UN makes an offer to Taliban, delinks it from al Qaeda

Discussion in 'West Asia & Africa' started by SHASH2K2, Jun 18, 2011.

  1. SHASH2K2

    SHASH2K2 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,711
    Likes Received:
    723
    Location:
    Bihar, BanGalore , India

    The UN Security Council on Friday split the international sanctions regime for the Taliban and al Qaeda to encourage the Taliban to join reconciliation efforts in Afghanistan. The council unanimously passed two resolutions which set up one new blacklist of individuals and organizations accused of links to al Qaeda and a second for those linked to the Taliban militia.
    The two groups have until now been handled by the same sanctions committee. But the international powers wanted to separate them to highlight the divide between al Qaeda's global jihadist agenda and the Taliban's focus on Afghanistan.

    The sanctions committee was set up in 1999 when al Qaeda had major bases in the Taliban, which ruled Afghanistan until they were driven out of power by US led forces.

    The new resolutions, 1988 and 1989, send "a clear message to the Taliban that there is a future for those who separate from al Qaeda, renounce violence and abide by the Afghan constitution," said Susan Rice, UN envoy for the United States, which led the campaign for the division.

    Peter Wittig, Germany's UN ambassador who heads the security council anti-terrorism sanctions committee, said the resolution sends "a strong signal of trust and support for the peace and reconciliation efforts of the government of Afghanistan."

    US President Barack Obama has set July as the target date to start cutting the 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan and defense secretary Robert Gates said this month there could be talks with the Taliban before the end of the year.

    The new sanctions regime for those who pose "a threat to the peace, stability and security of Afghanistan" gives the Afghan government a say in the listing and delisting of accused militants. An ombudsman also gets extra powers to recommend delistings.

    The security council will have to vote unanimously to keep a person on a sanctions list if the ombudsman has recommended the name be taken off.

    Wittig called the changes a "major advance."

    While all 15 council measures backed the resolutions, India and Russia said there must be non easing up in the international fight against terrorism. "There must be no slackening of efforts to fight both al Qaeda and the Taliban," said Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin.

    Separately, the security council's sanctions committee is considering taking about 20 former Taliban commanders off the UN blacklist.

    The Afghan government had originally advanced about 50 names but withdrew many because it did not have the paperwork to back up the case, diplomats said. A decision on those still waiting will be taken in mid-July.

    The remaining list includes five members of Afghan President Hamid Karzai's Higher Council of Peace, which he set up last year to seek peace talks with Afghanistan's former hardline rulers.

    One of them, Mohammed Qalamuddin, was once head of the Taliban's feared religious police.

    There are 135 Taliban names facing sanctions. The 254 long al Qaeda list was cut by two this week following recommendations from an ombudsman.

    One Sudanese-Canadian, Abousfian Abdelrazik, 49, went to the security council with a delegation of Canadian civic and labor groups in a bid to get his name taken off the al Qaeda list.

    Abdelrazik has been on the UN list since 2006 and subject to an asset freeze and travel ban. Detained after travelling to Khartoum on what he said was a trip to see his ailing mother in 2003, he has denied any links to al Qaeda.

    "Since my name has been on that list no one has given me any evidence about what I am supposed to have done wrong," he said after meeting sanctions committee officials in New York.
     
  2.  
  3. bhramos

    bhramos Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    13,207
    Likes Received:
    6,638
    Location:
    Telangana/India/Bharat
    I feel its a wrong move, as Al-qida is noting but Idealogy of Taliban, so noting but a dangerous move to UN forces and ISAF in Afghan....
     
  4. Solid Beast

    Solid Beast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    63
    ][[][]][[[][[][][][][[][][]
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2011
  5. The Messiah

    The Messiah Bow Before Me! Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    Where are yank fanboys now who claim we should jump into bed with them ????
     
  6. asianobserve

    asianobserve Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    2,976
    I agree that this is a stupid move. But after nearly 10 years of war, a sagging economy, huge budget deficits, the US is no mood for a further war of attrition. The planners at Pentagon probably has realized that they cannot win in Afghanistan without breaking the Treasury (a dangerous case of another USSR). The key stumbling block really is the spoiling policy of Pakistan.

    The good thing about the war is that it redirected Pakistan's attention away from India. The sole reliance on militants to hit India has been waning off lately. This is a small consolation though for a very expensive semi-quagmire. But as soon as the US leaves Afghanistan India will be back at the cross hairs of Pakistan and its militant attack dogs... you'll see.
     
  7. asianobserve

    asianobserve Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    2,976
    Who will India jump into bed with if not US, Cuba? Iran? France? Russia? Ah, I forgot, the mighty India by its proud sself! Then go ahead, make my day!
     
  8. The Messiah

    The Messiah Bow Before Me! Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    One can have a productive partnership with usa without jumping into bed and becoming a puppet.

    Now if thats not acceptable then the yanks can run along.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    :violin:
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011
  9. asianobserve

    asianobserve Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,308
    Likes Received:
    2,976
    Here we go again, the "puppet" show. My reply, just look at Japan and SK on how to closely align with the US. The future is India for the taking no doubt but how it will execute its taking will mean a big difference.
     

Share This Page