common peoples you can see on the roadWhat is a mango Indian?
PM, if you believe that a casteist remark is responsible for the violence in Maruti, then I would say that you are not aware of the situation and no point in discussing further on this.Never mind, that is a Honda issue, and I mentioned that only because SOB brought it up.
The issue here is the Maruti plant. Labour issues, unions, pay hike demands, notwithstanding, these peripheral things are deflecting the issue at hand. The issue is a casteist remark starting a violence leading to one man's death, as reported by ToI.
Mango Indian == Aam Aadmi = Common ManWhat is a mango Indian?
I have to agree with sob here. Casteist remarks are an obfuscation to hide what is experientially known to a lot of us.PM, if you believe that a casteist remark is responsible for the violence in Maruti, then I would say that you are not aware of the situation and no point in discussing further on this.
Some supervisor is accused of making the remarks and the workers burnt alive a General Manager.Never mind, that is a Honda issue, and I mentioned that only because SOB brought it up.
The issue here is the Maruti plant. Labour issues, unions, pay hike demands, notwithstanding, these peripheral things are deflecting the issue at hand. The issue is a casteist remark starting a violence leading to one man's death, as reported by ToI.
Vandharai Vazhavaikkum Tamil Nadu
The HR manager was not connected to the incident? Are you saying that with certainty? The supervisor made casteist remark, then as a retaliation the worker slapped him, and then the worker was suspended. Two wrongs done, and one person punished, and the one who started it is not punished.Some supervisor is accused of making the remarks and the workers burnt alive a General Manager.
Don't you find this suspicious? He was in no way connected to the incident. My hunch is this violence was pre-planned.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ss-confidence-intact/articleshow/15045097.cmsThe worker allegedly beat him up following which he was suspended and that triggered the large scale violence. Haryana government and police pledged to take stringent action against those responsible for violence.
:welcome:Vandharai Vazhavaikkum Tamil Nadu
Translation - The state which welcomes immigrants with open arms
Anyway, no labour problems will be allowed to ruin the industries here in our state. They will be crushed mercilessly(as they should be) in our state by the govt. So Let them come here. We will soon solve the Electricity crisis and so that will not be a problem any more:thumb:
Physical assault of any factory personnel gets you immediately suspended irrespective of the cause of the incident. Managers don't want hooligans among their staff. The person who felt insulted after hearing casteist remarks should have lodged a police complaint instead of beating up his supervisor. Physical assault can be verified but verbal attacks like casteist remarks cant be verified immediately. The manager was right in suspending the violent worker. If only the workers were led by a cool headed leader the tragic murder and violence that day would not have happened.The HR manager was not connected to the incident? Are you saying that with certainty? The supervisor made casteist remark, then as a retaliation the worker slapped him, and then the worker was suspended. Two wrongs done, and one person punished, and the one who started it is not punished.
Perhaps Maruti Suzuki should be more careful when hiring their managerial staff?
I think you should read this ToI report:
Source: Maruti's Manesar plant GM(HR) burned to death, 91 workers arrested; government says business confidence intact - The Times of India
Here is a broad sequence of events:
- Supersivor hurls casteist abuse against worker.
- Worker assaults Supervisor.
- Worker is Suspended, Supervisor is not.
- HR manager killed by workers.
As I have already said, since the HR manager died, which is indeed sad, most people will not sympathize with the workers.
Objective reaction: Look at all the incidents in the right sequence.
Emotional reaction: Ignore points 1, 2, 3, and focus on point 4. (most posters here are doing that)
Emotional reactions never solve problems.
Fearing for their lives and careers, the leaders of the Maruti Suzuki Workers Union (MSWU) at the Manesar facility have gone underground. Through most of the day, union general secretary Sarabjeet Singh's phone remained switched off even as president Ram Mehar Singh mailed a signed statement this afternoon alleging that the Maruti management had unleashed bouncers who beat up workers.
It is interesting to note that though the violent clashes on Wednesday (18 July) may not have been triggered by impending wage negotiations, the workers under MSWU have been demanding a five-fold hike! Since a permanent worker takes home about Rs 18,000 a month (including perks), this would mean each worker has demanded close to Rs 90,000 every month in wages!
another question begs an answer: how did the workers, who were apparently working peacefully till the altercation began with a supervisor, suddenly turn into a blood-thirsty mob? Various versions of what happened yesterday abound but company officials alleged that perhaps the workers came prepared to unleash violence.
These officials alleged that when the altercation between the supervisor and one worker remained unresolved, workers rushed to executives' cars parked outside and quickly extracted what is known as a side-impact beam from the doors of these cars. Though this beam is meant to lessen the impact of a collision in the car, workers – who themselves stand on the shopfloor assembling car doors and are quite familiar with car parts – used it to hit management executives on their heads.
But there is every possibility that national trade unions, affiliated to various political parties, would jump in and participate in this standoff between workers and management, just like last year.
I might have a different perspective (not a legal one):Physical assault of any factory personnel gets you immediately suspended irrespective of the cause of the incident. Managers don't want hooligans among their staff. The person who felt insulted after hearing casteist remarks should have lodged a police complaint instead of beating up his supervisor. Physical assault can be verified but verbal attacks like casteist remarks cant be verified immediately. The manager was right in suspending the violent worker. If only the workers were led by a cool headed leader the tragic murder and violence that day would not have happened.
the casteist remark claim is yet to be proved, it could be a cover to start the pre-planned fight.I might have a different perspective (not a legal one):
The first hooligan was the one who made a casteist remark.
And that's what i said, management acted based on evidence.[*]Verbal abuses are difficult to prove, physical assault is relatively easy to prove.
You cant morally support violent behaviour, will you support the police if they catch hold of the murderer who killed the GM and shoot him dead?[*]I have full moral support for the worker for retaliating to the casteist supervisor with a slap (or whatever it was). That's just me and no offense to anyone.
We have yet to see the proof for the supposedly offensive casteist remark. The management acted based on the evidence at hand, which proves that a worker assaulted a supervisor, which is the proper way to act in such situations.[*]The HR manager suspended the one who retaliated, but let go of the one who started it. Bad work ethic, and utter dishonesty on part of the management. In other words, he was abetting and grooming casteism in the factory.
HR manager was innocent in this matter, he wasn't the person who made the supposedly remark. All he did was act on the evidence provided. No management tolerates violence among its workers.[*]The workers saw the incident, and saw the skewed justice being dispensed by the imbecilic management. This acted as a catalyst. It is naïve to believe that the HR manager was killed because of the pay issue.
Agreed[*]The HR manager should not have been killed, and it is sad.
Again it's premature to jump to conclusion when there is no evidence to prove the casteist remark was made. The trade unions were itching for a fight by making exorbitant demands like Rs.90,000/ month salary.[*]If it is a corporate policy to fire some one for assault but not for casteist remark, then it is a flawed policy and needs to be changed. The management should have either fired both on the spot, or should have handed the case to the police and the courts. Again, a bad decision by the management.
Certainly there should be a clause which penalises violent trade union activists by giving them exemplary punishment and fines for recovery of the lost income due to such instigated attacks.[*]Finally, we need to reform our labour laws to bring erring managers and workers in line.
The problem is not confined to Maruti. The problem is in Manesar area. Earlier a few years back the workers at Honda plant went on a rampage. they assaulted even the cops. The local SP had both his arms with multiple fractures. Then earlier in the year there were reports of violence at Orient Craft, and some other garment units. And now it is the turn of Maruti. I have a feeling that some Trade Union is very active in this region, as on the whole Gurgaon area does not have much of Industrial Disputes.There is something uniquely wrong with Suzuki. Why is only them who make headlines under labor dispute section every year?