Supreme Court Rules Anti-Maoist Militias Unconstitutional

Discussion in 'Internal Security' started by sanjay, Jul 6, 2011.

  1. sanjay

    sanjay Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    186
  2.  
  3. The Messiah

    The Messiah Bow Before Me! Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    Ofcourse they are legally. So lets not bash the court for saying the obvious.
     
  4. civfanatic

    civfanatic Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,562
    Likes Received:
    2,526
    Location:
    తెలంగాణ
    Any militia should be illegal, regardless of their purpose. This is not Afghanistan where everyone and their dog has a private army.
     
  5. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,163
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Looks like I said this long time back here at DFI:

     
  6. GPM

    GPM Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    506
    Means Maosists are constitutional. OK. CRPF is impotent to take on the Maoists. Army and IAF are UNWILLING [they are to defend. Hum unhe kyon pal rahe hain?]

    Now PSOs are to be abolished!! Tie the hands of the State, then bemoan, then dismiss the govt.

    Good. Maoists WON this round. They are on winning spree.

    I SHALL never relocate in Chhatisgarh.

    Gentlemen, I have seen the terror DIRECTLY during my extensive travels through Jharkhand, Chhatisgarh [both were yet to created de jure], and Murshdaibad distt. of WB.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2011
    Dark_Prince likes this.

Share This Page