UN slams Sri Lanka for deporting Pakistani asylum seekers

Discussion in 'Subcontinent & Central Asia' started by Ray, Aug 13, 2014.

  1. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    A rather heartless act of sending persecuted folks back into the lion's den.

    But then Sri Lankans have always shown that they are heartless and have no humanity in them when their Buddhist aims and majorityism is threatened. Too many Muslims and Christians would change the demography?

    Or is it that they want ot show they are the handmaiden of the Pakistani Sunni Govt and not caring a damn about the asylum seekers being wiped out on return?
     
  2.  
  3. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,936
    Likes Received:
    10,289
    Location:
    India
    Why not UN slams Terrorist Pakistan first about persecuting minorities since 47?

    Where was UN when Terrorist Pakistan killed 3 million Bangladeshi and raped 200,000 women?

    Where was UN when Terrorist Pakistan gave shelter to OBL?

    Where was UN when Terrorist Pakistan killed 100,000 Kashmiris?

    UN is a joke today.
     
    happy, HeinzGud and Otm Shank like this.
  4. Jagdish58

    Jagdish58 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    571
    Location:
    Bangalore
     
  5. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Then why heart full India didn't take them?

    India didn't even take there own citizen who were in Sri Lanka. :p
     
  6. ladder

    ladder Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Location:
    India
    Court intervened isn't it? What did court say?

    I thought giving asylum to Pakistani was a deserving way to say 'thank you' to them for helping you in LTTE war.

    Also, after removal of the ISI agents from Pak high commission, Colombo. That place can accommodate a few of the refuges. Pak will oblige if Colombo requests.

    Also, who lives in refugee camps in south India? refugees from northern Lanka or ghosts?

    Maybe ghosts, live in refugee camps in India as soulless inhabitants inhabit Sri Lanka.
     
  7. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    I do not now about the court order though we cannot take any refugees because we cannot sustain them. Why not India the rising super power take them instead?

    India didn't even give citizenship for those people. But your people say Tamils care about Tamils. Those poor refugees still live in misery. Sri Lanka has never said we don't take them back. Sri Lanka has always welcomed them. But the issue is that many do not want to come after living is so many years in India. Before pointing fingers at us please grant citizenship to those people or try to elevate their living standard.
     
  8. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Because you claim you are the most humane nation in the world and so they flock to you.

    We care.

    Sure we do.

    That is why Tibetans, East Pakistanis, SL Tamils, Afghans, Iranis all have got refuge.

    But then all want to return to their homeland, right?

    We must facilitate that or should be give them nationality?

    And you Gautama Buddha was a man of compassion.

    Even if you have forgotten that!
     
    Ahsan Bin Tufail and sydsnyper like this.
  9. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Like, my good man, which own citizens are you talking about?

    The Sri lankans who went from Bengal to bring enlightenment to the savages in Sri Lanka way back in history?

    You are so disgraceful that you want to bite the hand that fed you (metaphorically).
     
  10. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Do not get carried away. Sri Lankan did not come from Bengal. Bengali's came from Bengal. If Bengali's from Bengal can be called Sri Lankans Indian can be called Iranians as well. It is absurd.

    I am talking about the Tamil coolies India reject to take despite they are being Indians. Not even Sri Lankan Tamils recognized them as their own.
     
  11. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere

    Correct.

    It is Sri Lankans who have come to Bengal.

    Now, whip out a fudged map like your mentors, China.

    If Tamils were coolies, at least they were productive.

    The British took the Ceylonese Buddhist to be genuine parasites who were too lazy.

    You are living off the toils of the Tamil coolies, you born parasites!
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
  12. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Well it is not. Perhaps India can speed up it's propaganda on that.

    Those people came to India without Indian consent. India didn't welcome them.

    So how India has facilitate the return of Sri Lankan Tamils from India? Besides you are so eager about the living conditions of Tamils in Sri Lanka. Why not care about them who live in India?
     
  13. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: The land is ours. So we live off from anybody.

    But the point is why didn't India take them back?
     
  14. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Genetic studies on the Sinhalese is part of population genetics investigating the origins of the Sinhalese populations today.

    Studies looking at the origin of the Sinhalese have been contradictory. Older studies suggest a predominantly Tamil origin followed by a significant Bengali contribution with no North Western Indian contribution. While modern studies point towards a predominantly Bengali contribution and a minor Tamil and North Western Indian contribution

    Sources
    Kirk, R. L. (1976). "The legend of Prince Vijaya — a study of Sinhalese origins". American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45: 91. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330450112.
    Papiha SS, Mastana SS, Purandare CA, Jayasekara R, Chakraborty R (October 1996). "Population genetic study of three VNTR loci (D2S44, D7S22, and D12S11) in five ethnically defined populations of the Indian subcontinent". Human Biology 68 (5): 819–35. PMID 8908803
     
  15. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    The land belong now to the Chinese.

    You are just 吸起 (Xī qǐ) what the Chinese call for suck ups.

    They think you are 牛屄.

    I assure you that Bengal will not take you back inspite of genetics.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
  16. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Racist scum.
     
  17. ladder

    ladder Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Location:
    India

    You don't know what your court said, probably you don't know what UNHCR said.

    Are all Sri Lankans like you? Don't know the facts but come to argue, painting themselves as idiots in the process?
    But, can't blame you kid, your stock's source of entertainment are perverted like the 'love letter' distortion saga.

    Here is the below link.

    Sri Lankan court stays deportation of Pakistani asylum seekers | The Indian Express

    ========================================

    India is doing what is required for her in obligation to UNHCR.

    Where it's not mandatory to give citizenship to refugees.

    Yes, we do care for Tamils. Who said we don't, your MoD website article?

    Must be a great privilege for them live in misery in India so they don't want to return to Sri Lanka. Did misery become a second nature to them?

    So, at least you agree we didn't turn our backs to refugees like Sri-Lanka is doing, isn't it.

    Citizenship again, why? who was the author of the article which said India has to give Sri Lankan Tamils citizenship? Or is it from your fertile imagination?

    But, the moot point is Sri-Lanka which now boasts of best %GDP growth and best GDP/capita isn't able to convince it's citizens to come back to their homes. Or providing money to India who is looking after their sustenance.

    So, the question arises, has the little Lanka abandoned them? Not a fat fetched thought isn't it?

    ==================================

    But, coming to topic, I am willing to bet 2 SL Rupees that, the judge will be changed and harassed if he/she delivers final justice against deportation.

    Boy, haven't we have seen harassment and impeachment of CJ of Sri Lanka?
     
  18. HeinzGud

    HeinzGud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,961
    Likes Received:
    382
    Location:
    Colombo, Sri Lanka
    Yes I'm aware of it now. Your point?

    Fair point. But those Tamils were blood relatives of Tamilnadu Tamils. Those Tamilnadu Tamils cry over anything happens to Sri Lankan Tamils but when it comes to really do something for them they look away. Shame.


    We simply cannot sustain them that is the reason. We have no new land to settle them nor our government coffers are rich enough to support them. It is better they should be sent to somewhere much better than us. But it should definitely not to be Pakistan.

    We always welcome them because they are our citizens. It is the fact that they do not want to come because of the social reason.


    Wait and see
     
  19. ladder

    ladder Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Location:
    India
    You are aware of it only 'NOW' and that exactly was my point.

    And there shouldn't have been a sliver of confusion over what was my point, for who is able to write a error free English sentence.

    ================================

    And so are all Pakistanis blood relatives of Indians? So what do you expect us to do?

    BTW, Bangladeshis, then East Pakistanis were also our blood relatives. :eyebrows:

    The country whose subjects they are, are responsible for them. Morally and legally.

    And shame is on the country who can't take responsibility.

    =============================================

    You have off loaded thousands of SL Tamils into refugee camps in India. The money you save from that can be spent on this poor Pakistani refugees instead of spending on the Sinhalese.

    Your empty coffers point is a moot because of the above point.

    Also, see Lebanon, it hasn't turned it's back on Syrian refugees. And last I knew Lebanese coffers weren't overflowing with money.

    But, also, being Bum-Chums of Pak you always can persuade them from persecuting minorities in the first place.

    ==============================================

    The same social reason for which these refugees don't want to return to Pakistan?

    My dear, world over that social issue is called 'persecution' update your vocabulary.

    ======================================

    Obviously, we all shall wait and see. But, precedent makes it easier to predict.

    ====================================
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
  20. Banda

    Banda Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Sri Lanka
    These pakistani refugees are living in a christian dominated area which is Negombo a bit far from Colombo city. It is the christian ppl there who are making noises because the pakistani refugee influx has been too big to bear. There is no religious angle to it.

    SL is right to deport them as SL is not a UN signatory to accept refugees. And even though UN has promised quick action, they are very slow and some are even here in SL for 6+ years.
    Same time UN when pointing at SL unfairly (as UN is another foriegn policy arm of US) asks SL to accept refugees. That is a joke in the first place.

    The only thing that is highlighted here is anti SL propaganda are hollow. The fact that people of different faiths come to SL seeking protection shows how the seperatist propaganda is wrong.

    And these fellows have been fed by SL people and churches. I know people from Negombo so i know how they face hardships because of refugee influx.

    For an anti SL racist baboon there is no wonder there is still left to point at SL for NOT accepting refugees. lol
     
    HeinzGud likes this.
  21. Banda

    Banda Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Sri Lanka
    UN has been a joke for a very long time
     

Share This Page