Sorry, Kashmir Is Happy

Discussion in 'Internal Security' started by ejazr, May 14, 2012.

  1. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    Sorry, Kashmir Is Happy | OPEN Magazine

    Why is it obscene to accept that a historically wounded people are ready to move on?

    SRINAGAR, GULMARG ~ There was a moment when Prashant Bhushan was irreversibly diminished, and he became the Ringo Starr of Team Anna’s famous four. It happened in the middle of a television interview, when thugs broke into his chamber and beat him up for demanding a referendum in Kashmir to solve the dispute. At the time, a section of Kashmir’s intellectuals were still waiting to hear from Anna Hazare. They were naïve enough to believe everything that television anchors said and to invite him to take up the Valley’s cause with the evil Indian government. After all, Hazare had demanded a referendum for the anti-corruption bill. He was surely the referendum-type? But Hazare soon made his position clear. Even as Bhushan’s body was still aching, Hazare publicly condemned his stand on Kashmir. According to Hazare, and possibly some other former truck drivers of the Indian Army, Kashmir was not a disputed part of India.

    It was another reminder for the people of Kashmir that it is almost impossible to transmit to all of India the simple fact that India has occupied Kashmir and this occupation is morally indefensible. Kashmir’s intellectual elite, which includes writers, melancholy poets, artists, Facebook revolutionaries, filmmakers and at least one rapper who owns a hood, have since resumed what Kashmir’s elite has always done.

    Trauma in Kashmir is like a heritage building—the elite fight to preserve it. ‘Don’t forget,’ is their predominant message, ‘Don’t forget to be traumatised.’ They want the wound of Kashmir to endure because the wound is what indicts India for the many atrocities of its military. This might be a long period of calm, but if the wound vanishes, where is the justice? India simply gets away with all those rapes, murders and disappearances? So nothing disgusts them more than these words: ‘Normalcy returns to Kashmir’; ‘Peace returns to the Valley’; ‘Kashmiris want to move on’.

    Yet, all this is true. And for the regular people of Kashmir, who do not have second homes in North America, Europe, Dubai or Delhi, who have no choice but to continue living in Kashmir, this reality is not so disgusting.

    Peace is designed to be fragile in Kashmir. Any moment, at the slightest provocation, its youth will be nudged by those who stand to gain from strife to erupt against the Indian Army, or militants may choose to stir things up to bolster the lucrative business of terrorism. But it is hard not to see that this is an extraordinary period of peace. A few days ago, Syed Salahuddin, chief of terrorist organisation Hizbul Mujahideen, confirmed something, which Kashmiris say is common knowledge—that he has withdrawn all his men from Kashmir. According to Jammu and Kashmir’s tourism minister, in 2011 more tourists visited the Valley than in recent memory. It is believed that the figure was over a million. This winter, almost all hotels in Gulmarg, a skiing destination an hour from Srinagar, were fully booked. Zahoor, who is from Srinagar and works in Gulmarg in the winters as a skiing instructor, and who taught me how to ski, says he is enjoying the peace and hordes of Indian tourists and his newfound ability to earn a decent living. Also, in Kashmir, the political stakes in ensuring that the Indian Army does not violate human rights are so high that Kashmiris today have little to complain.

    On the streets of Srinagar and in the villages around, regular people, who are not writers or journalists or intellectuals, have come to hate Pakistan for what it has done to the Valley in the name of freedom. Also, what Pakistan has become, politically and economically, has ensured that accession to that country is not part of popular sentiment here anymore. In fact, there is even relief in Kashmir that historical circumstances saved the Valley from being a part of Pakistan. And what India has become, politically and economically, has made it more endearing than the Kashmiri elite wants to admit in public. But freedom from India remains a fervent wish for many, which means that an independent sovereign Kashmir stranded between India and Pakistan is the only option left. Kashmir’s elite, especially those who live in Kashmir, believe that a sovereign Kashmir is an impractical idea and to continue the status quo with the newly prosperous and somewhat secular India is the best way forward. “But we can’t say it, you know, we can’t say it publicly without a lot of our brothers from Dubai and America abusing us,” says one of the prominent journalists of Kashmir in an informal chat with me in the lobby of a hotel in Srinagar.

    Is it obscene to search for happiness in Kashmir, is it obscene for a writer from the south of India to wander around Kashmir interviewing people who will tell him that they want to get on with their lives despite the presence of the Indian Army? What is the stake of an outsider in Kashmir? The fact is that Kashmir, too, has occupied India. Kashmir is the reason why India is one of the worst victims of terrorism. All Indians have a stake in Kashmir’s state of mind.

    +++

    About sixty kilometres from Srinagar, in a crowded village hall on the slope of a hill, a meeting is underway. The district magistrate, who had arrived in a car that was followed by a battered ambulance and will leave the same way, is addressing a gathering of newly elected village leaders (there was a voter turnout of nearly 90 per cent in local elections held last year). The gathering is mostly male but there are about ten women in the back rows. The women are among the elected leaders, all of them for the first time, and they listen carefully as the district magistrate tells them how governance works. There are questions and complaints and occasional laughter.

    When I arrived, the district magistrate, for my benefit, started talking in English and Hindi. He even started using words like “chauvinistic” to describe the men who had made the women take the back rows. His audience quickly instructed him to speak in Kashmiri. They were not here to be part of a farce; they were here to know the way forward. They want to know, very simply, the economic consequences of peace. They wanted roads and electricity and schools and hospitals.

    At the end of the meeting, which lasted over two hours, the district magistrate told me, “There was not a word about politics. Not a word about the Indian Army or Pakistan or anything. They want to talk about things that matter to them and their families.”

    His deputy is Shah Faesal, a delicate, affable and sharp man. Two years ago he was placed first among the 500,000 candidates who wrote the civil services exam. When the news broke, people went to his home in Srinagar playing drums and singing. Shah Faesal, now twenty-nine, was front-page news. It is hard to believe that someone who topped one of the toughest exams in the world will sit in a small village hall, in the smell of hay, and listen to the aspirations of villagers. But this is what Faesal wants to do.

    Faesal does not have a passport yet. The only foreign country he has ever visited is Nepal. “But that’s still India, right?” he says with a chuckle. A decade ago, his father, a schoolteacher and known moderate, was killed by “unidentified gunmen”. Once, after a bomb blast in Srinagar, Army jawans rounded up some men on the streets, including Faesal’s father. The men were beaten up and they were, according to Faesal, forced to chant, “Ram, Ram.”

    We drive together towards Srinagar. On the way someone tells us that we must turn back, there is stone-pelting going on just a few hundred metres ahead. Faesal nods.

    He knows what it is about. A few days ago, some boys had tampered with an electrical transformer and they were picked up by the police. The stone-pelting was in protest against the arrest.

    We don’t turn back, we head towards the venue of the apparent protest. There are about thirty boys standing on the road, doing nothing but laughing. They were the stone-pelters. The fun was over, for the moment.

    In an earlier interview, Faesal told me that this period of peace in Kashmir might just be the beginning of something significant. He said, “Commonsense is finally winning.” I quoted him in an article in the International Herald Tribune. I had quoted him in indirect speech. But just that comment of Faesal—that commonsense was finally winning in Kashmir—attracted the wrath of many Kashmiris on Twitter and Facebook, chiefly the non-resident Kashmiris who live in affluent countries. They hurled a string of abuses at him and hurtful messages. It is as if, in their opinion, peace and happiness are truly obscene things until Kashmir is resolved. They themselves are in peaceful places, they have moved on, got on with their lives, but they want the people of Kashmir to have the decency to suffer.

    Faesal posted his analysis of these angry Kashmiris on his Facebook page: ‘…the crop of burger-fed, Armani-attired pseudo-revolutionaries has actually harmed Kashmir, more than anyone else.’

    The non-resident patriotic Indian, who adores Narendra Modi, and the non-resident patriotic Kashmiri are adversaries in the vacuous space of social media. But they have much in common. From the comfort of distance, they financially and emotionally support ideologies whose consequence they don’t have to face. They are not just a nuisance. As a collective they are dangerous. When men capable of murder receive the affection of engineers and MBAs, it makes them potentially far more lethal. That is why, in the genocide of impoverished Tamil civilians in Sri Lanka by that country’s army, the affluent non-resident Tamils living in Europe, who supported the LTTE through money and love, are very much complicit.

    +++

    Srinagar does not have pubs or discos or cinema halls. Most young people there do not drink. A popular form of fun is sitting in a café and having coffee with friends. They are still uncorrupted by city slickness and there is an endearing honesty in their words. It is almost impossible to dislike Kashmiris, especially the strangers—they are too beautiful and too civilised.

    One of the most popular professions among the young in Kashmir is journalism because they have for long seen their own world interpreted through this profession, which they overrate. The biggest private sector employers in Kashmir are cellphone service providers. “We are crazy about mobile phones,” says a 37-year-old employee of Aircel, whose job is to manage complaints from angry customers. “Every Kashmiri has at least one mobile phone,” he says. Cellphones have made Kashmiris feel safer. “You can reach your children at all times,” the man says, “That’s why everyone has one.”

    He and his close friend take me to Café Coffee Day, which is filled with young people. Both the men work for Aircel. They say what many educated young people in Kashmir say—can we move on? Can we have development first instead of waiting forever for the Kashmir issue to be solved? We want industries to come here, we want MNCs and malls. We want to watch a cricket match in Srinagar. “We want KFC,” one of them says, and they burst out laughing.
     
  2.  
  3. Virendra

    Virendra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Location:
    Delhi, India, India
    There are many people on both sides of LOC whose shops would shut down if the Kashmiris moved on.
    Truth is triumphant. It will shine one day or the other.
    If Kashmir wasn't the inseparable part of India since times we know of, by tradition, culture, people - there is no reason a nation so secular and soft would cling to a piece of land with so much perseverence even after shedding so much blood in and out of Kashmir.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2012
    panduranghari likes this.
  4. agentperry

    agentperry Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    678
    Location:
    delhi
    kashmir is too difficult for me to understand. better go block by block. srinagar, jammu, poonch, leh....
     
  5. Manas7

    Manas7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    244
    Everybody wants peace, prosperity and justice ,who rules is a secondary concern.
     
  6. balai_c

    balai_c Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    443
    By Kashmir, the author means Kashmir valley , not jammu. Just the valley, not jammu or laddakh. The three parts of the state are completely distinct in terms of culture and demographics. Separatism started in Kashmir valley, not so much in jammu.
     
    amitkriit likes this.
  7. agentperry

    agentperry Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    678
    Location:
    delhi
    it doesnt matter, the matter is islamized more than politicized.
     
  8. ice berg

    ice berg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2011
    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    289
    It got more to do with work, education than religion.

    Just my 2 cents.
     
  9. balai_c

    balai_c Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    443
    ^^ The problem is with the islamized rabid valley fanatics. These folks are quite like our Pakistanis. No amount of economic empowerment would appease , other than " azadi". i.e license to talibanize the state to the level of Afghanistan.
     
  10. agentperry

    agentperry Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    678
    Location:
    delhi
    a gold touched by pakistan turns into unworthy stone. kashmir touched by pakistan is the same case. you educate them or even bribe them it wont affect them, they are pakistanized.

    history is witness, pakistan and separatism are hand in gloves. where ever they go, they spread the virus. even china is diseased now if im not wrong
     
  11. Virendra

    Virendra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Location:
    Delhi, India, India
    China isn't the soft secular types to fall for it. Their ideology, beliefs, life style, spirituality is all poles apart from the virus Pakistan spreads.
    They are better equiped to fight it and more importantly they would inherently be ruthless in fighting it blow by blow.
    China was already exposed to Islam in early medieval centuries. Yet isn't contaminated by any of the ill manifestations till date.
     
  12. A chauhan

    A chauhan "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l" Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,928
    Likes Received:
    4,563
    Location:
    Raipur
    Biased essay!!
    Highly objectionable thread with moderate Pakistani view, deserves to be deleted !
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2012
    panduranghari, parijataka and balai_c like this.
  13. balai_c

    balai_c Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    443
    ^^It's written by manu joseph , we do not need any more clue!!
     
    LurkerBaba likes this.
  14. Tshering22

    Tshering22 Sikkimese Saber Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,404
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Location:
    Gangtok, Sikkim, India
    Well there was a decision to separate Ladakh from J&K's jurisdiction due to powerless state government in the state. Ladakhis got fed up of Omar Abdullah's listlessness while the PDP and others overtly supported terrorist anti-Indian loonies.

    It'd be interesting to see if Srinagar could consider new leaders from other regions of the state.
     
  15. The Messiah

    The Messiah Bow Before Me! Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    Good read.
     
  16. LurkerBaba

    LurkerBaba Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    6,769
    Likes Received:
    3,678
    Location:
    India

    I hate Manu Joseph's articles the NYT. Guy has absolutely no clue about India or it's culture
     
  17. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    Try to read the entire article before jumping to any conclusion. The part you have higlighted is basically a explaining in a sarcastic tone what a section of Kashmiris and Non-Resident Kashmiris living the easy life in Europe and the US think or want to propagate.

    The main THEME of the article is that the people of Kashmir, the aam aadmi if you will are happy to move on from the traumatic experience of the past 2 decades and are genuinely moving forward while the so called "intellectual Kashmiris" mostly living outside India don't want these people to forget the trauma and keep feeling victimised to sustain the "evil Indian govt." and "Kashmir occupied" narratives running
     
  18. A chauhan

    A chauhan "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l" Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,928
    Likes Received:
    4,563
    Location:
    Raipur
    I have read it , it's an ambiguous essay full of "biased incidents of past" like forcing someone to chant Ram Ram, blaming Indian govt. & Army; having inserted some lines with ideal message regarding the "common Kashimiris", which is not apparent.

    What the writer forgot to specifically clarify in his essay is that "the problem is created by Pakistan and not by the Indian govt. or Army". It only tells that seeing the present status of Pakistan and India, some people will like to remain with India. 90% readers will get the meaning from this essay is that "Indian govt. and Army has made Kashmiri life traumatic ; which they want to forget and move on" but a section of Kashmiris and Non Resident Kashmiris doesn't want to let them forget." which is wrong. I am not the one who goes after the conclusion alone, the conclusion to which you have reached may be right but the narration is wrong. That is why i called it a biased essay with "moderate Pakistani view".
     
    Nagraj, Virendra and parijataka like this.
  19. Virendra

    Virendra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Location:
    Delhi, India, India
    Yes the narration is objectionable and subtle in its bias towards Pakistan. It conveniently hides what started all this mess. It although sheds tears on what a man was supposedly forced to say but doesn't even mention of what the millions of kashmiri pandits were forced to do.
    However I don't support the idea of deleting such threads from here. Instead such news should be posted here, scrutinized and its rots should be torn apart for the world to see. Atleast the ones browsing net who stumble here would know what the truth is.
    Deleting such threads is counteractive to the best practices of our fraternity here at DFI.
    Deceptive propaganda is not fought by looking the other way, but by meticuously and thoroughly debunking the myths that it sponsors.

    Regards,
    Virendra
     
    A chauhan likes this.
  20. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    @ A chauhan

    The Ram Ram incident as the author points out is sourced from Shah Faesal, the IAS topper. He could be lying about it ofcourse, but I guess it means confirming with Shah Faesal if he actually said this story and if its really true.
    And there have been cases of HR violations although these tend to be exagerated ofcourse. Any place where we quell insurgencies there is bound for this to happen. It happened in NE, it happened in Punjab and it should not be a surprise to know that it happened in Kashmir as well. If you have an article that says there has been no HR violations in Kashmir, then that would be biased.

    At the same time, he talks about the militants and the lucrative business of their terrorism. He mentions that Shah Faesal's father had been killed by militants not by the Indian Army. He desribes how the stone pelting incidents are more fun and games by rowdy youth groups rather than some real "resistance" agains the Indian state.

    To see conspiracy theories that the author supports the Pakistani pov in an article which is generally IMO a positive article from the Indian pov and shows that Indian Kashmiris are integrating with India would be an incorrect conclusion.
     
  21. SLASH

    SLASH Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    458
    More mall, more movies and more industries. This will give the youth a sense of belongingness with India. But for that we need peace in the valley.
     

Share This Page