Tactics used by jihadi forces in Asia

Discussion in 'General Multimedia' started by satyam, Jun 5, 2010.

  1. satyam

    satyam New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    14
    I read an interesting post made by Brihaspati in Bharat rakshak forum. Thought to share with you guys.

    The recent fiasco in the "Gaza adventure" throws up in sharp light the current tomfoolery that is being played on Asia. Since the fall of USSR there was a temporary lull in pandering to Islamist violence from the west. Within that space, the Jihadis consolidated and turned their attention from Russia towards their real objectives in Asia - Israel and India. They intensified their campaign against India with Jammu and Kashmir, and their rocket/bombing campaigns against Israelis, from both within Lebanon and the Gaza strip.

    Their real ambitions is for global domination, and the real long term targets for Islam - militant Jihad and Ghazwas to convert, loot, rape and take over non-muslim majority nations. This became clear to the racially and colour blinded ideology of the west only when the Jihadis turned their attention directly to pricking the west, as part of their global strategy to tie down western forces away from any protective interest the west may develop for Israel and India.

    The calculations were quite clear and as consistently seen in the tactics of Islamist groups ranged against their Asian targets.

    (1) Carry out terroristic outrages against both military and civilians of Israel and India, so that the military of these nations are forced to react. Use the terror attacks to stimulate survivor instincts within the civilians in the hope that they will create political pressure on their governments not to retaliate. Use the internationally conformed limitations within which national armies have to work as a tactical field advantage.

    (2) Pressurize muslims living within the territory of these nations to take sides, which in the ultimate analysis has always been historically proved to be on the position that "jihad cannot or should not be opposed violently" by Muslims anywhere. In every situation of war or conflict where Islamism has taken up arms to subjugate non-muslims among them or beside them, the Muslim population has never ever really taken any effective steps to resist such Jihadi outrages on non-Muslims. In ME, in now Pakistan occupied western India, or in then East Pakistan now Bangladesh in 1971, large Muslim populations which apparently showed all outward forms of communal amity did not do anything to stop Jihadi outrages on non-Muslims and in many instance took advantage of the situation to possess land, wealth and women of non-Muslims. This practice is consistent with the basic line of Islamist expansion as formulated in their core texts.

    (3) Simultaneously carry out a publicity campaign among western nations - especially those in academia and media who for various reasons have had anti-establishment fantasies all the while being sustained by the establishment. There have always been a toying undercurrent with Marxist thinking in the west, especially in the British universities beginning in the post war radicalism phase of 60's. Probably this was maintained out of two tactical considerations by the authorities - as a honey trap to confine radical intellectuals so that they did not go out to do more damage in the outer world, and at the same time work as a captive experiment where the Leftist thought process could be observed and manipulated. Problem with this game is that it basically creates a reward system for radicalism and anti-establishment sentiments which over time will draw more and more opportunist political activists who will use this legitimacy to carry out their personal political agendas.

    The Islamists used this sympathetic base from within the western establishment. It was natural that with the fall of the USSR and an overtly nationalistic and dictatorial redefinition under Putin the western establishment radicals were without a cause to champion. This they now found in championing the cause of supposedly repressed Islamic communities under Israel and India.

    (4) To drive home the Islamist representation of reality, Islamists selectively targeted western institutions with violence. Having placed a pro-Islamist radical western sympathy base among the very vocal academia, media, NGO's, charities etc, such targeting could be used to pretend that all this was because the west was not doing enough to destroy Israel and India or dismember these countries so that the Jihadis could occupy the dismembered portions. The general risk avoidance of the civilian populations of prosperous economies would ensure that there would be a backlash against any government retaliation.


    (5) Once the western core of governments or regimes realized the new trends, the policy formulated was perhaps two pronged : give the Jihadis a new target of shifting attention towards Russia in chechnyia and adjoining muslim dominated areas sensitive for Russian security, and towards Eastern Turkmenistan currently under Chinese occupation. Simultaneously, overt pressure would be put on both India and Israel to concede more towards Islamist demands. It is possible that the first hesitant and obviously confused (read secret intense debate and therefore indecision) implementation of this policy was in the Balkans with the ultimate creation of a Muslim homeland within Europe.

    (6) The success of the Croatian case showed the Jihadis the way forward, and they now know almost all the manipulative strings that they can use to pressurize the west into conceding more and more Islamist homelands carved out of non-Muslim dominated areas, from where they will launch more and more Jihadi campaigns.

    The western strategists are losing this game. It is crucial that Israel and Indian people do not get confused by the manipulative propaganda and representations of Islamists and their non-muslim sympathizers, and see to it that regimes capable of resisting western pressures are put in government.

    The national armies and even special intervention forces have to work under international forms and restrictions that will be stringently applied by Islamists and their sympathizers for their ulterior motives. In both countries there should be targeted erasure of the sources of support for Jihad, or all anti-state terror under forces that do not officially exist. Forces which also have strong ideological indoctrination to add that extra armour to manipulation. Forces which do not exist and therefore are free of formal restrictions of so-called one-sided humanitarianism
     
  2.  
  3. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    I don't ever remember single incident in both india and israel where public has come out on streets only for the reason that their govt don't attack terrorists.not to attack at least was political descision in india's case in both 2002 and 2008 as under usa pressure but not indian public pressure.In case of last israeli attack on gaza what i remember pictures of israeli children happily signing off bombs as love from israel(if i can find those now?)

    Ah i've to still find indian muslim who supported pak on 26/11..Even in kashmir we know the real hearts of the separatist where they lies.BTW what is pakistan occupied western india??????is it present day pakistan or the future western indian territories pak gonna occupy???If its former then there can be no pak itself then its either pakistan or western india....if its later then its poster is just too panicky due to the mention of ghazawa -e hind speech from zaid bhai that he mentioned pak like that .


    If jehadis were able to influence anybody in west then they would not have been targeted by drones at will in pakistan by the west itself...sorry,but govt are run on practicality but not emotions of academicians and media.
     
  4. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    Did 9/11 happaned coz usa didn't give israel/india on platter to muslim world???Oh ..but poster thinks that israel /and india has so much value ????? or the 7/7 bombing happened in london due to india or israel or the bali bombing ????BTW india was always at loggerheads with west so where is the question of attacking west coz they support india???
     
  5. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    This can be discussed under great game theory.coz the creation of jihad was itself for the great game of west in afghanistan against USSR.Now whatever blowback we are seeing now in pak and against west is due to that.....can this be contained by west and re-targeted against new targets such as china russia is debatable...coz as of today it is west who is in danger of being targeted than the above 2 countries as mentioned.
     
  6. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,038
    Likes Received:
    715
    Croatia and war in balkans was another extension of great game in afghanistan to clear out russian influence in that area through serbs and in most of eastern European countries by NATO.

    Poster goes by premise that jehadi forces command influence over west so that they can run over india/israel..but in reality its other way round.....
     

Share This Page