US issues waiver for sale of major defence equipment to Pakistan

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by Blackwater, Apr 5, 2013.

  1. Blackwater

    Blackwater Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    20,986
    Likes Received:
    11,813
    Location:
    Akhand Bharat
    Washington: In an indication of the "positive trajectory" of the bilateral ties, the US has issued a waiver, second in six months, for sale of major defence equipment to Pakistan citing national security interest.

    The waiver issued quietly by the then Deputy Secretary of States Thomas Nides on February 15 and posted on the State Department website a week later on February 22 would pave the way for some major defence equipment sales to Pakistan.

    "The Department issued the waiver because we have determined that security assistance is important to the national security interests of the United States and is a critical component of US efforts to continue to build a strong, mutually beneficial relationship with Pakistan grounded in concrete action on areas of shared interest," a State Department spokesperson told PTI.


    The waiver, issued within a fortnight of Secretary of State John Kerry taking the reins US diplomacy on February 1, allows for the execution of America's Foreign Military Financing (FMF) programme, and for the sale or export of certain Major Defence Equipment (MDE).

    "Major Defence Equipment," means any US manufactured defence article whose export is controlled by US Munitions List which has a nonrecurring research and development cost of more than USD 50,000,000 or a total production cost of more than USD 200,000,000. These items require Congressional notification, the spokesman said.

    "As a matter of policy we do not discuss proposed defence sales or transfers until they have been formally notified to Congress," he said, refraining to give any figure to the expected sale of major defence items to Pakistan after this waiver.

    According to a known South Asia expert, the two waivers issued by the then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in September were sweeping and so allowed the release of all forms of assistance for the fiscal 2012 including nonmilitary.

    It seems the main purpose of the February 15 waiver was to create a positive atmosphere for meetings in Washington DC with visiting senior military officials from Pakistan.

    "These waivers don't represent an improvement in US-Pak relations so much as they represent attempts to improve such relations," an expert explained said adding that from the US perspective, some level of working relations with Pakistan is necessary for the US drawdown from Afghanistan to go smoothly.

    Observing that security assistance builds Pakistan's capabilities in countering terrorism, the State Department official said that such assistance will continue to be implemented consistent with its policy goals of supporting Pakistan's shared interest in regional stability and countering terrorism.

    "Despite the past challenges in our bilateral relationship with Pakistan, we are encouraged by recent engagements which indicate the positive trajectory of the relationship, including productive working group meetings addressing the full range of the relationship and Pakistan's participation in Core Group meetings with Afghanistan," the spokesperson said.

    "As we have said, our number one shared priority remains pursuing our counterterrorism objectives to secure the safety of American and Pakistani citizens. We face a common threat from a common enemy, and we must confront terrorism and extremism together," the official asserted.

    In a two-paragraph notice to US exporters posted on the website February 22, the Directorate of Defence Trade Controls of the State Department said Section 203 of the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-73), which is more popular as Kerry-Lugar-Berman bill, prohibits for fiscal years 2012-2014 the issuance of export licenses for major defence equipment to be exported to Pakistan absent an appropriate certification or waiver under Section 203 in the fiscal year.

    "On February 15, 2013, Deputy Secretary Thomas Nides signed a waiver of these prohibitions for the current fiscal year. DDTC is now reviewing all license applications for the export to Pakistan of defence articles, including major defence equipment, on a case-by-case basis," said the notification.

    Under the Kerry-Lugar-Berman bill the US can't approve sale of major defence equipment to Pakistan unless the Secretary of State either gives a waiver under national security interest or certifies that Pakistan is continuing to cooperate US to dismantle supplier networks relating to the acquisition of nuclear weapons-related materials, and has demonstrated a sustained commitment to and is making significant efforts towards combating terrorist groups.

    The bill requires the Secretary of State to certify that Pakistan has made progress on matters such as ceasing support, including by any elements within the Pakistan military or its intelligence agency, to extremist and terrorist groups, particularly to any group that has conducted attacks against United States or coalition forces in Afghanistan, or against the territory or people of neighboring countries.

    It also requires the State Department to certify that Pakistan is taking steps to prevent Al Qaeda, the Taliban and associated terrorist groups, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, from operating in the territory of Pakistan, including carrying out cross-border attacks into neighboring countries, closing terrorist camps in the FATA (federally administered tribal areas), dismantling terrorist bases of operations in other parts of the country, including Quetta and Muridke, and taking action when provided with intelligence about high-level terrorist targets.

    Among other things the State Department also needs to certify that Pakistan is strengthening counterterrorism and anti-money laundering laws; and that the security forces of Pakistan are not materially and substantially subverting the political or judicial processes of Pakistan.


    US issues waiver for sale of major defence equipment to Pakistan | NDTV.com
     
    W.G.Ewald likes this.
  2.  
  3. Blackwater

    Blackwater Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    20,986
    Likes Received:
    11,813
    Location:
    Akhand Bharat
    is it the lollipop from US?? or again pakis manage to beg and blackmail USA
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  4. Virendra

    Virendra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Location:
    Delhi, India, India
    Americans ... :dude:
    They will never learn it seems :tsk: :tsk:
    By the way, to what extent will the Americans continue to support Pakistan overall, after the former had taken their necks out of Afghanistan in 2014?
     
  5. drkrn

    drkrn Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    898
    Location:
    visakhapatnam
    what kind of equipment are they going to get now
    any possibility of drones?
     
  6. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    i hope we get our 32 embargo F-16 as well for whom we have paid in the 90's
     
  7. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    i dont think america will turn there back to pakistan onwards 2014 or when the withdraw from afghanistan..

    i mean pakistan and america relation has only disturbed after the afghanistan invasion not improved.
     
  8. agentperry

    agentperry Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    678
    Location:
    delhi
    well such embargo doesnt last long specially when embargoes state is an important coalition partner( atleast on paper, willfully or not is a doubtful case)
    with the presence of cheap chinese weapon system i dont think this will change anything between usa and pakistan. this is on the basis of the way weapons are procured, hard cash in case of usa and cheap soft loans in case of chinese weaponry.
     
  9. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    I think more military aid is just bribe for killing Pakistanis in future with drone attack. These strikes are going to get increase since not much ground presence by uncle.
    Plus all the equpiment is bugged with gps, geo fence, remote kill switch and inspection and other things.
     
    rock127 likes this.
  10. arnabmit

    arnabmit Homo Communis Indus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    Location:
    Kolkata
    US violating their own ATT resolution by supplying weapons to a terrorist state.
     
  11. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    No it isn't because US does not list Pak as State Sponsor of Terrorism.

    State Sponsors of Terrorism

    Q.E.D.
     
  12. hit&run

    hit&run Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    5,495
    Likes Received:
    4,670
    They always have a clause of national interest when wavering sanctions and self imposed embargoes; to lick the what they spit back and against what they first went gaga about on moral duties being a rational super power.
     
  13. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,283
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Ok this is the carrot, what's the stick this time?
     
  14. arnabmit

    arnabmit Homo Communis Indus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    Location:
    Kolkata
    That's the biggest hypocrisy of US. Hope that will change after 2014 else US will face severe credibility loss.

     
  15. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Do you not believe Obama?


    Refocusing on the Threat from al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan

    Foreign Policy | The White House
     
    farhan_9909 likes this.
  16. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,938
    Likes Received:
    10,289
    Location:
    India
    More drone attacks.
     
    sayareakd likes this.
  17. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    US-Afghan-Pakistani Relations During Obama’s Second Term

    Pakistan-U.S. Relations

     
  18. arnabmit

    arnabmit Homo Communis Indus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    Location:
    Kolkata
    US needs a FDR again :sad:

     
  19. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,624
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    Yeah they aid, trained and shelter them, OBL raid is prime example still Uncle has to see smoke screen to have legs in Afghan.
     
  20. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    you consider pakistan a terrorist state? :O

    anyway USa lawmakers like hagel consider india a terrorist state as evident from the statement of India is funding terrorism against pakistan in afghanistan
     
  21. arnabmit

    arnabmit Homo Communis Indus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    Location:
    Kolkata
    I don't have to. Pakistanis themselves knows so.

    [video=youtube_share;r4D9goJqQME]http://youtu.be/r4D9goJqQME[/video]

    [video=youtube_share;_chA3nowdCE]http://youtu.be/_chA3nowdCE[/video]

    [video=youtube_share;rkmlWqzoOKE]http://youtu.be/rkmlWqzoOKE[/video]

    Chuck never called India a terrorist state or accused India of terrorism. He said we financed Balouchi nationals. Please clean your ear and watch the video again. Chuck's silence on this topic after assuming office and avoiding clarification shows how embarrassed he is of that misinformed statement he made many years ago. Current US policy towards India has nullified that statement many times over.

    On a personal note, financing the liberation of oppressed people is good karma. We should do more of it. We do not send weapons or men, so our support can not be called terrorism.

     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
    gokussj9 likes this.

Share This Page