U.S. Tries To Stop India's Solar Policy

Discussion in 'Americas' started by Hadeed, Apr 6, 2014.

  1. Hadeed

    Hadeed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Abbottabad
    WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration talks a lot about the need to develop renewable energy around the world to curb climate change. But right now, it's trying to kill India's effort to boost its domestic solar industry.

    The U.S. wants India to back off a policy that would require local sourcing for solar energy technology, and has sought World Trade Organization enforcement action. Representatives from the two nations reportedly met last week to try to settle the trade battle over India's rapidly developing solar industry, but reached no resolution.

    U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said in February that India's rules for locally made products for its solar power program "discriminate against U.S. exports" and break WTO rules. "We are determined to stand up for U.S. workers and businesses," he said.

    The U.S. and India have 60 days from last month's announcement of the enforcement action -- until April 11 -- to resolve the conflict before it goes to the WTO, which can impose sanctions. Last month, India indicated it would block WTO investigations into its trade policies, according to Reuters.

    The dispute centers on the second phase of India's solar power policy, known as the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission. PV Magazine described the rules in an article in October, noting that they require that half the solar components come from domestic sources.

    The U.S. objected to domestic sourcing requirements for the first phase of India's program, leading to WTO consultations in February 2013. Phase II, however, expands domestic sourcing requirements to include thin film solar technologies, which the U.S. exports to India.

    Indian and U.S. representatives met last week, according to reports. The countries "are consulting," said a spokesman for the USTR, who spoke on background. "We continue to prefer that our concerns be resolved bilaterally, but after we filed last year's WTO solar dispute, India maintained and expanded the local content requirements in its national solar policy rather than seek to resolve U.S. concerns."


    Some environmental advocates have criticized U.S. representatives for challenging a policy meant to help develop India's renewable energy. They argue that the WTO action contradicts work by the U.S. and other nations through the United Nations to reach international agreements on cutting emissions and supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy in developing countries like India.

    Right now, India is "incredibly reliant on coal," said Ilana Solomon, director of the Sierra Club's Responsible Trade Program. "It is imperative for the people of India and our global climate that India begins to transition away from fossil fuels like coal and to renewable energy sources like solar.

    "We do believe that U.S. has a right to, and should be, fostering its own manufacturing," said Solomon. "But that doesn't mean that the U.S. should be trying to tear down the capacity of other countries to do the same."

    The USTR spokesman argued that the effort to change India's policy would benefit the shift to renewable energy. "The U.S. request for consultations supports the goal of rapid global deployment of renewable energy," said the spokesman. "Local content rules not only are an unfair barrier to U.S. exports, but also raise the cost of solar energy, hindering deployment of solar energy around the world, including in India."

    The U.S. spokesman noted that other countries have taken steps to mitigate climate change "without discriminating against imports." The spokesman added: "Countries have available a wide range of policy tools to promote increased reliance on clean energy that are far more effective than local content rules, and that do not unfairly discriminate against U.S. workers and businesses. Nothing in this dispute would stand in the way of other countries, including India, taking similar measures."

    The U.S. and China have also faced off over solar panels. In 2011, the U.S. accused China of illegally subsidizing solar technology and then "dumping" the cheaper panels in the U.S. market. The U.S. later imposed tariffs on Chinese panels. China initiated WTO consultations over the U.S. tariffs in 2012; the panel convened to examine that case is still working, according to the WTO. China also levied its own tariff on U.S.-made panels last year.

    India has, so far, resisted pressure from the U.S. "We are ready to explain our position. Our arguments remain the same as those made when the U.S. had complained against the first phase," an Indian official told The Hindu Business Line last week.

    India's Commerce Minister Anand Sharma has defended the country's policies. "We are also clear that India has to create domestic manufacturing capacities," he said last month, according to The Hindu. "India must have those capacities. Otherwise, we will end up importing for the rest of our lives."

    U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz traveled to India in early March, and the solar dispute was probably discussed. Ahead of that trip, U.S. and Indian civil group leaders who have been meeting to discuss bilateral cooperation on climate and energy sent a letter to Moniz and to Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia, India's deputy chairman of the planning commission, urging the two to resolve the dispute. The letter was signed by Carol Browner, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress who previously directed the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy, and the head of the Indian nonprofit Ananta Centre.

    "These disputes can hinder efficient renewable energy development and investor confidence across jurisdictions. The current trade dispute between the United States and India over solar power development is highly unfortunate," the civil leaders wrote in the letter. "We encourage the two governments to resolve the dispute quickly with an eye towards advancing renewable energy more broadly and recognizing that the wider deployment of renewable energy serves to create a global public good as a response to climate change."

    Anjali Jaiswal, director of the India Initiative at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said she remains optimistic that the two countries can "work it out."

    "India can design solar policies that encourage domestic manufacturing, while allowing other countries' solar industries to work in India," Jaiswal said.

    India launched its solar energy mission in 2010, and is expected to have 2 gigawatts of capacity by 2015, Jaiswal said.

    Jaiswal said domestic sourcing requirements have not been functioning as well as they could in increasing India's manufacturing base, pointing to a NRDC report in 2012 on Phase 1 of the solar project. The report found that the installation and sales of solar technology will generate more jobs in India than the manufacturing of components, and that making solar parts is "not the sole, optimal route for short-term job and value creation."

    Jaiswal and a colleague suggested other ways that India could help develop its domestic manufacturing base in an op-ed on the report.

    What's really hampering India's industry, she said, is the trade standoff.

    "What we need for solar energy is confidence in the market," said Jaiswal. "A trade dispute does not help confidence in the market. It sends a chilling effect."
    source:huffingtonpost
    written by:Kate sheppard
     
    TrueSpirit1 and Sea Eagle like this.
  2.  
  3. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,896
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    Installation, sales AND manufacturing will generate more jobs in India.

    Where is the indigenous brigade?
     
  4. jmj_overlord

    jmj_overlord Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    154
    Location:
    Cochin
    what kind of policies are these americans adopting nowadays ? those guys only think of themselves and they talk of global prosperity....
     
  5. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    3,351
    It is much more cheaper for India to manufacture the equipment here in India.
     
  6. Hadeed

    Hadeed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Abbottabad
    USA is a disease to this world.ofcourse it doesn,t wan,t india to prosper.
     
    sesha_maruthi27 likes this.
  7. Dovah

    Dovah Untermensch Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,754
    Likes Received:
    3,273
    Location:
    Modindia
    Hey let's play a game. What your hometown is famous for!!!

    You go first.
     
    W.G.Ewald likes this.
  8. jmj_overlord

    jmj_overlord Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    154
    Location:
    Cochin
    not only india, but the entire developing nations i think....
     
  9. Hadeed

    Hadeed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Abbottabad
    the shooting of the biggest hollywood movie ever called bin laden operation.
     
  10. jmj_overlord

    jmj_overlord Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    154
    Location:
    Cochin
    thus we can reduce the costs on importing.......but will WTO go in favor of US and impose sanctions i wonder ?
     
    Srinivas_K likes this.
  11. ninja85

    ninja85 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    342
    Location:
    MS
    nothing new, one of the reasons that india and china's economies are not growing at fast speed because they are not getting all the fuel or energy they need and as these two economies are threat to US and it's economy they are trying to slow it down,only the difference is US efforts to stop are working in india and not in china because of our money hungry neta's so US is our friend and kind of cold war going on between china and US.
     
  12. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    3,351
    As usual we should go for JV's and then develop the technology we need based on that !
     
  13. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    pmaitra, happy, p2prada and 1 other person like this.
  14. nirranj

    nirranj Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2013
    Messages:
    910
    Likes Received:
    776
    Location:
    Bangalore
    We should not buckle down to whatever sanctions they impose... We should come out with a strong Manufacturing policy that will eventually reduce the price of the equipmente our people manufacture and thereby makes imports costlier than buying inhouse... This will also give a tough competition to other players in the International market... So in simple words, Govt should help in creating a manufacturing environment that will manufacture goods, which will be cheaper than that of the competitors in the international market... This is how we should face them....
     
  15. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,943
    Likes Received:
    10,311
    Location:
    India
    If its such a disease then cut all relations with USA and live a AIDS free life.
     
    W.G.Ewald likes this.
  16. t_co

    t_co Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    699
    Location:
    China
    Which Indian body sets tariffs and trade policy? Can they be imposed by a ministry, or do they require a Lok Sabha vote?
     
  17. Bhadra

    Bhadra Defence Professionals Defence Professionals Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,687
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    Ah ! You mean paradise lost ??
     
  18. IBSA

    IBSA Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    832
    Location:
    São Paulo
    Western countries are in favor to renewable energies and sustainable development... but since they are made with Western technologies!
     
  19. Hadeed

    Hadeed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Abbottabad
    i wan,t to,but my leaders don,t listen to me,why are you being so pro-USA,are americans the reason you got aids.
     
  20. Hadeed

    Hadeed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Abbottabad
    exactly,well actually paradise found.
     
  21. happy

    happy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    3,369
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
    US is going to lose billions of dollars if India start using locally manufactured solar panels. It cannot force India to import it's panels directly. Hence it is trying very hard to use the WTO card. It is total bs saying that if we manufacture locally then jobs will decrease. On the contrary, jobs will increase manifold as demand will rise for these panels across strata. First they accuse Indians of hogging all their jobs, now they accuse India of not buying their products and later they will accuse India of breathing air which has purportedly blown over the continental USA !!!

    A month old news but worth mentioning :

    India hardens stance against U.S. protectionism ahead of visits | Reuters

     
    Hadeed and TrueSpirit1 like this.

Share This Page