Navneet Kundu
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2016
- Messages
- 274
- Likes
- 410
That is true as a broad observation but the specific point that I am trying to harp on is that if Pakistan wasn't under any influence, it would prefer to invest in its Naval and Air assets, but the Americans make sure that they pressurize Pakistan to spend almost all the aid on ground assets to keep India in check. So I disagree on the part where you say 'particularly Pakistan' because if Pakistan had more Naval and Air assets, it would be more lethal force in general which could project power even in Central Asia (via air) and Africa and Middle East (via Navy). What I'm saying is Pakistan is not as smart as we give it credit for; It doesn't have the capacity or the intelligence to pose a threat had it not been for USA. That makes the US our primary concern.The enemies of India always have the strategic plans to break, weaken and destroy India.
My analysis is based on Ajit Doval's quote : "You can't fight an enemy which you are unable to define". I believe time has come to switch our strategic thinking from saying 'particularly Pakistan' to 'particularly USA'. You can't deter an aggressor if you don't know who the aggressor is. I've seen calls for covert actions against Pakistan but I believe, as per the highest traditions of Indian culture which teaches us to share the 'prasad' with everyone, we should make sure that if an Indian interest is hurt anywhere, we should insist that we want to share it with not just Pakistan but USA and China.
After all, don't forget, last time Gurdaspur was attacked, we found American night vision equipment. It's time we started sharing the 'prasad' with all deserving candidates.
Last edited: