United Kingdom is a third rate power

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scalieback

Professional
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
1,092
Likes
249
Deny the British empire's crimes? No, we ignore them
I'm not ignoring them in the slightest. The response was to the 'willy waving' about Britain being a third rate power and my response being that any country would have to go some way to control 25% of the globe (or is it 30%?) or more.

Your post isn't relevant ie I'm not denyng it and isn't relevant to my point ie controlling 25% of the land surface of the globe. How we did it is a different debate already going on with the 'I hate Churchill thread'

Britain is nowhere near what it was, in fact a fraction of it. It's down, but not out imo.

Then again, how many global trade empires could sustain two world wars?

Ask Ray what really went on at Arrse. I'd like to see the truth come out about this and why he's gone from an Anglophile to a 'Brit Hater' :)
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
ScalieBack, while you are discussing, may I request you, when you get an opportunity, to go to this thread (click) and comment on the SA80? We would like to know as much as we can from a person who has had first hand experience, something that we cannot get off the internet.
 

panduranghari

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
1,786
Likes
1,245
Why are we discussing the Brits still? Working with them 10 hours daily tells me that most are normal but they are ignorant as well. There are highly educated cultured people here as we have in India as well. Then there are morons as well.

They deny atrocities because they are not allowed to teach the truth. Britain is a war mongering country. Many American thinkers have stated so. Why waste our time over these people who in reality loathe everything. They hate the weather, they hate the French, they hate the Germans, they hate the Yanks, they hate the immigrants, they hate the state of the economy....there are many things you can dislike about Brits.

But they are good as well. As much as I dislike them, I think they are fair in general. However, they need to be re taught their history. There will be a day in the future when Britain will be a nobody. they will read about their atrocities and they will despair.
 

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,572
What do British school history books say about the British Raj and colonialism in general? Are Jallianwalla Bagh and the various famines even mentioned? If so, how are they depicted? I am curious to hear from those who have lived through the British education system.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
where is the QC calieback?

You chaps are getting away with mudr.

Are you aware he is an assistant to Mrs Blair, wide mouthed frog as they say in Britain?
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
I have never seen anywhere else the kind or overweening arrogance as will be found there.

But if the Brits want to behave that way, maybe fewer people will hate Yanks. :-D

The tough-talking military types there just sound like homosexual rough trade, IMHO.
The last time I was there I was talking about the Jinxed HMS Astute. They were in total denial.
 

balai_c

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
420
Likes
462
Yeah, I do. Glad that we've clarified that.




This is not the 19th century. The Royal Navy can no longer sail to Calcutta or Hong Kong, land a few troops, and expect to win a war. We live in a new world, and some of us have woken up.
Unless Royal Navy wants to be bombarded with swarms of brahmos, and swamped by long range su 30 mki, it should stay away. It will only be getting a bi@#$ slap.
 

Godless-Kafir

DFI Buddha
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
5,842
Likes
1,837
Country flag
If you want to buy Russian, that's up to you. Brit Armd Divns were under US Comd but they never 'rolled together as a pack'

The only thing to have destroyed a C2 is another C2, 'blue on blue'. M1's have been disabled by RPG's etc unlike C2's.



Maybe we'd go back to what the Romans used? Times move on and it's the most commonly used language, albeit second language in a lot of cases. All languages have their common routes as do numerals etc.
I personally like things to be done in India and exported but that is just me.

Ya everything has a common root but we cant use Roman numerals that would have never allowed science to grow, we cant write big numbers like hexadecimals etc.,which would have limited our ability at Math or Physics, engineering etc,,

Anyway i get your point.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
What do British school history books say about the British Raj and colonialism in general? Are Jallianwalla Bagh and the various famines even mentioned? If so, how are they depicted? I am curious to hear from those who have lived through the British education system.
They have sophisticated ways to disclose their sins and sound unapologetic at the same time. Its not a jobs of simple minds to read what they say/teach and what they mean.

Eton, the Raj and modern India


By Alastair Lawson
BBC News

"While we hold onto India, we are a first rate power. If we lose India, we will decline to a third rate power. This is the value of India." So spoke Lord Curzon, one of 11 viceroys of British India (from 1898 to 1905) who was educated at Eton College, one of England's top private schools.



The Eton display will feature the good, the bad and the ugly

The school also prides itself on providing five governor-generals who served in India, and three high commissioners after independence.

Now the strong links between the famous "playing fields of Eton" - attributed as a key reason by the Duke of Wellington for Britain's victory in the Battle of Waterloo - and the Raj will be celebrated at an exhibition at the school, due to be staged in April.

The aim of the display is to reveal the benefits of the Raj - while exposing its warts as well.

Benefits of colonialism

"Eton has had a link with India since the early days of British colonialism to the present," says the event organiser, Andrew Robinson, who teaches history at the school.

"Those links have been various and have worked both ways. Since the middle 19th century, Indians have come to Eton, and many do so now.

"India has been the place for the Raj, and for business, and for mission - it remains the case that many Etonians wish to travel there, possibly to put something back so far as the relationship has gone," he said.

Mr Robinson says that he sometimes encourages his pupils to look upon British rule in India in much the same way that contemporary Britons should look upon Roman rule in most of what is now England and Wales.


Colonial rule in both cases brought benefits, he argues. In India the positives included a unifying influence in the country, a functioning civil service and a basic infrastructure.

"I like to think in India I find traces of what some have called the love affair between our two countries, stronger and more durable than the at times violent relationship of rulers and ruled.


ETONIANS' VIEWS


In pictures: Young Etonians talk about the Raj
"In teaching British India at school, it is important not to obscure the warts in the portrait, but we should not perhaps ignore the plus points either, " he says.

Mr Robinson has been gathering documents, photographs, memorabilia and film footage - from old boys or their families - for next month's display.

Artefacts and documents rarely before seen in the public domain have been unearthed, including a picture of the Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, riding his horse in 1939 - the day that he announced that India, like Britain, was at war with Germany.

Lord Linlithgow did not consult the Indian army before making his announcement.

Mr Robinson did not have to look too hard though to find exhibits for his display.

About turn

The school itself already has a large collection of portraits, sculpted busts and private correspondence from old boys who served in India.

Eton's connections with India continue to this day
It all amounts to an intriguing record of Old Etonians who served in India over the centuries.

Lords Curzon's pith helmet, lent by his family, is in the exhibition, as are artefacts relating to Lord Cornwallis, Governor General of India after defeating the forces of Tipu Sultan in 1792.

That victory represented a major about turn in Cornwallis's career, because he was blamed by many Britons for losing the Battle of Yorktown in 1781 which led to American independence.

Also on display are invitations to 4 June parties - traditional school functions - held by Lord Curzon in Simla, the British summer capital.

In 1901, 14 Old Etonians attended.

"But it would be misleading to say that Eton provided the people who ran the Raj: we certainly provided our fair share of leaders, but the day-to-day work of administering British India was not done by Old Etonians," Mr Robinson says.

The exhibition features an interview with Gaj Singh II, Maharajah of Jodhpur, who attended the school in the 1960s.

There is a memorial at Eton to Princes Victor and Frederick, Maharajah Duleep Singh's two sons who were at Eton in the 1870s.

The Punjabi maharajah was much admired by Queen Victoria. "Those eyes and those teeth are too beautiful," she is reported to have written.

Good, bad and ugly

Photographs have been discovered of Kumara Mangalam, chief of staff of the Indian military in the 1960s.

There is also correspondence from Peter Lawrence, an Eton teacher who taught at The Doon School, one of the best known private schools in India during the 1930s and 1940s. At that time the school's headmaster was AE Foot, also an Etonian.


Portrait of Field Marshal Lord Roberts of Kandahar
Eton has links with many other private schools in India today, such as Mayo College in the state of Rajasthan.

"The display features the good, the bad and the ugly," says Mr Robinson.

There is the diary entry from 1858 by a young man who had been at Eton, who wrote: 'What fun it is to shoot mutineers. It's almost like shooting partridges.' "

There are old photographs of Etonians going on tiger shoots, alongside new photographs of Etonians taking time during their gap years to help in poverty alleviation projects.

"It is this kind of work, the work of the future - rather than the successes and failures of the past - which most pupils now want to devote their energies," says Mr Robinson.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

balai_c

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
420
Likes
462
^^ Wow! Quite a find! The comments are quite interesting. It appears Stockholm syndrome has affected quite a number of Indians into a halo of admiration for their former oppressors. Really very disturbing.

Any fool can crticize the British; but it takes a person of some maturity and respectable integrity to praise the British for the good they did in India. Were it not for the British India would have long endured as a continent of nations -- with more chiefs than Indians. Even at the time of Indian indpendence there were over 460 petty 'kings' and rajas. If the British achieved one thing, they gave the Indians an opportuity to unite as one country, inspite of the religous folly known as East and West Pakistan. Does any one remember what one Etonian said of Westernized Indians? " Out of place everywhere and at home nowhere." I know that feeling. So did Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru. I just quoted him. If Indians are reaping the English education harvest today, they owe a subtle debt to the British--Eton,et alia. Pradip Tara
Pradip Tara, U.S.A.
Although the British Raj has always been considered an awful blemish on India's glorious history, I found this article refreshing. It is imperative to take things into perspective and for us Indians to recognise that despite the unfairness of colonial rule, the British did bring to India infrastructure, a sense of organisation, and more importantly the English language. In a certain way, Britain played a role in developing India into what it is today. I would argue that Britain's love affair with India was a symbiotic relationship, in which both countries benefited form each other (perhaps Britain more than India, however).

Of course there are many good posts as well. One post that stood out would be:

The Brit arrogance shows through again- may I ask whether the millions who starved in Bengal in a famine exacerbated by callous British administrators, woul appreciate the Eton exhibition? The British plundered India, impoverished millions of Indians, threw literacy to the winds( before the UK colonised India, India had a huge educated population with a plethora of teachers and educators in regional languages, the British abolished the system and forced education for a privileged few in English), made sure of a Hindu- Muslim divide, plundered India's natural resources, sent thousands of Indians to their death via organised murder through sham tribunals, hangings and conducted massacres using troops (Jallianwala Bagh anyone)? As an Indian Catholic with a keen interest in history, I am keenly aware of the brutality committed by the Raj, with the acquiescence of the British Govt against India- with hindus being dubbed as heathens. The British acts sicken me, as they should any civilised Christian. Andrew Robinson can take his denial and stuff it!
John De Souza, India
 

LurkerBaba

Super Mod
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
7,882
Likes
8,125
Country flag
x-posting from http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...nger-naval-power-fleet-strength-depleted.html


For mile upon mile they stretched, their flag-bedecked ranks receding into the haze. The ships of the Royal Navy, 165 of them, drawn up at Spithead on June 26 1897 to mark the diamond jubilee of Victoria, for 60 years Queen of Great Britain and Ireland and her dominions beyond the seas, and, since 1876, Empress of India.

There were 21 battleships and 44 cruisers, their names conveying the confidence of a world-spanning Empire: Victorious, Renown, Powerful, Terrible, Majestic and Mars. A vast, intimidating presence intended to impress on friend and foe alike the continuing potency of the British behemoth. And what was more, the assembly of this great fleet had required the recall of not a single ship from the Mediterranean or the far-flung squadrons guarding the imperial sea lanes.

....

....
One hundred and fifteen years later and Britain is celebrating only the second diamond jubilee in its history.The occasion calls for a naval review, a staple of coronations and other great moments in the life of the nation, but it is not to be. The Royal Navy, the country's saviour in two world wars, is a sorry shadow of its former self, so depleted by successive rounds of cuts that it can no longer muster a dozen ships for the occasion. So embarrassed are the ministers and civil servants at the Ministry of Defence who have overseen these disastrous reductions that they have quietly drawn a veil over the issue, hoping no one will notice the absence of a major role for the Senior Service in this week's celebrations.

....
...


In contrast, the navies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, are growing. Last year the Indian navy staged its presidential fleet review off Mumbai. There were 81 vessels, 10 more than the entire Royal Navy, including the carrier Viraat (ex British carrier Hermes). She still flies Sea Harriers, giving India a lead over its former naval mentor.
Diamond Jubilee: The Queen no longer rules the waves - Telegraph
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Did anyone see the loyal british "subjects" bowing to the queen today ? :facepalm:
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Don't they do that every jubilee? It is the least they can do for getting another trivial national holiday.
 

Godless-Kafir

DFI Buddha
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
5,842
Likes
1,837
Country flag
Dont take all these silly man made GLORY seriously. Britian has already gone into the history books and soon it will be out of memory, how long will we remember GREAT Britian? Another 50,000 years? LMAO... All these conquerors will be conquered by time.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Will it still be great when Scotland leaves it?
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594

Sharing some hilarious comments:

[HR][/HR]

lordlondon
Yesterday 06:02 PM
Three Wicked Witches are dancing around a cauldron of evil, casting a spell for the destruction of Britain: Their names are
Treason, Corruption and Socialism.

Behold how the erstwhile Third World nations, such as India, Brazil, China, etc., grow stronger and richer, while Britain becomes weaker and more indebted day by day.

Of course, even though Britain is drowning in debt, we still send "foreign aid" to such nations.

Who can explain it?

[HR][/HR]

Apache12
Yesterday 05:06 PM
But they can still find billions to hand over to Brussels every year! And more billions to waste on foreign aid to places like India. Who have the own their own space programme, nuclear weapons system and a navy that is larger than ours! And if Blair and Mandelson had their way we would be in the Euro now and truly stuffed. Something about "led by donkeys" comes to mind!

[HR][/HR]

Excellent sense of humour, I say!

Darth
Yesterday 04:31 PM
Admiral Doenitz was reputed to have kept a painting of the sea in his office.

When asked about it, he reportedly said, that is the picture of the fleet (all U-Boats) on parade.

The equivalent of U-Boats for Germany in World War II for UK today is unmanned platforms.

Why wasn't a fly / drive / cruise by of unmanned, autonomous or not, vehicles arranged for HM to review?

[HR][/HR]

Now, few of these Brits made some rude comments about Americans, and here's an American hitting back:
Skipdallas1
Yesterday 04:25 PM
Yes, Americans are all uncouth ignorant barbarians, devoid of culture and class. We were however willing to pull your backside out of the flames in two world wars. And today, we are taking the lead that Great Britain has dropped in the last hundred years in world-wide naval power. This not only benefits the USA, but all of the Western Democracies as well. And BTW, George Bush was a deplorable President, and person. He was just a figurehead President, devoid of any leadership skills of his own, and rather limited in intelligence.
I for one am interested in the Royals only in their historical context.

[HR][/HR]

westcheshireman
Yesterday 12:51 PM
The navies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, are growing. The number of ships is not necessarily the be all and end all. It's the type of vessel, firepower and the training of the crews on board. Having said that can't see the Brazilian navy being up to much.

[HR][/HR]

Rare and reasonable:
ronaldduncan
Yesterday 12:30 PM
It sounds like we are spending our money reasonably sensibly. We no longer dominate world trade and thus no longer need to defend it.

The article could have mentioned earlier that there were 300 ships at the Coronation significantly more than at Victoria's Jubilee, because we had just come out of a world war and started the cold war.

In terms of threat, it will be long time before anyone builds a fleet capable of invading the UK, and we should be able to see it coming. An invasion fleet also requires control of the air, which should be the priority for defense.

However, we are not defending the islands, and at peace with all our neighbors, so why spend a fortune on defense. It is one of the benefits of peace.

[HR][/HR]

northumbriannomad
Yesterday 12:08 PM
Anybody see that Channel 5 documentary about the navy on drug patrols in the Caribbean. Total and utter shambles. They tried to sink an empty motor boat and couldn't do it. They tried every weapon on the ship. In the end they had to climb aboard and cut holes in its hull. Toe-curlingly embarrassing.

[HR][/HR]

Connor Bruce
Yesterday 01:11 PM
I am fairly sure that the US, and Russia have larger navies, add to that China, India and Brazil and we're well down the list.

I am also fairly sure that our brand spanking new destroyers have nothing that could pierce the hull of a our old 1950s destroyers (most of which are probably in service with the Indian and Brazilian navies) save perhaps for the lone 4.5inch gun - in the 50s destroyers had six of them. Against other ships, they are pretty much useless.

We've put all our eggs in one basket, relying on our anti-aircraft capabilities and missiles, which are prone to problems, especially in bad conditions at the expense of decent anti-ship capability. We've done this eggs and basket thing before, prior to WWII and before the Falklands and paid for it both times (when the Argies made our hi-tech state of the art ships look like toys).

One Brazilian aircraft carrier and a couple of 1950s destroyers could probably take out the entire Royal Navy today.

It is also worth pointing out that up until 1943, we had the largest most powerful navy in the world, bar none, and had done for the past 250 years. Now our navy is purely for aesthetic purposes, other than our subs (which we have precious few of just 14 compared to 50 in 1953) they are little better than rubber ducks.
 

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
Anybody see that Channel 5 documentary about the navy on drug patrols in the Caribbean. Total and utter shambles. They tried to sink an empty motor boat and couldn't do it. They tried every weapon on the ship. In the end they had to climb aboard and cut holes in its hull. Toe-curlingly embarrassing.
:rofl: :rofl:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top