgarh towards the enemy's rear in the Pasrur area. But in view of the enemy's known capability to mount a counteroffensive against the Nandpur-Ramgarh-Samba sector no risks could be countenanced, and consequently this area was to be held by 39 Infantry Division in a defensive posture till the enemy revealed his hand. This thrust was to be developed only when the Pakistanis committed their reserve formations south of the Degh.
Dovetailed with the above, XV Corps, with 10 and 26 Infantry Divisions supported by the affiliated armoured bri-gade, was to launch a two-pronged offensive simultaneously, or shortly before or after, with one thrust on either side of the Chenab. The intention was to encircle and destroy Pakistan 1 Corps if possible by multiple but converging thrusts by I and XV Corps.
In addition, depending upon the Pakistani reaction to these thrusts, if the rear areas of Pasrur and Quila Sobha Singh were vacated by the Pakistani reserve formations moving to meet either of the above thrusts and towards the Chenab, XI Corps with two infantry brigades and an armoured brigade was to develop an offensive through Gil ferry in the south towards Quila Sobha Singh and Pasrur, making Narowal fortress en route.

This offensive plan was on the whole approved with slight modifications. It can rightly be called K K's plan as Candeth, not being much of a military thinker himself, was fed it in bits and pieces at various meetings with the Chief. Like most advanced planning, its working depended upon various assumptions which imponderables like the enemy's reaction and the progress of operations in other sectors could upset. But on the face of it this plan was flexible enough to meet the fluctuating fortunes of war.
The allocation of Pakistani forces to the Shakargarh bulge and their assigned tasks were known to us with some exactitude, especially from the information obtained from defecting East Pakistani officers. Pakistan I Corps was operationally responsible for the defence of the Shakargarh bulge, and its mission was to eliminate the Indian enclaves on the Pakistani side of the Ravi in the general area of Narowal and simulate offensive actions which would draw the Indian strike force into the bulge so as to foil their timely extraction to meet the main Pakistani offensive in the Ganganagar-Suratgarh area.
Source : http://www.indiandefencereview.com/spotlights/1971-war-battle-of-shakargarh-bulge/

=================
=================

Back to Border

It's been 15 years since director JP Dutta's superhit film, Border (1997), based on the Indo-Pak war of 1971, hit the screens. It's also been six years since Dutta directed a movie — his last film was the Aishwarya-starrer Umrao Jaan (2006). But he's now set to return to Bollywood with a

However, the only actor being retained from the original multi-starrer is Suniel Shetty. "I'm playing an army officer in Border 2," says Suniel. The original film had actors Sunny Deol, Jackie Shroff, Akshaye Khanna, Pooja Bhatt and Rakhee Gulzar, among others. However Shetty reveals that none of them are there in the sequel: "No, they are not doing it. It has a different bunch of actors."

Apparently, model and actor Muzammil Ibrahim will be one of the new cast members. He too is likely to play an army officer. The rest of the cast is yet to be finalised, even though the film is meant to go on the floors in a couple of months.

We learnt, however, that the sequel will not be a continuation of the original story, though it will be in the same genre. That also makes it possible for Suniel Shetty to be cast once again. If you recall, in Border, he played a subedar with the Border Security Force (BSF) who died during the war.

Shetty says, "I'm sure this story will help the betterment of the relationship between India and Pakistan." After a series of comedies like De Dana Dan (2009), Tum Milo Toh Sahi (2010) and Thank You (2010), Suniel also seems to be back to doing what he does best — being an action hero. He is also shooting for two more action-packed movies, Shooter and Enemy. In both the films, he plays a cop.
Source : Back to Border - Hindustan Times

============>>



Will be waiting..
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top