USA pass bill to create a park on the Moon

Discussion in 'Americas' started by IBSA, Jul 15, 2013.

  1. IBSA

    IBSA Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    832
    Location:
    São Paulo
    "Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act" Designates Moon Sites As National Parks

    [​IMG]

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida -- As the prospect of lunar missions made by commercial spacecraft and foreign nations comes closer to a reality with the passing of each day, a bill titled "Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act" was introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives that would designate the U.S. lunar landing sites created between 1969 and 1972 during the Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 missions as Historical Parks that would fall under the administration of the U.S. National Park System.


    Additionally, H.R. 2617 would seek international recognition of the landing sites through the United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) with a "World Heritage Site" designation.


    The bill, which was sponsored by U.S. Representative Donna Edwards (MD-4) and co-sponsored by U.S. Representative Eddie Johnson (TX-30), was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Natural Resources for review.


    In 2011, NASA issued a detailed publication titled: "NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts" which laid out recommendations to future lunar missions where not to go, or disturb, prior U.S. Lunar Mission sites.


    Although NASA advises that the document is a recommendation and does not "represent mandatory U.S. or international requirements," the publication is full of citations to both U.S. law and international treaties.


    While the lack of an ongoing U.S. manned space flight program makes many Americans cringe, the prospect of a hostile nation in the future wiping out any evidence of the U.S. lunar landings in an effort to re-write history becomes unfathomable.


    NASA's statement follows:

    "NASA recognizes the steadily increasing technical capabilities of space-faring commercial entities and nations throughout the world, and further recognizes that many are on the verge of landing spacecraft on the surface of the moon. In the 50 years since the first lunar missions, the spaceflight community has not formally provided recommendations to the next generation of lunar explorers on how to preserve the original artifacts and protect ongoing science from the potentially damaging effects of nearby landers.

    Until more formal guidance is developed – perhaps through a multilateral approach – NASA has assembled this document that contains the collected technical knowledge of its personnel. External experts from the historic, scientific and flight-planning communities have reviewed these technical recommendations for lunar vehicle design and mission planning teams. This document does not represent mandatory U.S. or international requirements; rather, it is offered to inform lunar spacecraft mission planners interested in helping preserve and protect lunar historic artifacts and potential science opportunities for future missions.

    These recommendations are intended to apply to United States Government artifacts on the lunar surface. These artifacts include:

    Apollo lunar surface landing and roving hardware;

    Robotic lunar surface landing sites (e.g., Surveyor sites);

    Impact sites (e.g., Ranger, S-IVB, LCROSS, lunar module [LM] ascent stage);

    USG experiments left on the lunar surface, tools, equipment, miscellaneous EVA hardware;

    and Specific indicators of U.S. human, human-robotic lunar presence, including footprints, rover tracks, etc., although not all anthropogenic indicators are protected as identified in the recommendations.

    Because of the relevance of these recommendations to current and future lunar elements deposited by other space-faring entities, NASA has engaged in dialogue with commercial and international space agencies to share the document and open the discussions for improvements to the recommendations."
     
  2.  
  3. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Democrats.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  4. Dovah

    Dovah Untermensch Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    3,273
    Location:
    Modindia
    Okay, would it be legal to lay a claim to the Moon just by the virtue of being there first? I mean this isn't the 17th century anymore.
     
  5. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Moon Treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

     
  6. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    4,500
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    If I am not mistaken, the United States is effectively advocating the claiming of certain territory on the Moon by designating it as a National Park. Does it not violate the treaty below:
    Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies aka Outer Space Treaty. It has been ratified by most countries including the USA.

    Outer Space Treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2013
    Dovah likes this.
  7. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    The United States is not advocating the claiming of anything. A bill has been introduced in a committee of Congress by two Democrats.
     
    Dovah likes this.
  8. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    4,500
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Corrected @W.G.Ewald
    So you think it won't get enough support in the senate or congress or whatever?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  9. Dovah

    Dovah Untermensch Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    3,273
    Location:
    Modindia
    Thread title is misleading.
     
    Razor likes this.
  10. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    4,500
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Plus there is no Source link. :(
     
  11. lcatejas

    lcatejas Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    255
    Location:
    Bharat
    Great Inspiring news for Mayawati to build new statue on moon ....::cool2:
     
  12. Dovah

    Dovah Untermensch Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    3,273
    Location:
    Modindia
  13. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    I believe the bill would have to be brought to the House of Representatives for a vote by the chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Natural Resources, voted on, and then it would go to the Senate. The progress can be followed here: Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act (H.R. 2617) - GovTrack.us

    .
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
    Razor likes this.
  14. TrueSpirit

    TrueSpirit Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,891
    Likes Received:
    824
    Location:
    Forget It....Trace my IP if you can
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  15. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    I have seen her Wikipedia entry :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  16. dhananjay1

    dhananjay1 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2013
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    912
    Location:
    india
    Those who have power, can lay claims on anything they want. That's the way of all the centuries, be it 17th or 21st century.
     

Share This Page