US law forbids oil and gas deals with Iran

gokussj9

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag
US law forbids oil and gas deals with Iran | DAWN.COM

WASHINGTON: A US law, that the State Department says can be used against Pakistan if it finalises the gas pipeline deal, forbids any major investment in Iran's energy sector.

The Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010, as explained by the Congressional Research Service, requires the US president to:

Impose sanctions "if a person has, with actual knowledge, made an investment of $20 million or more that directly and significantly contributed to Iran's ability to develop its petroleum resources."

The sanctions will also apply on "any combination of investments of at least $5 million which in the aggregate equals or exceeds $20 million in any 12-month period."

The act also directs the US President to impose sanctions if a person has, with actual knowledge, sold, leased, or provided to Iran "any goods, services, technology, information, or support that would allow Iran to maintain or expand its domestic production of refined petroleum resources, including any assistance in refinery construction, modernisation, or repair."

Sanctions will also apply if a person has, with actual knowledge, provided Iran with refined petroleum resources or "engaged in any activity that could contribute to Iran's ability to import refined petroleum resources, including providing shipping, insurance, or financing services for such activity."

Sanctions established under this Act are in addition to any sanctions already imposed under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.

The 2010 act establishes additional sanctions prohibiting specified foreign exchange, banking, and property transactions.

The 2010 Act extended US economic sanctions placed on Iran under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 and punishes companies and individuals who aid Iran's petroleum sector.

It is part of a larger US campaign to target the Iranian petroleum industry with the aim to force Iran to abandon its nuclear programme. The act was passed by the House (408-8) and Senate (99-0) on June 24, 2010 and signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 1, 2010.

As the US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said on Monday, the act forced the European Union and Japan to drastically reduce their dependence on Iranian oil.

"In the case of the EU, they're now at zero. In the case of Japan, they've been making a steady decline, as have other countries that we have waived sanctions on," she said,

But the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project, if finalised, "would take Pakistan in the wrong direction right at a time that we're trying to work with Pakistan on better, more reliable ways to meet its energy needs."

During the 2012 presidential campaign, Mr Obama said that the US-sponsored economic sanctions were "crippling the Iranian economy" which was now "in shambles."

In recent congressional debates, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers hoped the sanctions will soon force Iran to give up its nuclear programme.

They also claimed that the sanctions had triggered such widespread discontent in Iran that the regime could be toppled in a popular revolt.

An Israeli foreign minister document, leaked recently, reported that Iranian energy exports had fallen by 50 per cent after the European Union joined the United States last year in imposing an oil embargo on Iran.

US officials and diplomatic sources in Washington say that allowing Pakistan to finalise the pipeline deal will reduce the impact of the sanctions by allowing Iran to export its gas. That's why, they argue, Washington is opposing the deal.

But a report posted on a popular US news site noted that the sanctions were hurting the Iranian people, not the government. The sanctions were making the Iranian currency "increasingly worthless," the report added. The currency, Rial, has dropped 80 per cent in just the past year.

"This was making it hard for Iranians to procure medicine from overseas. The price of an imported wheelchair has increased ten-fold in just a year. The price for a cancer patient to receive chemotherapy has nearly tripled, and filters for kidney dialysis are up by 325 per cent," said the report while urging the United States to ease the sanctions.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
The question will Obama apply this law on Pakistan for starting the pipeline and China for accepting to finance it.
 

limit_sky

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
84
Likes
23
The question will Obama apply this law on Pakistan for starting the pipeline and China for accepting to finance it.
Sir, the article mentions that the sanctions are waived on countries who are in the process of reducing the dependence on Iranian Oil. The countries include India , Japan and EU. Dont know about china.
what if China reduces the net dependency on Iranian oil YoY but funds Iran-Pakistan pipeline and later its extension to China can she be sanctioned as theoretically dependency is reduced.( classified only as alternate route)
But China gains massively as it gets alternate route for supply of gas without going through Indian ocean so giant leap in energy security.

Also Sir it remains to be seen whether through this project net dependency of Pakistan increases or not? if increases then it can be sanctioned but if advantages for China are massive then She will bail Pakistan out otherwise future of the project is not so bright.

Sir your take on this?
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
USA law is universal law. all depends on american interest how soon they enforced it
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag
US is known to bend their own rules for short term benefits... Don't expect Obama to do anything to against pak, they still need the supply routes through pak. Even if US put sanctions, they themselves will make up for it in aids.

Forget about China... China owns US.

The question will Obama apply this law on Pakistan for starting the pipeline and China for accepting to finance it.
 
Last edited:

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Sir, the article mentions that the sanctions are waived on countries who are in the process of reducing the dependence on Iranian Oil. The countries include India , Japan and EU. Dont know about china.
what if China reduces the net dependency on Iranian oil YoY but funds Iran-Pakistan pipeline and later its extension to China can she be sanctioned as theoretically dependency is reduced.( classified only as alternate route)
But China gains massively as it gets alternate route for supply of gas without going through Indian ocean so giant leap in energy security.

Also Sir it remains to be seen whether through this project net dependency of Pakistan increases or not? if increases then it can be sanctioned but if advantages for China are massive then She will bail Pakistan out otherwise future of the project is not so bright.

Sir your take on this?
Please don't 'Sir' me. I'm a normal poster just like you.

My assessment is that nothing is going to happen on Iran-Pakistan pipeline. Neither of them have the money to complete the pipeline. The news of Chinese funding the pipeline came from Pakistani side which is known to lie a lot to its public, so I won't take that piece of news as seriously. Its just a gimmick which serves both Iran government and Pakistan government to show it to their people that something is being done. Mere smoke and mirrors.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
may be if USA approval the marshal plan(50billions USD)

otherwise they can go to **** with there own law
 

Prometheus

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
400
Likes
344
may be if USA approval the marshal plan(50billions USD)

otherwise they can go to **** with there own law
Dont you guys feel ashamed to always ask the US for money ? Its really funny how Pakistanis DEMAND and actually believe that its the US taxpayers responsibility to support the otherwise great state of Pakistan. Why do you guys always take to blackmailing the US .... why dont you guys instead ask your great ally China to bail you out ?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top