Trump may ask India to send troops to Afghanistan

FactsPlease

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2016
Messages
196
Likes
387
Country flag
In 2015,Ajit Doval said that we have a 106 km non-contiguous border with Afghanistan(via PoK) and the Army must be ready to patrol it in the future.We are slowly moving towards that.......
I believe "patrol" is the last sort that India troops can expect, which most people already been clear with.
Moreover, there is other incentives that Trump had changed his mind about Afghanistan strategy.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/18...search-for-a-winning-strategy-in-afghanistan/
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
Mattis may push for Indian troops in Afghanistan
The Hindu
3 hours ago Top Stories
U.S. Defence Secretary Jim Mattis landed in India on Monday for his maiden three-day visit, the first by a Cabinet member of the Trump administration.

Officials said the focus was on deepening the defence partnership and expand the high technology cooperation, and among the key focus areas of discussion would be the situation in Afghanistan.

In the light of U.S. President Donald Trump’s renewed engagement in Afghanistan and call for greater Indian role, Mr. Mattis could be expected to push for Indian troops in Afghanistan.

Indian aid to Afghanistan

India has already extended a $3-billion aid to Afghanistan and also provides training to its military and other assistance.

The two sides could also discuss the new Chinese posturing in the region and terrorism originating from Pakistan, officials said.

The Defence Secretary will hold a restricted dialogue with his counterpart Nirmala Sitharaman followed by delegation-level talks on Tuesday. After the talks, the two Ministers would issue press statements.

Later Mr. Mattis will call on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and also meet National Security Advisor Ajit Doval.

The two sides are expected to conclude the formal agreement for holding a bilateral maritime exercise, focused on providing humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

Defence talks

They are also expected to discuss significant measures under the Major Defence Partner (MDP) status.

They will also review high technology cooperation under the Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI).

An Indian delegation led by Secretary, Defence Production, who co-chairs the DTTI from India, was in the U.S. recently to prepare the ground.

However, the cooperation is contingent on India signing other foundational agreements especially the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA).

The U.S. has been pressing for early conclusion of the agreement but India has been cautions. Discussions are under way.

In a statement issued ahead of the visit, the U.S. Department of Defence had said the Secretary would emphasise that the U.S. viewed India as a “valued and influential partner, with broad mutual interests extending well beyond the South Asian region.”

Mr. Mattis would also express American appreciation for India’s important contributions toward Afghanistan’s democracy, stability, prosperity and security, it said.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

vishwaprasad

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
474
Likes
149
Country flag
We should not at all send our troops to Afganistan to clear the mess US has made. Why risk lives our soldiers? Afganistan should be helped only in the form of arms supply, economic aid and help in their civilian projects. No troops at any cost.
 

spikey360

Crusader
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
3,525
Likes
6,575
Country flag
We should not at all send our troops to Afganistan to clear the mess US has made. Why risk lives our soldiers? Afganistan should be helped only in the form of arms supply, economic aid and help in their civilian projects. No troops at any cost.
Wrong. Aid->money->middlemen->fanatics->jihadis->attacks on India/Indian diplomats.
"Boots on the ground" is inevitable. Power players don't just give aid. They ensure that something tangible comes from that aid - like security/construction contracts.
 

spikey360

Crusader
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
3,525
Likes
6,575
Country flag
Reading most commenters of the thread, makes me understand why Bharatvarsh will not be a power the world fears/respects for decades to come.
Such opportunities come once in a decade when the Yanks themselves are asking for help. Last time they asked was in 2001. ABV hesitated. That was a mistake.
This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.
 

indus

Living in Post Truth
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
5,060
Likes
21,990
Country flag
Reading most commenters of the thread, makes me understand why Bharatvarsh will not be a power the world fears/respects for decades to come.
Such opportunities come once in a decade when the Yanks themselves are asking for help. Last time they asked was in 2001. ABV hesitated. That was a mistake.
This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.
While I agree with ur pov and would love to see Indian troops in Afghanistan I have some questions. Do we have the capability. We are already talking abt 2 front war with China pak combined. Can we commit to another war at the same time. It will become 3 front war scenario. Secondly what will be the objectives of Indian intervention. If US could not remove Taliban in 16 long years how long India would have to sustain. Wont Indian public and opposition ask pressurise Govt the same way happening in USA. Third India entering directly in Afghan will also require US to totally ditch Pak. Is US ready to do that. Its the only vassal state available for sale in South Asia. Till these answers are available its best to stay away from that pit called Afpak
 

sthf

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
2,271
Likes
5,327
Country flag
This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.
This is the worst possible time for a military adventure against Taliban. Taliban is making Afghanistan bleed profusely and sooner or later will be a part of the Kabul government.

Apart from an uninterested US and hollowed out Afghanistan India has no allies in the region. Iran and Russia are firmly on Taliban side and are betting on them to stop ISIS in the region.

So you have the same limitations as US (logistics) and none of its strength.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
While I agree with ur pov and would love to see Indian troops in Afghanistan I have some questions. Do we have the capability. We are already talking abt 2 front war with China pak combined. Can we commit to another war at the same time. It will become 3 front war scenario. Secondly what will be the objectives of Indian intervention. If US could not remove Taliban in 16 long years how long India would have to sustain. Wont Indian public and opposition ask pressurise Govt the same way happening in USA. Third India entering directly in Afghan will also require US to totally ditch Pak. Is US ready to do that. Its the only vassal state available for sale in South Asia. Till these answers are available its best to stay away from that pit called Afpak

A third issue is one that received only a passing reference in the India-Afghanistan Joint Statement, and none at all in the US strategy. This is the question of narcotics. Afghanistan continues to be the largest opium producer in the world, with opiate production surging every year after a brief dip in 2015. What is of even more relevance to the war in Afghanistan is that an overwhelming 85 percent of areas under cultivation are under Taliban control or areas of high influence. Simply put, an erosion of the narcotics trade would seriously hit Taliban funds and Taliban leaders personally. Leaders like Maulvi Abdul Zahir, formerly agriculture minister in the Taliban government, is known to be heavily involved in narcotics trafficking. Another drug lord was a minister for Haj and religious affairs.

Analysts now believe that the Taliban are a drug cartel in the fullest sense of the term. In fact, a large part of the fighting is believed to be dictated by the need to exert control over drug routes or cultivation areas. Witness the jostling for Badghis which is the entry for trade into Russia and the almost unending fight for Helmand, the wellspring of drug cultivation. Unsurprisingly, the nodes of finance are in Pakistan, often under the control of Taliban leaders or their cutouts.

It is hardly likely that Pakistan Intelligence would be unaware of its activities. Indeed, with much of drug money being banked in Pakistan, it is entirely possible that this segment this forms a significant part of Pakistan’s own economy. Analysts have argued reasonably that fighting the Taliban, while allowing them to rake in the profits of the drug industry is like trying to empty out a well with a bucket of water. Counter Narcotics experts in their turn have called for a complete and effective ending of narcotics production with the use of aerial spraying among other methods. However, US officials and aid agencies feel that such a move would ruin Afghanistan, and add unemployed youth to the ranks of the Taliban.

In this assessment, they are only partly right. They forget that in the 1970s Afghanistan was once self-sufficient in food production, and a net exporter of agricultural produce, including dried fruits and nuts, or derived from agricultural products including karakul skins, wool, cotton, and rugs. This long-lost capability can be revived, if India and the US work together to knit projected Indian assistance in hydropower and irrigation, to US counter-narcotics expertise. Certainly, such an effort will have to move district by district, eliciting local support in these areas.

http://www.firstpost.com/india/indi...shington-cannot-rely-on-pakistan-4095125.html



----------

Reading most commenters of the thread, makes me understand why Bharatvarsh will not be a power the world fears/respects for decades to come.
Such opportunities come once in a decade when the Yanks themselves are asking for help. Last time they asked was in 2001. ABV hesitated. That was a mistake.
This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.
Ground realities in Afghan and world perception tho tells a different story about STRONG INDIA.
We dont need boots on the ground to be world dominant force. We just need to work the soft power factor harder and efficient.
If USA has instilled FEAR and RESPECT Afghan would have been solved by now..
BUT..
we know, what happened..

https://www.rt.com/news/india-afghans-afghanistan-projects/

They have invested some $50 billion in the country, some 50 times what India has put into the country.

And yet according to a recent poll, one in two Afghans want America out, while three in four want India in.

“We have a long history of friendly relations between Afghanistan and India,” said political analyst Matiullah Kharoti. “India is our only neighbor who does not interfere in our internal affairs.”

On the streets of Kabul, you do not have to walk too far to feel India and smell its unmistakably spicy flavor.

Share-now Dehli Darbar Indian chef says that in Afghanistan he can find whatever he wants.

Lots of Afghans speak my language, there are Indian CDs, Indian books and our languages are very similar,” he said.

And India’s role here in the medical and construction industries has not gone unrecognized.

This is one of the projects built by Indians four years ago. It brings water down from a river several kilometers away so that farmers here can easily cultivate their land.

Young Afghans are all involved in development work. They say where India falls short in terms of cash support, it more than makes up for in understanding the needs of Afghanistan.

Many complain that American projects are often inefficient and poorly resourced, while analysts say India is just better than the US at developing projects Afghans want and appreciate.

Afghans love India,” Kharoti said. “In my experience, India is just better at implementing projects than the United States. US projects often suffer from inefficiency and bad planning.”

India is clearly held in high regard here, and it seems they have not had to buy this positive reputation – a fact that could leave Americans scratching their heads as they continue to bankroll their costly Afghanistan strategy.


Boots on the ground in todays world is interpreted as INVASION.
India has commanded respect in African nations with its transparency and people connect projects than the INVADING CHINA!!!


So it tells the story that without BOOTS on the ground, India gets super strong.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Trump has promised India a permanent UNSC seat if they take the war over in Afghanistan.
 

Rahul Prakash

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
173
Likes
220
Country flag
Trump has promised India a permanent UNSC seat if they take the war over in Afghanistan.
Not saying that India should go into Afghanistan but eventually India will have to step out of its comfort zone and be willing to use hard power far from its shore as without it India will not be a superpower.so someday we must be able to that further our races goals and we must build up our country for that eventuality.

I think we must ourself reject UNSC seat if given for free as it will jarringly inconsistent with what we as country is able and willing to commit abroad.it will just look wierd.

We must build a pro Indian narrative and then take the seat otherwise we will end up like USA which does wars and conflicts nowdays for everybody but white people.we must follow the Chinese model,selfish and only for Chinese people.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Not saying that India should go into Afghanistan but eventually India will have to step out of its comfort zone and be willing to use hard power far from its shore as without it India will not be a superpower.so someday we must be able to that further our races goals and we must build up our country for that eventuality.

I think we must ourself reject UNSC seat if given for free as it will jarringly inconsistent with what we as country is able and willing to commit abroad.it will just look wierd.

We must build a pro Indian narrative and then take the seat otherwise we will end up like USA which does wars and conflicts nowdays for everybody but white people.we must follow the Chinese model,selfish and only for Chinese people.
The good thing about engaging in Afghanistan is it expands India's sphere of influence into Central Asia and checks Chinese expansion into the area, especially when they have not done any of the fighting to earn it. If it secures a permanent seat on the UNSC and promotes India's strategic goals and security, it is a necessary move to India becoming a true power.
 

Kalki_2018

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
720
Likes
1,253
Country flag
India already had troops like ITBP and CAPF forces in Afghanistan. Some IA and IAF training forces are also present. I don't see the need to put Infantry or Arty in afghanistan. Better supply and train ANA with 105 mm, T-55/72's and Mi-35's.
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,723
Reading most commenters of the thread, makes me understand why Bharatvarsh will not be a power the world fears/respects for decades to come.
Such opportunities come once in a decade when the Yanks themselves are asking for help. Last time they asked was in 2001. ABV hesitated. That was a mistake.
This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.
While I agree with ur pov and would love to see Indian troops in Afghanistan I have some questions. Do we have the capability. We are already talking abt 2 front war with China pak combined. Can we commit to another war at the same time. It will become 3 front war scenario. Secondly what will be the objectives of Indian intervention. If US could not remove Taliban in 16 long years how long India would have to sustain. Wont Indian public and opposition ask pressurise Govt the same way happening in USA. Third India entering directly in Afghan will also require US to totally ditch Pak. Is US ready to do that. Its the only vassal state available for sale in South Asia. Till these answers are available its best to stay away from that pit called Afpak
This is the worst possible time for a military adventure against Taliban. Taliban is making Afghanistan bleed profusely and sooner or later will be a part of the Kabul government.

Apart from an uninterested US and hollowed out Afghanistan India has no allies in the region. Iran and Russia are firmly on Taliban side and are betting on them to stop ISIS in the region.

So you have the same limitations as US (logistics) and none of its strength.
You people seem to be either fanatical or cowardly. Cowards cite 2 front war as if it is such a big deal for a country with huge population like India. We can hire more soldiers as we need. There is no dearth. Taxation and redistribution to defence etc is part and parcel of a country.

For those who want India to project power hastily as if sending troops there would make India super powerful must understand the reality -

Afghanistan is partly controlled by Taliban. About 50% is controlled by Taliban. Taliban doesn't require drugs as badly as one thinks. Taliban gets generous funds from Saudis and training from ISI. The Afghan population is all muslim and are not friendly as media portrays. Afghans are hardcore jihadis and were so for hundred of years.

The current regime is a puppet installed by USA and hence is more moderate in outlook. Also, the fact that Pakistan wants to control Afghanistan via Taliban makes the Pashtuns angry. They always consider people across Hindu-Kush with contempt. The Hindu Kush name itself comes from these Pashtuns - Hindu Killer - who would kill hindus who tried to cross. So, they will never accept submission in front of Pakistan and want to rule in their own terms. They are not against Taliban per se but against Pakistan meddling in their affairs.

India has no job unnecessarily taking the side of Afghanistan by shedding Indian blood. We never know when they will turn against us. For the time being, it is advisable to help Afghans defend themselves by training and supplying arms and also establishing consulate of India in Afghanistan to monitor the situation.

Another important thing is to understand that India doesn't have good arms manufacturing ability like helicopter engine, fighter jet engine etc. Without having such capability, we can't call ourselves superpower just by sending a few troops. We have a small amount of troops in Afghanistan to defend our embassy and consuls. In addition, we are also heavily investing in training Afghanistan police and military forces and supplying them with small arms, medical facilities and building infrastructure. Doing more just to satisfy one's ego of being superpower is meaningless.
 

Vijyes

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1,978
Likes
1,723
Trump said that?? :shock:
When did that happen??
UNO has little value nowadays. Soon, its value will be lost. I have lost respect for it. It serves no purpose and simply is a wasteful body

Trump merely said that he supports Indian bid for permanent seat at UNSC. He didn't link it with Afghanistan
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
My consistent stand is that the unsc seat is like a retired general with a lot of medals for long service this and that war and he is already retired , poor chap

we dont need it unless we are given it with full veto powers and all rights like the others and no conditions llike do his and tha for us i unsc .... otherwise git lost ! trump baiting us with do this and that for us in a'stan is a git lost response !

look at germany , japan s korea all rich and reasonably powerful without usc ....israel controls usa through federal reserve and desnt care two hoots about unsc or multitude of resolutions against it ...carries on controlling us uk Eu .....

aim for something similar .... indians now are well-placed in academins in the usa and to a lesser ecxtent in the uk but indians have good commercial presence in the uk ....from each of those two bases , we should expand step by step .....that's how zionists expanded , that's what we should do ....no thatnks to involvement in a'stan and unsc is something we dont really need ....if the world wants to give us , well ok but dont pay one cent for it

The good thing about engaging in Afghanistan is it expands India's sphere of influence into Central Asia and checks Chinese expansion into the area, especially when they have not done any of the fighting to earn it. If it secures a permanent seat on the UNSC and promotes India's strategic goals and security, it is a necessary move to India becoming a true power.
strongly disagree, Sir
that is just the last thing we need ....... usa wants us in there to themselves get out and offering us a lousy unsc seat as a false herring ....nah just git lost !

if china wants to mess around in astan , hey teyre more than welome ..... will be the joke of the century to see them get ass-whacked
what we an do is influence their gov and academia , weill be a cinc for us we are strong in that and let packs and a'stanis ass-whack the chimps


In 2015,Ajit Doval said that we have a 106 km non-contiguous border with Afghanistan(via PoK) and the Army must be ready to patrol it in the future.We are slowly moving towards that.......
I believe "patrol" is the last sort that India troops can expect, which most people already been clear with.Moreover, there is other incentives that Trump

Mattis may push for Indian troops in Afghanistan The Hindu3 hours ago Top StoriesU.S. Defence Secretary Jim Mattis landed in India on Monday for his maiden three-day visit, the first by a Cabinet member of the Trump administration.
atalk

We should not at all send our troops to Afganistan to clear the mess US has made. Why risk lives our soldiers? Afganistan should be helped only in the form of arms supply, economic aid and help in their civilian projects. No troops at any cost.
Reading most commenters of the thread, makes me understand why Bharatvarsh will not be a power the world fears/respects for decades to come.SBV hesitated. That was a mistake.This time, if we do not put boots on the ground, it will be another mistake.

While I agree with ur pov and would love to see Indian troops in Afghanistan I have some questions. Do we have the capability. We are already talking abt 2 way from that pit called Afpak

This is the worst possible time for a military adventure against Taliban. Taliban is making Afghanistan bleed profusely and sooner or later will be a part of the Kabul goUS (logistics) and none of its strength.

A third issue is one that received only a passing reference in the India-Afghanistan Joint Statement, and none at all in the US strategy. This is the question of narcotics. Afghanistan continues to be the largest opium the jostling strong.




US army itself is involved in protecting and transfer of drugs.Are they willing to let go of this multibillion dollar business

Not saying that India should go into Afghanistan but eventually India will have to step out of its comfort zone and be willing to use hard power far from its shore as without it India will not be a superpower.so someday we.
India already had troops like ITBP and CAPF forces in Afghanistan. Some IA and IAF training forces are also present. I don't see the need to put Infantry or Arty in afghanistan. Better supply and train ANA with 105 mm, T-55/72's and Mi-35's.

You people seem to be either fanatical or cowardly. Cowards cite 2 front war as if it is such a big deal for a country with huge population like India. We can hire . In addition, we are also heavily investing in training .

Trump said that?? When did that happen??
UNO has little value nowadays. Soon, its value will be lost. I have lost respect for it. It serves no purpose and simply is a wasteful body
 
Last edited:

spikey360

Crusader
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
3,525
Likes
6,575
Country flag
This is the worst possible time for a military adventure against Taliban. Taliban is making Afghanistan bleed profusely and sooner or later will be a part of the Kabul government.

Apart from an uninterested US and hollowed out Afghanistan India has no allies in the region. Iran and Russia are firmly on Taliban side and are betting on them to stop ISIS in the region.

So you have the same limitations as US (logistics) and none of its strength.
You have to understand the difference between a heavy presence and an invasion. US has heavy presence in friendly countries like SoKo, Japan, Germany to name a few. They are not necessarily seen as invading forces. They are just there for the day the need for them to be there arises.
We need boots on the ground not to fight anyone, but to merely remain vigilant. To encircle Pakistan, one country at a time. I disagree that Iran and Russia are on Taliban side. This is a completely baseless claim.
Taliban are Sunni insurgents raised by Pakistan, they are not Afghans, but consist mainly people from FATA of Pakistan. Iran a Shia power, does not side with Sunni Taliban, it has no reason to. The Taliban do not give any strategic edge to Iran.
Russians on the other hand, are no fools. They are not closet Islamists like the US that they would side and support the very force which defeated them during the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan. Never has Moscow shown any affinity towards the Taliban by words, nor ever by action. So it is implausible that Russia is siding with Taliban.

Ground realities in Afghan and world perception tho tells a different story about STRONG INDIA.
We dont need boots on the ground to be world dominant force. We just need to work the soft power factor harder and efficient.
If USA has instilled FEAR and RESPECT Afghan would have been solved by now..
BUT..
we know, what happened
Keep pushing the soft power pot dream. That will get us somewhere definitely, say in the next century.

You people seem to be either fanatical or cowardly. Cowards cite 2 front war as if it is such a big deal for a country with huge population like India. We can hire more soldiers as we need. There is no dearth. Taxation and redistribution to defence etc is part and parcel of a country.
You seem to have the idea that war is something ordinary and can be easily dealt with and won simply by adding more manpower. I suggest you go back to the basics of strategy and warfare and start reading history books and wars.
There is no dearth?! If there is no dearth why do you cower from going into Afghanistan?
 

spikey360

Crusader
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
3,525
Likes
6,575
Country flag
While I agree with ur pov and would love to see Indian troops in Afghanistan I have some questions. Do we have the capability.
Yes, we do. If we could send troops into Lanka 20 years ago, the raised warfighting capabilities of the nation can surely afford a few Afghan bases now.
We are already talking abt 2 front war with China pak combined. Can we commit to another war at the same time. It will become 3 front war scenario.
Not necessarily a 3 front war. China does not internationally want to be seen as being a military ally of Pakistan. Two front war is a very remote scenario. If that day comes, we would have failed diplomatically already and all is lost. In a two front scenario, it is unlikely that India will not ask for allies and it is unlikely that the Russians will not come to our help. Russia is still a time tested friend. Whatever they have been doing with China, they have been calculative enough as to never infringe upon our interests, ever.
So a 3 front war scenario is remote possibility.
Secondly what will be the objectives of Indian intervention. If US could not remove Taliban in 16 long years how long India would have to sustain. Wont Indian public and opposition ask pressurise Govt the same way happening in USA.
We should enter Afghanistan on our own terms, and not on the terms of Trump. If we put boots on the ground, it should be as our first foreign military base. To encircle Pakistan, nothing less, nothing more. India should have nothing to do with Afghan polity.
Third India entering directly in Afghan will also require US to totally ditch Pak. Is US ready to do that. Its the only vassal state available for sale in South Asia. Till these answers are available its best to stay away from that pit called Afpak
True. Trump is a madman, we may just be able to coerce him into it(ditching Pak) if we play out cards right. Of course, the US deep state and not Trump controls the US policy towards Pak. But of course, a madman in the mix just might work to our advantage.

I agree, we should enter Af with clearly defined goals, anything less is suicide. But so is sky diving - suicide if you do not have a parachute.
 

Rahul Prakash

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
173
Likes
220
Country flag
You have to understand the difference between a heavy presence and an invasion. US has heavy presence in friendly countries like SoKo, Japan, Germany to name a few. They are not necessarily seen as invading forces. They are just there for the day the need for them to be there arises.
We need boots on the ground not to fight anyone, but to merely remain vigilant. To encircle Pakistan, one country at a time. I disagree that Iran and Russia are on Taliban side. This is a completely baseless claim.
Taliban are Sunni insurgents raised by Pakistan, they are not Afghans, but consist mainly people from FATA of Pakistan. Iran a Shia power, does not side with Sunni Taliban, it has no reason to. The Taliban do not give any strategic edge to Iran.
Russians on the other hand, are no fools. They are not closet Islamists like the US that they would side and support the very force which defeated them during the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan. Never has Moscow shown any affinity towards the Taliban by words, nor ever by action. So it is implausible that Russia is siding with Taliban.

Keep pushing the soft power pot dream. That will get us somewhere definitely, say in the next century.

You seem to have the idea that war is something ordinary and can be easily dealt with and won simply by adding more manpower. I suggest you go back to the basics of strategy and warfare and start reading history books and wars.
There is no dearth?! If there is no dearth why do you cower from going into Afghanistan?
To be blunt,I would say India DOES NOT have capability,even China does not have the capability.and democracies are lousy invaders unless they are racist nationalist democracies which we should become if we want to try.
Yes, we do. If we could send troops into Lanka 20 years ago, the raised warfighting capabilities of the nation can surely afford a few Afghan bases now.

Not necessarily a 3 front war. China does not internationally want to be seen as being a military ally of Pakistan. Two front war is a very remote scenario. If that day comes, we would have failed diplomatically already and all is lost. In a two front scenario, it is unlikely that India will not ask for allies and it is unlikely that the Russians will not come to our help. Russia is still a time tested friend. Whatever they have been doing with China, they have been calculative enough as to never infringe upon our interests, ever.
So a 3 front war scenario is remote possibility.

We should enter Afghanistan on our own terms, and not on the terms of Trump. If we put boots on the ground, it should be as our first foreign military base. To encircle Pakistan, nothing less, nothing more. India should have nothing to do with Afghan polity.

True. Trump is a madman, we may just be able to coerce him into it(ditching Pak) if we play out cards right. Of course, the US deep state and not Trump controls the US policy towards Pak. But of course, a madman in the mix just might work to our advantage.

I agree, we should enter Af with clearly defined goals, anything less is suicide. But so is sky diving - suicide if you do not have a parachute.
The thing is I think India is yet to come out of the paralysis of not having its own racial narrative.

If we join afg Congress will whine,Muslims will whine,many people will whine and finally we will neither control our own country neither will we achieve our objectives.

A countries top most asset is the firm and unwavering loyalty of its people to the country and hence it military on a racial or religious level.our unity and support will be shaky with sickularism Hindus,Muslims,Congress,etc.We must solve our internal loyalty problem otherwise we can't be a superpower or even develop our country which goes hand in hand.

I'm sad to say China is far ahead of India that I'm jealous of them in this regard.most Chinese see their country as having a unique Chinese message to the world,identify with their race and hence their country and not by foreign ideologies and religions and hence are much smoother to govern.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top