The secret billions of sonia & rahul gandhi-express article

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by sean, Jan 3, 2011.

  1. sean

    sean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    5


    According to Subrmaniam swami , Sonia Maino's two sister Anushka and Madia received 30,000 crores and the loot was sent out of the country. The reason Congress Chairperson Sonia Maino not accepting JPC is as simple as the foot print of the loot money to it's foreign fligt can be traced immediately with the opposition demand and Sonia Maino may have to go to jail. Now this Express story mention ed the secret billions of 2.2 bil in Swiss account in the name of Rahul was leaked by the Swiss paper earlier. And with KGB pay out regularly to the family, no body knows how much wealth these Sonia and Raul Voncci stashed away in different foreign banks under different name of Sonia's family including Puala Maino, Sonia's mother. this Lady Mussolini needs to be dragged out and be hanged in the poor Aam Admi's court in the glare of TV camera for looting openly the country's wealth.

    here is the original story_

    http://expressbuzz.com/opinion/columnists/zero-tolerance-secret-billions/236261.html

    Zero tolerance, secret billions


    S Gurumurthy
    First Published : 02 Jan 2011 11:04:00 PM IST
    Last Updated : 03 Jan 2011 12:51:33 AM IST

    What was Rajiv Gandhi’s fatal error in politics? It does not need a seer to say that it was his claim to honesty — branding himself as ‘Mr Clean’ — that proved fatal to him. Indira Gandhi was his contrast. Asked about corruption in her government, she said nonchalantly, ‘it was a global phenomenon’. This was in 1983. An honest Delhi High Court judge even lamented how could corruption be controlled when someone holding such a high position had almost rationalised it. The result, no one could ever charge Indira Gandhi with corruption, because she never claimed to be clean. But, ambitious to look ideal, Rajiv proclaimed honesty and so provoked scrutiny; in contrast, Indira, opting to be practical, immunised herself against scrutiny. Eventually, Rajiv’s claim to honesty became the very cross on which he was crucified in the 1989 elections when the Bofors gun shot the Congress out of power. The lesson to the political class was: don’t claim to be honest, if you really are not so. The hard lesson seems forgotten now by the Gandhi family itself. Sonia Gandhi, instead of following Indira’s safe path, is wrongly caught on Rajiv’s risky steps. The consequences seem to be ominous. Will the politics of 1987 to 1989 repeat?

    Following Rajiv and forgetting Indira, Sonia Gandhi proclaimed ‘zero tolerance’ to corruption at a party rally in Allahabad in November 2010. She repeated it at the Congress plenary in Delhi weeks later. Asking the cadre to take the corrupt head on, she said that her party was ‘prompt’ in acting against the corrupt; ‘never spared the corrupt’ because corruption impedes development’. This was almost how Rajiv Gandhi spoke in the Congress centenary in Mumbai 25 years ago. Two crucial differences marked Rajiv away from Sonia. First, when Rajiv claimed to be ‘Mr Clean’, he had no scams to defend against. But, Sonia claims to be honest amidst huge and continuing scams — CWG, Adarsh, 2G Spectrum allocation scam…. Next, Rajiv had a clean slate to begin with, with no known skeletons in his cupboard till the Bofors scam smashed his ‘Mr Clean’ image. In contrast, Sonia’s slate is full of credible exposures of bribes and pay-offs in billions of dollars secreted in Swiss bank accounts, not counting Quattrocchi’s millions from Bofors. To make it worse, for almost two decades now, she has not dared to deny the exposures or sue the famous Swiss magazine or the Russian investigative journalist who had put out evidence of bribe against the Sonia family. Seen against this background, Sonia’s vow to act against the corrupt seems like a suspect hooting ‘catch the thief’ and scooting away. This is the main story that unfolds here.

    $2.2 billions to 11 billions!

    A stunning exposure on Sonia Gandhi’s secret billions in Swiss banks came, surprisingly, from Switzerland itself, where the world’s corrupt stash away their booty. In its issue of November 19, 1991, Schweizer Illustrierte, the most popular magazine of Switzerland, did an exposé of over a dozen politicians of the third world, including Rajiv Gandhi, who had stashed away their bribe monies in Swiss banks. Schweizer Illustrierte, not a rag, sells some 2,15,000 copies and has a readership of 9,17,000 — almost a sixth of Swiss adult population. Citing the newly opened KGB records, the magazine reported ‘that Sonia Gandhi the widow of the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was controlling secret account with 2.5 billion Swiss Francs (equal to $2.2 billion) in her minor son’s name’. The $2.2 billion account must have existed from before June 1988 when Rahul Gandhi attained majority. The loot in today’s rupee value equals almost Rs 10,000 crore. Swiss banks invest and multiply the clients’ monies, not keep them buried. Had it been invested in safe long-term securities, the $.2.2 billion bribe would have multiplied to $9.41 billion (Rs 42,345 crore) by 2009. If it had been put in US stocks, it would have swelled to $12.97 billion (Rs 58,365 crore). If, as most likely, it were invested in long-term bonds and stocks as 50:50, it would have grown to $11.19 billion (Rs 50,355 crore). Before the global financial meltdown in 2008, the $2.2 billion bribes in stocks would have peaked at $18.66 billion (Rs 83,900 crore). By any calculation the present size of the $2.2 billion secret funds of the family in Swiss banks seems huge — anywhere between Rs 43,000 plus to some Rs 84,000 crore!

    KGB papers

    The second exposé, emanating from the archives of the Russian spy outfit KGB, is far more serious. It says that the Gandhi family has accepted political pay-offs from the KGB — a clear case of treason besides bribe. In her book The State Within a State: The KGB and its Hold on Russia-Past, Present, and Future, Yevgenia Albats, an acclaimed investigative journalist, says: “A letter signed by Victor Chebrikov, who replaced Andropov as the KGB head in 1982 noted: ‘the USSR KGB maintains contact with the son of the Premier Minister Rajiv Gandhi (of India). R Gandhi expresses deep gratitude for the benefits accruing to the Prime Minister’s family from the commercial dealings of the firm he controls in co-operation with the Soviet foreign trade organisations. R Gandhi reports confidentially that a substantial portion of the funds obtained through this channel are used to support the party of R Gandhi’.” (p.223). Albats has also disclosed that, in December 2005, KGB chief Victor Chebrikov had asked for authorisation from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, “to make payments in US dollars to the family members of Rajiv Gandhi, namely Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi.” And even before Albats’ book came out the Russian media had leaked out the details of the pay-offs. Based on the leaks, on July 4, 1992, The Hindu had reported: “the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service admits the possibility that the KGB could have been involved in arranging profitable Soviet contract for the company controlled by Rajiv Gandhi family”.

    Indian media

    Rajiv Gandhi’s sad demise delayed the Swiss and Russian exposé on Sonia being picked up here. But Indian media’s interest in it actually coincided with Sonia Gandhi assuming leadership of the Congress. A G Noorani, a well-known columnist, had reported on both Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats’ exposés in Statesman (December 31, 1988). Subramanian Swamy had put out the photocopies of the pages of Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats’ book in his website along with the mail of the Swiss magazine dated February 23, 2002 confirming that in its article of November 1991 it had named Rajiv Gandhi with a total of Swiss Franc 2.5 billion ($2.2 billion) in secret account; it had also offered to supply a original copy of the magazine to Swamy. (See: http://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.html) These facts were again recalled in my article in The New Indian Express (April 29, 2009) written in response to Sonia Gandhi speech at Mangalore (April 27, 2009) declaring that, “the Congress was taking steps to address the issue of untaxed Indian money in Swiss banks”. The article had questioned her about her family’s corrupt wealth in Swiss banks in the context of her vow to bring back the monies stashed away abroad. Rajinder Puri, a reputed journalist, has also earlier written on the KGB disclosures in his column on August 15, 2006. Recently, in India Today (December 27, 2010) the redoubtable Ram Jethmalani has referred to the Swiss exposé, asking where is that money now? So the Indian media too has repeatedly published the details of the secret billions of the Gandhi family investigated by the Swiss and Russian journalists. Amal Datta (CPI(M)) had raised the $2.2 billion issue in Parliament on December 7, 1991, but Speaker Shivraj Patil expunged the Gandhi name from the proceedings!

    Self-incriminating

    But, what has been the response of Sonia or Rahul, major after June 1988, to the investigation by Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats and to the Indian media’s repeated references to their investigation? It can be summed up in one word: Silence. Thus, apart from the exposés, the deafening silence of the Gandhis itself constitutes the most damaging and self-incriminating evidence of the family’s guilt. When Schweizer Illustrierte alleged that Sonia had held Rajiv Gandhi’s bribes in Rahul’s name in Swiss banks, neither she nor the son, protested, or sued the magazine, then or later; nor did they sue A G Noorani or Statesman when they repeated it in 1998, or later; nor would they sue Subramanian Swamy when he put it on his website in 2002; neither did they sue me, or the Express when the article was carried in April 2009. When major papers, The Hindu and The Times of India included, had carried the expose on KGB payments in the year 1992 itself adding that the Russian government was embarrassed by the disclosures, neither of the Gandhis challenged or sued them; nor did they sue Yevgenia Albats when she wrote about KGB payments to Rajiv Gandhi in 1994. Neither did they act against Swamy when he put Albats’ book pages on his website or when Rajinder Puri, a well-known journalist, wrote about it in his column on August 15, 2006. However, a feeble but proxy suit was filed by Sonia loyalists to defend her reputation when Albats’ exposé was made part of the full-page advertisement in The New York Times in 2007 issued by some NRIs to ‘unmask’ Sonia to the US audience, as they claimed. The suit was promptly dismissed by a US court because Sonia herself did not dare file the suit. Shockingly even that suit did not challenge the $2.2 billion Swiss account at all!

    Imagine that the report in Schweizer Illustrierte or in Albats book was false and Sonia Gandhi did not have those billions in secret accounts in Rahul Gandhi’s name or the family was not paid for its service to the KGB as alleged. How would they, as honest and outraged people, have reacted? Like how Morarji Desai, then retired and old at 87, responded in anger when, Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist, had mentioned in his book that Morarji Desai was a ‘paid’ CIA mole in the Indian Cabinet. Morarji Desai forthwith filed a libel suit. Commenting in The American Spectator, Rael Jean Isaac wrote in 2004, five years after Morarji Desai had passed away, that Hersh habitually indulged in character assassination; and in his attempt to do down Henry Kissinger, Morarji Desai became the victim. Isaac added that Desai, 87, calling it a “sheer mad story”, reacted in outrage with a libel suit seeking $50 million in damages. When the suit came up, as Desai, 93, was too ill to travel to US, Kissinger testified on Desai’s behalf, flatly contradicted Hersh’s charge and stated that Desai had no connection to the CIA. That is how even retired and old persons, honest and so offended and outraged, would act. But see the self-incriminating contrast, the complete absence of such outrage, in Sonia, who is reigning as the chairperson of the UPA now, neither retired or tired like the nonagenarian Morarji Desai, being just 41 when the story broke out in Schweizer Illustrierte. Imagine, not Sonia or Rahul, but Advani or Modi had figured in the exposés of Schweizer Illustrierte or Albats. What would the media not have done to nail them? What would the government of Sonia not have done to fix them?

    Rs 20.80 lakh-crore loot

    The billions of the Gandhi family being both bribes and monies stashed away in Swiss banks, they are inextricably linked to the larger issue of bringing back the huge national wealth stashed abroad. All world nations, except India, are mad after their black wealth secreted in Swiss and like banks. But India has shown little enthusiasm to track the illicit funds of Indians in Swiss and other banks. Why such reticence?

    When during the run-up to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, the BJP leader L K Advani promised to bringing back, if voted to power, Indian monies estimated between $500 billion and $1.4 trillion stashed abroad, the Congress first denied that there was such Indian money outside. But when the issue began gathering momentum, Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi had to do damage control and promise that the Congress too would bring back the national wealth secreted abroad. Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a non-profit institution working against global black funds, has recently estimated that the Indian wealth secreted away is about $462 billion, approximately equal to Rs 20.80 lakh-crore. The GFI says that more than two-thirds of it was looted away under the liberalisation regime. This is what the GFI says about the character of the loot: “From 1948 through 2008, India lost a total of $213 billion in illicit financial flows (or illegal capital flight)” through “tax evasion, corruption, bribery and kickbacks, and criminal activities”. Does one need a seer to say under what head would the $2.2 billion in Sonia family’s secret account (which would have grown to $9 to $13 billion by now) fall? But accretions, if any, from the loot in 2G and CWG where the numbers are even bigger are not still accounted. Now comes the more critical, yet practical issue. When the Sonia Gandhi family is among the suspects who have secreted away monies abroad, how will it affect the efforts to bring back the wealth stashed away by others?

    Looters safe

    Just a couple of examples will demonstrate how the government is unwilling to go after Indian money secreted abroad. As early as February 2008 the German authorities had collected information about illegal money kept by citizens of different countries in Lichtenstein bank. The German finance minister offered to provide the names of the account holders to any government interested in the names of its citizens. There were media reports that some 250 Indian names were found in the Lichtenstein Bank list. Yet, despite the open offer from Germany to provide the details, the UPA-II government has never showed interest in the Indian accounts in Lichtenstein Bank. The Times of India reported that “the ministry of finance and PMO have, however, not shown much interest in finding out about those who have their lockers on the secret banks of Liechtenstein which prides itself in its banking system”. But under mounting pressure the Indian government asked for details not under the open offer but strategically under India’s tax treaty with Germany. What is the difference? Under the tax treaty the information received would have to be kept confidential; but, if it were received openly, it can be disclosed to the public. Is any further evidence needed to prove that the government is keen to see that the names of Indians who had secreted monies abroad are not disclosed?

    The second is the sensational case of Hasan Ali, the alleged horse-breeder of Pune, who was found to have operated Swiss accounts involving over Rs 1.5 lakh-crore. The income tax department has levied a tax of Rs 71,848 crore on him for concealing Indian income secreted in Swiss accounts. This case is being buried now. The request sent to the Swiss government was deliberately made faulty to ensure that the Swiss would not provide details. Some big names in the ruling circles are reportedly linked to Hasan Ali. That explains why the government would not deepen the probe. It is Hasan Alis and the like who transport through hawala the bribes of the corrupt from India. If Hasan Ali is exposed, the corrupt will stand naked. This is how the hawala trader and the corrupt in India are mixed-up.

    Is it too much to conclude that thanks to Sonia family’s suspected billions in Swiss accounts the system cannot freely probe the $462 billion looted from India at all? Tail-pieces: The total wealth of both Gandhis, as per their election returns, is just Rs 363 lakh, Sonia owning no car. Sonia lamented on November 19, 2010, that graft and greed are on the rise in India!! Rahul said on December 19, 2010, that severe punishment should be given to the corrupt!!! Amen.
     
  2.  
  3. warriorextreme

    warriorextreme Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    536
    Location:
    Mumbai
    it took so long to get out..but it wont be shown on news channels..as all news channels worship that sonia as goddess..one day congress will be so obsolete that it will be history..regional parties will take over in all states
     
  4. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,159
    Location:
    EST, USA
    How did indira gandhi and sanjay looted amber fort

    There is a report that Indira Gandhi also acquired a lot of wealth from the Amber Palace, Jaipur. Some argue it was done to get loans from World Bank. The report goes like this, but I'd like other members to kindly comment:

     
  5. Rahul92

    Rahul92 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    748
    Congress will be just a history
     
  6. sesha_maruthi27

    sesha_maruthi27 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,884
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh(INDIA)
    People arround the amber palace say the curse of the gandhi family will never end..............

    First of all they do not believe in the curse as they do not believe in our gods............

    But history tells and prooves that the curse is for real..............

    They are still looting our country............

    When will our people come to know this truth about gandhi and nehru...........
     
  7. brain_dead

    brain_dead Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    25
    can we see a pattern here ?
    it seems the nationalistic media has finally decided to expose these thugs.
    recently i can see more of such articles being published.
    off course the elitist news channels wont say a word against these Gandhian thugs, coz they get their funding from christian missionaries only to badmouth right wing.
    seems a polarization of media is taking place, one nationalistic media, and other- opportunistic media.
     
  8. S.A.T.A

    S.A.T.A Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    453
    ^
    Nehru clans run in with the Jaipur royalty is quite a legend.Maharani Gayatri Devi,wife of Sawai Mansingh,the last absolute ruler of Jaipur,accounts for similar story during the 70's.The Maharani recalled how Indira and her son pestered the Jaipur royal family about troves of treasure and jewelry that the family allegedly had buried in Palaces and forts owned by the the royal family(hidden on the eve of independence)..Gayatri Devi rejected there was any hidden jewelry and claimed it just a story concocted by Indira Gandhi to settle political scores with Her.Indira Gandhi,i recall had even had Gayatri Devi imprisoned on some tax evasion charges.Even earlier there was an instance where Pt Nehru reportedly slapped Sawai Mansingh,Maharaja of Jaipur.
     
  9. sesha_maruthi27

    sesha_maruthi27 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,884
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh(INDIA)
    These idoits must be punished severly.....................
     
  10. S.A.T.A

    S.A.T.A Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    453
    Nehru-Gandy dynasty is the proverbial high Vatican of political corruption in India and Sonia Gandhi its high pope.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2011
  11. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    Vow first Indians pride themselves of electing the first foreigner,catholic women as their PM then go on whining that she looted the country:) if Indians themselves loot the country what do you expect foreigners to do.

    Deceive me shame on you Deceive me twice shame on me i.e shame on us for electing such faggots in office no need to whine
     
  12. KS

    KS Bye bye DFI Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    5,718
    Location:
    irrelevant
    Exactly man.

    First they vote for Congress and then they cry how Congress is looting the country. The Italian should not have been allowed to win in the first place.
     
  13. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    JBH22,
    Please mind what you write. This is a warning for you.

    1. She is not a foreigner, she is an Indian citizen.
    2. There is nothing wrong with having female leaders
    3. India is a secular republic and Catholics are a proud part of this country
    4. She is not the PM.
    5. Corruption is endemic in our society
    6. Now for some levity - She cannot be a faggot.

    Don't degenerate the discourse, please employ arguments not rants.
     
  14. brain_dead

    brain_dead Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    25
    1. she is not a Indian citizen. she is an Italian citizen. she has not surrendered Italian nationality yet. she travels on Italian passport and not on Indian one.

    4. she was very well on her way to be the PM. thanks to then president, who dint let her take the oath, becoz Indian constitution doesn't allow this, i thank to then president for saving the dignity of this country by not letting her become the PM.

    6. faggot or not, she is very anti India. we both will see her and her son going into jail by the end of this decade. remember my words.
     
  15. brain_dead

    brain_dead Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    25
    yes, we deserve to be made fun of. jab apna he sikka khota ho to dusre ko kya dosh de. but as an indian, i can tell u, that the work to eliminate these thugs has already been started, and now there is no looking back. please wait for 5 more years.
     
  16. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    If you are not born of Indian parents but naturalized citizen does it make you Indian? A piece of paper does it make you a good citizen!!

    Show me where i said its wrong in this respect voting in someone like Uma bharti or Mayawati wil be noble cause for the advancement of Indian women

    Again why are you getting touchy i never said that i'm against any minority infact i respect Dr APJ kalam more than any Hindu politician

    Please is it worth mentioning that she gifted this to MMS to crush opponents criticism about her being a foreigner??

    So its endemic does it mean i should applaud that??its endemic because we have allowed it,i'm not here to teach or moralize anyone but still high time for that sh!tty list of scams to stop

    Did i pinpoint her in my post i said "shame on us for electing such faggots in office no need to whine" so this applies to most incumbent babus in office.
    If you read the Mitrokhin Archives the KGB case officer said "it was as if the whole country was for sale" so do you want me to hesitate when criticising Congress or its elite. Note that before the coming of BJP India was a sort of USSR run by Congress only something like Communist Party.

    Lastly i don't want to live in banana republic where the great grandfather then daughter then son,daughter in law now both kids are in to enjoy power what is this boss?
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2011
  17. JBH22

    JBH22 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    Rahul Gandhi







    if i can't question about political masters then i believe that its not democracy
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  18. sesha_maruthi27

    sesha_maruthi27 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,884
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh(INDIA)
    There is no need of electing them to power. They elect themselves by voting themselves at the poling booths or change the casted votes to CONGRESS and also spen crores and crores to feed the voters correctly one weeek before the election. They feed them with chicken biryani, mutton biryani and also provide them with alchohol and other things for the entire week until they vote. Here in my home town they did this and this known to everyone, it is an open secret.
     
  19. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    What evidence do you have ? And please don't give me the cliche reply, "what proof do you have ?" in return. You are the one making allegations fyi.


    If you are willing to exercise your right to rant, then let me exercise my right to delete those rants.
    --------------------------------

    It hardly matters if you were born here or not and which religion you follow, a naturalized citizen is an Indian citizen and ought to be treated as such.


    DFI is not a vent, you are NOT welcome to air personal grievances or make ad hominem attacks against people, countries you don't like. You are not alone in having such strong feelings.

    My previous post was a warning and a reminder to you and others to not to slander. It is both against the Indian Cyber Laws and DFI's rules. That is why we at DFI urge you to provide us logical, reasonable, well thought out and factual arguments as it allows us to be on the right side of the law, and also to provide our members with good, mature and intellectually stimulating discussions.
     
  20. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    I hope now we can all be civilized and carry on the discussion.
     
  21. thakur_ritesh

    thakur_ritesh Administrator Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    4,434
    Likes Received:
    1,719
    Location:
    Land of the GODS - "Dev Bhomi".
    guys as paaji has said DFI is not to vent out frustrations and dislikes for others. we most welcome statements backed by facts and if not facts then atleast some source to a statement and also while doing that please keep in mind that there is no need to make personal remarks or personal insults who ever that person might be. there is a dignified manner of debating and that is the minimum we expect off our members.

    thanks.
     

Share This Page