Upcoming UN SDGs a Christlamofascist plot?

[Rowdy]

As we all know the UN's Millennium Development Goals (MDG) end this year . India got some , missed some but progressed in all.
The UN will come up with the new Sustainable development goals .... Which consist of the following points:

1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture
3. Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages
4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all
9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialisation, and foster innovation
10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (taking note of agreements made by the UNFCCC forum)
14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification and halt and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss
16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise the global partnership for sustainable development

Note the last three points in Red..... very very dangerous ... they sound like "secularism"... .... What does it have to do with Christlamofascists ( Christian + Islamic fascists)
Theorem 1: Christianity and Islam are parasitic faiths, they are how ever comfortable with each other and will cut a deal... everyone else will convert or die.
Proof : History of both "faiths."
Enter the so called "Holy See"

His Holiness Pope Francis will visit the UN on 25 September 2015, and give an address to the UN General Assembly immediately ahead of the official opening of the UN Summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda.

Here is a statement from the vaticans official academy of sciences and social sciences
(The Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences)

Unsustainable consumption coupled with a record human population and the uses of inappropriate technologies are causally linked with the destruction of the world’s sustainability and resilience. Widening inequalities of wealth and income, the world-wide disruption of the physical climate system and the loss of millions of species that sustain life are the grossest manifestations of unsustainability. The continued extraction of coal, oil and gas following the “business-as-usual mode” will soon create grave existential risks for the poorest three billion, and for generations yet unborn. Climate change resulting largely from unsustainable consumption by about 15% of the world’s population has become a dominant moral and ethical issue for society. There is still time to mitigate unmanageable climate changes and repair ecosystem damages, provided we reorient our attitude toward nature and, thereby, toward ourselves. Climate change is a global problem whose solution will depend on our stepping beyond national affiliations and coming together for the common good. Such transformational changes in attitudes would help foster the necessary institutional reforms and technological innovations for providing the energy sources that have negligible effect on global climate, atmospheric pollution and eco-systems, thus protecting generations yet to be born. Religious institutions can and should take the lead in bringing about that change in attitude towards Creation.
The Catholic Church, working with the leadership of other religions, can now take a decisive role by mobilizing public opinion and public funds to meet the energy needs of the poorest 3 billion people, thus allowing them to prepare for the challenges of unavoidable climate and eco-system changes. Such a bold and humanitarian action by the world’s religions acting in unison is certain to catalyze a public debate over how we can integrate societal choices, as prioritized under UN’s sustainable development goals, into sustainable economic development pathways for the 21st century, with projected population of 10 billion or more.

since when did these fascists care about poor unless they could convert them.
Notice The stress on
a) Anti Coal , oil & Gas energy generation (Stifiling the poor from cheap energy)
b) "Climate change is a global problem" (It wasn't so when the west was industrializing )
c) The Catholic Church, working with the leadership of other religions, can now take a decisive role by mobilizing public opinion and public funds (Other religions = Islam ... rest will be subdued through victim tactics and NGOs and Leftists)
Finally a Reaction from India
New UN development goals will drive nations 'nuts': Indian economist

NEW DELHI (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - An Indian economist and member of a key government panel which formulates policy on social issues slammed the United Nations' new development goals on Tuesday, saying that having so many goals and targets would drive governments "nuts".


World leaders are due to adopt a set of new development objectives in September, to replace eight expiring U.N. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These will include objectives like ending poverty, reducing child mortality and tackling climate change.

Although the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will be finalised only in September, U.N. officials say member states have identified 17 goals and 169 targets.

Bibek Debroy, member of the NITI Ayog - a panel appointed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to act as a think-tank and advise on development priorities - said the SDGs were overly ambitious.

"I am going to provoke my hosts, but I am greatly disturbed by what is happening on the SDGs. Eight goals, 21 targets, I can understand. But 17 goals, 169 targets? We'll go nuts. Imagine the plight of the countries which will now have to collect data for these, if collecting that data at all is possible," he said.

Debroy, who was speaking at a news conference organized by the United Nations to launch a report on the Asia-Pacific region's progress on the MDGs, said he thought the SDGs would not have the "virtue" that the MDGs had.

"I look at some of those proposed goals and I don't understand what they mean. It's as if you are looking for a unified field theory and are trying to solve every problem under the sun."

United Nations officials said they agreed that there were many SDGs, but said the number of goals and targets was decided by all 193 member states.

"I agree with his (Debroy's) analysis and his concern that the goals and indicators are too many to be implementable and to be measured and monitored. This is a very serious concern," Rebecca Tavares, U.N. representative for India, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

"The good news is that the SDG process was a broad-based consultative process that member states themselves managed. The member states took control over the process and consulted all groups over many years. There were so many proposals and it was difficult to hone to down to a manageable number."

Like most countries, India has achieved some goals, but failed on others, the U.N. report said.

India has achieved 12 of the 21 targets.

These include halving the number of people living on less than $1.25 a day, ensuring universal primary schooling, achieving gender parity in primary schools, halving the number of people without access to clean drinking water and increasing forest cover, the report said.

The country has, however, been slow to reduce the number of underweight children, and to curb the number of women dying in childbirth and the number of infants dying, it added.

Debroy, a free-market ideologue, said people had to be careful when focusing on goals and should not make "value judgments" on people's lifestyle.

"For example, should people have piped drinking water? Everyone will say yes. But in India in 2001, 45,000 villages had populations less than 100, some of those villages are in hilly areas where they get perfectly clean drinking water from streams," he said.

"So what is the objective? Is it to get drinking water from taps or just to get clean drinking water?"

THESE SO CALLED SDGs ARE A FARCE TO KEEP POOR NATIONS POOR AND RICH FOR SOUL HARVEST AND INDIA IS THEIR PRIME TARGET. THEY WILL PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY. I PREDICT THE MEDIA WILL SING PRAISES OF THESE GOALS AND BASH MODI FOR NOT BEING SUFFICIENTLY ACTIVE.
@Mad Indian @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @roma @Rashna @Khagesh @OneGrimPilgrim @blueblood @AnantS

 

[blueblood]

Frankly I agree with with all of the above SDG. At the same time I will disagree with their definition and time period required to achieve them.

Since a member of NITI aayog has already voiced his concerns about the impracticality of SDGs means they are aware of this chicanery and because this govt. has more than enough balls they will continue to do whatever they were doing apart from some token symbolism.

That pope thing actually works in India's favour. Turds in the republican party has been denying climate change for years. Your average republican unabashedly consumes multiple times energy than you and I and since he is creationist and pope lover, chances are that he might actually listen to him.

We need those fat Americans to get off their butts so that some of the natural resources should be left for us too or else we will be arriving to a party with no food left.

 

[Rashna]

We can't not have any goals to achieve or else a chaotic country like India would become even more so. However i agree with the economist that the goals need to be achievable and realistic.

Blaming the west for climate change is one thing but we also need to accept that much of modern development came from the western experiments which obviously comes for a price we are paying in terms of climate change globally.

An awareness and need to save the environment is a good thing as long as everyone is on board. For e.g. An american uses 500 plastic bags every year (avg). We know where these plastic bags end up....