The End of China's Easy Growth

Discussion in 'China' started by ash2win, Sep 18, 2012.

  1. ash2win

    ash2win Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    42
    Caixin magazine reports - with disbelief - that the wish-list for industrial parks and mega-projects unveiled by all echelons of the Chinese system has reached 15 trillion yuan by some estimates.
    This is over $2.3 trillion or nearly four times the blitz of extra spending after the Lehman crisis in 2008, a policy that pushed investment to a world record 49pc of GDP and is now deemed to have been a mistake.
    But as Caixin also reports, the authorities are running out of easy money. Land transfer fees for the 300 largest cities have fallen 38pc over the last year.
    The central government’s tax revenues have grown 8pc, but spending has risen 37pc. "The good days of overflowing government coffers are over," it said.
    Mark Williams from Capital Economics said the fiscal blitz is a mirage. Most of the road and urban rail plans were already in the pipeline. Spending will be spread over years. "We can see no sign of a fresh stimulus. The project approvals are interesting solely because the government chose to publicise them," he said.

    China may have to muddle through the downturn after all with less extra juice than hoped. This will be sobering. The country’s cost advantage over America - and others - has vanished.
    A new report by PricewaterhouseCoopers entitled "A Homecoming for US Manufacturing" claims it is now cheaper for whole clusters of US industry to produce at home, close to their markets. Firms are "re-shoring" -- to use the vogue term -- to cut transport and inventory costs and take advantage of cheap shale gas. The weaker dollar has iced the cake.
    PwC said the US has clawed back a cost advantage of 2pc in steel output against China, at least for the North American market. Its "heat map" gives the US the edge in chemicals, primary metals, electrical products, machinery, paper, transport equipment, and wood, in that order.
    This did not stop Republican candidate Mitt Romney accusing China of job "theft" and "currency manipulation" on Sunday. He needs to keep up with the literature. The yuan is no longer undervalued in any meaningful sense. Nomura thinks China will have a current account deficit by 2014.
    Google is building its Nexus Q Music and video player in the US. General Electric and Ford are switching to plants at home. So is Caterpillar, which is interesting since its chief Chinese rival Sany Heavy Industry is in trouble. It has just asked creditors to waive a $510m financial covenant.
    Boston Consulting Group has been banging on this homecoming drum for some time, arguing that wage inflation of 16pc annually for a decade has eroded China’s lead. The gap in "productivity-adjusted wages" was 22pc of US levels in 2005. It will be 43pc (61pc for the US South) by 2015.
    It issued a fresh report last week -- "The End of Easy Growth" -- warning that the profit margin of China’s leading companies has been slipping behind since 2009. It fell to 11pc last year compared to 18pc for global peers.
    The group studied 50 fast-growing companies -- among them Sany, as it happens -- concluding that they are at an "historical turning point". Either they make the changes needed to break through in the global big league as Brazil’s Vale, Mexico’s Cemex, or India’s Wipro have all done, or they risk languishing as also-rans.
    The World Bank made much the same argument for the country as a whole earlier this year in a joint report with Beijing’s Development Research Centre. It said the export-led growth model launched by Deng Xiaoping over thirty years ago is obsolete. China risks a drift into the "middle income trap" unless it abandons its top-down strategies and grasps the nettle of free-market reform.
    "Innovation at the technology frontier is quite different in nature from catching-up technologically. It is not something that can be achieved through government planning," it said.
    Premier Wen Jiabao agrees, but there are others at the top of the Communist Party who think the 2008-2009 crisis vindicated tight party control of industry and the banking system. It did no such thing.
    You could argue that East-West rebalancing in labour costs is just what the world needs. The question is whether China can tolerate the shock.
    I missed the World Economic Forum in Tianjin last week but Jamil Anderlini from the Financial Times reported a pervasive tone of "despondency and cynicism" from Chinese officials and economists, in marked contrast to the bullish certainties -- or naïveté? -- of foreigners at the event.
    "I believe China is going to experience a very serious economic downturn and I think it has already started," said one leading economists. "The government is trying now to stabilize the economy but the instruments they have are very limited. If it can’t turn things around then I expect huge and widespread social unrest."
    There are degrees of bearishness on China. My own view as a "soft bear" -- based more on anthropology than economics -- is that the country will ultimately pull through and reclaim its rightful place as a global superpower. The dynamism is unstoppable, much like the US in the Roaring Twenties.
    But that is the sweep of history. The ups and downs of economic cycles are another matter. The Politburo clearly misjudged the difficulty of deflating a property bubble after letting loans grow by almost 100pc of GDP in five years (IMF data), almost double the rate in Japan over the five years before the Nikkei bubble burst or in US before the sub-prime peak.
    Albert Edwards from Societe Generale -- an Ice-Age bear -- thinks China’s downturn has reached an inflexion point. The balance of payments were in deficit in the second quarter. Capital outflows trumped the trade surplus. Foreign reserves fell.
    Let us not forget that reserve accumulation -- the side-effect of holding down the yuan to pursue export share -- was the prime cause of China’s credit bubble in the first place.
    It automatically forced China to import a US monetary policy that was far too loose for the needs of a fast-growing, over-heating economy, as Alan Greenspan warned at the time. It seemed to work marvellously, but Faustian Pacts come due.
    This powerful process is now going into reverse. Lombard Street Research estimates that capital flight has reached $320bn over the last year. Monetary policy is tightening by default.
    "It is a massive shift down through the gears for the monetary printing press. And if the capital outflows accelerate, the next gear may yet be reverse," said Mr Edwards.
    China’s $3.2 trillion reserves may be large at 22pc of the M2 money supply, but they were even larger -- 35pc -- for the Asian Tigers just before their currencies buckled in 1997. The reserves prove nothing either way. The issue that matters is whether they are enough to overwhelm the actions of China’s own elites, should they continue to squirrel money abroad as fast as they can.
    This capital flight appears to be `tail-risk’ insurance by well-informed Chinese, a hedge in case the 10-year power transition in October goes badly wrong or in case the pressures of a secular downturn cause another of China’s sudden political pivots, as in 1898, or at the onset of the Cultural Revolution, or indeed in case a "war" engulfs the Pacific region -- as US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta warned over the weekend.
    What is clear is that the deeper effects of the global crisis and the Long Slump have at last caught up with China. The headwinds will be greater from now on. A President Xi Jinping -- if it be he -- will face an entirely different landscape.

    Source:The End of China's Easy Growth - Telegraph
     
  2.  
  3. libindi

    libindi Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yep china is going down,shanghai can never catch up wtih Mumbai,good job bro。
     
  4. G90

    G90 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    13
    :rofl:Come on, you have to give them some credits on their strategies here, eventually China may experience some slowdown, since every event could be happened with a probability of one if your forecast horizon is infinity:rofl:

    Then these guys or their sons of sons of sons.... can brag they have "successfully" predicted China's slowdown since probabily 100000000000000 years ago, so they can be crowned as the smartest smartass :rofl:
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2012
  5. Phenom

    Phenom Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2010
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    401
    This would have happened sooner or later. China cannot defy the laws of economics, although most internet Chinese argued otherwise, slower growth was inevitable.

    But the only problem for them now is dealing with the slow growth phase and the global economic slowdown at the same time. This would mean less demand from abroad and from home, so the situation is lot trickier than otherwise. When signs of this started, CCP's first reaction was to pump in a huge amount of liquidity into the market, although it worked at that time, that measure could have made the situation worse by creating a property bubble on top of other problems.

    Ofcourse, none of this means the 'China story' is over. CCP's authoritarian nature and lack of transparency means they can handle an economic crisis far better than anyone else.

    For India, this is a good opportunity. If the govt carries out serious economic reforms, then India growth can start to pick up and could easily surpass China's falling growth rate. And this could bring the 'India story' back in the international limelight.
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2012
  6. G90

    G90 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    13
    :rofl:OK, nice theory, but whats your forecast horizon? within next 500 years from now or "always the next year":rofl:
     
  7. Phenom

    Phenom Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2010
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    401
    I don't know about China but in rest of the world people don't forecast something that's already happening.

    Just look at the current Chinese growth rate and compare it with your earlier rates, also look at the growth forecast given by major companies. Contrary to what you may have heard, even China can't grow at 9 - 10 % for ever and ever.
     
  8. G90

    G90 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    13
    And their economy growth rate picked up in 2010 after 2009's slowdown, you know doing forecast is not that simple, a guy like me who have earned a funature from forecasting tell you so:rofl:
     
  9. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,397
    Likes Received:
    2,314
    China rail cargo has fallen 8.2% YoY. Oil imports are down 15.7% YoY. Power generation down 6.3% YoY. Where is the growth? This is how CCP internally measures its progress so they know they are in recession. China has begun its Japanese style fall and will remain stagnant for just as long. They never achieved their wealth before they started ageing. At least Japan walked away from their bubble with major brands, China has none. They say they are moving up the value chain but where is the value when you can't brand it? It is still a bunch of bottom feeder companies trying to underbid quality brands. Not even Chinese consumers want Chinese brands from cars to apparel. They heavy investment into a Green economy has fallen on its face with wind, solar, electric vehicles and high speed rail failing miserably. The only hope for any future growth in China increasing the service sector and that is hindered by suppressed private consumption and no bank lending. CCP has to increase buying power of Chinese consumers and rebalance the economy for a nice 3-4% growth rate or they will continue to decline.
     

Share This Page