To China, it is not just the current His Holiness Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso) that is a threat but the very position of our great spiritual leader in title and institution. Because we and mainly the Tibetans follow our way of life i.e. Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism which is not compliant with the man-made artificial Communist policies where CCP leaders are gods, HH will always remain a threat to these paranoid Communists.Will China accept to settle this issue if it assures that it will leave Dali Lama alone and not jail him if he returns to Tibet? If so we can settle that issue and move on, or would china still be paranoid to have the Dali Lama back in Tibet?
I second that.Relationship with Japan is more important. I think at least.
I'd rather keep UK out of it. Their words and deeds have no harmony. Their actions and accommodation of radicalized groups suggests poorly.UNSC is a dying council; We already have powerful friends in that group: Russia, France and UK.
I agree. With their bullshit rights talk for terrorists hidden inside their country and their zilch status as a significant global power any longer makes their position secondary to the other two powers. OTOH France and Russia retain their independent stand.I'd rather keep UK out of it. Their words and deeds have no harmony. Their actions and accommodation of radicalized groups suggests poorly.
Regards,
Virendra
I heard you can treat Yechury a peg and you can get him to say what you want.Karat though radical has more integrity than Sitaram Yechury
A "you know" orifice to Yechury can get you a billion dollar government contract also.Karat is a man of integrity though a commie.Yusuf do you know that because of Karat the UPA government did not meddle with the banking sector and that was the reason India's arse was saved during the 2008-2010 recession.I heard you can treat Yechury a peg and you can get him to say what you want.
Karat may be a man of integrity, but is a political fool. He can have impeccable integrity as he does not have to fight elections. Lol!!A "you know" orifice to Yechury can get you a billion dollar government contract also.Karat is a man of integrity though a commie.Yusuf do you know that because of Karat the UPA government did not meddle with the banking sector and that was the reason India's arse was saved during the 2008-2010 recession.
What hate? It's rather common sense. It's just not in China's or maybe most developing countries interest to add Japan into Security Council because Japan is only a puppet state of US and just do what US told her to do. What's point of supporting Japan?So the Chinese hate the Japs more than they hate us! Wow..
"What did you see in Japan, and is there any chance of India following in the progressive steps of Japan?"
"None whatever, until all the three hundred millions of India combine together as a whole nation. The world has never seen such a patriotic and artistic race as the Japanese, and one special feature about them is this that while in Europe and elsewhere Art generally goes with dirt, Japanese Art is Art plus absolute cleanliness. I would wish that every one of our young men could visit Japan once at least in his lifetime. It is very easy to go there. The Japanese think that everything Hindu is great and believe that India is a holy land. Japanese Buddhism is entirely different from what you see in Ceylon. It is the same as Vedanta. It is positive and theistic Buddhism, not the negative atheistic Buddhism of Ceylon.
Apropos the question of greater sinner, it is PRC, no doubt. One should notice that PRC is our neighbour.Pressure is at its place and has to be applied as and when necessary. Give back in kind if you ever receive a handful. Thats not a problem, we can be that bit mean to protect our interests.
But I don't know who is the greater sinner or the saint. And in geo politics, one doesn't care. Its between China and Japan to sort out.
My point is, Chinese grudges with Japan should not dictate how India goes about achieving its foreign policy goals such as UNSC and relations with Japan.
We don't choose our allies like that.
In this kind of world, there is no way that you could part ways from any country. Hell we can't part ways from Pakistan even when we want to (talks back on track), Japan is a long shot to even think about.
This could be an attempt by PRC to try and scuttle this 'alliance' that is forming involving India, Vietnam, Japan, Taiwan and US.PM, Indias relations with Japan cannot be looked only from the prism of NSG. we are looking at a formation of either explicit or implicit alliance with US heading it against China. I think the centrality of the US will then take care of our NSG concerns as also the formation of this alliance.
Well it is like this Right Now India cant claim to be more powerful than Britain and France
SO India cant say that right now India deserves a place ahead of UK and France
If India keeps up with its economic , military and technological progress then in 20 years India will be a a BIG power
It doesnt matter whether you are in or out of the security council
What matters is power , When we are a big power then only we can OPENLY SAY that there are weaker nations than India in the UNSC
So for the next 20 years India should focus on BECOMING a big power rather than expecting a favour from US
I was thinking about this too.Moreover the Japanese have billions lined up for infra development in India and we should not forget that.