- Joined
- Aug 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,403
- Likes
- 4,199
What about Modiji?
He wore that crown at Red Fort.
He really behaves like some kind of King.
He wore that crown at Red Fort.
He really behaves like some kind of King.
if only he could muster majority in most of the states he would truly fit the 'King' tag.What about Modiji?
He wore that crown at Red Fort.
He really behaves like some kind of King.
Probably you don't know history,,, u need to study about Chandragupta,shivaji and others for that matter...ALL monarchs in the Indian context none had a vision for the future.In that context gandhiji,patel and ambedkar were great individuals
This is news to me !!
i have no idea about authenticity of this clip . i found it on fb .
Many kings were left out in this list.
I wonder why Emperor Amoghavarsha of the Rashtrakuta Empire was not mentioned.
He was more tolerant towards other religions than Akbar. He respected all religions and even allowed the construction of mosques in his cities despite of the fact that Muslims were a small minority in India at that time. The Empire of Amoghavarsha was described by foreign travelers like the Arabs as one of the 4 great Empires of the world.
And unlike Akbar Amoghavarsha dominated the major part of India in the 9th century as his Empire stretched from Kannauj in northern India to the borders of Tamil Nadu in southern India. On the other hand Akbar only ruled northern India. It is disgraceful that a great Emperor like Amoghavarsha was not mentioned in this list while Akbar is celebrated for no reason
You have justified your handle name "IamanIdiot" through your post. Before jotting down such marvellous lines of equating Mohandas "British Agent" Gandhi with above mentioned Emperors, please do some genuine research. Reading boot-licking historians & believing them is not good for mental health.Can anyone shut this fucking annoying thread.this is like discussing which pile of poo is gold.All monarchs in the Indian context are crap.The greatest individuals are those who give a golden future and more cards to play and they also must provide a golden platform and atmosphere for future leaders to grow.Only the "Mahatma" did that none else.Ambedkar and Patel also did that.Nehru also helped democracy to take root
India's golden age started from 1947 not some imaginary past
I concur with your opinion, with a request: Please change "Mythical Era" to any other suitable name. Because Suryavanshi Kings were not myths. Entire ancestry of Suryavansh is available.Mythical era : King Bharat. Whoever it was. Whether real or not, but very important character that allows us to claim and fantasize about India as the most ancient nation since eternity.
Yes, it was Raja Raja Chola.The kings that ruled south east asia/ spread Indian culture there. I am not sure whom I should name. Rajraja Chola is it?
Without hesitation or second thought, I agree with your proposition that Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is the liberator & founder of modern Bharat.Modern era: Chhatrapati Shivaji. Who is founder of modern India that exists today.
Perfectly said, mate.In such a large country, over such a long period, there would be innumerable kings. We can chose any as favourite depending on our taste and out tribe.
But for modern Indian nation, the ones I find important ones, who give identity, sense of continuity and moral legitimacy to Indian republic as a single political unit are: