Iamanidiot
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,325
- Likes
- 1,504
Discuss..I wanted to post this thread since a long time
Anyone who contributes in harming unity of India is a "invader" so it doesnt matter which religion/caste he belongs to.Are the high castes, pseudo-Aryans Brahmins and Kshatriyas counted as invaders or insiders? If the latter, I agree they have weakened Hinduism more than any invader ever could.
But India itself was a fluid concept, changing shape and size every 200 odd years. An invader once, was an insider a couple of centuries later. How do you differentiate?Anyone who contributes in harming unity of India is a "invader" so it doesnt matter which religion/caste he belongs to.
There are everincreasing Vibhishans in India.
Ok I said as per present situation in a diplomatic way.But India itself was a fluid concept, changing shape and size every 200 odd years. An invader once, was an insider a couple of centuries later. How do you differentiate?
pseudo aryans. You just punctured several egos there. NiceAre the high castes, pseudo-Aryans Brahmins and Kshatriyas counted as invaders or insiders? If the latter, I agree they have weakened Hinduism more than any invader ever could.
But how did you root cause the caste system to be the determining factor that will stall the decline of Hinduism and India? Indians didn't throw out caste system for 2500 odd years, faced Buddhism, Jainism, proselytizing Islam and Christianity and in spite of all the onslaught, Hindus still are 75-80% of the population. Is the enormity of the current situation greater than all that was faced earlier?Ok I said as per present situation in a diplomatic way.
As per history India meant Hindu states where there was 1 big maharaja controlling most of the states.Whenever there was a power struggle it broke down and for small regional goals the Vibishans sided with external invaders.The thing is that unless we stop giving reasons to "internal invaders" there would be troubles.
So instead of going too much in history lets concentrate what we have today.Hindus needs to throw caste system if it wants to have unity otherwise history would repeat itself and India would be a land of converts.
75-80% is not the actual figure.Include the entire South Asia plus far east countries which was mostly Hindu but declined due to conversions.So this roughly means only 50% and declining.But how did you root cause the caste system to be the determining factor that will stall the decline of Hinduism and India? Indians didn't throw out caste system for 2500 odd years, faced Buddhism, Jainism, proselytizing Islam and Christianity and in spite of all the onslaught, Hindus still are 75-80% of the population. Is the enormity of the current situation greater than all that was faced earlier?
Agreed. If we take in the whole of the sub-continent, the figure would probably be around 50%.75-80% is not the actual figure.Include the entire South Asia plus far east countries which was mostly Hindu but declined due to conversions.So this roughly means only 50% and declining.
Whats wrong with living under a foreign religion?Caste system has ALWAYS divided Hindu community and untill curbed would lead to Hindus becoming minority and have to live under foreign religion as it has happened before.
As in, the Kshatriya rulers who were unable to forge an alliance to face a foreign enemy?Caste system is no reason for this problem,the real problem was the lack of unity amongst kshatriyas.
Sikhs+Rajput+Maratha alliance would have been not just very formidable but could have ruled far west as well but again "would" "could"....yes indeed and it happened as late as 1761 where the Rajputs and Sikh Misls just did nothing to support the Marathas against Ahmad Shah Abdali.
You have to analyse situation from the context of the times prevalent. In this case you are applying the current boundaries of nationalism and analyzing incidents 250 years ago.yes indeed and it happened as late as 1761 where the Rajputs and Sikh Misls just did nothing to support the Marathas against Ahmad Shah Abdali.
You took the wrong character to illustrate your point.There are everincreasing Vibhishans in India.