pmaitra
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,594
SOB, here is some insight into the Honda problem:
My questions are:
The entire setup is mind numbingly stupid.
Source: Gurgaon workers unrest: Background, features, chronology, and economic notes on India's automobile industry at Sanhati1c. Dispute at Honda HMSI
HMSI currently has 1,872 regular workers and another 2,500 on contract. Honda HMSI plant was affected by the disputes at Rico and Sunbeam due to lack of parts – but there was a 'home-grown' conflict going on, as well. The Honda workers union and Honda management were in process of negotiating a three years wage agreement. The management accused the union of using a go-slow tactic at the new third production assembly line, involving 40 permanents and 100 casuals, in order to put pressure on the management.
On 10th of October HMSI management announced that production at the plant is down by more than 50 per cent and that the new line for vehicles – the third one since production began – has failed to take off. "This means a production loss of almost 600 two-wheelers per day. Overall, we are equipped to roll out 4,350 vehicles a day but we are doing only a little over 2,000 units because of the workers' attitude," an HSMI official said. While no concrete figures are available, it is estimated that the company has suffered a loss of around 250 crore Rs.
Mohan Deepak, VP for Industrial Relations at HMSI, said the average cost-to-company (CTC) for a shop-floor worker is currently around Rs 25,000. According to HSMI management the wage demands of the union will push their CTC higher than shop floor workers at Hero Honda, the current market leaders with stronger business and production figures.
On 27th of October 2009 union and management enter an agreement on 3-years wage contract including "performance reward scheme.
My questions are:
- How come Honda was running with more contract workers than regular workers? More than 50% workers are contingency workers, that means their business model is contingency based. This is insane!
- Why aren't companies willing to take full responsibility of workers, yet are expecting them to take full ownership of the car production? This is like McDonald's in the US. Get hired today, get fired tomorrow. They want to manufacture automobiles with that policy?
- The contract workers can be laid off anytime, so what about their job security?
- If these people at Honda cannot afford to make their large workforce regular, why don't they get some robots to do their jobs instead? They are doing this at BMW Factory in South Carolina (I have been there).
- Also, speaking of the management, were more than 50% of them contract workers, or were all settled in secured jobs?
The entire setup is mind numbingly stupid.