US may not target Mullah Omar after this year

Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by Neo, Dec 22, 2014.

  1. Neo

    Neo Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    803
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    US may not target Mullah Omar after this year


    WASHINGTON: The United States has said that after Jan 2, US forces in Afghanistan will not target Mullah Omar and other Taliban leaders unless they posed a direct threat to the US.

    “Being a member of the Taliban doesn’t mean that the United States is going to prosecute operations against you for that reason alone,” Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby told a recent news briefing in Washington.

    But he also drew a line between combatant and non-combatant Taliban, saying that those who continued to fight would not be spared.

    Also read: Taliban leader Mullah Omar says prisoner swap “big victory”

    “We’ve also concurred that a member of the Taliban who undertakes missions against us or our Afghan partners — by that act alone, renders himself vulnerable and liable to US action,” Rear Admiral Kirby said.

    In his year-end news conference on Friday, President Barack Obama assured the American nation that he would fulfil his pledge to end the US-led war in Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

    “And in less than two weeks, after more than 13 years, our combat mission in Afghanistan will be over,” he said.

    President Obama, however, has authorised this force to fight the militants if they posed a direct threat to them or caused a major threat to official Afghan forces.

    Know more: Conflicting loyalties among Afghans at Mullah Omar's mosque

    At the Pentagon briefing, journalists asked Mr Kirby to further explain the policy and also asked him if US forces would continue to pursue Taliban leader Mullah Omar after 2014 as well, as they did in the past.

    Mullah Omar was Afghanistan’s head of state from 1996 until the US forced him from power in 2001. He has been on the State Department’s Rewards for Justice programme since Oct 2001, for harbouring Osama bin Laden and other terrorists. The reward for his capture is $10 million.

    “Is Mullah and the other people on this list, are they no longer liable for their past acts in Afghanistan?” a journalist asked.

    “I don’t know if I can answer that question. As the recognised leader of the Taliban to the degree the Taliban still poses a threat or poses a threat to us or to our allies, they will continue to be prosecuted by US military operations,” Admiral Kirby said. “I can’t really make it any more simpler than that.”

    The Pentagon spokesman explained that from January 2nd, the US policy in Afghanistan would change.

    But “what changes fundamentally, though, is (that) … on January 2nd, just by being a member of the Taliban doesn’t make you an automatic target,” he explained.

    “So, beginning January 2nd, it will be up to the Afghans to go after someone like a Mullah Omar?” asked a journalist.

    “That’s correct, unless there is a direct threat that’s posed,” Mr Kirby said.


    US may not target Mullah Omar after this year - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
     
  2.  
  3. Neo

    Neo Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    803
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    Back to 'good taliban bad taliban' policy?
     
  4. Illusive

    Illusive Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    2,335
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    Did they do this because he is a threat to pak?
     
  5. Neo

    Neo Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    803
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    US may blame us for Osama but they haven't been a great help in targetting the Taliban leaders we want. It took a long time before Meshud was killed, Mullah Omar, Fazalullah and Khorasani are still hiding in Afghanistan. They can kill Osama in Pakistan but can't get hold of these guys? I am not buying this.
     
  6. Illusive

    Illusive Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    2,335
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    Do these guys eg Omar have openly stated they have attacked Pakistani interests or carried attacks on pakistan, in pakistani words "do you have the proof" of them involving of incidents in pakistan.
     
  7. datguy79

    datguy79 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    937
    Location:
    Canada
    Pretty hard to attack someone holed up in an ISI safehouse in Karachi
     
    boris likes this.
  8. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    3,351
    US still has its strategic interests in Afg.
     
  9. jus

    jus Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    1,208
    Location:
    Universe
    US never cared about talibans (good/bad),their main aim is ALKAIDA &OBL.Talibans sheltered him, US attacked without knowing consequences.And it is struggling from last 14 yrs in this SHI* HOLE called as Pak-Af border.

    Now US leaving, Talibans are not old ones they are wounded,droned,killed.They want nothing less than revenge, which can steals pak-af army sleep. :rofl:

    Note:Talibs want rule afg under sharia,Alkaida is direct war with US.Both are diff
     

Share This Page