USS Enterprise is in Pakistani waters near Balochistan !

[Blackwater]

In 1971 our all weather friend USSR sent its nuke subs and destroyers behind "Task Force 74" to rein US adventurism supporting biggest terrorist nation of today called Pakistan.

So can we expect China to do similar to save Pakis?





btw any credible source of US AC near country named Balochistan?

records shows china never send warships to help pakis

 

[BangersAndMash]

records shows china never send warships to help pakis

Maybe not warships, but if G Parthasarathy is to be believed, this is how sugar daddy China helps it's bitch pakistan, listen from 0:37 onwards......

 

[rock127]

records shows china never send warships to help pakis

I know, it was a taunt to the rhetoric "all weather friend" song pakis-chinis sing

 

[Zebra]

USS Enterprise Prepares To Cross Suez Canal, Days Away From Anchor In Arabian Sea
by Tyler Durden,
03/29/2012

USS Enterprise Prepares To Cross Suez Canal, Days Away From Anchor In Arabian Sea | ZeroHedge

 

[sayareakd]

it will take 10-15 days for any chines ship to reach Pakistan by that time their wont be any Pakistan.

 

[sayareakd]

USS Enterprise Prepares To Cross Suez Canal, Days Away From Anchor In Arabian Sea
by Tyler Durden,
03/29/2012

USS Enterprie Prepares To Cross Suez Canal, Days Away From Anchor In Arabian Sea | ZeroHedge

So the news is true, Pakistan will, if US NAVY would allow will find ssbn and nuke attack sub near AC.

Pakistan is about to be screwed
big time.

 

[sayareakd]

looks like, ISI, PN & PAF has no idea as to what is going on.

 

[Zebra]

@ saya, the news is true.

May be, kahin pe nigahein kahin pe nishana.

 

[arya]

So the news is true, Pakistan will, if US NAVY would allow will find ssbn and nuke attack sub near AC.

Pakistan is about to be screwed
big time.

pressure game nothing else and alarm time for India

pakistan can do anything if they feel insecure , usa will act on Pakistan before leaving afgan

 

[Yusuf]

In 1971 our all weather friend USSR sent its nuke subs and destroyers behind "Task Force 74" to rein US adventurism supporting biggest terrorist nation of today called Pakistan.

So can we expect China to do similar to save Pakis?



btw any credible source of US AC near country named Balochistan?

China of today is nowhere close to the USSR of 71, militarily.

 

[arya]

what will we do if usa start any operation in Pakistan

 

[Zebra]

If US starts any operation in Pakistan, then US- India bhai bhai.

 

[latsar]

This is not a video game. US will not use tactical nukes.

.Mr. Yusuf ,I didn't say the U.S. will start using tactical nukes unprovoked. First I said in post 15 that ' If the situation deteriorates ' the U.S. might enforce a naval blockade on the Pakistani ports .This itself would bring pakis to its knees.Mr. Ray responded for the above comment in post 18 and I replied to his post that only if the pakis stupidly or by mistake try to pre empt an attack on U.S. a/c .,I said they will use tactical nukes.No one attacks U.S. and gets way with it. If Pakistan is not a nuclear weapon state then they might use conventional force but Pakistan as nuclear weapons so if it comes to an attack on Pakistan ,the U.S. will use tactical nukes to nullify Pakistan from retaliating with nukes and its military's fighting capability.The U.S. will not use a nuclear bomb since it would cause more civilian destruction .Hence I said they might use small and precision tactical nukes.I hve also acknowledged that in this scenario couple of nukes can escape the U.S. and Indian air defenses and might hit India.

 

[rock127]

what will we do if usa start any operation in Pakistan

This is a good option ---> op:

But we need to be cautious... these Pakis can certainly do adventurism to divert and spread the war to save themselves by blackmailing.

 

[Yusuf]

.Mr. Yusuf ,I didn't say the U.S. will start using tactical nukes unprovoked. First I said in post 15 that ' If the situation deteriorates ' the U.S. might enforce a naval blockade on the Pakistani ports .This itself would bring pakis to its knees.Mr. Ray responded for the above comment in post 18 and I replied to his post that only if the pakis stupidly or by mistake try to pre empt an attack on U.S. a/c .,I said they will use tactical nukes.No one attacks U.S. and gets way with it. If Pakistan is not a nuclear weapon state then they might use conventional force but Pakistan as nuclear weapons so if it comes to an attack on Pakistan ,the U.S. will use tactical nukes to nullify Pakistan from retaliating with nukes and its military's fighting capability.The U.S. will not use a nuclear bomb since it would cause more civilian destruction .Hence I said they might use small and precision tactical nukes.I hve also acknowledged that in this scenario couple of nukes can escape the U.S. and Indian air defenses and might hit India.

You mean to say a conventional Paki attack on US carrier will get a nuclear response from the US?

 

[latsar]

Yes sir, Pakistan as nuclear weapons and it can hit its bases in the middle east and can even attack Israel. So the U.S. will not take chances.The A/C is a part of U.S. territory.

 

[Yusuf]

Yes sir, Pakistan as nuclear weapons and it can hit its bases in the middle east and can even attack Israel. So the U.S. will not take chances.

Conventional paki attack on US carrier will not result in a nuclear strike on Pak by US. It will unleash all its conventional power to destroy Pak military infra and also take out all its nuclear installations.

 

[latsar]

Sir ,you have the right to your views but I will stick to mine thanks

 

[Yusuf]

Sir ,you have the right to your views but I will stick to mine thanks

Sure you can. But then there has to be any logic for a nuclear response to a conventional strike that too on an aircraft carrier. Total disproportionate response.

 

[W.G.Ewald]

If true, quite funny that the same carrier moved into Bay of Bengal in 1971 to intimidate India in support of Pak and now It's intimidating Pak.

USS Enterprise (CVN 65)